Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences) ›› 2024, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (9): 93-100.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2024.0335

• Advances in Basic and Clinical Research on Aortic Diseases-Clinical Research • Previous Articles    

Early results of surgically assisted short-distance retrograde needle puncture technique for in situ fenestration of the aortic arch

ZHANG Zhiwei, MENG Qingyou, DING Qingwei, ZHANG Xiaoyu   

  1. Department of Vascular Surgery, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai 200080, China
  • Published:2024-10-10

Abstract: Objective To analyze the early results of the application of surgically assisted short-distance retrograde needle puncture(SDRNP)technique for in situ fenestration in thoracic endovascular aortic repair(TEVAR)in patients with aortic arch disease. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 57 patients with aortic arch diseases between March 2021 and March 2023 who underwent TEVAR, and surgically assisted SDRNP in situ fenestration and reconstruction of the superior arch branches. There were 32 cases of aortic dissection, 15 cases of aortic aneurysm and 10 cases of penetrating ulcer. Inclusion criteria were aortic dissection/aneurysm, penetrating ulcer and other arch diseases, insufficient proximal landing zone for TEVAR, and stent graft covering the superior arch branches, and at least one fenestration. Exclusion criteria were the arch disease involving the ascending aorta, less than 20 mm from the opening of the coronary artery, or the diameter of the proximal landing zone greater than 45 mm, or the dominant left vertebral artery originating from the aortic arch. Results The success rate of the surgically assisted SDRNP technique was 98.2%(56/57). In 57 patients, simple left subclavian artery(LSA)fenestration was in 27 patients, LSA+left common carotid artery(LCCA)fenestration was in 18 patients, LCCA + brachiocephalic trunk(BCT)fenestration was in 1 patient, and LSA+LCCA+BCT fenestration was in 11 patients. SDRNP was performed 98 times, LSA 56 times, LCCA 30 times, and BCT 12 times. One patient with type A dissection was scheduled for triple fenestration. However, due to severe LSA distortion, SDRNP in the LSA failed after LCCA+BCT fenestration, and left carotid to left artery-left axillary artery bypass was performed. The mean operative time was(159.1±69.6)min. The mean operative time was(112.4±42.7)min for LSA fenestrations,(165.9±45.7)min for LSA+LCCA fenestrations, and(226.5±79.9)min for LSA+LCCA+BCT fenestrations. Postoperative complications included 1 paraplegia, 2 cerebral infarctions, 1 acute myocardial infarction and 1 limb numbness. Among them, one patient eventually died because of a massive cerebral infarction. Totally 51 patients were followed up with a median follow-up time of 19 months(ranging from 13 to 34 months). Post-operative CTA showed that 5 patients experienced endoleak, including 1 type Ⅰ, 1 type Ⅱ, and 3 type Ⅲ. Two cases with type Ⅲ endoleak were improved by coil embolization after re-intervention. There were no out-of-hospital cerebrovascular events or deaths. Conclusion Surgically assisted SDRNP in situ fenestration of the aortic arch is technically feasible, with the advantages of rapid and efficient manipulation and high success rate of fenestration, yielding acceptable short-term results in selected patient cohorts. However, the long-term effect still needs to be further monitored before the application of this technology can be popularized.

Key words: Aortic arch disease, Thoracic endovascular aortic repair, In situ needle fenestration, Short-distance, Surgical assistance

CLC Number: 

