您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (12): 21-31.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2024.0806

• 药物临床研究与评价 • 上一篇    

高龄老年新型冠状病毒肺炎患者应用抗凝治疗的短期疗效和安全性

王玉淼,崔晓霈,张红雨   

  1. 山东大学齐鲁医院老年医学科, 山东 济南 250012
  • 发布日期:2024-12-09
  • 通讯作者: 张红雨. E-mail:hongyuzhangql@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    济南市老年医学临床医学研究中心(202132001)

Short-term efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy in elderly patients with corona virus disease 2019

WANG Yumiao, CUI Xiaopei, ZHANG Hongyu   

  1. Department of Geriatric Medicine, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China
  • Published:2024-12-09

摘要: 目的 探讨高龄老年新型冠状病毒肺炎患者接受抗凝治疗的短期疗效和安全性。 方法 纳入2022年12月-2023年8月在山东大学齐鲁医院因新型冠状病毒肺炎入院且年龄≥80岁的患者,根据是否接受抗凝治疗分为抗凝组和非抗凝组,观察两组患者住院期间出血事件及临床结局。 结果 共纳入254例患者,平均年龄85岁,其中抗凝组183例、非抗凝组71例。与非抗凝组相比,抗凝组重症(45.90% vs. 30.99%, P<0.001)和危重症(16.39% vs. 4.22%, P<0.001)患者占比更高,二元Logistic分析表明抗凝治疗(OR=9.224, 95%CI: 3.435~24.769)、应用非甾体类抗炎药(OR=3.619, 95%CI:1.696~7.723)为住院期间发生出血事件的独立危险因素。死亡患者33例,其中病情分型为危重型者32例(96.97%)。采用倾向性评分匹配法(propensity score matching, PSM)对两组基线特征特别是病情分型进行均衡后,抗凝组住院期间出血事件发生率显著高于非抗凝组(40.85% vs. 8.45%, P<0.001),两组住院期间死亡率差异无统计学意义(4.22% vs. 4.22%, P>0.999)。 结论 抗凝治疗未能降低高龄老年新型冠状病毒肺炎患者短期死亡风险,但会增加患者的出血风险。

关键词: 高龄老年, 新型冠状病毒肺炎, 抗凝治疗, 出血, 死亡率, 倾向性评分匹配

Abstract: Objective To analyse short-term efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy in elderly patients with corona virus disease 2019. Methods The study included corona virus disease 2019 patients aged ≥ 80 years who were admitted to Qilu Hospital of Shandong University between December 2022 and August 2023. They were divided into anticoagulant and non-anticoagulant groups according to whether they received anticoagulant therapy. The bleeding events and clinical outcomes during hospitalisation were observed in the two groups. Results A total of 254 patients with an average age of 85 years were divided into the anticoagulant group(n=183)and the non-anticoagulant group(n=71). Compared with the non-anticoagulant group, there were more severe(45.90% vs. 30.99%, P<0.001)and critically ill(16.39% vs. 4.22%, P<0.001)patients in the anticoagulant group. Binary Logistic analysis showed that anticoagulant therapy(OR=9.224, 95%CI: 3.435-24.769)and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs(OR=3.619, 95%CI: 1.696-7.723)were independent risk factors for bleeding events during hospitalisation. There were 33 deaths, of which, 32(96.97%)patients were classified as critically ill. After propensity score matching(PSM)to balance baseline characteristics, the incidence of bleeding events in the anticoagulant group was significantly higher than that in the non-anticoagulant group(40.85% vs. 8.45%, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between the two groups(4.22% vs. 4.22%, P>0.999). Conclusion Anticoagulant therapy does not reduce mortality in elderly patients with corona virus disease 2019 but result in more bleeding events.

