您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (7): 1-5.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2016.1301

• 基础医学 •    下一篇

巴马小型猪冠状动脉粥样硬化模型的评价方法

尹妮1,杨关林1,姜钧文2,王春田3,王凤耀4,贾连群5,高晓宇1,潘嘉祥1,李芹1,李佳1,冯元洁1,高玉竹1,周鹤1,张哲1   

  1. 1.辽宁中医药大学附属医院血脉病研究室, 辽宁 沈阳 110032;2.辽宁中医药大学附属医院心内科, 辽宁 沈阳 110032;3.辽宁中医药大学实验动物中心, 辽宁 沈阳 110847;4.辽宁中医药大学附属医院麻醉科, 辽宁 沈阳 110032;5.辽宁中医药大学重大科研平台, 辽宁 沈阳 110847
  • 收稿日期:2016-10-13 出版日期:2017-07-10 发布日期:2017-07-10
  • 通讯作者: 张哲. E-mail:pedtrainzhzh7676@163.com E-mail:pedtrainzhzh7676@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点基础研究发展计划(2013CB531704)

A reliable system to assess atherosclerosis model of Bama minipigs

YIN Ni1, YANG Guanlin1, JIANG Junwen2, WANG Chuntian3, WANG Fengyao4, JIA Lianqun5, GAO Xiaoyu1, PAN Jiaxiang1, LI Qin1, LI Jia1, FENG Yuanjie1, GAO Yuzhu1, ZHOU He1, ZHANG Zhe1   

  1. 1. Blood-vessel Laboratory, Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang 110032, Liaoning, China;
    2. Department of Cardiology, Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang 110032, Liaoning, China;
    3. Laboratory Animal Center, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang 110847, Liaoning, China;
    4. Department of Anesthesia, Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang 110032, Liaoning, China;
    5. Platform of Scientific Research, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang 110847, Liaoning, China
  • Received:2016-10-13 Online:2017-07-10 Published:2017-07-10

摘要: 目的 从可行性、稳定性和安全性等方面对巴马小型猪冠状动脉粥样硬化模型进行评价。 方法 巴马小型猪随机分为对照组(给予基础饲料)和模型组(给予高脂喂饲联合机械损伤),在0、24、48周分别对两组行冠状动脉造影、血管内超声(IVUS)、心电图、血脂、炎症指标检测和病理学分析。 结果 24周模型组总胆固醇(TC)、甘油三酯(TG)、低密度脂蛋白(LDL-C)、高密度脂蛋白(HDL-C)、氧化低密度脂蛋白(ox-LDL)、高敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、白介素-6(IL-6)、血管细胞黏附分子-1(VCAM-1)、单核细胞趋化因子-1(MCP-1)和P选择素(sP-selectin)明显高于对照组(P<0.05);模型组0、24周ST段下移程度与对照组相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),模型组0周T波振幅与对照组相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),模型组24周T波振幅与对照组相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);24、48周冠状动脉造影和IVUS显示模型组冠脉平均面积狭窄率高于对照组;48周模型组血管内膜厚度和内膜中膜厚度比大于24周。 结论 离体在体结合评价是一种可行、安全的评价冠状动脉粥样硬化模型的方法。

关键词: 模型评价, 巴马小型猪, 动物模型, 机械损伤, 动脉粥样硬化, 高脂喂饲

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the feasibility, stability and safety of a coronary atherosclerosis model of Bama minipigs. Methods Bama minipigs were randomly assigned into control group(basic diet)and model group(high-fat diet combined with mechanical injury). In week 0, 24 and 48, both groups underwent coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound(IVUS), electrocardiogram, serum lipid testing, inflammation factors testing, and pathological analysis 山 东 大 学 学 报 (医 学 版)55卷7期 -尹妮,等.巴马小型猪冠状动脉粥样硬化模型的评价方法 \=-to evaluate the model. Results In week 24, compared with the control group, the model group had significantly increased total cholesterol(TC), triglycerides(TG), low density lipoprotein cholesterol(LDL-C), high density lipoprotein cholesterol(HDL-C), oxidized low-density lipoprotein(ox-LDL), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein(hs-CRP), interleukin-6(IL-6), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1(VCAM-1), monocyte chemotactic protein(MCP-1)and soluble P-selectin(SP-selectin)(P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in ST segment depression in week 0 and 24(P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in T waves in week 0(P>0.05), but there was statistically significant difference in T waves in week 24(P<0.05). In week 24 and 48, the model group showed significantly higher coronary stenosis rate than the control group. In week 48, the model group had higher intima/intima-medial thickness ratio than in week 24. Conclusion The in vitro and in vivo model is safe and feasible in the assessment of atherosclerosis.

