您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 64 ›› Issue (1): 109-117.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2025.0839

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

改良腋窝单孔非溶脂腔镜腺体切除治疗男性乳房发育症的学习曲线与疗效评估

邵长秀1,贺青卿1,王宇男2,宋泽辉2,岳涛1,周鹏1,李小磊1,庄大勇1   

  1. 1. 中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九六〇医院甲状腺乳腺外科, 山东 济南 250031;2.中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九六一医院普外科, 黑龙江 齐齐哈尔 161006
  • 发布日期:2026-01-27
  • 通讯作者: 庄大勇. E-mail:zhuangdayong163@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    中国人民解放军联勤保障部队医学重点学科项目;山东省医药卫生重点学科

Learning curve and efficacy evaluation of a modified single-port axillary non-liposuction endoscopic glandectomy for gynecomastia

SHAO Changxiu1, HE Qingqing1, WANG Yunan2, SONG Zehui2, YUE Tao1, ZHOU Peng1, LI Xiaolei1, ZHUANG Dayong1   

  1. 1. Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, the 960th Hospital of PLA Joint Logistics Support Force, Jinan 250031, Shandong, China;
    2. Department of General Surgery, the 961th Hospital of PLA Joint Logistics Support Force, Qiqihar 161006, Heilongjiang, China
  • Published:2026-01-27

摘要: 目的 探讨改良的腋窝单孔入路非溶脂腔镜腺体切除术治疗男性乳房发育的学习曲线及临床疗效。 方法 回顾性分析2023年3月至2025年2月于解放军第九六〇医院甲状腺乳腺外科接受经腋窝单孔入路非溶脂腔镜腺体切除男性乳房发育患者68例的临床资料。统计患者单侧手术切口长度、手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流管放置时间、术后引流量、手术并发症及患者满意度。采用累积和法拟合学习曲线,比较学习阶段与成熟阶段相关指标差异。 结果 68例患者共123侧乳房均顺利完成手术,中位手术切口长度5 cm(范围:4~6 cm),单侧乳房手术时间(96.46±21.81)min(范围:50~135 min),中位单侧乳房术中出血量25 mL(范围:5~75 mL),中位术后单侧负压引流管放置时间7 d(范围:4~12 d),中位术后单侧引流量216.5 mL(范围:52~450 mL)。术后切口均甲级愈合,无感染、脂肪液化、乳头和皮肤坏死等并发症,术后2例乳头出现缺血性表现,3例皮下出血,5例皮下积液,术后3个月患者满意率 91.2%(62/68)。根据手术时间曲线图绘制学习曲线,学习曲线拟合曲线峰值对应的手术例数为32例,以32例为界,分为手术学习阶段(1~32例)和手术成熟阶段(33~68例)两组。手术学习阶段单侧乳房手术时间(106.27±19.36)min(范围:65~135 min),中位术后单侧乳房负压引流管放置时间8.25 d(范围:4.50~12.00 d);手术成熟阶段单侧乳房手术时间(87.75±20.32)min(范围:50~127.50 min),中位术后单侧乳房负压引流管放置时间7 d(范围:4~11.50 d)。两阶段单侧乳房手术时间及术后引流管放置时间差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组患者年龄体质量指数切口长度术中单侧乳房出血量术后单侧乳房引流量及并发症方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 改良的腋窝单孔入路非溶脂腔镜皮下腺体切除术安全可行,术者需经历32例学习周期可掌握该手术方式。此手术方式可缩短手术时间,减少体表疤痕,并发症少,具有较好的美容效果。