Key words: Elderly, Corona virus disease 2019, Anticoagulant therapy, Bleeding, Mortality, Propensity score matching

中图分类号: 

  • R563.1
[1] Knight R, Walker V, Ip S, et al. Association of COVID-19 with major arterial and venous thrombotic diseases: a population-wide cohort study of 48 million adults in England and Wales[J]. Circulation, 2022, 146(12): 892-906.
[2] Cui SP, Chen S, Li XN, et al. Prevalence of venous thromboembolism in patients with severe novel coronavirus pneumonia[J]. J Thromb Haemost, 2020, 18(6): 1421-1424.
[3] Grimnes G, Isaksen T, Tichelaar YIGV, et al. Acute infection as a trigger for incident venous thromboembolism: results from a population-based case-crossover study[J]. Res Pract Thromb Haemost, 2017, 2(1): 85-92.
[4] Bunce PE, High SM, Nadjafi M, et al. Pandemic H1N1 influenza infection and vascular thrombosis[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2011, 52(2): 14-17.
[5] ATTACC Investigators, ACTIV-4a Investigators, REMAP-CAP Investigators, et al. Therapeutic anticoagulation with heparin in noncritically ill patients with covid-19[J]. N Engl J Med, 2021, 385(9): 790-802.
[6] Di Castelnuovo A, Costanzo S, Antinori A, et al. Heparin in COVID-19 patients is associated with reduced In-hospital mortality: the multicenter Italian CORIST study[J]. Thromb Haemost, 2021, 121(8): 1054-1065.
[7] Ionescu F, Jaiyesimi I, Petrescu I, et al. Association of anticoagulation dose and survival in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a retrospective propensity score-weighted analysis[J]. Eur J Haematol, 2021, 106(2): 165-174.
[8] Maatman TK, Jalali F, Feizpour C, et al. Routine venous thromboembolism prophylaxis may be inadequate in the hypercoagulable state of severe coronavirus disease 2019[J]. Crit Care Med, 2020, 48(9): 783-790.
[9] Paranjpe I, Fuster V, Lala A, et al. Association of treatment dose anticoagulation with In-hospital survival among hospitalized patients with COVID-19[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2020, 76(1): 122-124.
[10] Perepu US, Chambers I, Wahab A, et al. Standard prophylactic versus intermediate dose enoxaparin in adults with severe COVID-19: a multi-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial[J]. J Thromb Haemost, 2021, 19(9): 2225-2234.
[11] Investigators I, Sadeghipour P, Talasaz AH, et al. Effect of intermediate-dose vs. standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation on thrombotic events, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment, or mortality among patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit: the INSPIRATION randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA, 2021, 325(16): 1620-1630.
[12] Lopes RD, de Barros E Silva PGM, Furtado RHM, et al. Therapeutic versus prophylactic anticoagulation for patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 and elevated D-dimer concentration(ACTION): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2021, 397(10291): 2253-2263.
[13] Barnes GD, Burnett A, Allen A, et al. Thromboembolic prevention and anticoagulant therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic: updated clinical guidance from the anticoagulation forum[J]. J Thromb Thrombolysis, 2022, 54(2): 197-210.
[14] Cuker A, Tseng EK, Schünemann HJ, et al. American Society of Hematology living guidelines on the use of anticoagulation for thromboprophylaxis for patients with COVID-19: March 2022 update on the use of anticoagulation in critically ill patients[J]. Blood Adv, 2022, 6(17): 4975-4982.
