您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（医学版）》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (9): 33-37.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2018.756

• • 上一篇    下一篇

加速康复外科在直肠癌腹会阴联合切除术中的应用

王海锋,王刚,赵健,刘江,周嘉晖,江志伟   

  1. 南京大学医学院附属金陵医院普通外科研究所, 江苏 南京 210002
  • 发布日期:2022-09-27
  • 通讯作者: 江志伟. E-mail:surgery34@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81500417);江苏省社会发展项目(BE2015687)

Implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery in abdominoperineal resection of rectal cancer

WANG Haifeng, WANG Gang, ZHAO Jian, LIU Jiang, ZHOU Jiahui, JIANG Zhiwei   

  1. Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002, Jiangsu, China
  • Published:2022-09-27

PDF (PC)

85

摘要： 目的 探讨加速康复外科(ERAS)在直肠癌腹会阴联合切除术(APR)围手术期应用的安全性及有效性。 方法 回顾性分析2015年2月至2017年8月接受APR的80例直肠癌患者病历资料,其中40例患者实施ERAS围手术期处理措施(加速康复组),另40例实施传统围手术期处理措施(传统组)。观察比较两组术后视觉模拟评分法(VAS)疼痛评分、首次进食时间、肠功能恢复时间、首次下床活动时间、停止静脉输液时间、术后住院时间及术后并发症发生情况。 结果 加速康复组术后1~3 d VAS疼痛评分均低于传统组。加速康复组术后首次进食时间、肠功能恢复时间、首次下床活动时间、停止静脉输液时间及术后住院时间短于传统组,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。加速康复组术后会阴部切口并发症发生率为5%,低于传统组的15%(P=0.018)。 结论 ERAS在直肠癌腹会阴联合切除术围手术期的应用是安全有效的,可显著缩短患者术后住院时间,降低术后会阴部切口并发症发生率。

关键词: 加速康复外科, 直肠癌, 经腹会阴联合切除术

Abstract: Objective To explore the safety and efficacy of enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)for patients with rectal cancer treated with abdominoperineal resection(APR). Methods A retrospectivereview of 80 rectal cancer patients who underwent APR at Jinling Hospital during Feb. 2015 and Aug. 2017 was conducted. The patients were divided into ERAS group(n=40)and traditional group(n=40). The postoperative pain, eating time, intestinal function recovery time, ambulation time, stop intravenous infusion time, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative complication in the two groups were observed and compared. Results ERAS group had lower VAS pain score, earlier oral feeding and intestinal function recovery, shorter ambulation and intravenous infusion time, and shorter hospital stay than the traditional group. Postoperative perineal wound complication rate reached 15% in the traditional group, which was significantly higher than the 5% in the ERAS group(P=0.018). Conclusion ERAS is feasible and effective for rectal cancer patients undergoing APR, which can significantly shorten the postoperative hospital stay, and reduce the incidence of perineal wound complications.

Key words: Enhanced recovery after surgery, Rectal cancer, Abdominoperineal resection

中图分类号: 