关键词: 男性乳房发育, 腋窝单孔入路, 腔镜手术, 非溶脂技术, 学习曲线

Abstract: Objective To explore the learning curve and clinical efficacy of modified single-port axillary approach non-liposuction endoscopic gland excision for the treatment of gynecomastia. Methods Clinical data from 68 gynecomastia patients who underwent modified single-port axillary non-liposuction endoscopic gland excision were retrospectively reviewed. All procedures were performed between March 2023 and February 2025. Parameters recorded included unila-teral incision length, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage duration, postoperative drainage volume, surgical complications, and patient satisfaction. The cumulative sum method was used to plot the learning curve. Differences in related indicators between the growth level group and the master level group were compared. Results All 123 breasts in 68 patients underwent successful surgery. The median unilateral incision length was 5 cm(range: 4-6 cm). The unilateral operative time was(96.46±21.81)min(range: 50-135 min). The median unilateral intraoperative blood loss was 25 mL(range: 5-75 mL). The median unilateral postoperative drainage duration was 7 days(range: 4-12 days). The median unilateral postoperative drainage volume was 216.5 mL(range: 52.0-450.0 mL). All postoperative incisions achieved grade A healing without complications such as infection, fat liquefaction, or nipple and skin necrosis. Ischemic changes of the nipple were noted in 2 patients, subcutaneous hemorrhage occurred in 3 patients, and subcutaneous seroma developed in 5 patients. Patient satisfaction at 3 months postoperatively was 91.2%(62/68). The learning curve was constructed by plotting the cumulative sum analysis of operative times. The inflection point of the curve, which corresponded to 32 cases, was used as the threshold to define two distinct periods: the growth level group(patient IDs: 1-32)and the master level group(patient IDs: 33-68). During the growth level group, the mean unilateral operative time was(106.27±19.36)min(range: 65-135 min)and the median unilateral postoperative drainage duration was 8.25 days(range: 4.50-12.00 days). During the master level group the unilateral operative time was(87.75±20.32)min(range: 50-127.50 min)and the median unilateral postoperative drainage duration was 7 days(range: 4-11.50 days). Statistically significant differences between the two groups were observed in unilateral operative time and postoperative drainage duration(P<0.05). No statistically significant differences were found between the groups regarding age, BMI, incision length, unilateral intraoperative blood loss, unilateral postoperative drainage volume, or complication rates(P>0.05). Conclusion The modified single-port axillary approach non-liposuction endoscopic subcutaneous gland excision is safe and feasible, and the surgeon requires a learning curve of 32 cases to achieve proficiency. This surgical approach significantly reduces operative time, minimizes visible scarring, and is associated with a low rate of postoperative complications while offering superior cosmetic outcomes.

Key words: Gynecomastia, Single-port axillary approach, Laparoscopic surgery, Non-liposuction endoscopic, Learning curve

中图分类号: 

