您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 64 ›› Issue (7): 69-80.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2025.1059

• 公共卫生与预防医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

降压药物和降脂药物与眼部疾病的因果关联:一项跨种族药物靶点孟德尔随机化分析

陈昌海,张秀美,袁中尚,王淑康   

  1. 1.山东大学齐鲁医学院公共卫生学院生物统计系, 山东 济南 250012;2.国家健康医疗大数据研究院, 山东 济南 250003
  • 出版日期:2026-07-10 发布日期:2026-07-21
  • 通讯作者: 王淑康. E-mail:wsk2001@sdu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(82373686);中央高校青年教师科研创新能力支持项目(SRICSPYF-ZY2025123);山东省自然科学基金(ZR2024JQ029);山东省泰山学者项目(tsqn202211025)

Causal associations of antihypertensive and lipid-lowering drugs with ocular diseases: a cross-ancestry drug target Mendelian randomization study

CHEN Changhai, ZHANG Xiumei, YUAN Zhongshang, WANG Shukang   

  1. 1. Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;
    2. National Institute of Health and Medical Big Data, Jinan 250003, Shandong, China
  • Online:2026-07-10 Published:2026-07-21

摘要: 目的 通过药物靶点孟德尔随机化(Mendelian randomization, MR)分析,探索东亚和欧洲人群中常用降压药及降脂药与常见眼部疾病的因果关联。 方法 利用GWAS Catalog公开发布的全基因组关联研究(genome-wide association studies, GWAS)汇总数据,开展跨种族药物靶点MR分析。将5类常用降压药物,包括血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, ACEIs)、血管紧张素Ⅱ受体拮抗剂(angiotensin II receptor blockers, ARBs)、β-受体阻滞剂(β-blockers, BBs)、钙通道阻滞剂(calcium channel blockers, CCBs)及噻嗪类利尿剂(thiazide diuretics, TDs)和3类常用降脂药物,包括3-羟基-3-甲基戊二酰辅酶A还原酶(3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase, HMGCR)抑制剂、前蛋白转化酶枯草溶菌素9(proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9, PCSK9)抑制剂、尼曼-匹克C1型类似蛋白1(Niemann-Pick C1-like 1, NPC1L1)抑制剂作为暴露因素,6种常见眼部疾病(老年白内障、青光眼、干眼症、视力障碍、老花眼、近视)作为结局变量。以逆方差加权法(inverse variance weighted, IVW)作为主要分析方法,对关联有统计学意义的结果辅以7种MR方法进行验证。采用Cochrans Q检验、MR-Egger截距分析和留一法进行敏感性分析。 结果 在东亚人群中,ACEIs与近视(OR=1.024, 95%CI:1.01~1.038, PFDR=0.002)、老年白内障(OR=1.022, 95%CI:1.019~1.024;PFDR<0.001)及青光眼(OR=1.017, 95%CI:1.011~1.023, PFDR<0.001)风险增加存在因果关联,BBs与老年白内障风险降低存在因果关联(OR=0.994, 95%CI:0.989~0.999, PFDR=0.034);PCSK9抑制剂与老花眼(OR=0.992, 95%CI:0.986~0.997, PFDR=0.003)和视力障碍(OR=0.996, 95%CI:0.993~0.999, PFDR=0.048)风险降低存在因果关联。在欧洲人群中,ACEIs与青光眼风险增加存在因果关联(OR=1.088, 95%CI:1.029~1.152, PFDR=0.016);HMGCR抑制剂与老年白内障风险增加存在因果关联(OR=1.194, 95%CI:1.049~1.359, PFDR=0.022);PCSK9抑制剂与干眼症(OR=1.106,95%CI:1.039~1.176, PFDR=0.004)和老花眼(OR=1.082, 95%CI:1.024~1.145, PFDR=0.017)风险增加存在因果关联,与青光眼风险降低存在因果关联(OR=0.892,95%CI:0.822~0.968, PFDR=0.018);NPC1L1抑制剂与青光眼风险降低存在因果关联(OR=0.706,95%CI:0.579~0.861,PFDR=0.002)。 结论 ACEIs在东亚与欧洲人群中均可能增加部分眼部疾病风险;BBs在东亚人群中可能降低老年白内障风险;HMGCR抑制剂在欧洲人群中可能增加白内障风险;NPC1L1抑制剂在欧洲人群中可能降低青光眼风险;PCSK9抑制剂对眼部疾病的效应呈现种族差异。