  • R654.3
[1] Iafrancesco M, Ranasinghe AM, Dronavalli V, et al. Open aortic arch replacement in high-risk patients: the gold standard[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2016, 49(2): 646-651.
[2] Minatoya K, Inoue Y, Sasaki H, et al. Total arch replacement using a 4-branched graft with antegrade cerebral perfusion[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2019, 157(4): 1370-1378.
[3] Settepani F, Cappai A, Basciu A, et al. Outcome of open total arch replacement in the modern era[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2016, 63(2): 537-545.
[4] Maeda K, Ohki T, Kanaoka Y. Endovascular treatment of various aortic pathologies: review of the latest data and technologies[J]. Int J Angiol, 2018, 27(2): 81-91.
[5] Bavaria J, Vallabhajosyula P, Moeller P, et al. Hybrid approaches in the treatment of aortic arch aneurysms: postoperative and midterm outcomes[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2013, 145(Suppl 3): S85-S90.
[6] Wang CT, von Segesser LK, Berdajs D, et al. Endovascular treatment of the dissected proximal aortic arch: a systematic review[J]. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2021, 33(5): 746-754.
[7] Gao WT, Yang GM, Zhu YL, et al. Short-term outcomes of in situ fenestration in total endovascular aortic arch treatment[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2022, 81: 105-112. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2021.09.026.
[8] Li HL, Chan YC, Jia HY, et al. Methods and clinical outcomes of in situ fenestration for aortic arch revascularization during thoracic endovascular aortic repair[J]. Vascular, 2020, 28(4): 333-341.
[9] 彭智猷, 金剑, 叶开创, 等. 鞘转流系统辅助下胸主动脉腔内修复术联合原位激光开窗治疗主动脉弓部病变的临床结果[J]. 中华血管外科杂志, 2022, 7(1): 43-47. PENG Zhiyou, JIN Jian, YE Kaichuang, et al. Clinical results of sheath-based bypass system-assisted thoracic endovascular aortic repair with in situ laser fenestration for aortic arch disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2022, 7(1): 43-47.
[10] Li C, Xu P, Hua ZH, et al. Early and midterm outcomes of in situ laser fenestration during thoracic endovascular aortic repair for acute and subacute aortic arch diseases and analysis of its complications[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2020, 72(5): 1524-1533.
[11] Li DL, Zeng QL, Xiang YL, et al. Experimental analysis of the quality of needle-assisted fenestration in aortic stent-grafts and the differences between gradual and rapid balloon dilation[J]. J Endovasc Ther, 2021, 28(1): 44-52.
[12] Tse LW, Lindsay TF, Roche-Nagle G, et al. Radiofrequency in situ fenestration for aortic arch vessels during thoracic endovascular repair[J]. J Endovasc Ther, 2015, 22(1): 116-121.
[13] Qiu CY, Li ZJ, Dai XC, et al. Technical details of thoracic endovascular aortic repair with fenestrations for thoracic aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch: a Chinese expert consensus[J]. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2022, 9: 1056229. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2022.1056229.
[14] Li X, Shu C, Wang LC, et al. First-in-human implantation of gutter-free design stent-graft in in situ fenestration TEVAR for aortic arch pathology[J]. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2022, 9: 911689. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2022.911689.
[15] He TX, Bai J, Wu JJ, et al. Long-term outcomes of thoracic endovascular repair with quick fenestrater assisted in situ fenestration for type B aortic dissection[J]. Vascular, 2023: 17085381221140168. doi:10.1177/17085381221140168.
[16] Bai J, Liu YD, Jin J, et al. Single-stage endovascular management of complicated thoracic aorta coarctation concurrent with aortic arch aneurysm using a novel fenestration device[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2018, 10(4): 2474-2480.
[17] Xiang YL, Qiu CY, He YY, et al. A single center experience of in situ needle fenestration of supra-aortic branches during thoracic endovascular aortic repair[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2019, 61: 107-115. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2019.03.016.
[18] Hongo N, Miyamoto S, Shuto R, et al. “Squid-capture” modified in situ stent-graft fenestration technique for aortic arch aneurysm repair[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2014, 37(4): 1093-1098.
[19] Katada Y, Kondo S, Tsuboi E, et al. Endovascular total arch repair using in situ fenestration for arch aneurysm and chronic type A dissection[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2016, 101(2): 625-630.
[20] Malina M, Sonesson B. In situ fenestration: a novel option for endovascular aortic arch repair[J]. J Cardiovasc Surg, 2015, 56(3): 355-362.
[21] Upchurch GR Jr, Escobar GA, Azizzadeh A, et al. Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2021, 73(1): 55-83.
[22] Zhang ZH, Zhou Y, Lin SM, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of association of prophylactic cerebrospinal fluid drainage in preventing spinal cord ischemia after thoracic endovascular aortic repair[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2022, 75(4): 1478-1489.
[23] Ohki T, Maeda K, Baba T, et al. Early clinical outcomes of retrograde in situ branched stent grafting for complex aortic arch aneurysms[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2022, 75(3): 803-811.
[24] Spear R, Clough RE, Fabre D, et al. Total endovascular treatment of aortic arch disease using an arch endograft with 3 inner branches[J]. J Endovasc Ther, 2017, 24(4): 534-538.
[25] Bianco V, Sultan I, Kilic A, et al. Concomitant left subclavian artery revascularization with carotid-subclavian transposition during zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2020, 159(4):1222-1227.
[26] 国家心血管病专家委员会血管外科专业委员会, 等. 杂交技术治疗累及弓部主动脉病变的中国专家共识[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2020, 35(2): 124-129. National Society of Vascular Surgery, China. Chinese expert consensus on hybrid technique on treating thoracic aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch[J]. Chinese Circulation Journal, 2020, 35(2): 124-129.
[27] Fan BW, Fang K, Tian C, et al. In situ fenestration and carotid-subclavian bypass for left subclavian artery revascularization during thoracic endovascular aortic repair[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2024, 47(6): 717-727.
[28] Haulon S, Greenberg RK, Spear R, et al. Global experience with an inner branched arch endograft[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2014, 148(4): 1709-1716.
[1] YANG Jianping, GUAN Sheng, FANG Qingbo, CI Hongbo, GE Xiaohu. Advances in diagnosis and treatment of blunt thoracic aortic injury [J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2024, 62(9): 36-41.
[2] WANG Lunchang, QIN Qi, SHU Chang. Advances in diagnosis and treatment of traumatic type B aortic dissection [J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2024, 62(9): 19-25.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!