您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版)

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

乳腺MRI在预测导管内癌早期浸润中的价值

郝雯,赵斌,王翠艳,李慧华,邱秀玲   

  1. 山东省医学影像学研究所磁共振研究室,山东 济南 250021
  • 收稿日期:2013-11-06 出版日期:2014-04-10 发布日期:2014-04-10
  • 通讯作者: 王翠艳 E-mail:wcyzhang@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东省科技攻关项目(008GG30002041);国家自然科学基金(81371525)

Potential of breast MRI in predicting the presence of early invasion in ductal carcinoma in situ

HAO Wen, ZHAO Bin, WANG Cuiyan, LI Huihua, QIU Xiuling   

  1. Department of MR Imaging, Shandong Medical Imaging Research Institute, Jinan 250021, Shandong, China
  • Received:2013-11-06 Online:2014-04-10 Published:2014-04-10

摘要: 目的  比较单纯导管内癌(DCIS)和DCIS早期浸润的形态学及动态强化特点,探讨乳腺MRI在预测早期浸润中的价值。方法  对经手术病理证实、术前行乳腺MRI的82个单纯DCIS病灶(N1组)和51个DCIS早期浸润病灶(N2组),结合美国放射学会乳腺影像报告与数据系统(ACR BI-RADS),描述病变的形态学特征和时间信号强度曲线,采用单变量和多变量Logistic回归进行回顾性分析。结果  病灶大小和延迟期曲线具有预测早期浸润的潜力,≥1.9cm的病变出现早期浸润的可能性明显高于<1.9cm的病变(OR=2.285,95%CI:1.119~4.663);延迟期曲线呈平台型及流出型的病变出现早期浸润的可能性分别为流入型病变的2.657倍(95%CI:1.089~6.482)及4.773倍(95%CI:1.880~12.118)。非肿块样强化是DCIS及DCIS早期浸润最主要的强化方式。两组间各形态学特点的差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。结论  乳腺MRI所显示的病灶大小及延迟期曲线具有预测DCIS早期浸润的潜力。

关键词: 决策分析, 乳腺, 导管内癌, 磁共振成像

Abstract: Objective  To evaluate the potential of breast MRI in predicting the presence of invasion by comparing the morphologic and kinetic characteristics between pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and DCIS with early invasion. Methods  Preoperative breast MRI of 82 pure DCIS lesions(N1 group)and 51 DCIS lesions with early invasion (N2 group) were reviewed retrospectively. The morphologic characteristics and time-intensity curve (TIC) of all lesions were described in accordance with American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Repot and Data System (ACR BI-RADS). All cases were confirmed by surgery and pathology. Statistical analyses were performed through univariate and multivariate logistic regression approach. Results  Lesion size and delayed TIC were associated with the presence of early invasion. Compared with lesion size <1.9cm, the probability of invasion was higher for lesion size ≥1.9cm (OR=2.285, 95% CI:1.110-4.663). Compared with persistent TIC, the probability of invasion of washout TIC was 4.773 times (95%CI:1.880-12.118)and the probability of plateau TIC was 2.657 times (95%CI:1.089-6.482). The majority of both pure DCIS and DCIS with early invasion were depicted as non-mass-like enhancement, and there was no significant difference in morphology between two types of lesions(P>0.05). Conclusion  Lesion size and delayed TIC on breast MRI have the potential in predicting the presence of early invasion in DCIS.

Key words: Breast, Decision analysis, Ductal carcinoma in situ, MRI

中图分类号: 

  • R445.2
[1] 古春青,郭睿思,周勤勤,刘恒辉,巴婉玉,孙士玲,王冰,郑玉玲,吴宿慧. 基于网络药理学和动物实验探讨酸枣仁-远志药对治疗乳腺癌相关性失眠的作用机制[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(1): 99-108.
[2] 金晨曦,沈薇,李娜,孙建锋,杨驰,郭泾. ADDWoR关节镜下盘复位术盘-髁运动的定量分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(7): 54-61.
[3] 刘保国,宋翔,赵晓文,毛亚丽. 血清STAT5B、NKAIN1 mRNA检测在乳腺癌中的应用价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(7): 68-74.
[4] 王雪梅,杨豪,宋洋,程世超,张婷婷,王艳春. 抗糖尿病药物与女性恶性肿瘤的因果关联:一项两样本孟德尔随机化分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(6): 67-77.
[5] 余之刚,郑超. 乳腺癌多学科诊疗的现状、挑战与创新模式[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(1): 1-9.
[6] 山东省医学会乳腺疾病多学科联合委员会. 乳腺癌多学科协作诊疗山东共识(2024年版)[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(1): 10-16.
[7] 程跃启,王斐,于理想,郑超,余之刚. 曲妥珠单抗致HER2阳性乳腺癌患者心脏毒性的研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(1): 17-24.
[8] 王敏, 李习平, 檀军, 邱梅, 侯泽宇, 田莹, 罗鸿莹, 范超文, 齐玲, 俞琦, 谢薇. 慢病毒载体介导Gag-Caspase-8诱导三阴性乳腺癌原代细胞凋亡及S期阻滞[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(1): 25-34.
[9] 张洁,张芳芳,王靖楠,李泽宇,宋颖,李娜. circ_0000144在乳腺癌中的表达及其对乳腺癌细胞增殖、迁移和侵袭能力的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(1): 35-42.
[10] 宋雅雯,郭联涛,孔德光,孙圣荣. VTCN1导致HR+乳腺癌预后不良及内分泌治疗耐药[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(1): 43-59.
[11] 刘晶晶,庞婧,赵晓丹,林昕,付敏,陈静静. 基于乳腺X线摄影及DCE-MRI机器学习模型预测乳腺癌新辅助治疗后病理完全缓解:双中心研究[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(1): 60-72.
[12] 孙婧,杨瑞敏,王聪,张月,罗兵. 基于术前超声、炎症指标及超声影像组学联合模型预测乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(1): 73-80.
[13] 李永,崔书君,杨飞,张凡,殷晓霞. 基于增强MRI的亚区域影像组学模型可预测乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗后的病理完全反应[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(1): 81-89.
[14] 卢晓颂,杨瑞敏,王义成,周海丰,罗兵,李晓宇,李娜娜. 含瘤周组织的超声影像组学在鉴别乳腺结节良恶性中的价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(1): 90-98.
[15] 袁宗怀,潘广晔,迟曰梅,安传国,张永刚. 孟德尔随机化分析低级别浆液性卵巢癌与乳腺癌的因果关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(1): 99-107.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!