利用上皮源性卵巢癌预后的多基因信息建立预测预后模型

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2019.104

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的通过基因表达谱汇编(GEO)数据库和癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)数据库筛选并建立与上皮源性卵巢癌(EOC)患者预后有关联的多基因模型,并验证其预后价值。方法从GEO数据库中下载EOC有关芯片数据(GSE14407),筛选出在EOC组织和正常卵巢上皮组织中差异表达的基因(DEGs),采用单因素和多因素Cox回归模型筛选出与预后有关联的DEGs,建立多基因预后模型和预后指数(PI)公式。对TCGA数据库中EOC患者的mRNA数据及临床信息进行整理,通过PI公式对患者进行评分,并根据评分将患者分为低风险组和高风险组。通过Cox回归风险模型分析临床病理参数(年龄、发病位置、组织分级、肿瘤残余及FIGO分期)和预后指数参数与EOC预后的关系。根据年龄、发病位置、组织分级、肿瘤残余及FIGO分期进行分组,采用Kaplan-Meier(K-M)生存分析验证多基因模型对卵巢癌的预后价值。结果共筛选出47个在EOC组织和正常卵巢组织中的DEGs,其中有37个表达下调的DEGs和10个表达上调的DEGs。将上述DEGs进行单因素和多因素Cox回归分析,共筛选出4个DEGs,分别是PACSIN3、KCNT1、LAMP3及KIR3DX1。PI公式:(-0.169×PACSIN3的表达量+0.078×KCNT1的表达量-0.246×LAMP3的表达量-0.147×KIR3DX1的表达量)。Cox回归模型分析证实,年龄、肿瘤残余和预后模型是卵巢癌患者的独立预后因素(P<0.01)。通过K-M生存分析证实,在TCGA数据库的312例EOC患者中,预后评分低风险的患者总体生存期(OS)较高风险患者延长,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在不同的年龄、临床分期、发病位置(单侧和双侧)、肿瘤残余<10 mm的EOC患者亚组中,预后评分低风险的患者OS较高风险患者延长,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论四基因预后模型是EOC患者的独立预后因素,并在总体和根据各临床病理特征分组的EOC患者亚组中得到了验证。

关键词: 卵巢癌, 预后, 癌症基因组图谱, Cox比例回归模型, 生物信息学

Abstract: Objective To establish a multigene prognostic model associated with the prognosis of the epithelial ovarian cancer(EOC)patients and validate the prognostic power through Gene Expression Omnibus(GEO)database and The Cancer Genome Atlas(TCGA)database. Methods The Affymetrix expression profiles(GSE14407)were downloaded 山东大学学报 (医学版)57卷10期 -朱爱国,等.利用上皮源性卵巢癌预后的多基因信息建立预测预后模型 \=-and analyzed from GEO dataset. Different expression genes(DEGs)between EOC tissue and normal epithelial tissue were selected to identify a multigene prognostic model. DEGs were selected by univariate and multivariate Cox regression model to establish a multigene prognostic model and prognostic index(PI)formula. mRNA expression data and clinical data of patients were obtained from TCGA dataset. According to PI, the patients were divided into high risk group and low risk group. Clinical and pathological feature(age, neoplasm subdivision, histologic grade, residual tumor, clinical stage)and PI were evaluated as influence factors affecting overall survival(OS)of EOC patients. The prognostic value of multigene model by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was verified in overall and subgroup EOC patients according to age, neoplasm subdivision, residual tumor, and clinical stage. Results A total of 47 DEGs between EOC and normal tissues were screened, in which 37 DEGs were down-regulated and 17 DEGs were up-regulated. By univariate and multivariate Cox model, 4DEGs, i.e., PACSIN3,KCNT1,LAMP3 and KIR3DX1, were finally selected to establish a four-gene prognostic model. PI formula was as follows:(-0.169 × the expression of PACSIN3 + 0.078 × the expression of KCNT1 -0.246 × the expression of LAMP3 -0.147 × the expression of KIR3DX1). Age, residual tumor and multigene gene prognostic model were independent prognostic factors of EOC patients(P<0.01). OS of low risk group was longer than high risk group by K-M plots(P<0.05). In different subgroups(age,clinical stage, neoplasm subdivision, residual tumor)of EOC patients, low risk group had longer OS than high risk group(P<0.05). Conclusion Four-gene prognostic model is the independent prognostic factor in EOC patients, and is demonstrated remarkable prognostic value in overall EOC patients and each subgroup according to different clinical and pathological factors.

