JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES) ›› 2017, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (1): 60-62.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2016.1534

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of female age on the outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening

LI Yun, ZHONG Wanxia, YAO Ning, HU Shuanggang, LIU Hongmao   

  1. Center for Reproductive Medicine, Renji Hospital, Medical School of Shanghai Jiaotong University;
    Shanghai Key Laboratory for Assisted Reproduction and Reproductive Genetics, Shanghai 200135, China
  • Received:2016-11-20 Online:2017-01-10 Published:2017-01-10

PDF (PC)

189

Abstract: Objective To investigate the female effects of age on the outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening(PGD/PGS). Methods Clinical data of 149 patients who received PGD/PGS in our hospital during Jan. and Dec. 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to age: group Ⅰ(n=10, <25 years, 36 blastocysts), group Ⅱ(n=94, 25-34 years, 329 blastocysts), and group Ⅲ(n=45, ≥35 years, 89 blastocysts). The normal chromosome rate and clinical pregnancy rate of the three groups were compared. Results The normal chromosome rate in groups Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ was 50.00%, 50.15% and 29.21%, respectively. There were statistical differences between groups Ⅰ and Ⅲ(χ=24.855, P<0.05), and groups Ⅱ and Ⅲ(χ=212.376, P<0.05). The clinical pregnancy rate in groups Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ was 82.33%, 82.50% and 40.00%, respectively. There were statistical differences between groups Ⅰ and Ⅲ(χ=23.893, P<0.05), and groups Ⅱ and Ⅲ(χ=27.510, P<0.05). Conclusion The female age can affect the outcome of PGD/PGS. Age ≥35 years will significantly reduces the normal chromosome rate and clinical pregnancy rate.

Key words: Female age, Normal chromosome rate, Blastocyst biopsy, Clinical pregnancy rate, Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening

CLC Number: 

  • R715.5
[1] Girardet A, Viart V, Plaza S, et al. The improvement of the best practice guidelines for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of cystic fibrosis: toward an international consensus[J]. Eur J Hum Genet, 2016, 24(4): 469-478.
[2] Scott RT, Ferry K, Su J, et al. Comprehensive chromosome screening is highly predictive of the reproductive potential of human embryos: a prospective, blinded, nonselection study[J]. Fertil Steril, 2012, 97(4): 870-875.
[3] 刘茜桐, 田莉, 师娟子, 等. 胚胎植入前遗传学诊断和筛查的研究进展[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2016, 27(1): 123-126. LIU Xitong, TIAN Li, SHI Juanzi, et al. Research progression on preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening[J]. Chinese Journal of Woman and Child Health Research, 2016, 27(1): 123-126.
[4] 张静, 吕睿, 吕永焕, 等. 胚胎植入前遗传学诊断和筛查的研究进展[J]. 国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志, 2015, 34(3): 243-247. ZHANG Jing, LÜ Rui, LÜ Yonghuan, et al. Research progress of preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening[J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2015, 34(3): 243-247.
[5] Tan YQ, Tan K, Zhang SP, et al. Single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based preimplantation genetic diagnosis is likely to improve the clinical outcome for translocation carriers[J]. Hum Reprod, 2013, 28(9): 2581-2592.
[6] 陈大蔚, 章志国, 邹薇薇, 等. 反复种植失败患者经植入前遗传学筛查获妊娠的研究[J/CD]. 中华临床医师杂志, 2015, 9(6):20-23. CHEN Dawei, ZHZNG Zhiguo, ZOU Weiwei, et al. Blastocyst preimplantation genetic screening(PGS)of a recurrent implantation failure(RIF)couple[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2015, 9(6):20-23.
[7] Schoolcraft WB, Treff NR, Stevens JM, et al. Live birth outcome with trophectoderm biopsy, blastocyst vitrification, and single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based comprehensive chromosome screening in infertile patients[J]. Fertil Steril, 2011, 96(3): 638-640.
[8] Scott RT, Upham KM, Forman EJ, et al. Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Fertil Steril, 2013, 100(3): 697-703.
[9] Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Goodall N, et al. The cytogenetics of polar bodies: insights into female meiosis and the diagnosis of aneuploidy[J]. Mol Hum Reprod, 2011, 17(5): 286-295.
[10] Yang Z, Liu J, Collins GS, et al. Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study[J]. Mol Cytogenet, 2012, 5(1): 24.
[11] Gardner DK, Sakkas D. Assessment of embryo viability: the ability to select a single embryo for transfer-a review[J]. Placenta, 2003, 24: S5-S12.
[12] Hodes-Wertz B, Grifo J, Ghadir S, et al. Idiopathic recurrent miscarriage is caused mostly by aneuploid embryos[J]. FertilSteril, 2012, 98(3): 675-680.
[13] Forman EJ, Tao X, Ferry KM, et al. Single embryo transfer with comprehensive chromosome screening results in improved ongoing pregnancy rates and decreased miscarriage rates[J]. Hum Reprod, 2012, 27(4): 1217-1222.
[14] Fischer J, Colls P, Escudero T, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis(PGD)improves pregnancy outcome for translocation carriers with a history of recurrent losses[J]. Fertil Steril, 2010, 94(1): 283-289.
[15] Kuliev A, Cieslak J, Ilkevitch Y, et al. Chromosomal abnormalities in a series of 6733 human oocytes in preimplantation diagnosis for age-related aneuploidies[J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2003, 6(1): 54-59.
[16] Pellestor F, Andreo B, Arnal F, et al. Maternal aging and chromosomal abnormalities: new data drawn from in vitro unfertilized human oocytes[J]. Hum Genet, 2003, 112(2): 195-203.
[17] Forman EJ, Hong KH, Ferry KM, et al. In vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Fertil Steril, 2013, 100(1): 100-107.
[18] Ata B, Kaplan B, Danzer H, et al. Array CGH analysis shows that aneuploidy is not related to the number of embryos generated[J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2012, 24(6): 614-620.
[19] Franasiak JM, Forman EJ, Hong KH, et al. The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening[J]. Fertil Steril, 2014, 101(3): 656-663.
[20] Tulay P, Gültomruk M, Fndıklı N, et al. PGD management scheme for older females with balanced translocations: do older females have less chance of balanced embryo transfer?[J]. Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc, 2016, 17(2): 91-95.
[1] . Improvement and application of comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2009, 47(7): 89-92.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Copyright 2018 © Editorial office of Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences)
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd