您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (4): 18-25.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2022.1418

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

cg20657709位点甲基化对肺腺癌早期诊断的初步探讨

刘士标1,2,张淑君1,2,李培龙1,2,杜鲁涛1,2,王传新1,2   

  1. 1.山东大学第二医院检验医学中心, 山东 济南 250033; 2.山东省肿瘤大数据与精准医疗技术创新中心, 山东 济南 250033
  • 发布日期:2023-04-11
  • 通讯作者: 王传新. E-mail:cxwang@sdu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(82172355);济南市创新团队研究计划(2019GXRC004,2021GXRC020)

The cg20657709 site methylation in the early detection of lung adenocarcinoma

LIU Shibiao1,2, ZHANG Shujun1,2, LI Peilong1,2, DU Lutao1,2, WANG Chuanxin1,2   

  1. 1. Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250033, Shandong, China;
    2. Tumor Big Data and Precision Medicine Technology Innovation Center of Shandong Province, Jinan 250033, Shandong, China
  • Published:2023-04-11

摘要: 目的 探讨cg20657709位点甲基化在肺腺癌早期诊断中的临床价值。 方法 通过对30例肺腺癌患者(肺腺癌组)和45例健康对照者(健康对照组)进行Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip检测,获得基于外周血单个核细胞(PBMCs)的肺腺癌全基因组甲基化图谱以及候选差异甲基化位点(DMP)。进一步采用焦磷酸测序,在35例肺腺癌患者和30例健康对照者中,对该DMP对肺腺癌的诊断价值进行验证。最后,基于多重目的区域甲基化富集测序,在50例肺原位腺癌和50例健康对照者中,评估该DMP对肺原位腺癌的诊断价值。 结果 Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip检测结果显示,肺腺癌组具有基于PBMCs的特异性甲基化图谱,肺腺癌组和健康对照组甲基化水平差异显著。以∣Δβ∣≥0.06且 校正P<0.05为标准,初步筛选出1 345个DMPs。经过多步骤筛选,确定cg20657709为候选位点。cg20657709位点甲基化水平在肺腺癌患者中高表达(Δβ=0.097,校正P=0.004)。焦磷酸测序显示,cg20657709位点能够明显区分肺腺癌患者与健康对照者(AUC=0.946,敏感性为91.4%,特异性为90.0%,截断值为66.91)。多重目的区域甲基化富集测序显示,cg20657709位点对肺原位腺癌具有较好的诊断价值(AUC=0.787,敏感性为86.0%,特异性为64.0%,截断值为0.746 5)。 结论 与健康对照者相比,cg20657709位点甲基化水平在肺腺癌患者中显著升高,对肺腺癌的早期诊断具有重要的临床价值。

关键词: 肺腺癌, 外周血单个核细胞, 甲基化, 早期诊断, 临床价值

Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical value of cg20657709 site methylation in the early detection of lung adenocarcinoma(LUAD). Methods The genome-wide DNA methylation profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells(PBMCs)and candidate differentially methylated position(DMP)were obtained from 30 LUAD patients and 45 healthy controls using Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip detection. Furthermore, the candidate DMP was validated in 35 LUAD patients and 30 healthy controls by pyrosequencing. Finally, multiple target region methylation enrichment sequencing was performed to evaluate the diagnostic value of DMP in the detection of lung adenocarcinoma in situ(AIS)in a cohort of 50 lung AIS patients and 50 healthy controls. Results Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip detection results showed that LUAD patients had specific genome-wide DNA methylation profiling based on PBMCs. The methylation levels of LUAD patients and healthy controls were significantly different. Initially, 1,345 DMPs were screened with the standard of∣Δβ∣≥0.06 and adjusted P<0.05. After multi-step screening, cg20657709 was determined as the candidate site. The cg20657709 site methylation was significantly higher in LUAD patients than in healthy controls (Δβ=0.097, adjusted P=0.004). Pyrosequencing results showed that cg20657709 site could clearly discriminate LUAD patients from healthy controls(AUC=0.946, sensitivity=91.4%, specificity=90.0%, cut-off value=66.91). Multiple target region methylation enrichment sequencing results showed cg20657709 site had good value in the detection of lung AIS(AUC=0.787, sensitivity=86.0%, specificity=64.0%, cut-off value=0.746 5). Conclusion Compared with healthy controls, LUAD patients have significantly higher cg20657709 site methylation, which is an important marker in the early detection of LUAD.