关键词: 药物靶点孟德尔随机化, 降压药, 降脂药, 眼部疾病

Abstract: Objective To investigate the causal associations between commonly used antihypertensive and lipid-lowering drugs and prevalent ocular diseases in East Asian and European populations using drug-target Mendelian randomization(MR). Methods This cross-ancestry drug-target MR study utilized publicly available genome-wide association study(GWAS)summary data from the GWAS Catalog. Five classes of antihypertensive drugs, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors(ACEIs), angiotensin II receptor blockers(ARBs), β-blockers(BBs), calcium channel blockers(CCBs), and thiazide diuretics(TDs), and three classes of lipid-lowering drugs, including 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase(HMGCR)inhibitors, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9(PCSK9)inhibitors, and Niemann–Pick C1-like 1(NPC1L1)inhibitors were selected as exposures. Six common ocular diseases(senile cataract, glaucoma, dry eye syndrome, visual impairment, presbyopia, and myopia)were defined as outcomes. Inverse variance weighted(IVW)was employed as the primary analytical method, supplemented by seven additional MR methods for findings with statiscauy significant correlation. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using Cochrans Q test, MR-Egger intercept test, and leave-one-out analysis. Results In East Asian populations, ACEIs were causally associated with increased risks of myopia(OR=1.024, 95%CI: 1.010-1.038, PFDR=0.002), senile cataract(OR=1.022, 95%CI: 1.019-1.024, PFDR<0.001), and glaucoma(OR=1.017, 95%CI: 1.011-1.023, PFDR<0.001); BBs were associated with reduced risk of senile cataract(OR=0.994, 95%CI: 0.989-0.999, PFDR=0.034); PCSK9 inhibitors were associated with reduced risks of presbyopia(OR=0.993, 95%CI: 0.986-0.997, PFDR=0.003)and visual impairment(OR=0.996, 95%CI: 0.992-0.999, PFDR=0.048). In European populations, ACEIs were associated with increased glaucoma risk(OR=1.088, 95%CI: 1.029-1.152, PFDR=0.016); HMGCR inhibitors were associated with increased senile cataract risk(OR=1.194, 95%CI: 1.049-1.359, PFDR=0.022); PCSK9 inhibitors were associated with increased risks of dry eye syndrome(OR=1.106, 95%CI: 1.039-1.176, PFDR=0.004)and presbyopia(OR=1.082, 95%CI: 1.024-1.145, PFDR=0.017), but with reduced glaucoma risk(OR=0.892, 95%CI: 0.822-0.968, PFDR=0.018); NPC1L1 inhibitors were associated with reduced glaucoma risk(OR=0.706, 95%CI: 0.579-0.861, PFDR=0.002). Conclusion ACEIs may increase risks of certain ocular diseases in both East Asian and European populations. BBs may reduce senile cataract risk in East Asians. HMGCR inhibitors may increase cataract risk in Europeans, while NPC1L1 inhibitors may reduce glaucoma risk in Europeans. The effects of PCSK9 inhibitors on ocular diseases exhibit ethnic differences.