  • R619
[1] Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation[J]. Br J Anaesth, 1997, 78(5): 606-617.
[2] 江志伟, 李宁, 黎介寿. 加速康复外科的概念及临床意义[J].中国实用外科杂志, 2007, 27(2): 131-133.
[3] Abdikarim I, Cao XY, Li SZ, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery with laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for stomach carcinomas[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2015, 21(47): 13339-13344.
[4] Bona S, Molteni M, Rosati R, et al. Introducing an enhanced recovery after surgery program in colorectal surgery: a single center experience[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2014, 20(46): 17578-17587.
[5] Keane C, Savage S, McFarlane K, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery versus conventional care in colonic and rectal surgery[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2012, 82(10): 697-703.
[6] 中国研究型医院学会机器人与腹腔镜外科专业委员会. 胃癌胃切除手术加速康复外科专家共识(2016版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2017, 16(1): 14-17. Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgery Committee of Chinese Research Hospital Association. Expert consensus on enhanced recovery after gastrectomy for gastric cancer(2016 edition)[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery, 2017, 16(1): 14-17.
[7] 中华医学会肠外肠内营养学分会加速康复外科协作组. 结直肠手术应用加速康复外科中国专家共识(2015)版[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2015, 18(8): 785-787. China Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Group of Chinese Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Chinese consensus of enhanced recovery after surgery for colorectal surgery(2015)[J]. Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2015, 18(8): 785-787.
[8] 荚卫东. 加速康复外科多学科团队建设[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2018, 56(1): 14-17. JIA Weidong. Multidisciplinary team building in enhanced recovery after surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Surgery, 2018, 56(1): 14-17.
[9] 中华医学会外科学分会,中华医学会麻醉学分会. 加速康复外科中国专家共识暨路径管理指南(2018)[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2018, 38(1): 8-13. Chinese Society of Surgery, Chinese Society of Anesthesiology. Consensus on ERAS and guidelines for pathway management in China(2018)[J]. Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology, 2018, 38(1): 8-13.
[10] Gritsenko K, Khelemsky Y, Kaye AD. Multimodal therapy in perioperative analgesia[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol, 2014, 28(1): 59-79.
[11] Rafiq S, Steinbrüchel DA, Wanscher MJ, et al. Multimodal analgesia versus traditional opiate based analgesia after cardiac surgery, a randomized controlled trail[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2014, 9: 52. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-9-52.
[12] 高建军, 孙纲, 李明, 等. 折刀位经腹会阴联合直肠癌根治术[J].临床军医杂志, 2012, 40(2): 451-453.
[13] Holm T, Ljung A, Hiiggmark T, et al. Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer[J]. Br J Surg, 2007, 94(2): 232-238.
[14] Dinaux AM, Amri R, Berger DL. Prone positioning reduces perineal infections when performing the miles procedure[J]. Am J Surg, 2017, 214(2): 217-221.
[15] Showalter SL, Kelz RR, Mahmoud NN. Effect of technique on postoperative perineal wound infections in abdominoperineal resection[J]. Am J Surg, 2013, 206(1): 80-85.
[16] 鲍扬, 江志伟, 王刚, 等. 腹腔镜联合折刀位直肠癌腹会阴根治术[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2011, 16(10): 752-754. BAO Yang, JIANG Zhiwei, WANG Gang, et al. Laparoscopic Miles operation with jackknife position for low rectal carcinoma[J]. Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, 2011, 16(10): 752-754.
[17] Liu P, Bao H, Zhang X,et al. Better operative outcomes achieved with the prone jackknife vs. lithotomy position during abdominoperineal resection in patients with low rectal cance[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2015, 13: 39. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0453-5.
[1] 李梓绮,魏闫若雪,刘晓晗,刘春铖,赵然,刘玉昆. 长链非编码RNA HEATR3反义RNA 1参与结直肠癌发生发展的功能及其临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(9): 108-115.
[2] 杜雪,李春霞,刘云霞,张涛. 基于MFPC-Cox的结直肠癌患者预后动态预测模型[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 101-110.
[3] 胡冰涛,张文灿,王崇怡,林翔宇,王凯斌,冯运泽,刘郴,徐万龙,李乐,司海朋. 基于加速康复外科理念的单孔分体内镜微创技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床效果分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(3): 1-7.
[4] 马志虎,于晓凤,孙玉亮,王刚,裴艳涛,陈斌,史安浩,乔丽,朱磊. 加速康复外科综合治疗在三角纤维软骨复合体损伤患者围术期中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(3): 28-35.
[5] 王刚,徐鹏演,赵旭安,王海锋,葛苗苗,潘华峰,江志伟. ω-3多不饱和脂肪酸对腹腔镜结直肠癌术后迷走神经和肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(2): 36-42.
[6] 崔倩倩,李金鹏,吴豫丹,侯志平,孙玮螺,崔盼盼,何培元. 粪便miRNA对结直肠进展期腺瘤无创筛查的临床价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(2): 43-50.
[7] 常宇,胡云峰,王会丰,郭静,张跳,郝雅琴,刘雨. 阑尾切除术与结直肠癌发病风险关联的孟德尔随机化研究[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(2): 77-83.
[8] 俞静,王刚,王烨,邵明月,潘华峰,葛苗苗,王海锋,江志伟. 基于I-FEED评分系统观察益气导滞方对结直肠癌术后胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(12): 35-43.
[9] 王潇,孔文茹,崔伟亮,王姝麒. 羊角棉总生物碱增强氟尿嘧啶对结直肠癌化疗敏感性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(6): 30-37.
[10] 魏闫若雪,李梓绮,刘春铖,刘晓晗,赵然,刘玉昆. 结直肠癌中SP1的瘤内异质性表达及其临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(5): 89-94.
[11] 刘春铖,刘晓晗,魏闫若雪,李梓绮,刘玉昆,赵然. 结直肠癌中含溴结构域蛋白9的亚细胞定位模式及其临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(4): 24-30.
[12] 司海朋,王崇怡,宫桂青,张文灿,郭英俊,王凯斌,冯运泽,徐万龙,李乐. 加速康复外科在脊柱外科中的应用进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(10): 8-17.
[13] 张杨,李晓旭. 加速康复外科理念在骨折治疗中的研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(10): 18-25.
[14] 冯昌,郭岩,赵杰,赵鑫. 加速康复外科理念下超声引导区域阻滞在骨科手术中的研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(10): 26-35.
[15] 姜任东,赵建莉,时超,贺业腾,袁振. 加速康复外科理念下全膝关节置换治疗类风湿关节炎与骨关节炎患者的临床疗效[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(10): 62-67.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(医学版)》编辑部　
地址:山东大学科技期刊社（济南市历城区山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B座721室） 电话: 0531-88366918 E-mail: xbyxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发