[15] Schulman S, Sholzberg M, Spyropoulos AC, et al. ISTH guidelines for antithrombotic treatment in COVID-19[J]. J Thromb Haemost, 2022, 20(10): 2214-2225.
[16] Song JC, Wang G, Zhang W, et al. Chinese expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of coagulation dysfunction in COVID-19[J]. Mil Med Res, 2020, 7(1): 19. doi:10.1186/s40779-020-00247-7.
[17] ODriscoll M, Ribeiro Dos Santos G, Wang L, et al. Age-specific mortality and immunity patterns of SARS-CoV-2[J]. Nature, 2021, 590(7844): 140-145.
[18] Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China[J]. N Engl J Med, 2020, 382(18): 1708-1720.
[19] Singh S, Bajorek B. Pharmacotherapy in the ageing patient: the impact of age per se(a review)[J]. Ageing Res Rev, 2015, 24(Pt B): 99-110.
[20] 卫生健康委办公厅 中医药局综合司.新型冠状病毒感染诊疗方案(试行第十版)[EB/OL].(2023-01-05)[2024-04-06]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2023-01/06/content_5735343.htm.
[21] Kaatz S, Ahmad D, Spyropoulos AC, et al. Definition of clinically relevant non-major bleeding in studies of anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolic disease in non-surgical patients: communication from the SSC of the ISTH[J]. J Thromb Haemost, 2015, 13(11): 2119-2126.
[22] Schulman S, Kearon C, Subcommittee on Control of Anticoagulation of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non-surgical patients[J]. J Thromb Haemost, 2005, 3(4): 692-694.
[23] 中华医学会外科学分会血管外科学组. 深静脉血栓形成的诊断和治疗指南(第三版)[J]. 中国血管外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 9(4): 250-257.
[24] 徐蕾, 张伟霞, 许倍铭, 等. 那屈肝素临床应用药学专家意见[J]. 上海医药, 2022, 43(21): 12-17. XU Lei, ZHANG Weixia, XU Beiming, et al. Opinions of pharmaceutical experts on clinical application of nadroparin[J]. Shanghai Medical & Pharmaceutical Journal, 2022, 43(21): 12-17.
[25] 中华医学会临床药学分会《磺达肝癸钠药学实践专家共识》编写工作组. 磺达肝癸钠药学实践专家共识 [J]. 医药导报, 2022, 41(11): 1571-1581.
[26] Wang YT, Guo YT, Qin MZ, et al. 2024 Chinese expert consensus guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of atrial fibrillation in the elderly, endorsed by geriatric society of Chinese medical association(cardiovascular group)and Chinese society of geriatric health medicine(cardiovascular branch): executive summary[J]. Thromb Haemost, 2024, 124(10): 897-911. doi:10.1055/a-2325-5923.
[27] 山东大学齐鲁医院新型冠状病毒肺炎诊治专家组, 薛玉文. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疑似病例诊断及管理专家共识·齐鲁医院标准 [J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2020, 58(3): 1-7. Consensus Group of Diagnosis and Treatment for Coronavirus Disease 2019, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, XUE Yuwen. Diagnosis, management, prevention and control for suspected cases of coronavirus disease 2019, Qilu Hospital criteria[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Science), 2020, 58(3): 1-7.
[28] Middeldorp S, Coppens M, van Haaps TF, et al. Incidence of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with COVID-19[J]. J Thromb Haemost, 2020, 18(8): 1995-2002.
[29] Wu CM, Chen XY, Cai YP, et al. Risk factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and death in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia in Wuhan, China[J]. JAMA Intern Med, 2020, 180(7): 934-943.
[30] Onder G, Rezza G, Brusaferro S. Case-fatality rate and characteristics of patients dying in relation to COVID-19 in Italy[J]. JAMA, 2020, 323(18): 1775-1776.
[31] Docherty AB, Harrison EM, Green CA, et al. Features of 20 133 UK patients in hospital with covid-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol: prospective observational cohort study[J]. BMJ, 2020, 369: m1985. doi:10.1136/bmj.m1985.