Key words: Atherosclerosis, Bama minipigs, High-fat diet, Model evaluation, Mechanical injury, Animal model

中图分类号: 

  • R332
[1] Zaragoza C, Gomez-Guerrero C, Martin-Ventura JL, et al. Animal models of cardiovascular diseases[J]. J Biomed Biotechnol, 2011, 2011: 497841. doi: 10.1155/2011/497841.
[2] McGill HC Jr, McMahan CA, Gidding SS. Preventing heart disease in the 21st century implications of the Pathobiological Determinants of Atherosclerosis in Youth(PDAY)study[J]. Circulation, 2008, 117(9): 1216-1227.
[3] 陈伟伟, 高润霖, 刘力生, 等. 《中国心血管病报告2014》概要[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2015, 7: 617-622.
[4] 韩雅玲. 中国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南2012(简本)[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2012, 40(4): 18-26.
[5] Xiangdong L, Yuanwu L, Hua Z, et al. Animal models for the atherosclerosis research: a review[J]. Protein Cell, 2011, 2(3): 189-201.
[6] Smith AC, Swindle MM. Preparation of swine for the laboratory[J]. ILAR J, 2006, 47(4): 358-363.
[7] Casellas J, Vidal O, Pena RN, et al. Genetics of serum and muscle lipids in pigs[J]. Anim Genet, 2013, 44(6): 609-619.
[8] Bergen WG, Mersmann HJ. Comparative aspects of lipid metabolism: impact on contemporary research and use of animal models[J]. J Nutr, 2005, 135(11): 2499-2502.
[9] Hammad SM, Siegel HS, Marks HL. Total cholesterol, total triglycerides, and cholesterol distribution among lipoproteins as predictors of atherosclerosis in selected lines of Japanese quail[J]. Comp Biochem Physiol A MolIntegr Physiol, 1998, 119(2): 485-492.
[10] Weiner BH, Ockene IS, Levine PH, et al. Inhibition of atherosclerosis by cod-liver oil in a hyperlipidemic swine model[J]. N Engl J Med, 1986, 315(14): 841-846.
[11] 黎洪展, 吕永恒, 陈琪, 等. 动脉粥样硬化大鼠主动脉内膜增生与树突状细胞分布的关系[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2011, 27(9): 655-657. LI Hongzhan, LÜ Yongheng, CHEN Qi, et al. Relationship of dendreiec cells distribution and intima hvperplasia in atherosclerotic mice[J]. Journal of Clinical Cardiology, 2011, 27(9): 655-657.
[12] Wang M, Gao M, Liao J, et al. Adipose tissue deficiency results in severe hyperlipidemia and atherosclerosis in the low-density lipoprotein receptor knockout mice[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2016, 1861(5): 410-418.
[13] 张美玲, 王茁伉, 彭成. 动脉粥样硬化动物模型研究进展[J]. 四川动物, 2009, 28(5): 794-797.
[14] Gerrity RG, Natarajan R, Nadler JL, et al. Diabetes-induced accelerated atherosclerosis in swine[J]. Diabetes, 2001, 50(7): 1654-1665.
[15] Xu X, Mao W, Chai Y, et al. Angiogenesis inhibitor, endostar, prevents vasa vasorum neovascularization in a swine atherosclerosis model[J]. J Atheroscler Thromb, 2015, 22(10): 1100-1112.
[1] 段盈竹,董波,于睿. 内在情感与类风湿关节炎患者冠状动脉粥样硬化风险关系的孟德尔随机化分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(4): 63-71.
[2] 李习平,邱梅,黄瑞峰,林慧慧,刘丝丝,罗鸿莹,王宇月,王敏,杨晓彤. 基于脂质沉积抑制-代谢清除协同效应的黄连素抗动脉粥样硬化机制研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(9): 77-83.
[3] 杜艾家,张曼,陈鹤,王丽新,尚应殊. 微小RNA-1270靶向调控血管生成素样蛋白7抑制巨噬细胞炎症和脂质蓄积[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(2): 1-9.
[4] 许天旗,常娜,张帅,李莎,矫秉轩,于鑫鑫,王锡明. 非酒精性脂肪肝识别基于CTA颈动脉高危斑块[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(12): 36-43.
[5] 吴虹,张正铎,唐延金,祁少俊,高希宝. 5-甲基四氢叶酸对大鼠动脉粥样硬化的潜在干预作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(8): 6-13.
[6] 王国云,潘臧钰. 子宫腺肌病动物模型研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(7): 48-55.
[7] 赵婷婷,齐亚娜,张颖,袁冰,韩明勇. 小鼠乳腺癌诱导转移前肺组织微环境的改变[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 24-29.
[8] 谢佳莹,祁佳,宋铭,李育林,王迪,贾旭,张薇,钟明,尚嫄嫄. 血清蛋白质β-折叠水平与冠心病的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(1): 21-26.
[9] 杨佳,张曼,陈凯明,曹曦. miR-146a经TLR4/MyD88途径加速巨噬细胞迁移所致动脉硬化的作用机制[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(11): 1-7.
[10] 仇静静,吴婷,牟亚魁,崔丽梅,郭文涛,韩锋产,孙岩. 大鼠鼓室硬化建模优化及与纤维连接蛋白高表达的关联[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(1): 22-27.
[11] 付洁琦,张曼,张晓璐,李卉,陈红. Toll样受体4抑制过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ加重血脂蓄积的分子机制[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 24-31.
[12] 金海燕,张炎,马小莉,韩羽,赵蕙琛,刘元涛,张玉超. MiR-122与miR-33a在2型糖尿病合并冠心病患者中的表达[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(3): 94-98.
[13] 张淑莹,武晓峰,郭丽敏,乔温,彭洁琼,李大庆. 两种阿霉素心力衰竭模型及心功能进展的评估[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(12): 1-7.
[14] 张美玲,孙卉,孙文凯,孟朝暾,邬信芳,高伟,李钦. 鼻腔滴入γ干扰素对变应性鼻炎大鼠外周血Th17/Treg细胞及相关细胞因子的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(1): 13-19.
[15] 娄福臣,刘性祥,马国云,庄向华. 阿卡波糖对冠心病合并糖耐量受损患者YKL-40和肠道菌群的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(7): 86-91.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!