您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (4): 110-117.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2019.1280

• 公共卫生与管理学 • 上一篇    

癫痫人群丙戊酸暴露与癌症发生风险的相关性分析

王振东,丁稳稳,凤志慧   

  1. 山东大学公共卫生学院职业与环境健康学系, 山东 济南 250012
  • 发布日期:2022-09-27
  • 通讯作者: 凤志慧. E-mail:fengzhihui@sdu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81472800);2019年山东省重点研发计划(2019GSF108083)

Correlation between valproic acid exposure and cancer risk in epileptic population

WANG Zhendong, DING Wenwen, FENG Zhihui   

  1. Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China
  • Published:2022-09-27

摘要: 目的 探讨癫痫人群丙戊酸(VPA)暴露与癌症发生风险的相关性。 方法 通过山东省多中心健康医疗大数据平台获取2012~2017年癫痫人群,分析VPA暴露与非暴露组癌症总发病密度差异与相对危险度(RR);应用Cox模型分析VPA暴露的癌症发生风险比(HR);分析癌症发生风险与VPA暴露时长及处方剂量间的关系。 结果 通过大数据平台获得2012~2017年癫痫患者3 107例,其中筛选出VPA暴露者1 233例,非暴露者1 788例。暴露与非暴露组分别有27、23例诊断为癌症,癌症总发病密度分别为9.68/1 000(6.03~13.33/1 000)人年、5.70/1 000(3.37~8.03/1 000)人年;剔除卡马西平、苯巴比妥和苯妥英钠3种抗癫痫药物暴露的人群干扰后,暴露与非暴露组癌症总发病密度分别为4.95/1 000(0.10~9.80/1 000)人年、5.25/1 000(2.15~8.35/1 000)人年;经年龄调整后RR为0.79(0.26~2.40),P=0.681,Cox模型调整后HR为0.80(0.25~2.53),P=0.702筛选暴露时长D≥100且处方剂量P≥10的高暴露剂量人群,癌症总发病密度与暴露时长的χ2线性趋势检验发现,癌症总发病密度的点估计结果随暴露时长增加依次下降,且具有统计学意义(P=0.031);暴露时长按中位数分组的Cox分析得到调整HR为0.59(0.22~1.59),P=0.301;处方剂量按中位数分组的Cox分析得到调整HR为0.93(0.35~2.47),P=0.890。 结论 未发现VPA具有降低癌症发生风险的作用。

关键词: 癫痫, 丙戊酸, 癌症, 风险比

Abstract: Objective To explore the relationship between valproic acid(VPA)exposure and cancer risk in epileptic population. Methods Patients with epilepsy from 2012 to 2017 were collected from Shandong Multi-Center Healthcare Big-Data. Total incidence of cancer in VPA exposed and unexposed groups were analyzed, and the relative risk(RR)was calculated. The Hazard ratio(HR)was analyzed with Cox model. Correlations between cancer risk and duration of VPA exposure(D)and prescription dose of VPA exposure(P)were analyzed. Results A total of 3 107 people with epilepsy were collected, including 1 233 VPA exposed and 1 788 unexposed. Cancer was detected in 27 and 23 cases in the exposed and unexposed groups, respectively, and the total incidence of cancer was 9.68/1 000(6.03-13.33/1 000)person/year, and 5.70/1 000(3.37-8.03/1000)person/year, respectively. After exposures to carbamazepine, phenobarbital and phenytoin were excluded, the total incidence of cancer in VPA exposed and unexposed group was 4.95/1 000(0.10-9.80/1 000)person/year, and 5.25/1 000(2.15-8.35/1 000)person/year, respectively. After age was adjusted, the RR was 0.79(0.26-2.40), P=0.681. After Cox model was adjusted, HR was 0.80(0.25-2.53), P=0.702. For population with high VPA exposure(D≥100 and P≥10), the incidence of cancer significantly decreased with the increase of duration of exposure(P=0.031). After grouping based on the median duration of VPA exposure, the adjusted HR was 0.59(0.22-1.59), P=0.301. After grouping based on the median of the prescription dose of VPA, the adjusted HR was 0.93(0.35-2.47), P=0.890. Conclusion VPA is not associated with a significant reduction in cancer risk.