Key words: Ovary cancer, Prognosis, The Cancer Genome Atlas, Cox proportional regression model, Biological information

中图分类号:

R711.75

朱爱国,马振敕,王健. 利用上皮源性卵巢癌预后的多基因信息建立预测预后模型[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(10): 80-85.

ZHU Aiguo, MA Zhenchi, WANG Jian. Establishment of survival related multigene prognostic model of epithelial ovarian cancer[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2019, 57(10): 80-85.

参考文献

[1] 陈静, 李春艳, 赵苗青, 等. EZH2蛋白在卵巢上皮性肿瘤中的表达及其作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(2): 65-70. CHEN Jing, LI Chunyan, ZHAO Miaoqing, et al. Expression of EZH2 protein and its role in ovarian epithelial tumor [J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2015, 53(2): 65-70.
[2] Liu JF, Konstantinopoulos PA, Matulonis UA. PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer: current status and future promise[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2014, 133(2): 362-369.
[3] Eisenhauer EA. Real-world evidence in the treatment of ovarian cancer[J]. Ann Oncol, 2017, 28(suppl_8): viii61-viii65.
[4] Ramalingam P. Morphologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular features of epithelial ovarian cancer[J]. Oncology(Williston Park), 2016, 30(2): 166-176.
[5] 邱建,傅云峰,周彩云,等. 上皮性卵巢癌组织CK2β和p53蛋白表达临床意义分析[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志, 2015,22(6): 451-456. QIU Jian, FU Yunfeng, ZHOU Caiyun, et al. Analysis of the relationship between expression of CK2β, p53 and prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer tissues[J]. Chin J Cancer Prev Treat, 2015, 22(6): 451-456.
[6] Nakonechny QB, Gilks CB. Ovarian cancer in hereditary cancer susceptibility syndromes[J]. Surg Pathol Clin, 2016, 9(2): 189-199.
[7] Zhang M, Zhuang G, Sun X, et al. TP53 mutation-mediated genomic instability induces the evolution of chemoresistance and recurrence in epithelial ovarian cancer[J]. Diagn Pathol, 2017, 12(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13000-017-0605-8.
[8] Darcy KM, Brady WE, Mcbroom JW, et al. Associations between p53 overexpression and multiple measures of clinical outcome in high-risk, early stage or suboptimally-resected, advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancers A Gynecologic Oncology Group study[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2008, 111(3): 487-495.
[9] Seagle BLL, Yang CPH, Eng KH, et al. TP53 hot spot mutations in ovarian cancer: selective resistance to microtubule stabilizers in vitro and differential survival outcomes from The Cancer Genome Atlas[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2015, 138(1): 159-164.
[10] Kotsopoulos J, Rosen B, Fan I, et al. Ten-year survival after epithelial ovarian cancer is not associated with BRCA mutation status[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2016, 140(1): 42-47.
[11] Arts-de Jong M, de Bock GH, van Asperen CJ, et al. Germline BRCA1/2 mutation testing is indicated in every patient with epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic review[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2016, 61:137-145. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.03.009.
[12] Dumas J, Gargano MA, Dancik GM. shinyGEO: a web-based application for analyzing Gene Expression Omnibus datasets[J]. Bioinformatics, 2016, 32(23): 3679-3681.
[13] Colaprico A, Silva TC, Olsen C, et al. TCGAbiolinks: an R/Bioconductor package for integrative analysis of TCGA data[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2016, 44(8): e71. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1507.
[14] Zhou W, Ma C, Yan Z. Microarray data analysis reveals differentially expressed genes in prolactinoma[J]. Neoplasma, 2015, 62(1): 53-60.
[15] 毛燕南, 曾丽霞, 李宇虹, 等. PAX8、PAX2、p53和RAS蛋白在卵巢及输卵管组织中的表达对于高级别卵巢浆液性癌起源的意义[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2017, 52(10): 687-696. MAO Yannan, ZENG Lixia, LI Yuhong, et al. Significance and expression of PAX8, PAX2, p53 and RAS in ovary and fallopian tubes to origin of ovarian high grade serous carcinoma[J]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi, 2017, 52(10): 687-696.
[16] Webb PM, Jordan SJ. Epidemiology of epithelial ovarian cancer[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2017, 4: 3-14. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2016.08.006.
[17] Andrews L, Mutch DG. Hereditary ovarian cancer and risk reduction[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2017, 4: 31-48. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2016.10.017.
[18] Graffeo R, Livraghi L, Pagani O, et al. Time to incorporate germline multigene panel testing into breast and ovarian cancer patient care[J]. Breast Cancer Res Tr, 2016, 160(3): 393-410.
[19] Schael S, Nuchel J, Muller S, et al. Casein kinase 2 phosphorylation of protein kinase C and casein kinase 2 substrate in neurons(PACSIN)1 protein regulates neuronal spine formation[J]. J Biol Chem, 2013, 288(13): 9303-9312.
[20] Roach W, Plomann M. PACSIN3 overexpression increases adipocyte glucose transport through GLUT1[J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2007, 355(3): 745-750.
[21] Lim CX, Ricos MG, Dibbens LM, et al. KCNT1 mutations in seizure disorders: the phenotypic spectrum and functional effects[J]. J Med Genet, 2016, 53(4): 217-225.
[22] Rizzo F, Ambrosino P, Guacci A, et al. Characterization of two De novo Kcnt1 mutations in children with malignant migrating partial seizures in infancy[J]. Mol Cell Neurosci, 2016, 72: 54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2016.01.004.
[23] Nagelkerke A, Sieuwerts AM, Bussink J, et al. LAMP3 is involved in tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer cells through the modulation of autophagy[J]. Endocr Relat Cancer, 2013, 21(1): 101-112.
[24] Liao X, Chen Y, Liu D, et al. High expression of LAMP3 is a novel biomarker of poor prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2015, 16(8): 17655-17667.
[25] Qiu X, You Y, Huang J, et al. LAMP3 and TP53 overexpression predicts poor outcome in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Int J Clin Exp Pathol, 2015, 8(5): 5519-5527.