Key words: Drug target Mendelian randomization, Antihypertensive drugs, Lipid-lowering drugs, Ocular diseases

中图分类号: 

  • R77
[1] World Health Organization. World report on vision[R]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2019:26.
[2] Klein R, Klein B E K. The prevalence of age-related eye diseases and visual impairment in aging: current estimates[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2013, 54(14): ORSF5-ORSF13.
[3] Gudayneh Y A, Shumye A F, Gelaye A T, et al. Prevalence of hypertensive retinopathy and its associated factors among adult hypertensive patients attending at Comprehensive Specialized Hospitals in northwest Ethiopia, 2024, a multicenter cross-sectional study[J]. Int J Retina Vitreous, 2025, 11(1): 17. DOI:10.1186/s40942-025-00631-2
[4] Li Y S, Xie L Y, Song W J, et al. Association between dyslipidaemia and dry eye disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMJ Open, 2023, 13(11): e069283. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069283
[5] Lee J S, Cha H R, Bae H W, et al. Effect of antihyperten-sive medications on the risk of open-angle glaucoma[J]. Sci Rep, 2023, 13(1): 16224. DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-43420-3
[6] Wang Y W, Liu S D, Lin G L, et al. Association between statin use and dry eye disease in patients with hyperlipidemia: a population-based retrospective cohort study[J]. Clin Transl Sci, 2024, 17(10): e70039. DOI:10.1111/cts.70039
[7] Leuschen J, Mortensen E M, Frei C R, et al. Association of statin use with cataracts: a propensity score-matched analysis[J]. JAMA Ophthalmol, 2013, 131(11): 1427-1434.
[8] Chodick G, Heymann A D, Flash S, et al. Persistence with statins and incident cataract: a population-based historical cohort study[J]. Ann Epidemiol, 2010, 20(2): 136-142.
[9] Cheng C Y, Schache M, Ikram M K, et al. Nine loci for ocular axial length identified through genome-wide association studies, including shared loci with refractive error[J]. Am J Hum Genet, 2013, 93(2): 264-277.
[10] Bailey J N C, Loomis S J, Kang J H, et al. Genome-wide association analysis identifies TXNRD2, ATXN2 and FOXC1 as susceptibility loci for primary open-angle glaucoma[J]. Nat Genet, 2016, 48(2): 189-194.
[11] Fan B H, Zhang J M, Zhao J V. Systematic review of Mendelian randomization studies on antihypertensive drugs[J]. BMC Med, 2024, 22(1): 547. DOI:10.1186/s12916-024-03760-x
[12] Gill D, Dib M J, Cronjé H T, et al. Common pitfalls in drug target Mendelian randomization and how to avoid them[J]. BMC Med, 2024, 22(1): 473. DOI:10.1186/s12916-024-03700-9
[13] Zhong A, Zhang L Y, Ma X, et al. Sex differences in albuminuria risk with metformin use: insights from a cross-sectional study and drug-target Mendelian randomization analysis[J]. Diabetes Metab J, 2025, 49(6): 1346-1348.
[14] Jee Y, Shin J W, Ryu M, et al. Causal relationship between drug target genes of LDL-cholesterol and coronary artery disease: drug target Mendelian randomization study[J]. Lipids Health Dis, 2025, 24(1): 92. DOI:10.1186/s12944-025-02502-z
[15] Buniello A, MacArthur J A L, Cerezo M, et al. The NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog of published genome-wide association studies, targeted arrays and summary statistics 2019[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2019, 47(D1): D1005-D1012.
[16] Keaton J M, Kamali Z, Xie T, et al. Genome-wide analysis in over 1 million individuals of European ancestry yields improved polygenic risk scores for blood pressure traits[J]. Nat Genet, 2024, 56(5): 778-791.
[17] Graham S E, Clarke S L, Wu K H, et al. The power of genetic diversity in genome-wide association studies of lipids[J]. Nature, 2021, 600(7890): 675-679.
