您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版)

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

乳腺癌患者细胞免疫水平与预后危险因素的关系及临床意义

俞新爽,韩俊庆,王兴文,盛巍,王瑜   

  1. 山东大学山东省立医院肿瘤研究中心, 山东 济南 250021
  • 收稿日期:2006-11-18 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-09-24 发布日期:2007-09-24
  • 通讯作者: 韩俊庆

Relationship between cytoimmunologic status and prognosis of patients with breast cancer

YU Xin-shuang, HAN Jun-qing, WANG Xing-wen, SHENG Wei, WANG Yu   

  1. Cancer Reseach Center, Shandong Provincal Hospital of Shandong University,Jinan 250021, Shandong, China
  • Received:2006-11-18 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2007-09-24 Published:2007-09-24
  • Contact: HAN Jun-qing

摘要: 目的:探讨乳腺癌患者细胞免疫状态与预后危险因素之间的关系。方法:回顾性分析1997年至2002年收治的110例女性乳腺癌患者的临床资料,分析其一般情况及CD+3T、CD+4T、CD+8T、CD+4/CD+8、淋巴细胞转化率(LTR)的变化及其与乳腺癌肿块大小、淋巴结转移情况及癌胚抗原(CEA)的关系。结果:①乳腺癌不同肿块大小患者中CD+4T、CD+8T、CD+4/CD+8水平差异有统计学意义(P<0.01或P<0.05),在肿块较小时即有CD4+T水平的降低和CD+8T水平的升高,而CD+4/CD+8水平随着肿瘤负荷的增大而降低;②淋巴结转移组[LN(+)]与未转移组[LN(-)]比较,CD+4/CD+8在LN(+)组中显著降低(P<0.05);CD+3T、CD+4T、CD+8T在LN(+)组中表达增高,CD+3T、CD+8T的升高有统计学意义(P<0.05或P<0.01)。 ③CEA在LN(+)组中明显升高(P<0.05), 在不同肿瘤负荷组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。CEA(+)组和CEA(-)组之间比较,CD+4T升高及CD+4/CD+8水平降低差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01), 且CEA与CD+4T及CD+4/CD+8水平密切相关(P<0.01)。结论:乳腺癌患者存在不同程度的细胞免疫状态紊乱,且与乳腺癌CEA水平及肿块大小、淋巴结转移情况密切相关。

Abstract: To investigate the cytoimmunologic status of patients with breast cancer and its relationship with prognostic risk factors. Methods: One hundred and ten patients with breast cancer in Shandong Provincial Hospital between 1997 and 2002 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical features, as well as the alternation of CD+3T, CD+4T, CD+8T, CD+4/CD+8 and LTR and their relationship with mass size, metastasis of lymph nodes and CEA were also analyzed. Results: ①There were statistical differences in the percentage of CD+4T and CD+8T and the ratio of CD+4/CD+8 between groups of different mass sizes (P<0.05 or P<0.01). The percentage of CD+4T was decreased and of CD+8T was increased when mass size was small. The ratio of CD+4/CD+8 went down with an increase of mass size. ②Percentages of CD+3T and CD+8T in patients with metastasis of axillary lymph nodes[LN(+)] were significant higher than those without metastasis of axillary lymph nodes [LN(-)] (P<0.05 or P<0.01). ratioin patients with metastasis of LN(+) than those without metastasis of LN(-) (P<0.05 or P<0.01). The percentage of CD+4T was higher in patients with metastasis of LN(+)than in patients without metastasis of LN(-), but no significant difference was found(P>0.05). ③The CEA level was significant higher in patients with metastasis of LN(+) than in patients without metastasis of LN(-) (P<0.05), and no such difference was shown between different mass-size groups(P>0.05). The increase of CD+4T percentage and the decrease of CD+4/CD+8 ratio were obvious in the CEA(+) group compared with the CEA(-) group(P<0.01), and CEA was significantly correlated with the CD+4T percentage and the CD+4/CD+8 ratio (P<0.01). Conclusion: Disorder of the cytoimmunologic situation exists in patients with breast cancer, and it is closely correlated with the highly prognostic factors of mass size and the metastasis situation of axillary lymph nodes.

Key words: Breast neoplasm, Cytoimmunity, T-lymphocyte subsets, Carcinoembryonic antigen

中图分类号: 

  • R737.9
[1] 张佩佩,刘德泉,王蓓,赫淑倩,李菲,丁红宇,孙洪军. 非肿块型乳腺单纯性导管内癌声像图特征及病理学相关分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(11): 54-58.
[2] 冯涛,朱洪芳,郭崇勇. 超声检查阴性的乳腺原发性印戒细胞癌1例[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(7): 130-132.
[3] 孟繁超,冯鹭,邵广瑞. 人乳腺癌细胞系MCF-7中FOXM1调控SYK转录[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(3): 19-24.
[4] 林家香,郭子嘉,苏鹏,王晓,郭雅欣,吴晓娟,相磊,周志强, 王妍,崔秀杰,潘爱凤,郭成浩. 致癌蛋白CIP2A在乳腺导管上皮恶变中的作用及预测浸润性导管癌患者预后的能力[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(3): 100-106.
[5] 徐志宏,刘荣凤,王晓翔,冯莉,姚铁柱,刘红. 养正消积胶囊联合化疗治疗转移性乳腺癌的临床疗效及安全性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(5): 79-83.
[6] 李冉冉,张鹏飞,袁冰,房菲菲, 韩明勇. 乳腺癌MCF-7细胞分泌的血管内皮生长因子诱导血管内皮细胞免疫功能抑制[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(2): 38-43.
[7] 陈勇, 梁万炯, 王晓华, 陈建安, 谢惠君, 刘彦章. 环绕式注射法在乳腺良性肿块 微创旋切术中的应用研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(S2): 43-44.
[8] 李玲, 王丽丽, 王胜江, 于超, 刘延鹏, 徐成伟. 乳腺癌患者血浆D-二聚体水平与预后关系的探讨[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(9): 77-80.
[9] 孙莹, 于晶, 魏军民, 樊聪, 王秀问, 高鹏, 江立玉, 马婷婷. 35岁以下女性乳腺癌患者的临床病理特征[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(7): 71-74.
[10] 郭玉萍1,程显魁2,孙雅萌1,韩俊庆1. 原发性乳腺骨肉瘤1例[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(5): 109-110.
[11] 马振申1,王大伟2,孙秀彬3,史浩1,庞涛1,董桂青1,张成琪1. 3.0T磁共振对乳腺良恶性病变的定量分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(9): 79-83.
[12] 迟蔚蔚1,高海燕2,高海东3. 转化生长因子β1诱导的跨膜蛋白参与乳腺癌发展的分子机制[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(4): 26-29.
[13] 李珊珊,孙颖,丁涣,黎莉. β-catenin在不同亚型乳腺癌中的表达及其临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(3): 107-110.
[14] 岑东芝. NRIP3基因高表达抑制淋巴结阴性乳腺癌转移的研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(9): 83-.
[15] 王婧男1,郑燕2,肖东杰2,李金星1,丁卜同2,刘相东3,汪运山2,4. SATB1与HER2表达和乳腺癌分化程度的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(9): 91-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!