您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (3): 68-71.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2015.709

• • 上一篇    下一篇

血清循环miR-375检测对宫颈癌早期诊断及术后监测的意义

彭慧,何君梅,苏雪莲   

  1. 济南市第五人民医院妇产科, 山东 济南 250000
  • 收稿日期:2015-07-27 出版日期:2016-03-10 发布日期:2016-03-10
  • 通讯作者: 彭慧. E-mail:1245804336@qq.com E-mail:1245804336@qq.com

Expression of serum miR-375 and its clinical significance in the diagnosis and postoperative monitoring of cervical cancer

PENG Hui, HE Junmei, SU Xuelian   

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The 5th Peoples Hospital of Jinan, Jinan 250000, Shandong, China
  • Received:2015-07-27 Online:2016-03-10 Published:2016-03-10

摘要: 目的 检测循环miR-375在宫颈癌及宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)患者血清中的表达水平,探讨其对宫颈癌早期诊断及术后监测等的临床意义。 方法 采用实时荧光定量PCR(RT-qPCR)法分别检测64例宫颈癌患者(宫颈癌组)、64例CIN患者(CIN组)及50例健康对照组血清中循环miR-375表达水平,同时检测血清糖抗原125(CA125)水平,分析二者对宫颈癌早期诊断、术后监测的意义及血清循环miR-375与宫颈癌临床病理参数间的关系。 结果 宫颈癌组血清循环miR-375表达水平明显低于健康对照组和CIN组(P均<0.05);同时CIN组血清循环miR-375表达水平也明显低于健康对照组(P<0.05)。受试者工作曲线(ROC曲线)分析显示,血清循环miR-375诊断宫颈癌的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.782(95%CI:0.714,0.840),灵敏度为73.4%,特异度为78.9%, 其诊断价值高于CA125的0.677(95%CI:0.603,0.745),P<0.05。相比于宫颈癌术前,血清循环miR-375的表达水平在术后显著升高(P<0.05)。宫颈癌组患者血清循环miR-375表达水平与FIGO分期及局部淋巴结转移密切相关(P均<0.05),而与患者年龄、组织形态及细胞分化无关(P均>0.05)。 结论 血清循环miR-375表达水平检测有助于宫颈癌及癌前病变的早期发现及术后监测,并且可以作为宫颈癌病情进展以及淋巴结转移的辅助判断指标。

关键词: 宫颈肿瘤, 糖抗原125, 宫颈癌上皮内瘤变, miR-375

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the clinical significance of serum miR-375 in the diagnosis and postoperative monitoring of cervical cancer by analyzing its expression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia(CIN)and cervical cancer. Methods A total of 178 subjects, including 64 patients with cervical cancer, 64 patients with CIN and 50 healthy controls, were enrolled in the study. The expressions of serum miR-375 and CA125 were measured, and their diagnostic significance was evaluated. The relationship between miR-375 and clinical parameters of cervical cancer was analyzed. Results The expression of serum miR-375 in patients with cervical cancer was significantly lower than that in patients with CIN and healthy controls(both P<0.05). The level of serum miR-375 in CIN patients was significantly lower than that in healthy controls(P<0.05). Receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve analysis showed that the area under the ROC curve(AUC)for serum miR-375 was 0.782(95% CI: 0.714-0.840; sensitivity, 73.4%; specificity, 78.9%), which was significantly higher than that of CA125[0.677, 95%CI: 0.603-0.745], P<0.05. The expression of serum miR-375 was significantly up-regulated after surgery in the same subset of patients with cervical cancer(P<0.05). Moreover, serum miR-375 in patients with cervical cancer was significantly correlated with FIGO stages and lymphoid node metastasis(both P<0.05), while there was no significant association between serum miR-375 and 山 东 大 学 学 报 (医 学 版)54卷3期 -彭慧,等.血清循环miR-375检测对宫颈癌早期诊断及术后监测的意义 \=-age, histological type or cell differentiation(all P>0.05). Conclusion Serum miR-375 is conducive in the diagnosis of cervical cancer and CIN. It can serve as an index for the postoperative monitoring, progression and lymphoid node metastasis evaluation of cervical cancer.

Key words: Cervical cancer, CA125, Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, MiR-375

中图分类号: 