相关文章 15

[1]	郑苏,陈述花,李华,邓劼,陈春红,王晓慧,冯卫星,韩萧迪,张雨佳,李娜,李莫,方方. 脑电变化和BASED评分与54例婴儿痉挛症促肾上腺皮质激素疗效的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(9): 91-96.
[2]	王丽慧,高敏,孔北华. 子宫血管肉瘤2例报告并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(9): 108-112.
[3]	刘腾,马迎春. 基于生物信息库病例分析ECT2在子宫内膜癌中的表达及临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(8): 63-71.
[4]	高中霞,张铭,樊明德,谭晨阳,王梦迪,王超,樊跃飞,丁守銮,王成伟. 伽玛刀治疗81例肺癌脑转移瘤的疗效及预后因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(8): 44-49.
[5]	贺士卿,李皖皖,董书晴,牟婧怡,刘宇莹,魏思雨,刘钊,张家新. 基于数据库构建乳腺癌焦亡相关基因的预后风险模型[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(8): 34-43.
[6]	张艺馨,赵玉立,封丽. 超声特征及术前CA-125联合对51例卵巢交界性及Ⅰ期恶性肿瘤的鉴别诊断[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(7): 104-109.
[7]	张玉凤,徐敏,邢秀丽,逄曙光,户克庆. 689例非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的临床流行病学特征[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(7): 118-122.
[8]	李琳琳,王凯. 基于生物信息学预测肝细胞癌预后基因[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(5): 50-58.
[9]	郑昊天,王光辉,赵小刚,王亚东,曾榆凯,杜贾军. 基于数据库LKB1突变肺腺癌DNA异常甲基化位点构建的预后风险模型[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(3): 51-58.
[10]	哈春芳,李茹月. 卵巢癌耐药机制与靶向治疗策略的研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(9): 117-123.
[11]	陈立晓,英信江,陈歆维,王菲,孙臻峰,董频. 下咽鳞癌蛋白质谱鉴定及预后靶分子筛选[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(9): 140-147.
[12]	褚晏,刘端瑞,朱文帅,樊荣,马晓丽,汪运山,郏雁飞. DNA甲基化转移酶在胃癌中的表达及其临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(7): 1-9.
[13]	陈丽宇,肖娟,吕仙忠,段宝敏,洪凡真. 影响孕产妇下肢深静脉血栓预后的危险因素分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(7): 38-42.
[14]	田瑶天,王宝,李叶琴,王滕,田力文,韩波,王翠艳. 基于可解释性心脏磁共振参数的机器学习模型预测儿童心肌炎的预后[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(7): 43-49.
[15]	李皖皖,周文凯,董书晴,贺士卿,刘钊,张家新,刘斌. 利用数据库信息构建乳腺癌免疫关联lncRNAs风险评估模型[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(7): 74-84.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed