JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES) ›› 2017, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (8): 52-56.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2016.1145

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Feasibility and safety of transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defect with subaortic rim <2 mm

ZHAO Lijian, HAN Bo, ZHANG Jianjun, YI Yingchun, JIANG Diandong, LÜ Jianli, WANG Jing   

  1. Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan 250021, Shandong, China
  • Received:2016-09-12 Online:2017-08-10 Published:2017-08-10

Abstract: Objective To explore the feasibility and safety of transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defect(VSD)with subaortic rim less than 2 mm. Methods The clinical data of 156 patients with VSD who underwent percutaneous interventional procedure during May 2010 and May 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. According to the subaortic rim by transthoracic echocardiography, the patients were divided into short rim group(<2 mm, n=69)and long rim group(≥2 mm, n=87). The success rate and complications were compared. The risk factors of failure in short rim group were studied with Logistic regression analysis. Results The success rate of short rim group and long rim group was 78.3% vs 96.6%(P<0.01). Complications in the short rim group included trivial aortic regurgitation in 5 cases, heart arrhythmia in 23 cases and trivial residual shunt without mechanical hemolysis in 6 cases. Complications in the long rim group included trivial aortic regurgitation in 1 case, heart arrhythmias in 14 cases, residual shunt in 6 cases and mechanical hemolysis in 2 cases. Logistic regression analysis revealed aortic valve prolapse before procedure(OR=8.8, 95%CI: 1.4-54.9, P=0.02)and defects ≥5 mm(OR=11.6, 95%CI: 2.37-57.11, P=0.003)were independent 山 东 大 学 学 报 (医 学 版)55卷8期 -赵立健,等.经导管介入治疗主动脉瓣下边缘<2 mm的室间隔缺损疗效评价 \=-risk factors of failure. Conclusion Transcatheter closure of VSD with subaortic rim <2 mm has relatively lower success rate. Short subaortic rim combined with aortic valve prolapse before procedure and defects ≥5 mm were independent risk factors of failure. Therefore, indications of interventional procedure for VSD with short subaortic rim should be strictly selected.

Key words: Ventricular septal defect, Subaortic rim, Residual shunt, Atrioventricular block, Aortic regurgitation

CLC Number: 

  • R725.4
[1] 中国医师协会心血管内科分会先心病工作委员会. 常见先天性心脏病介入治疗中国专家共识二、室间隔缺损介入治疗[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2011, 20(2): 87-92.
[2] 中华儿科杂志编辑委员会, 《中华医学杂志英文版》编辑委员会. 先天性心脏病经导管介入治疗指南[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2004, 42(3): 234-239.
[3] Kenny D, Tometzki A, Martin R. Significant aortic regurgitation associated with transcatheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects with a deficient aortic rim[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2007, 70(3): 445-449.
[4] Chen GL, Li HT, Li HR, et al. Transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defect in patients with aortic valve prolapse and mild aortic regurgitation: feasibility and preliminary outcome[J]. Asian Pac J Trop Med, 2015, 8(4): 315-318.
[5] Gu M, You X, Zhao X, et al. Transcatheter device closure of intracristal ventricular septal defects[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2011, 107(1): 110-113.
[6] Lin K, Zhu D, Tao K, et al. Hybrid perventricular device closure of doubly committed subarterial ventricular septal defects: mid-term results[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2013, 82(3): 225-232.
[7] Zhang S, Zhu D, An Q, et al. Minimally invasive perventricular device closure of doubly committed sub-arterial ventricular septal defects: single center long-term follow-up results[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2015, 10(9): 119-126.
[8] Xing Q, Wu Q, Shi L, et al. Minimally invasive transthoracic device closure of isolated ventricular septal defects without cardiopulmonary bypass: long-term follow-up results[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2015, 149(1): 257-264.
[9] Hongxin L, Wenbin G, Liang F, et al. Perventricular device closure of a doubly committed juxtaarterial ventricular septal defect through a left parasternal approach: midterm follow-up results[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2015, 10(11):175-182.
[10] Bai Y, Xu XD, Li CY, et al. Complete atrioventricular block after percutaneous device closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defect: A single-center experience on 1046 cases[J]. Heart Rhythm, 2015, 12(10): 2132-2140.
[11] Zhou D, Pan W, Guan L, et al. Transcatheter closure of perimembranous and intracristal ventricular septal defects with the SHSMA occluder[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2012, 79(4): 666-674.
[12] Wei Y, Wang X, Zhang S, et al. Transcatheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects(VSD)with VSD occluder: early and mid-term results[J]. Heart Vessels, 2012, 27(4): 398-404.
[13] Zhong QH, Zheng HY, Zhang ZW, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of arrhythmias after transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defect in children[J]. Chinese Journal of Cardiology, 2014, 42(10): 840-845.
[14] Li JJ, Zhang ZW, Qian MY, et al. Transcatbeter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects: a comparative study between the asymmetric device and the symmetric device[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology, 2009, 17(6): 301-304.
[15] Topcuoglu MS, Atalay A, Gocen U, et al. An unusual complication of the ventricular septal defect closure by device: Late right aortic cusp perforation[J]. Heart Lung Circ, 2015, 24(7): 118-121.
[1] FENG Zhiyu, GUO Rui, YANG Yanliang, LI Haiming, DONG Mingliang, XU Huihui, LIU Yimin, GUO Kai, WANG Guangzhen, WANG Hui. Initial palliative repair of pulmonary atresia with ventricular septal defect by rehabilitating right ventricle to pulmonary artery connection [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2015, 53(11): 41-45.
[2] ZHAO Lijian, HAN Bo, ZHANG Jianjun, ZHUANG Jianxin, JIN Youpeng, WANG Yulin. Evaluation of transcatheter closure in 90 cases ofcongenital ventricular septal defect [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2010, 48(5): 89-92.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!