Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences) ›› 2025, Vol. 63 ›› Issue (6): 55-66.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2024.1431

• Clinical Medicine • Previous Articles    

Development and validation of a postpartum stress urinary incontinence risk prediction model based on machine learning

WANG Liyun1, GAO Tianqin2, LIU Yujia1, CHEN Qing3, CHEN Liu3, SHA Kaihui1   

  1. 1. School of Nursing, Binzhou Medical University, Binzhou 256600, Shandong, China;
    2. First Interventional Catheterization Laboratory, Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University, Binzhou 256600, Shandong, China;
    3. Postpartum Rehabilitation Center, Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University, Binzhou 256600, Shandong, China
  • Published:2025-07-08

Abstract: Objective To develop risk prediction models for postpartum stress urinary incontinence(PPSUI)using five machine learning algorithms based on the latest PPSUI definition, identify the optimal model, and evaluate its clinical applicability. Methods This study adopted a prospective design and included 1,208 postpartum women. Data were collected from questionnaires and electronic medical records, and the dataset was randomly divided into a training set and a test set in an 8∶2 ratio. Feature selection was performed using univariate analysis and the random forest algorithm. Five PPSUI prediction models were developed based on Logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, support vector machine, and extreme gradient boosting(XGBoost), with hyperparameter optimization conducted through grid search. Model training and validation were performed using the bootstrap method and ten-fold cross-validation to enhance stability and generalizability. The models were comprehensively evaluated in terms of classification performance, clinical applicability, and predictive reliability to identify the optimal prediction model. Results XGBoost was identified as the optimal prediction model, achieving the highest AUC in the test set(AUC=0.993, 95%CI: 0.985-0.998, P<0.01). Decision curve analysis showed that XGBoost provided the highest net benefit within the intermediate threshold range, while the calibration curve was closest to the ideal state, indicating superior predictive reliability and significant clinical applicability. Conclusion XGBoost is suitable for early screening and risk assessment of high-risk PPSUI populations, providing a scientific basis for precision medicine and postpartum health management.

Key words: Stress urinary incontinence, Postpartum, Risk prediction, Machine learning, Predictive model

CLC Number: 