  • R737.3
[1] Parkin DM, Bray F, Feday J, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2002[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2005, 55(2): 74-108.
[2] 朱书力, 黄威, 易萍, 等. 950例宫颈癌临床特征研究[J]. 解放军医学杂志, 2015, 40(3): 217-220. ZHU Shuli, HUANG Wei, YI Ping, et al. Analysis of clinical characteristics of 950 cases of cervical cancer[J]. Medical Journal of Chinese Peoples Liberation Army, 2015, 40(3): 217-220.
[3] Negrini M, Nicoloso MS, Calin GA. MicroRNAs and cancer-new paradigms in molecular oncology[J]. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 2009, 21(3): 470-479.
[4] Wang F, Li Y, Zhou J, et al. miR-375 is down-regulated in squamous cervical cancer and inhibits cell migration and invasion via targeting transcription factor SP1[J]. Am J Pathol, 2011, 179(5): 2580-2588.
[5] Yang YK, Xi WY, Xi RX, et al. MicroRNA-494 promotes cervical cancer proliferation through the regulation of PTEN[J]. Oncol Rep, 2015, 33(5): 2393-2401.
[6] Zhou C, Shen L, Mao L, et al. miR-92a is upregulated in cervical cancer and promotes cell proliferation and invasion by targeting FBXW7[J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2015, 458(1): 63-69.
[7] Chen X, Ba Y, Ma L, et al. Characterization of microRNAs in serum: a novel class of biomarkers for diagnosis of cancer and other diseases[J]. Cell Res, 2008, 18(10): 997-1006.
[8] Wang WT, Zhao YN, Yan JX, et al. Differentially expressed microRNAs in the serum of cervical squamous cell carcinoma patients before and after surgery[J]. J Hematol Oncol, 2014, 7: 6. doi: 10.1186/1756-8722-7-6.
[9] Ma Q, Wan G, Wang S, et al. Serum microRNA-205 as a novel biomarker for cervical cancer patients[J]. Cancer Cell Int, 2014, 14: 81. doi: 10.1186/s12935-014-0081-0. eCollection 2014.
[10] Zhao S, Yao D, Chen J, et al. Circulating miRNA-20a and miRNA-203 for screening lymph node metastasis in early stage cervical cancer[J]. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers, 2013, 17(8): 631-636.
[11] 温丽君, 吴继华, 宋淑军, 等. 失重对大鼠肾上腺髓质激素分泌及miRNA-375表达的影响[J]. 解放军医学杂志, 2015, 40(4): 322-326. WEN Lijun, WU Jihua, SONG Shujun, et al. Effect of simulated null gravity on the secretion of adrenomedullary hormones and miRNA-375 expression in rats[J]. Medical Journal of Chinese Peoples Liberation Army, 2015, 40(4): 322-326.
[12] Wu C, Li M, Hu C, et al. Clinical significance of serum miR-223, miR-25 and miR-375 in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Mol Biol Rep, 2014, 41(3): 1257-1266.
[13] Kachakova D, Mitkova A, Popov E, et al. Combinations of serum prostate-specific antigen and plasma expression levels of let-7c, miR-30c, miR-141, and miR-375 as potential better diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer[J]. DNA Cell Biol, 2015, 34(3): 189-200.
[1] 王遥,崔国英,王飞,李长忠. 人类白细胞抗原-E在宫颈癌中的表达及意义[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(9): 59-63.
[2] 张湛,许相丰,刘海东,王玮. MRI在宫颈癌T分期中的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(5): 70-73.
[3] 田馨莉, 矫俊, 张腾, 马道新, 崔保霞. Th22细胞联合Th17细胞在宫颈癌外周血中的表达及意义[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(7): 43-47.
[4] 刘亚飞, 张奇舒, 袁首道, 陈健行. HPV永生化细胞系与SiHa细胞系蛋白质表达差异的质谱分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(3): 22-26.
[5] 李晨, 程玉峰, 李爱禄. 妇科门诊女性人乳头瘤病毒感染型别分布特征及临床分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(11): 73-76.
[6] 宗丽菊, 张友忠, 王颉, 吴淑霞, 刘洪丽, 张璐. 四甲基吡啶卟啉-光动力疗法对人宫颈永生化上皮H8细胞的作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(1): 21-26.
[7] 王颉, 张友忠, 冯进波, 刘洪丽, 宗丽菊. 慢病毒介导的hTERT-shRNA联合光动力治疗对宫颈癌细胞SiHa的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(1): 27-33.
[8] 张演亮1,庄子荣2,朱琳1,梁婷婷1. 宫颈癌患者腹腔镜术后生存质量调查[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(6): 62-66.
[9] 孙高英1,王小元2,张晓金1,郝秀玉1,郭元芳1,王晓1,毕文祥1. N-乙酰半胱氨酸对子宫颈癌细胞紫杉醇耐药性的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(3): 42-47.
[10] 刘洪丽,张友忠,吕昌帅,丁佰娟,王颉. 核仁素表达下调对宫颈癌细胞Hela生物学行为的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(11): 46-50.
[11] 梁婷婷,张萍,马德美,朱琳. 靶向HPV16-E5的siRNA对TRAIL诱导宫颈癌Caski细胞凋亡的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(10): 24-28.
[12] 刘建猛,崔保霞,尹婷,张爱荣. 色素上皮衍生因子在宫颈鳞癌中的表达及其意义[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(5): 103-106.
[13] 丁佰娟,张友忠,吕昌帅,姜侃,刘洪丽. TMPyP4-PDT对人宫颈癌细胞的杀伤效应[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(11): 53-57.
[14] 张兴亮1,许俐2,王志萍1. [J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(1): 155-160.
[15] 尹海琴1,魏玉平2,王小元3,彭楠1,毕文祥2,孔峰2,张培海1. 子宫颈鳞癌及腺癌细胞抗氧化能力的比较[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(3): 55-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!