您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (9): 59-63.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2016.357

• • 上一篇    下一篇

人类白细胞抗原-E在宫颈癌中的表达及意义

王遥,崔国英,王飞,李长忠   

  1. 山东大学附属省立医院妇科, 山东 济南 250021
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-31 出版日期:2016-09-10 发布日期:2016-09-10
  • 通讯作者: 王飞. E-mail: feiwangde@163.com李长忠. E-mail:15168888909@163.com E-mail:feiwangde@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(81200426);山东省科技发展计划(2014GSF118048)

Expression and significance of human leucocyte antigen-E in cervical cancer

WANG Yao, CUI Guoying, WANG Fei, LI Changzhong   

  1. Department of Gynecology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan 250021, Shandong, China
  • Received:2016-03-31 Online:2016-09-10 Published:2016-09-10

摘要: 目的 探讨人类白细胞抗原(HLA-E)蛋白在宫颈癌、宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)中的表达,及其与宫颈癌临床病理特点的关系。 方法 采用免疫组织化学染色检测HLA-E蛋白在18例HSIL病变宫颈组织、74例宫颈癌癌灶及其对应的20例癌旁正常宫颈组织中的表达,并评价其表达水平与宫颈癌的临床病理特点(临床分期、组织学类型、肿瘤分化程度、肿瘤直径大小、淋巴结转移、肌层浸润深度)的相关性。 结果 免疫组织化学染色结果显示,HLA-E蛋白在HSIL及宫颈癌患者病变组织中的表达水平明显高于癌旁正常宫颈组织(P=0.00),HLA-E蛋白在宫颈癌患者中的表达亦高于HSIL患者(P<0.01)。HLA-E蛋白的表达水平与宫颈癌的临床分期、肿瘤直径大小以及肌层浸润深度密切相关(P均<0.05),而与组织学类型、组织分化程度及淋巴结转移与否无关(P均>0.05)。 结论 高表达的HLA-E参与宫颈癌的免疫逃逸机制,通过改变患者的免疫状态可为宫颈癌的治疗提供新的方向和思路。

关键词: 免疫逃逸, 人类白细胞抗原-E, 宫颈肿瘤, 高级别鳞状上皮内病变

Abstract: Objective To explore the correlation between expression of human leucocyte antigen-E(HLA-E)in cervical cancer and the pathological features of cervical cancer and its possible role in the pathogenesis of cervical cancer. Methods The expression of HLA-E was assayed by immunohistochemical staining in 18 cases of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion(HSIL), 74 cases of cervical cancer and 20 cases of adjacent normal tissues. The correlation between HLA-E expression and clinical staging, histological type, tumor differentiation, tumor size, lymph node metastasis, and muscle invasion was analyzed. Results Immunohistochemical staining showed the expression of HLA-E in cervical cancer and HSIL tissues were significantly higher than that in the adjacent normal cervical tissues(P=0.01), and the expression of HLA-E in cervical cancer was higher than that in the HSIL tissues(P<0.01). The expression of HLA-E was significantly correlated to tumor size and depth of myometrial invasion(all P<0.05), but not correlated to histological type, tumor differentiation, and lymph node metastasis(all P>0.05). Conclusion HLA-E expression is involved in the immune escape mechanism of cervical cancer. It may provide new directions and ideas for the treatment of cervical cancer by altering the immune status of patients.

Key words: Human Leucocyte Antigen-E, Cervical cancer, Immune escape, High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion

中图分类号: 