  • R655.8
[1] Kanakis GA, Nordkap L, Bang AK, et al. EAA clinical practice guidelines:gynecomastia evaluation and management[J]. Andrology, 2019, 7(6): 778-793.
[2] Patjamontri S, Lucas-Herald AK, Bryce J,et al. Gynecomastia and its management in boys with partial androgen insensitivity syndrome[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2025, 110(6): e2018-e2025.
[3] Rew L, Young C, Harrison T, et al. A systematic review of literature on psychosocial aspects of gynecomastia in adolescents and young men[J]. J Adolesc, 2015, 43(1): 206-212.
[4] Zavlin D, Jubbal KT, Friedman JD, et al. Complications and outcomes after gynecomastia surgery: analysis of 204 pediatric and 1583 adult cases from a national multi-center database[J]. Aesthetic Plast Surg, 2017, 41(4): 761-767.
[5] 李佳宣, 刘淼. 腔镜技术在乳腺外科中的应用进展[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2024, 39(9): 733-736. LI Jiaxuan, LIU Miao. Application progress of endoscopic technique in breast surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of General Surgery, 2024, 39(9): 733-736.
[6] Comerci AJ, Arellano JA, Alessandri-Bonetti M, et al. Risks and complications rate in liposuction: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Aesthetic Surg J, 2024, 44(7): 454-463.
[7] Woodall WH, Rakovich G, Steiner SH. An overview and critique of the use of cumulative sum methods with surgical learning curve data[J]. Stat Med, 2021, 40(6): 1400-1413.
[8] Gil PJ, Ruiz-Manzanera JJ, Ruiz de Angulo D, et al. Learning curve for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a cumulative summation(CUSUM)analysis[J]. Obes Surg, 2022, 32(8): 2598-2604.
[9] Ayyavoo A. Gynecomastia[J]. Indian J Pediatr. 2023, 90(10): 1013-1017.
[10] Daniels J, Brickstock A, Charlton R. Gynaecomastia[J]. Bmj, 2022,e069771. doi:10.1136/bmj-2021-069771
[11] Busch AS, Ljubicic ML, Upners EN, et al. Dynamic changes of reproductive hormones in male minipuberty: temporal dissociation of leydig and Sertoli cell activity[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2022,107(6): 1560-1568.
[12] Mieritz MG, Christiansen P, Jensen MB, et al. Gynaecomastia in 786 adult men: clinical and biochemical findings[J]. Eur J Endocrinol, 2017, 176(5): 555-566.
[13] Trinchieri A, Perletti G, Magri V, et al. Drug-induced gynecomastia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials[J]. Arch Ital Urol Androl, 2021, 93(4): 489-496.
[14] Laimon W, El-Hawary A, Aboelenin H, et al. Prepubertal gynecomastia is not always idiopathic: case series and review of the literature[J]. Eur J Pediatr, 2021, 180(3): 977-982.
[15] Singh VP, Das L, Kumar P, et al. The role of steroid receptors, peptides and growth factors in the aetiopathogenesis of idiopathic gynecomastia[J]. Andrologia, 2022, 54(6): e14414. doi: 10.1111/and.14414
[16] Pinelli M, De Maria F, Ceccarelli P, et al. Gynecomastia: an uncommon, destabilizing condition of the male adole-scent. our therapeutic choice[J]. Acta Biomed, 2023, 94(2): e2023055. doi:10.23750/abm.v94i2.14028
[17] 师丙帅, 韩宝三, 汪海滨, 等. 中国男性乳房发育临床诊治专家共识[J]. 中国肿瘤外科杂志, 2023, 15(4): 313-323.
[18] Chang D, Siy R, Friedman J, et al. Trends in the surgical correction of gynecomastia[J]. Semin Plast Surg, 2015, 29(2): 122-130.
[19] 王钠, 张兆祥, 马显杰, 等. 经乳晕下切口手术治疗中重度男性乳腺发育症[J]. 中国美容医学, 2019, 28(9): 45-47. WANG Na, ZHANG Zhaoxiang, MA Xianjie, et al. Treatment of moderate to severe gynecomastia by peri-areolar incision[J]. Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine, 2019, 28(9): 45-47.
[20] 曾立, 罗盛康, 徐翔, 等. 下皱襞切口治疗男性乳房发育症的临床效果[J]. 中华医学美学美容杂志, 2018, 24(4): 248-249. ZENG Li, LUO Shengkang, XU Xiang, et al. Clinical effect of lower Plica incision in the treatment of male gynecomastia[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Aesthetics and Cosmetology, 2018, 24(4): 248-249.
[21] Caridi RC. Total gynecomastia removal with layered closure: a study of 567 cases[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, 2022, 10(4): e4256. doi: 10.1097/gox.0000000000004256
[22] 中国医师协会微无创分会乳腺专家委员会. 乳腺疾病腔镜手术专家共识及操作指南(2021版)[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2021, 21(12): 1057-1067.
[23] 骆成玉, 刘宝胤. 乳腔镜男子乳腺发育微创手术专家共识及操作指南(2019版)[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2019, 19(11): 961-963. LUO Chengyu, LIU Baoyin. Expert consensus and ope-ration guide of minimally invasive surgery for male breast development with breast endoscopy(2019 edition)[J]. Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery, 2019, 19(11): 961-963.
[24] Luo CY, Zhang SQ, Wei CS, et al. The scar-hidden surgery on gynecomastia: experiences from a single-institutional large case series[J]. Aesthetic Plast Surg, 2025, 49(4): 1102-1108.
[25] Chen DB, Chen JL, Huang YQ, et al. Comparative analysis of surgical modalities for the gynecomastia treatment: efficiency and aesthetic outcomes[J]. Andrology, 2024, 12(6): 1398-1407.