Key words: Epilepsy, Valproic acid, Cancer, Hazard ratio

中图分类号: 

  • R730.1
[1] GBD 2016 Epilepsy Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of epilepsy, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 [J]. Lancet Neurol, 2019, 18(4): 357-375.
[2] 陈阳美, 金永寿, 李宇杰. 抗癫痫药的“一线主力”[J]. 家庭医药, 2012, 2012(9): 22-25.
[3] Peraino C, Fry RJ, Staffeldt E. Reduction and enhancement by phenobarbital of hepatocarcinogenesis induced in the rat by 2-acetylaminofluorene [J]. Cancer Res, 1971, 31(10): 1506-1512.
[4] Peraino C, Fry RJ, Staffeldt E. Brief communication: Enhancement of spontaneous hepatic tumorigenesis in C3H mice by dietary phenobarbital [J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1973, 51(4): 1349-1350.
[5] Diwan BA, Henneman JR, Nims RW. Enhancement of N-nitrosodiethylamine-initiated hepatocarcinogenesis by phenytoin in male F344/NCr rats at a dose causing maximal induction of CYP2B [J]. Int J Toxicol, 2001, 20(2): 81-87.
[6] Mawatari T, Ninomiya I, Inokuchi M, et al. Valproic acid inhibits proliferation of HER2-expressing breast cancer cells by inducing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis through Hsp70 acetylation [J]. Int J Oncol, 2015, 47(6): 2073-2081.
[7] Luo Y, Wang H, Zhao X, et al. Valproic acid causes radiosensitivity to breast cancer cells via disrupting DNA repair pathway [J]. Toxicol Res(Camb), 2016, 5(3): 859-870.
[8] Romain B, Benbrika-Nehmar R, Marisa L, et al. Histone hypoacetylation contributes to CXCL12 downregulation in colon cancer: impact on tumor growth and cell migration [J]. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(24): 38351-38366.
[9] Liu G, Wang H, Zhang F, et al. The effect of VPA on increasing radiosensitivity in osteosarcoma cells and primary-culture cells from chemical carcinogen-induced breast cancer in rats [J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2017, 18(5): 1027.
[10] Shoji M, Ninomiya I, Makino I, et al. Valproic acid, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, enhances radiosensitivity in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [J]. Int J Oncol, 2012, 40(6): 2140-2146.
[11] Sun L, He Q, Tsai C, et al. HDAC inhibitors suppressed small cell lung cancer cell growth and enhanced the suppressive effects of receptor-targeting cytotoxins via upregulating somatostatin receptor II [J]. Am J Transl Res, 2018, 10(2): 545-553.
[12] Sanaei M, Kavoosi F, Roustazadeh A, et al. In vitro effect of the histone deacetylase inhibitor valproic acid on viability and apoptosis of the PLC/PRF5 human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line [J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2018, 19(9): 2507-2510.
[13] Riva G, Cilibrasi C, Bazzoni R, et al. Valproic acid inhibits proliferation and reduces invasiveness in glioma stem cells through Wnt/β catenin signalling activation [J]. Genes(Basel), 2018, 9(11): 522.
[14] Terranova-Barberio M, Roca MS, Zotti AI, et al. Valproic acid potentiates the anticancer activity of capecitabine in vitro and in vivo in breast cancer models via induction of thymidine phosphorylase expression [J]. Oncotarget, 2016, 7(7): 7715-7731.
[15] Ryu CH, Yoon WS, Park KY, et al. Valproic acid downregulates the expression of MGMT and sensitizes temozolomide-resistant glioma cells [J]. J Biomed Biotechnol, 2012, 2012: 1-9.
[16] Ecke I, Petry F, Rosenberger A, et al. Antitumor effects of a combined 5-aza-2’deoxycytidine and valproic acid treatment on rhabdomyosarcoma and medulloblastoma in Ptch mutant mice [J]. Cancer Res, 2009, 69(3): 887-895.
[17] Duenas-Gonzalez A, Candelaria M, Perez-Plascencia C, et al. Valproic acid as epigenetic cancer drug: preclinical, clinical and transcriptional effects on solid tumors [J]. Cancer Treat Rev, 2008, 34(3): 206-222.
[18] Roffman CE, Buchanan J, Allison GT. Charlson comorbidities index [J]. J Physiother, 2016, 62(3): 171.
[19] Quan H, Li B, Couris CM, et al. Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries [J]. Am J Epidemiol, 2011, 173(6): 676-682.