  • R711.7
[1] 丰有吉, 沈铿, 马丁. 妇产科学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2015:296-301.
[2] Mehta AM, Jordanova ES, Kenter GG, et al. Association of antigen processing machinery and HLA class I defects with clinicopathological outcome in cervical carcinoma[J]. Cancer Immunol Immunother, 2008, 57(2):197-206.
[3] Pyo CW, Williams LM, Moore Y, et al. HLA-E, HLA-F, and HLA-G polymorphism: genornic sequence defines haplotype structure and variation spanning the nonclassical class I genes[J]. Immunogenetics, 2006, 58(4): 241-251.
[4] Kraemer T, Blasczyk R, Bade-Doeding C. HLA-E: a novel player for histocompatibility[J]. J Immunol Res, 2014, 2014: 352160.doi: 10.1155/2014/352160. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
[5] Leos Krena, Pavel Fabian, Ondrej Slaby. Multifunctional immune-modulatory protein HLA-E identified in classical Hodgkin lymphoma: possible implications[J]. Pathol Res Pract, 2012, 208(1):45-49.
[6] Tremante E, Ginebri A, Lo Monaco E, et al. A melanoma immune response signature including Human Leukocyte Antigen-E[J]. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res, 2014, 27(1):103-112.
[7] Andersson E, Poschke I, Villabona L, et al. Non-classical HLA-class I expression in serous ovarian carcinoma: Correlation with the HLA-genotype, tumor infiltrating immune cells and prognosis[J]. Oncoimmunology, 2015, 5(1): e1052213. doi:10.1080/2162402X.2015.1052213.
[8] Kochan G, Escors D, Breckpot K, et al. Role of non-classical MHC class I molecules in cancer immunosuppression[J]. Oncoimmunology, 2013, 2(11):e26491. doi:10.4161/onci.26491.
[9] Sheu BC, Chiou SH, Lin HH, et al. Up-regulation of inhibitory natural killer receptors CD94/NKG2A with suppressed intracellular perforin expression of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T lymphocytes in human cervical carcinoma[J]. Cancer Res, 2005, 65(7):2921-2929.
[10] Monnier-Benoit S, Mauny F, Riethmuller D, et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of CD4+ and CD8+ T- cell subsets in high risk human papillomavirus- associated pre- malignant and malignant lesions of the uterine cervix[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2006, 102(1):22-31.
[11] Iwaszko M, Bogunia-Kubik K. Clinical significance of the HLA-E and CD94/NKG2 interaction[J]. Arch Immunol Ther Exp, 2011, 59(5):353-367.
[12] Wada H, Matsumoto N, Maenaka K, et al. The inhibitory NK cell receptor CD94/NKG2A and the activating receptor CD94/NKG2C bind the top of HLA-E through mostly shared but partly distinct sets of HLA-E residues[J]. Eur J Immunol, 2004, 34(1):81-90.
[13] Pietra G, Romagnani C, Manzini C, et al. The emerging role of HLA-E-restricted CD8+T lymphocytes in the adaptive immune response to pathogens and tumors[J]. J Biomed Biotechnol, 2010, 2010: 907092. doi:10.1155/2010/907092.
[14] Gonçalves AS, Oliveira JP, Oliveira CF, et al. Relevance of HLA-G, HLA-E and IL-10 expression in lip carcinogenesis[J]. Hum Immunol, 2016, 77(9):785-790.
[15] Guo ZY, Lv YG, Wang L, et al. Predictive value of HLA-G and HLA-E in the prognosis of colorectal cancer patients[J]. Cell Immunol, 2015, 293(1):10-16.
[16] Ishigami S, Arigami T, Okumura H, et al. Human Leukocyte Antigen(HLA)-E and HLA-F Expression in Gastric Cancer[J]. Anticancer Res, 2015, 35(4):2279-2285.
[17] Garcia-Iglesias T, Del Toro-Arreola A, Albarran-Somoza B, et al. Low NKp30, NKp46 and NKG2D expression and reduced cytotoxic activity on NK cells in cervical cancer and precursor lesions[J]. BMC Cancer, 2009, 9:186. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-9-186.
[18] Chen Z, Ding J, Pang N, et al. The Th17/Treg balance and the expression of related cytokines in Uygur cervical cancer patients[J]. Diagn Pathol, 2013, 8:61. doi:10.1186/1746-1596-8-61.
[19] Peghini BC, Abdalla DR, Barcelos ACM, et al. Local cytokine profiles of patients with cervical intraepithelial and invasive neoplasia[J]. Hum Immunol, 2012, 73(9):920-926.
[1] 张湛,许相丰,刘海东,王玮. MRI在宫颈癌T分期中的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(5): 70-73.
[2] 彭慧,何君梅,苏雪莲. 血清循环miR-375检测对宫颈癌早期诊断及术后监测的意义[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(3): 68-71.
[3] 田馨莉, 矫俊, 张腾, 马道新, 崔保霞. Th22细胞联合Th17细胞在宫颈癌外周血中的表达及意义[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(7): 43-47.
[4] 刘亚飞, 张奇舒, 袁首道, 陈健行. HPV永生化细胞系与SiHa细胞系蛋白质表达差异的质谱分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(3): 22-26.
[5] 李晨, 程玉峰, 李爱禄. 妇科门诊女性人乳头瘤病毒感染型别分布特征及临床分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(11): 73-76.
[6] 宗丽菊, 张友忠, 王颉, 吴淑霞, 刘洪丽, 张璐. 四甲基吡啶卟啉-光动力疗法对人宫颈永生化上皮H8细胞的作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(1): 21-26.
[7] 王颉, 张友忠, 冯进波, 刘洪丽, 宗丽菊. 慢病毒介导的hTERT-shRNA联合光动力治疗对宫颈癌细胞SiHa的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(1): 27-33.
[8] 张演亮1,庄子荣2,朱琳1,梁婷婷1. 宫颈癌患者腹腔镜术后生存质量调查[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(6): 62-66.
[9] 孙高英1,王小元2,张晓金1,郝秀玉1,郭元芳1,王晓1,毕文祥1. N-乙酰半胱氨酸对子宫颈癌细胞紫杉醇耐药性的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(3): 42-47.
[10] 刘洪丽,张友忠,吕昌帅,丁佰娟,王颉. 核仁素表达下调对宫颈癌细胞Hela生物学行为的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(11): 46-50.
[11] 梁婷婷,张萍,马德美,朱琳. 靶向HPV16-E5的siRNA对TRAIL诱导宫颈癌Caski细胞凋亡的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(10): 24-28.
[12] 刘建猛,崔保霞,尹婷,张爱荣. 色素上皮衍生因子在宫颈鳞癌中的表达及其意义[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(5): 103-106.
[13] 丁佰娟,张友忠,吕昌帅,姜侃,刘洪丽. TMPyP4-PDT对人宫颈癌细胞的杀伤效应[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(11): 53-57.
[14] 张兴亮1,许俐2,王志萍1. [J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(1): 155-160.
[15] 尹海琴1,魏玉平2,王小元3,彭楠1,毕文祥2,孔峰2,张培海1. 子宫颈鳞癌及腺癌细胞抗氧化能力的比较[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(3): 55-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!