Key words: Lung adenocarcinoma, Peripheral blood mononuclear cell, Methylation, Early diagnosis, Clinical value

中图分类号: 

  • R734.2
[1] Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249.
[2] Hong Y, Kim WJ. DNA methylation markers in lung cancer[J]. Curr Genomics, 2021, 22(2): 79-87.
[3] Liang W, Zhao Y, Huang W, et al. Non-invasive diagnosis of early-stage lung cancer using high-throughput targeted DNA methylation sequencing of circulating tumor DNA(ctDNA)[J]. Theranostics, 2019, 9(7): 2056-2070.
[4] 孟瑞瑞,刘圆圆,官新立,等. 低剂量螺旋CT肺癌筛查的研究现状与进展[J]. 实用肿瘤学杂志, 2020, 34(4): 372-376. MENG Ruirui, LIU Yuanyuan, GUAN Xinli, et al. Status and progress of low-dose spiral CT in lung cancer screening[J]. Practical Oncology Journal, 2020, 34(4): 372-376.
[5] Zappa C, Mousa SA. Non-small cell lung cancer: current treatment and future advances[J]. Transl Lung Cancer Res, 2016, 5(3): 288-300.
[6] Yang R, Stöcker S, Schott S, et al. The association between breast cancer and S100P methylation in peripheral blood by multicenter case-control studies[J]. Carcinogenesis, 2017, 38(3): 312-320.
[7] 马晓阳,姜泽友. DNA甲基化及其在结直肠癌中的研究进展[J]. 山东医药, 2022, 62(22): 81-85.
[8] Angeloni A, Bogdanovic O. Enhancer DNA methylation: implications for gene regulation[J]. Essays Biochem, 2019, 63(6): 707-715.
[9] Martisova A, Holcakova J, Izadi N, et al. DNA methylation in solid tumors: functions and methods of detection[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22(8): 4247. doi:10.3390/ijms22084247.
[10] Zafon C, Gil J, Pérez-González B, et al. DNA methylation in thyroid cancer[J]. Endocr Relat Cancer, 2019, 26(7): R415-R439.
[11] Mahmoud AM, Ali MM. Methyl donor micronutrients that modify DNA methylation and cancer outcome[J]. Nutrients, 2019, 11(3): 608. doi:10.3390/nu11030608.
[12] Kulis M, Esteller M. DNA methylation and cancer[J]. Adv Genet, 2010, 70: 27-56. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-380866-0.60002-2.
[13] Koch A, Joosten SC, Feng Z, et al. Analysis of DNA methylation in cancer: location revisited[J]. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2018, 15(7): 459-466.
[14] Pan Y, Liu G, Zhou F, et al. DNA methylation profiles in cancer diagnosis and therapeutics[J]. Clin Exp Med, 2018, 18(1): 1-14.
[15] Constâncio V, Nunes SP, Henrique R, et al. DNA methylation-based testing in liquid biopsies as detection and prognostic biomarkers for the four major cancer types[J]. Cells, 2020, 9(3): 624. doi:10.3390/cells9030624.
[16] Fidan I, Yesilyurt E, Kalkanci A, et al. Immunomodulatory effects of voriconazole and caspofungin on human peripheral blood mononuclear cells stimulated by candida albicans and candida krusei[J]. Am J Med Sci, 2014, 348(3): 219-223.
[17] Zhang Y, Petropoulos S, Liu J, et al. The signature of liver cancer in immune cells DNA methylation[J]. Clin Epigenetics, 2018, 10: 8. doi: 10.1186/s13148-017-0436-1.
[18] Saghafinia S, Mina M, Riggi N, et al. Pan-cancer landscape of aberrant DNA methylation across human tumors[J]. Cell Rep, 2018, 25(4): 1066-1080.
[19] Wu A, Cremaschi P, Wetterskog D, et al. Genome-wide plasma DNA methylation features of metastatic prostate cancer[J]. J Clin Invest, 2020, 130(4): 1991-2000.
[20] Papanicolau-Sengos A, Aldape K. DNA methylation profiling: an emerging paradigm for cancer diagnosis[J]. Annu Rev Pathol, 2022, 17: 295-321. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-042220-022304.