[32] Akbar AN, Gilroy DW. Aging immunity may exacerbate COVID-19[J]. Science, 2020, 369(6501): 256-257.
[33] Levi M, Thachil J, Iba T, et al. Coagulation abnormalities and thrombosis in patients with COVID-19[J]. Lancet Haematol, 2020, 7(6): 438-440.
[34] Helms J, Tacquard C, Severac F, et al. High risk of thrombosis in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection: a multicenter prospective cohort study[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2020, 46(6): 1089-1098.
[35] Rentsch CT, Beckman JA, Tomlinson L, et al. Early initiation of prophylactic anticoagulation for prevention of coronavirus disease 2019 mortality in patients admitted to hospital in the United States: cohort study[J]. BMJ, 2021, 372: n311. doi:10.1136/bmj.n311.
[36] Goligher EC, Lawler PR, Jensen TP, et al. Heterogeneous treatment effects of therapeutic-dose heparin in patients hospitalized for COVID-19[J]. JAMA, 2023, 329(13): 1066-1077.
[37] Rowley CP. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation[J]. Yearb Med, 2012, 2012: 297-298. doi:10.1016/s0084-3873(12)00242-8.
[38] Kearon C, Akl EA, Ornelas J, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: chest guideline and expert panel report[J]. Chest, 2016, 149(2): 315-352.
[39] Raatikainen P, Lassila R. COVID-19: another reason for anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation[J]. Heart, 2022, 108(12): 902-904.
[40] Ko D, Hylek EM. Anticoagulation in the older adult: optimizing benefit and reducing risk[J]. Semin Thromb Hemost, 2014, 40(6): 688-694.
[41] Bhatt DL, Scheiman J, Abraham NS, et al. ACCF/ACG/AHA 2008 expert consensus document on reducing the gastrointestinal risks of antiplatelet therapy and NSAID use: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents[J]. Circulation, 2008, 118(18): 1894-1909.
[1] 王潇晗,吴学君,董典宁,王茂华,韩宗霖,高培显,孔祥骞. 原发性主动脉血栓形成诊治单中心经验[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 115-124.
[2] 孙丽娜,白红艳,牛宗格,张福帅,曲仪庆. 基于SII构建及评价预测ARDS住院死亡率的在线临床风险模型[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(7): 10-20.
[3] 张学宇,张学海,孙文青,刘晗,姜金波,刘寒,李远,陈晓梅. 重症新型冠状病毒肺炎伴侵袭性肺曲霉病及反复致命性消化道出血1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(7): 56-61.
[4] 徐梦纯,王静,郝田宇,王鹏飞,吴远宁,董亮. 抗磷脂综合征引起的弥漫性肺泡出血1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(5): 112-115.
[5] 张小春,沈丹丽,王翠众,管俊杰,郑凯,邢敬,江志伟,龚冠闻. 食用香椿致急性出血性坏死性肠炎1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(3): 112-116.
[6] 张红媛,顾永忠,侯哲. 产科47例子宫切除的临床分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(7): 96-100.
[7] 刘艳,冷珊珊,夏晓娜,董昊,黄陈翠,孟祥水. 基于影像组学参数评估376例幕上自发性脑出血患者的功能状态[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(5): 59-67.
[8] 崔振华,李志文,王贤仁,刘贞吉,商庆新,吕艳锋. 3例痔术后难治性出血患者介入治疗的即刻疗效与长期预后[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(5): 68-72.
[9] 王园园,孙云. 合并新型冠状病毒肺炎的维持性血液透析患者死亡危险因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(11): 68-73.
[10] 郑良,孙明浩,石圆,于胜男,王志强,李秀君. 2011—2019年山东省肾综合征出血热时空分布及影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(11): 104-110.
[11] 胥凯,韩超,丁守銮,丁璇,邢德广,王成伟. 181例高分级动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者术前再出血的影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(9): 97-101.
[12] 刘盈,杨淑霞,佘凯丽,程传龙,房启迪,韩闯,崔峰,李秀君. 2019年山东省淄博市居民死因及疾病负担探析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(6): 114-121.
[13] 曹义海. 血管生成在疾病治疗中的应用与展望[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(9): 9-14.
[14] 杨璇,李岩志,马伟,贾崇奇. 基于两样本孟德尔随机化的肺功能与新型冠状病毒肺炎病死风险的因果关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(7): 104-111.
[15] 周溪,黄霂晗,任玉洁,邱洋. 新型冠状病毒感染与天然免疫及炎症反应[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(5): 15-21.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!