[20] Kang H, Gillespie TW, Goodman M, et al. Long-term use of valproic acid in US veterans is associated with reduced risk of smoking-related cases of head and neck cancer [J]. Cancer, 2014, 120(9): 1394-1400.
[21] Farwell WR, Scranton RE, Lawler EV, et al. The association between statins and cancer incidence in a veterans population [J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2008, 100(2): 134-139.
[22] Sang Z, Sun Y, Ruan H, et al. Anticancer effects of valproic acid on oral squamous cell carcinoma via SUMOylation in vivo and in vitro [J]. Exp Ther Med, 2016, 12(6): 3979-3987.
[23] Singh G, Bell GS, Driever PH, et al. Cancer risk in people with epilepsy using valproate-sodium [J]. Acta Neurol Scand, 2012, 125(4): 234-240.
[24] Hallas J, Friis S, Bjerrum L, et al. Cancer risk in long-term users of valproate: a population-based case-control study [J]. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2009, 18(6): 1714-1719.
[25] Lin CC, Hsieh TC, Wu LS. Long-term use of valproic acid and the prevalence of cancers in bipolar disorder patients in a Taiwanese population: An association analysis using the National Health Insurance Research Database(NHIRD)[J]. J Affect Disord, 2018, 232: 103-108.
[26] Eckschlager T, Plch J, Stiborova M, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors as anticancer drugs [J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2017, 18(7): 1414.
[27] Singh G, Driever PH, Sander JW. Cancer risk in people with epilepsy: the role of antiepileptic drugs [J]. Brain, 2005, 128(Pt 1): 7-17.
[28] Salminen JK, Tammela TL, Auvinen A, et al. Antiepileptic drugs with histone deacetylase inhibition activity and prostate cancer risk: a population-based case–control study [J]. Cancer Causes Control, 2016, 27(5): 637-645.
[29] Göttlicher M, Minucci S, Zhu P, et al. Valproic acid defines a novel class of HDAC inhibitors inducing differentiation of transformed cells [J]. EMBO J, 2001, 20(24): 6969-6978.
[30] Hsieh LP, Huang CY. Antiepileptic drug utilization in Taiwan: Analysis of prescription using National Health Insurance database [J]. Epilepsy Res, 2009, 84(1): 21-27.
[1] 葛丽娟 金瑞峰 王纪文 许新升 李癊. 多药耐药基因1 C1236T多态性与癫痫患者对药物反应性的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2209, 47(6): 99-102.
[2] 吴瑞芳,李长忠. 女性生育力保护的现状与进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(9): 1-7.
[3] 郑苏,陈述花,李华,邓劼,陈春红,王晓慧,冯卫星,韩萧迪,张雨佳,李娜,李莫,方方. 脑电变化和BASED评分与54例婴儿痉挛症促肾上腺皮质激素疗效的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(9): 91-96.
[4] 李军,李保敏,杨璐. UBA5 基因突变致早发性癫痫性脑病临床特征与遗传学分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(8): 58-62.
[5] 吴新莹,冯一平,常开锋,贾贤杰,薛付忠. 绿色覆盖与癌症发病的因果关联分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(8): 115-119.
[6] 侯茹男,邵頔,秦廷廷,尚美美,申玉珍,孙晓杰. 山东省癌症患者烟草使用情况及影响因素分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(6): 102-106.
[7] 宋洛卿,周国钰,叶翔,卢梅,赵新静. 脑淀粉样血管病相关炎症长期误诊1例报道并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 119-122.
[8] 郑昊天,王光辉,赵小刚,王亚东,曾榆凯,杜贾军. 基于数据库LKB1突变肺腺癌DNA异常甲基化位点构建的预后风险模型[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(3): 51-58.
[9] 孙庆杰,张怡莎,管尚慧,凤志慧. 丙戊酸对134例放疗神经胶质瘤患者预后生存和肿瘤复发的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(8): 80-85.
[10] 孙宇,陈娜,马爱华. SLC35A2基因突变致先天性糖基化障碍1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(4): 113-116.
[11] 贾建华,陈思,吴倩倩,徐硕,李超,程莲,徐淑军. 立体定向脑电图引导下射频热凝毁损术治疗药物难治性癫痫的有效性分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(10): 80-86.
[12] 孙永锋,刘会昭,李煜环,石磊,袁俊,钟建卫. 超声引导脑电监测在脑动静脉畸形继发癫痫手术中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(12): 60-64.
[13] 杨玉霞,臧素洁,冷安丽,王健. 以5种癌症患者住院费用为例探讨其药占比及医保支付[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(4): 113-118.
[14] 朱爱国,马振敕,王健. 利用上皮源性卵巢癌预后的多基因信息建立预测预后模型[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(10): 80-85.
[15] 贾桂娟,李保敏, 雷革非, 孙若鹏, 刘心洁. 婴儿痉挛转型前发作持续时间与临床疗效分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(10): 112-117.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!