JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES) ›› 2014, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (1): 104-108.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2013.583

• Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Root resorption associated with self-ligating versus conventional ligating orthodontic bracket systems: a systematic review

LU Lu1,2, LI He1, YAN Yi3, GUO Jing1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthodontics, School of Stomatology, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China;
    2. Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine, Jinan 250012, China;
    3. Department of Stomatology, People′s Hospital of Lixia District of Jinan, Jinan 250014, China
  • Received:2013-09-27 Online:2014-01-10 Published:2014-01-10

Abstract:

Objective  To evaluate root resorption associated with self-ligating and conventional ligating bracket systems in orthodontic treatment. Methods  Electronic databases such as CNKI, Wan Fang Data, VIP, CBM, the Cochrane Library, Medline, PubMed and EMbase, were searched from the day of they were established to June 30, 2013, in order to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the root resorption associated with self-ligating versus conventional ligating brackets. The quality of the included studies was evaluated with two reviewers independently, and Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.2.1 software. Results  Three RCTs including 464 teeth were identified. The Results   of Meta-analysis showed no significant differences between the two groups in maxillary incisors (MD = 0.20, 95%CI -1.45 to 1.05, P=0.75), maxillary lateral incisors (MD=0.53, 95%CI -0.50, 1.56, P=0.31), mandibular incisors (MD=-0.01, 95%CI  -0.22, 0.20, P=0.92) and mandibular lateral incisors (MD=-0.31, 95%CI -1.33, 0.71, P=0.55). Conclusion  As the type of orthodontic appliance may not be the major factor influencing root absorption, and suitable brackets can be chosen by orthodontic dentists according to the merits and demerits of self-ligating and traditional ligating brackets and deformity of patients’ teeth.

Key words: Root resorption, Self-ligating brackets, Orthodontic treatment, Conventional ligating brackets, Systematic review

[1] HAN Ting, DU Jing, YU Jiali, ZHENG Wenzhou, WANG Yan. Factors influencing root resorption after replantation of avulsed permanent teeth: a report of 47 teeth [J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2020, 1(8): 115-119.
[2] SUN Fei, LI Shuxiang, WANG Lin, ZHANG Li, XIAO Shuiqing. Correlation between porphyromonas gingivalis FimA genotype V and ginival inflammatory in the orthodontic patients [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2017, 55(3): 59-63.
[3] SUN Yuanyuan, GAO Wei, CUI Ying, ZHANG Hong, JIAO Jianfen, LI Kan, XU Ruicai. A systematic review on the effects of venous access port and PICC in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2015, 53(10): 73-81.
[4] CONG Shu-min1, WANG Xu-xia2, ZHANG Li-na2, LI Tao2, WANG Sheng-lin3, LI Jing2, ZHANG Jun2,4. Effects of ibandronate on osteoclast in orthodontic root resorption [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2012, 50(9): 44-49.
[5] ZHANG Wei-wei,MAO Yu-long,WEI Lin,GUO Jing. Changes of the maxillary dentoalveolar and dental arch produced by In-Ovation selfligating system during the leveling andaligning phases of treatment [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2008, 46(11): 1098-1101.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!