  • R714.46
[1] Doumouchtsis SK, de Tayrac R, Lee J, et al. An International Continence Society(ICS)/International Urogynecological Association(IUGA)joint report on the terminology for the assessment and management of obstetric pelvic floor disorders[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2023, 34(1): 1-42.
[2] You C, Zhao YJ, Zhang C, et al. Pelvic floor parameters predict postpartum stress urinary incontinence: a prospective MRI study[J]. Insights Imaging, 2023, 14(1): 160. doi:10.1186/s13244-023-01488-5
[3] Coll CM, Franco EM, Qureal LA, et al. Hormonal influence in stress urinary incontinence during pregnancy and postpartum[J]. Reprod Sci, 2022, 29(8): 2190-2199.
[4] Dai SD, Chen HT, Luo TZ. Prevalence and factors of urinary incontinence among postpartum: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2023, 23(1): 761. doi:10.1186/s12884-023-06059-6
[5] Wang K, Xu XL, Jia GM, et al. Risk factors for postpartum stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Reprod Sci, 2020, 27(12): 2129-2145.
[6] Rashidi Fakari F, Hajian S, Darvish S, et al. Predictors of help-seeking behaviors in women with urinary incontinence: Based on Iranian womens lens[J]. PLoS One, 2023, 18(8): e0289785. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0289785
[7] Rashidi Fakari F, Hajian S, Darvish S, et al. Explaining factors affecting help-seeking behaviors in women with urinary incontinence: a qualitative study[J]. BMC Health Serv Res, 2021, 21(1): 60. doi:10.1186/s12913-020-06047-y
[8] 李巧巧, 于霞, 罗映娟, 等. 女性压力性尿失禁疾病负担研究进展[J]. 中国计划生育和妇产科, 2022, 14(9): 10-12.
[9] Ngiam KY, Khor IW. Big data and machine learning algorithms for health-care delivery[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2019, 20(5): e262-e273.
[10] Zhang A, Xing L, Zou J, et al. Shifting machine learning for healthcare from development to deployment and from models to data[J]. Nat Biomed Eng, 2022, 6(12): 1330-1345.
[11] Miku s M, Cori c M, Matak L, et al. Validation of the UDI-6 and the ICIQ-UI SF-Croatian version[J]. Int Urogynecology J, 2020, 31(12): 2625-2630.
[12] Huang L, Zhang SW, Wu SL, et al. The Chinese version of ICIQ: a useful tool in clinical practice and research on urinary incontinence[J]. Neurourol Urodyn, 2008, 27(6): 522-524.
[13] Legendre B, Cerasuolo D, Dejardin O, et al. How to deal with missing data? Multiple imputation by chained equations: recommendations and explanations for clinical practice[J]. Nephrol Ther, 2023, 19(3): 171-179.
[14] Speiser JL. A random forest method with feature selection for developing medical prediction models with clustered and longitudinal data[J]. J Biomed Inform, 2021, 117: 103763. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103763
[15] AlQuaiz AM, Kazi A, AlYousefi N, et al. Urinary incontinence affects the quality of life and increases psychological distress and low self-esteem[J]. Healthcare, 2023, 11(12): 1772. doi:10.3390/healthcare11121772
[16] Suar G, Cevik F, Simal Yavuz N, et al. Urinary incontinence in the postpartum 1-year period: its prevalence and effect on psychosocial status of women[J]. Low Urin Tract Symptoms, 2023, 15(5): 191-199.
[17] Chisholm LP, Sebesta EM, Gleicher S, et al. The burdens of incontinence: quantifying incontinence product usage and costs in women[J]. Neurourol Urodyn, 2022, 41(7): 1601-1611.
[18] Benítez-Andrades JA, García-Ordás MT, álvarez-González M, et al. Detection of the most influential variables for preventing postpartum urinary incontinence using machine learning techniques[J]. Digit Health, 2022, 8: 20552076221111289. doi:10.1177/20552076221111289
[19] 史可为, 吴亚飞, 方亚. 临床预测模型的可解释性及应用进展[J]. 现代预防医学, 2023, 50(6): 1122-1127. SHI Kewei, WU Yafei, FANG Ya. Interpretability and application of clinical prediction models[J]. 2023, 50(6): 1122-1127.
[20] Xu CC, Guo Y, Chi XL, et al. Establishment and validation of a simple nomogram for predicting early postpartum stress urinary incontinence among women with vaginal delivery: a retrospective study[J]. BMC Womens Health, 2023, 23(1): 8. doi:10.1186/s12905-023-02160-2
[21] Liu W, Qian LX. Establishment and validation of a risk prediction model for postpartum stress urinary incontinence based on pelvic floor ultrasound and clinical data[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2022, 33(12): 3491-3497.
[22] Eric Jelovsek J, Piccorelli A, Barber MD, et al. Prediction models for postpartum urinary and fecal incontinence in primiparous women[J]. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg, 2013, 19(2): 110-118.
[23] Zhang DF, Bo KR, Montejo R, et al. Influence of pelvic floor muscle training alone or as part of a general physical activity program during pregnancy on urinary incontinence, episiotomy and third- or fourth-degree perineal tear: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2024, 103(6): 1015-1027.