[18] Verma A, Huffman J E, Rodriguez A, et al. Diversity and scale: genetic architecture of 2068 traits in the VA Million Veteran Program[J]. Science, 2024, 385(6706): eadj1182. DOI:10.1126/science.adj1182
[19] Aragam K G, Jiang T, Goel A, et al. Discovery and systematic characterization of risk variants and genes for coronary artery disease in over a million participants[J]. Nat Genet, 2022, 54(12): 1803-1815.
[20] Matsunaga H, Ito K, Akiyama M, et al. Transethnic meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies three new loci and characterizes population-specific differences for coronary artery disease[J]. Circ Genom Precis Med, 2020, 13(3): e002670. DOI:10.1161/CIRCGEN.119.002670
[21] Kreutz R, Brunström M, Burnier M, et al. 2024 Euro-pean Society of Hypertension clinical practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension[J]. Eur J Intern Med, 2024, 126: 1-15. DOI:10.1016/j.ejim.2024.05.033
[22] 中国血脂管理指南修订联合专家委员会, 王增武, 李建军, 等. 中国血脂管理指南(基层版2024年)[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2024, 52(4): 330-337. Joint Committee on the Chinese Guidelines for Lipid Management, Wang Zengwu, Li Jianjun, et al. Chinese guideline for lipid management(primary care version 2024)[J]. Chinese Journal of Cardiology, 2024, 52(4): 330-337.
[23] Davies N M, Holmes M V, Davey Smith G. Reading Mendelian randomisation studies: a guide, glossary, and checklist for clinicians[J]. BMJ, 2018, 362: k601. DOI:10.1136/bmj.k601
[24] Skrivankova V W, Richmond R C, Woolf B A R, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using Mendelian randomization: the STROBE-MR statement[J]. JAMA, 2021, 326(16): 1614-1621.
[25] Lymperopoulou C, Kandarakis S A, Tzanaki I, et al. The effect of statins on ocular disorders: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials[J]. Pharmaceuticals, 2023, 16(5): 711. DOI:10.3390/ph16050711
[26] Vergroesen J E, Schuster A K, Stuart K V, et al. Association of systemic medication use with glaucoma and intraocular pressure: the European eye epidemiology consortium[J]. Ophthalmology, 2023, 130(9): 893-906.
[27] Leung G, Grant A, Garas A N, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of systemic antihypertensive medications with intraocular pressure and glaucoma[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2023, 255: 7-17. DOI:10.1016/j.ajo.2023.03.014
[28] Dai W, Tham Y C, Chee M L, et al. Systemic medications and cortical cataract: the Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Diseases Study[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2020, 104(3): 330-335.
[29] Lee E B, Hu W D, Singh K, et al. The association among blood pressure, blood pressure medications, and glaucoma in a nationwide electronic health records database[J]. Ophthalmology, 2022, 129(3): 276-284.
[30] Taddei S, Bortolotto L. Unraveling the pivotal role of bradykinin in ACE inhibitor activity[J]. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs, 2016, 16(5): 309-321.
[31] Bin Lim H, Lee M W, Park J H, et al. Changes in gang-lion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness and retinal microvasculature in hypertension: an optical coherence tomography angiography study[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2019, 199: 167-176. DOI:10.1016/j.ajo.2018.11.016
[32] Shen W, Jiang X X, Li Y W, et al. I/D polymorphism of ACE and risk of diabetes-related end-stage renal di-sease: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2019, 23(4): 1652-1660.
[33] Alves C, Mendes D, Batel Marques F. Statins and risk of cataracts: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies[J]. Cardiovasc Ther, 2018, 36(6): e12480. DOI:10.1111/1755-5922.12480