[26] 朱浩. 腔镜辅助下环乳晕小切口超声刀碎吸法治疗重度男性乳房发育症的临床分析[J]. 中国实用医药, 2021, 16(17): 74-76. ZHU Hao. Clinical analysis of endoscopic assisted small circum-areola incision ultrasonic knife aspiration in the treatment of severe gynecomastia[J]. China Practical Medicine, 2021, 16(17): 74-76.
[27] Innocenti A, Tarantino G. Endoscope-assisted minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of glandular gynecomastia[J]. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023, 47(Suppl 1): 103-104.
[28] 徐伯扬, 杨燕, 穆大力. 内窥镜辅助腋窝切口在男性乳房发育治疗的应用价值[J]. 中华医学美学美容杂志, 2020, 26(1): 12-15. XU Boyang, YANG Yan, MU Dali. Endoscopic assisted axillary approach of gynecomastia subcutaneous mastectomy: a prospective cohort study[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Aesthetics and Cosmetology, 2020, 26(1): 12-15.
[29] Lashin R, Youssef RA, Elshahat A, et al. Postoperative psychological impact on teenagers after gynecomastia correction[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, 2023, 11(6): e5094. doi:10.1097/gox.0000000000005094
[30] Xu CH, Diao YR, Chen RF, et al. Single axillary incision versus triple lateral chest wall incisions in endoscopic mastectomy for gynecomastia: a single-center retrospective analysis with propensity score matching[J]. Aesthetic Plast Surg, 2025, 49(11): 3049-3060.
[31] Tukenmez M, Emiroglu S, Kozanoglu E, et al. Single axillary incision endoscopic surgery and liposuction for gynecomastia[J]. Medicine, 2023, 102(7): e33020. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000033020
[32] Jian CX, Wu LM, Lin LS, et al. Single-port endoscopic mastectomy via the lateral chest approach for the treatment of grade II gynecomastia[J]. Medicine, 2020, 99(22): e20100. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000020100
[33] Chaghamirzayi P, Ahmadi Nejad M, Azizmanesh M, et al. Fat embolism following liposuction: a systematic review of reported cases[J]. Curr Probl Surg, 2025, 68: 101750. doi: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2025.101750
[34] Willet JW, Alvaro AI, Ibrahim AK, et al. A systematic review of efficacy and complications of high-definition liposuction[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2023, 152(1): 57-63.
[35] Hoyos AE, Perez ME, Domínguez-Millán R. Gyneco-mastia treatment through open resection and pectoral high-definition liposculpture[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2021,147(5): 1072-1083.
[36] Yang Y, Mu DL, Xu BY, et al. Endoscopic subcutaneous mastectomy plus liposuction via a single axillary incision for gynecomastia in Asian patients: a report of 45 cases[J]. Surgery, 2021, 170(1): 39-46.
[37] 马志强, 何建鑫, 王若楠, 等. 腔镜联合溶脂吸脂技术治疗男性乳房发育的效果及安全性分析[J]. 中华医学美学美容杂志, 2024, 30(5): 501-505. MA Zhiqiang, HE Jianxin, WANG Ruonan, et al. Effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic-assisted liposuction for treatment of gynaecomastia[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Aesthetics and Cosmetology, 2024, 30(5): 501-505.
[38] 徐青. 乳头乳晕复合体的局部解剖与保留[J]. 国际外科学杂志, 2022, 49(3): 150-154. XU Qing. Anatomy and preservation of the nipple-areola complex[J]. International Journal of Surgery, 2022, 49(3): 150-154.
[39] 胡薇, 詹璐, 闫桂玲. 乳头乳晕复合体血供与临床应用探讨[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(6): 327-330. HU Wei, ZHAN Lu, YAN Guiling. Blood supply of nipple-areola complex and its clinical application[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(6): 327-330.
[40] Rusby JE, Brachtel EF, Taghian A, et al. Microscopic anatomy within the nipple: implications for nipples-paring mastectomy[J]. Am J Surg, 2007, 194(4): 433-437.
[1] 山东省腔镜外科质量控制中心胸腔镜委员会. 山东省VATS/RATS非小细胞肺癌围术期质量控制指标专家共识(2025版)[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(12): 1-5.
[2] 郭永园,孙厚义,张元凯,颜廷宾,刘培来,贾玉华. 鸿鹄机器人辅助全膝关节置换的早期学习曲线[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(3): 115-120.
[3] 马维江,王高俊,欧阳询,臧晨曦,刘鑫. 非气管插管保留自主呼吸麻醉在电视胸腔镜手术中应用效果的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(12): 29-37.
[4] 董昌正,周伟,李风周,臧义丰,丁印鲁. 全腹腔镜下全胃+胆囊+阑尾切除经自然腔道取标本手术1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(7): 122-124.
[5] 张婷婷,王刚,徐昌霞,刘江,支梦伟,江志伟. 3D腹腔镜胃血管球瘤切除术报道1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(12): 110-113.
[6] 荣风年,赵珊. 限制单孔腹腔镜技术发展的因素分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(12): 26-30.
[7] 李小娟,段海霞. 辅助生殖治疗中宫腔镜手术应用及注意问题[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(10): 38-44.
[8] 吴鹏,方路,雷钧,刘念. 腹腔镜手术Trocar孔大出血的预防及处理[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(10): 95-96.
[9] 徐慧荣, 李健宁, 李增军, 徐忠法. 机器人手术与腹腔镜手术在直肠癌低位前切除术中疗效的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(7): 60-65.
[10] 熊丽1, 罗春芳2,周金桃1. 妇科腹腔镜全子宫切除术的学习曲线分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(3): 104-106.
[11] 阎俊新,王国义,李秀英,金彦. 硬腰联合麻醉复合喉罩通气在妇科腹腔镜手术中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2007, 45(11): 1159-1161.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!