[24] Krishnan R, Rajpurkar P, Topol EJ. Self-supervised learning in medicine and healthcare[J]. Nat Biomed Eng, 2022, 6(12): 1346-1352.
[25] Chen RJ, Wang JJ, Williamson DFK, et al. Algorithmic fairness in artificial intelligence for medicine and healthcare[J]. Nat Biomed Eng, 2023, 7(6): 719-742.
[26] 国家卫生健康委员会发布《全国医院信息化建设标准与规范(试行)》:明确医院信息化建设内容和建设要求[J]. 医学信息学杂志, 2018(4): 94.
[27] 孙烨祥, 吕筠, 沈鹏, 等. 健康医疗大数据驱动下的疾病防控新模式[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2021, 42(8): 1325-1329. SUN Yexiang, LYU Jun, SHEN Peng, et al. A new model for disease control and prevention driven by big data in healthcare[J]. Chinese Journal of Epidemiology, 2021,42(8): 1325-1329.
[28] Sheng XM, Wang J, Shaw JM, et al. Pelvic floor support and symptoms 1 year postpartum in relation to excess body habitus before, during and after first vaginal birth[J]. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg, 2022, 28(5): 273-279.
[29] DeLancey JOL, Masteling M, Pipitone F, et al. Pelvic floor injury during vaginal birth is life-altering and preventable: what can we do about it?[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2024, 230(3): 279-294.
[1] CHEN Yingyi, YOU Qian, WANG Yi, ZHANG Fan, LI Feng, JI Shuming, XU Haoyuan, RAO Zhiyong. Development and validation of a prediction model for muscle mass loss in office workers [J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2025, 63(4): 26-35.
[2] WANG Jing, LIU Xiaofei, ZENG Rong, XU Changjuan, ZHANG Jintao, DONG Liang. Identification of necroptosis-related biomarkers in asthma based on machine learning algorithms [J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2024, 62(7): 21-32.
[3] GUO Zhenjiang, WANG Ning, ZHAO Guangyuan, DU Liqiang, CUI Zhaobo, LIU Fangzhen. Development of preoperative models for predicting positive esophageal margin in proximal gastric cancer based on machine learning [J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2024, 62(7): 78-83.
[4] LIANG Yongyuan, CAI Peifei, ZHENG Guixi. Establishment and value assessment of colon cancer diagnostic models based on multiple variables and different machine learning algorithms [J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2024, 62(2): 51-59.
[5] DIAO Yujie, LIN Lin, LI Wenxuan, WANG Zhouyang, JIANG Bei, HU Yingying, LIU Guangyi. Neutrophil-to-platelet ratio predicts adverse renal outcomes in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis and its synergistic multifactor optimization model [J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2024, 62(2): 60-68.
[6] WANG Yutao, SUN Yan. Comprehensive analysis of single-cell transcriptomics and machine learning reveals potential biomarkers for abdominal aortic aneurysm [J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2024, 62(11): 40-53.
[7] ZHANG Jinghui, WANG Juan, ZHAO Yujie, DUAN Miao, LIU Yiran, LIN Minjuan, QIAO Xu, LI Zhen, ZUO Xiuli. Construction of a machine learning-based tongue diagnosis model for gastrointestinal diseases [J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2024, 62(1): 38-47.
[8] ZHANG Hongyuan, GU Yongzhong, HOU Zhe. A clinical analysis of 47 cases of hysterectomy [J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2023, 61(7): 96-100.
[9] ZHONG Lu, XUE Fuzhong. A Lung cancer risk prediction model based on Bayesian network uncertainty inference [J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2023, 61(4): 86-94.
[10] Yajun LIU,Zhao LANG,Anyi GUO,Wenyong LIU. Progresses and trends of intelligent technologies in orthopedic shock wave therapy [J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2023, 61(3): 7-13.
[11] Nan WU,Jianguo ZHANG,Yuanpeng ZHU,Guilin CHEN,Zefu CHEN. Application of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and treatment of spinal deformity [J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2023, 61(3): 14-20.
[12] ZHU Zhengyang, SHEN Jingfei, CHEN Sixuan, YE Meiping, YANG Huiquan, ZHOU Jianan, LIANG Xue, ZHANG Xin, ZHANG Bing. Prediction of isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation in glioma with different radiomic models based on susceptibility-weighted imaging [J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2023, 61(12): 44-50.
[13] JU Yanli, WANG Lihua, CHENG Fang, HUANG Fengyan, CHEN Xueyu, JIA Hongying. Construction of predictive models of radioiodine therapy based on machine learning [J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2023, 61(1): 94-99.
[14] Li KUANG,Xiaoming XU,Qi ZENG. Review of machine learning used in the field of suicide [J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2022, 60(4): 10-16.
[15] JIANG Zhen, SUN Jing, ZOU Wen, WANG Changchang, GAO Qi. A comparison study of suicidal behavior predictive models of bipolar disorder patients based on two machine learning algorithms [J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2022, 60(1): 101-108.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!