[34] Casula M, Soranna D, Corrao G, et al. Statin use and risk of cataract: a nested case-control study within a healthcare database[J]. Atherosclerosis, 2016, 251: 153-158. DOI:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.06.020
[35] Ghouse J, Ahlberg G, Skov A G, et al. Association of common and rare genetic variation in the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme a reductase gene and cataract risk[J]. J Am Heart Assoc, 2022, 11(12): e025361. DOI:10.1161/JAHA.122.025361
[36] Widomska J, Subczynski W K. Why is very high cholesterol content beneficial for the eye lens but negative for other organs [J]. Nutrients, 2019, 11(5): 1083. DOI:10.3390/nu11051083
[37] Qu H, Meng Y Y, Chai H, et al. The effect of statin treatment on circulating coenzyme Q10 concentrations: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Eur J Med Res, 2018, 23(1): 57. DOI:10.1186/s40001-018-0353-6
[38] Cheng Q F, Gerald Robison W, Samuel Zigler J. Geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate counteracts the cataractogenic effect of lovastatin on cultured rat lenses[J]. Exp Eye Res, 2002, 75(5): 603-609.
[39] Aikawa T. Geographic and ethnic variations in response to lipid-lowering therapies: why do they matter [J]. Eur J Prev Cardiol, 2023, 30(11): 1118-1119.
[40] Doi T, Langsted A, Nordestgaard B G. Lipoproteins, cholesterol, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in east asians and Europeans[J]. J Atheroscler Thromb, 2023, 30(11): 1525-1546.
[41] Lu X F, Li J, Li H X, et al. Coding-sequence variants are associated with blood lipid levels in 14, 473 Chinese[J]. Hum Mol Genet, 2016, 25(18): 4107-4116.
[42] Liu Y Q, Li T. Causal association between lipid-lowering drugs and glaucoma: a drug-targeted Mendelian randomization study[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2024, 65(10): 23. DOI:10.1167/iovs.65.10.23
[1] 陈雨梦,张越,张武林,杨国兴,许衍辉,韩爱军,刘彩娟,郭雨语,陈志敏. 应用大语言模型回答先天性晶状体脱位患儿家长提问的效果[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(5): 88-95.
[2] 况利,徐小明,曾琪. 机器学习用于自杀研究的综述[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 10-16.
[3] 戈宗元,贺婉佶,琚烈,姚轩,王璘,黄烨霖,杨志文,熊健皓,包怡宁,李明,张兵,赵昕. 眼科人工智能的算法新进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(11): 17-23.
[4] 林浩添,李龙辉,陈睛晶. 儿童眼病的人工智能研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(11): 11-16.
[5] 何明光,刘驰,李治玺. 人工智能在眼科真实临床场景的应用:机遇和挑战[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(11): 1-10.
[6] 于媛媛,王春霞,苏萍,孙苑潆,薛付忠,刘言训. 健康管理队列白内障发病风险预测模型[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(6): 104-107.
[7] 庄根苗,唐玲,臧丽娇,安丽. 新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病中血清前白蛋白水平与新生儿行为神经测定的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(12): 37-40.
[8] 郝风芹,李娜. 洋葱总黄酮对大鼠糖尿病视网膜神经节细胞的神经保护作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(1): 7-10.
[9] 刘雪莲, 白宁艳, 牟洁, 李治清, 吕鹏, 杨豪, 韦松, 颜学梅. 最小手术量治疗孔源性视网膜脱离的临床体会[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(S2): 34-35.
[10] 王国强, 赵燕, 杨赪文, 赵延涛, 丁颖. 超声乳化手术联合房角分离手术治疗 晶状体源性青光眼的疗效和安全性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(S2): 71-72.
[11] 郑琦, 向金明, 温静君, 董自平. 普拉洛芬联合玻璃酸钠治疗干眼症临床观察[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(S2): 117-118.
[12] 毕欢丽, 李艳, 张杰, 李梦云. 色素上皮衍生因子对高糖状态大鼠视网膜Müller细胞NF-κB表达的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(10): 40-44.
[13] 陈国玲, 任然, 张英辉, 宋玮, 考欣, 张晗. 大黄素对角膜炎大鼠角膜组织NF-κB活化表达的影响及意义[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(9): 44-47.
[14] 张颖,陈红梅,吴欣怡. 山东省寿光市高中生干眼患病率及影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(3): 82-85.
[15] 聂巧莉,王建荣,陈璇,王玉. 青光眼滤过术后迟发性滤过泡相关性眼内炎1例[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(12): 111-112.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!