[21] Luo H, Wei W, Ye Z, et al. Liquid biopsy of methylation biomarkers in cell-free DNA[J]. Trends Mol Med, 2021, 27(5): 482-500.
[22] Dumitrescu RG. Early epigenetic markers for precision medicine[J]. Methods Mol Biol, 2018, 1856: 3-17. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8751-1_1.
[23] Wu X, Zhang Y, Hu T, et al. A novel cell-free DNA methylation-based model improves the early detection of colorectal cancer[J]. Mol Oncol, 2021, 15(10): 2702-2714.
[24] Liu L, Toung JM, Jassowicz AF, et al. Targeted methylation sequencing of plasma cell-free DNA for cancer detection and classification[J]. Ann Oncol, 2018, 29(6): 1445-1453.
[25] Moss J, Zick A, Grinshpun A, et al. Circulating breast-derived DNA allows universal detection and monitoring of localized breast cancer[J]. Ann Oncol, 2020, 31(3): 395-403.
[26] 杨大伟,刘晓飞,钱娟娟.TIPE2、IP-10、miR-570在肝癌患者外周血单个核细胞中的表达及意义[J].国际检验医学杂志, 2022, 43(18): 2196-2200. YANG Dawei, LIU Xiaofei, QIAN Juanjuan. Expression and significance of TIPE2, IP-10 and miR-570 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with liver cancer[J]. International Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 2022, 43(18): 2196-2200.
[27] Arayataweegool A, Srisuttee R, Mahattanasakul P, et al. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma drives long interspersed element-1 hypomethylation in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells[J]. Oral Dis, 2019, 25(1): 64-72.
[28] Kraus B, Cain H. Is there a carcinoma in situ of gastric mucosa? [J]. Pathol Res Pract, 1979, 164(3): 342-355.
[1] 殷悦,莫振飞,吴培昕,刘金霞,魏元辉,任佳博,李春笋. GPX1基因在肺癌中的表达特征及其对肺腺癌细胞增殖、迁移、侵袭、凋亡的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(1): 65-73.
[2] 韩觉明,王晖,吴倩,郑慧玲,朱琳. B4GALNT4促进肺腺癌细胞增殖、迁移和侵袭能力[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(7): 23-31.
[3] 祝永才,谢艳,齐秋晨,李培龙,王传新,杜鲁涛. 基于外周血单个核细胞ATM基因甲基化的联合模型在胰腺癌早期诊断中的价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(6): 78-88.
[4] 赵汉卿,周新睿,李子建,唐兴. 循环肿瘤细胞联合血清学检测在非小细胞肺癌中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 79-85.
[5] 蔡佳莹,王靖婷,王增萍,王璟,郏雁飞,马晓丽. α5-nAChR对慢性应激肺腺癌荷瘤小鼠疑核c-Fos表达的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(4): 69-74.
[6] 张洁,赵颖慧,董雅琪,李娟,李培龙,杜鲁涛. GPR133基因甲基化在早期胃癌淋巴结转移预测中的作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(3): 76-84.
[7] 王靖婷,王璟,鲁艺,李静坦,李强,郏雁飞,马晓丽. α5-nAChR与MHC-I在肺腺癌中的表达及相关性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(5): 72-78.
[8] 杨闯,张荣雨,宋彬,王程君,赵文,玄甜甜,李际盛. 阿美替尼一线治疗EGFR突变肺腺癌伴大疱性类天疱疮1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(12): 32-37.
[9] 陈映均,刘同刚. 综合生物信息学分析鉴定乙型肝炎病毒相关肝细胞癌中异常甲基化修饰的差异表达基因[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(9): 101-117.
[10] 孟健丽,王庆港. 生物信息学方法探讨VPS72在肺腺/鳞癌中的表达及潜在作用机制[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(8): 40-49.
[11] 杜圣红,李晓梅,陈晨,王玲. 鼻型弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤合并肺腺癌1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(8): 111-115.
[12] 赵启迪,王凯,赵小刚,闫涛,王亚东,杜贾军. 基于SEER数据库构建并验证IIIB期非小细胞肺癌患者预后模型[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(10): 23-37.
[13] 吴文静,孙媛,王光裕,吕晓晴,焉传祝,林鹏飞. 1例女性杜氏肌营养不良的分子遗传学机制[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(10): 95-100.
[14] 洪慧,张卫海,李惠娴,李伟伟,张金岭. 异时性阑尾印戒细胞癌合并肺腺癌双原发癌1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(8): 130-132.
[15] 刘岩,张曼,姜朝阳,卞姝,杜艾家,陈鹤. LncRNA-HOTAIR调控H3K27me3影响巨噬细胞迁移的机制[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(6): 1-9.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!