您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (11): 85-91.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2020.0113

• • 上一篇    下一篇

加速康复外科指导下胃癌患者围手术期心率变异度的临床观察

支梦伟1,江志伟2,戴新娟3,王刚2,程伟2   

  • 发布日期:2020-11-04
  • 通讯作者: 戴新娟. E-mail:xingjdai@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81500417):江苏省社会发展项目(BE2015687)

Clinical observation of heart rate variability in patients with gastric cancer during perioperative period under the guidance of enhanced recovery after surgery

ZHI Mengwei1, JIANG Zhiwei2, DAI Xinjuan3, WANG Gang2, CHENG Wei2   

  1. 1. School of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, China;
    2. Department of General Surgery, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, China;
    3. Department of Nursing, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, China
  • Published:2020-11-04

摘要: 目的 探讨加速康复外科(ERAS)指导下腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术患者围手术期心率变异度(HRV)的变化情况。 方法 回顾性分析2019年1月至12月50例行腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术的胃癌患者,根据围手术期是否采用加速康复外科理念,分为对照组(n=25)和ERAS组(n=25)。对照组实施传统围手术期处理措施,ERAS组围手术期处理措施包括多模式健康宣教、液体管理、多模式止痛、早期肠内营养、早期下床活动等。观察比较两组手术前后心率变异度参数[全部窦性心搏RR期间的标准差(SDNN)、NN间期总个数除以NN间期直方图的高度(三角指数)、相邻NN间期之差>50 ms的个数占总窦性心搏个数的百分比(pNN50)、低频功率(LF)、高频功率(HF)、低频功率/高频功率(LF/HF)]及血清C反应蛋白(CRP)变化情况。 结果 ERAS组术后1~4 d SDNN均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);ERAS组术后第1、2、3、5天三角指数均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);ERAS组术后2~4 d LF/HF均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组术后1~5 d pNN50、LF、HF相比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。ERAS组术后第1、3天CRP均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论 加速康复外科提高了腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术后患者心率变异度,减轻了手术应激和炎症反应,促进了术后快速恢复。

关键词: 加速康复外科, 胃癌, 心率变异度, 自主神经系统, 应激反应

Abstract: Objective To explore the changes of heart rate variability(HRV)in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy under the guidance of enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS). Methods The clinical data of 50 patients who received laparoscopic radical gastrectomy during Jan. 2019 and Dec. 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. According to whether ERAS concept was adopted, the patients were divided into the control group(n=25)and ERAS group(n=25). Patients in the control group received traditional perioperative management, while patients in the ERAS group received multimodal health education, fluid management, multimodal analgesia, early enteral nutrition, early ambulation and so on. Perioperative HRV parameters were compared between the two groups, including standard deviation of NN intervals(SDNN), triangle index, number of pairs of successive NNs that differ by more than 50ms(pNN50), low frequency(LF), high frequency(HF), low frequency/high frequency(LF/HF). The serum hypersensitive C-reactive protein level in the two groups were also observed. Results In postoperative days 1-4, SDNN was significantly higher in the ERAS group than in the control group(P<0.05). In postoperative days 1, 2, 3 and 5, triangle index was significantly higher in the ERAS group than in the control group(P<0.05). In postoperative days 2-4, LF/HF was significantly higher in the ERAS group than in the control group(P<0.05). In postoperative days 1-5, there were no differences in LF, HF and LF/HF between the two groups(P>0.05). In postoperative days 1 and 3, C-reactive protein was significantly lower in the ERAS group than in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion ERAS improves HRV, reduces surgical stress and inflammatory response, and promotes recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy.

Key words: Enhanced recovery after surgery, Gastric cancer, Heart rate variability, Autonomic nervous system, Stress response

中图分类号: 

  • R619
[1] 陈秋磊. 加速康复外科对肠功能及自主神经调控的研究[D]. 南京: 南京大学, 2016.
[2] Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology[J]. Eur Heart J, 1996, 17(3): 354-381.
[3] 刘慧, 王新利, 关育红, 等. 妊娠期合并糖代谢异常对新生儿胰岛素敏感性的影响[J]. 中国新生儿科杂志, 2012, 27(4): 228-232. LIU Hui, WANG Xinli, GUAN Yuhong, et al. Effects of pregnancy complicated with abnormal glycometabolism on the offspring insulin sensitivity[J]. Chinese Journal of Neonatology, 2012, 27(4): 228-232.
[4] Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68(6): 394-424.
[5] 张静, 王晰程, 曹彦硕, 等. 二代测序在家族遗传性高危胃肠肿瘤筛查中的应用[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2018, 45(19): 1000-1004. ZHANG Jing, WANG Xicheng, CAO Yanshuo, et al. Application of next-generation sequencing for the screening of hereditary gastrointestinal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2018, 45(19): 1000-1004.
[6] Goudman L, Brouns R, Linderoth B, et al. Effects of spinal cord stimulation on heart rate variability in patients with failed back surgery syndrome: comparison between a 2-lead ECG and a wearable device[J]. Neuromodulation, 2019. doi:10.1111/ner.13091.
[7] Batchinsky AI, Cooke WH, Kuusela T, et al. Loss of complexity characterizes the heart rate response to experimental hemorrhagic shock in swine[J]. Crit Care Med, 2007, 35(2): 519-525.
[8] Salom(~overa)o E Jr, Otsuki DA, Correa AL, et al. Heart rate variability analysis in an experimental model of hemorrhagic shock and resuscitation in pigs[J]. PLoS One,2015,10(8): e0134387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134387.
[9] Hu S, Lou J, Zhang Y, et al. Low heart rate variability relates to the progression of gastric cancer[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2018, 16(1): 49. doi:10.1186/s12957-018-1348-z.
[10] Carli F. Physiologic considerations of enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)programs: implications of the stress response[J]. Can J Anaesth, 2015, 62(2): 110-119.
[11] 林雪梅, 符梅华, 黄丽娜, 等. 药枕联合耳穴贴压缓解胃肠道恶性肿瘤患者围手术期焦虑、抑郁的临床研究[J]. 北京中医药, 2019, 38(10): 968-973. LIN Xuemei, FU Meihua, HUANG Lina, et al. Application of medicinal pillow combined with auricular acupoint pressing in relieving perioperative anxiety and depression of patients with gastrointestinal malignancy[J]. Beijing Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2019, 38(10): 968-973.
[12] Fiol-Veny A, Balle M, De la Torre-Luque, et al. Negative cognitive emotion regulation as a predictor of adolescent heart rate variability and entropy under social stress[J]. Anxiety Stress Coping, 2019, 32(6): 641-653.
[13] Usui H, Nishida Y. The very low-frequency band of heart rate variability represents the slow recovery component after a mental stress task[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(8): e0182611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182611.
[14] Borys M, Zyzak K, Hanych A, et al. Survey of postoperative pain control in different types of hospitals: a multicenter observational study[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2018, 18(1): 83.
[15] Karri J, Zhang L, Li S, et al. Heart rate variability: a novel modality for diagnosing neuropathic pain after spinal cord Injury[J]. Front Physiol, 2017, 8: 495. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00495.
[16] Léonard G, Chalaye P, Goffaux P, et al. Altered autonomic nervous system reactivity to pain in trigeminal neuralgia[J]. Can J Neurol Sci, 2015, 42(2): 125-131.
[17] 房怿, 申岱. 相位整序信号平均技术用于全麻术中自主神经功能的评价[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2017, 33(1): 15-18. FANG Yi, SHEN Dai. Phase-rectified signal averaging for the assessment of automatic nervous system activity in surgery during general anesthesia[J]. Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology, 2017, 33(1): 15-18.
[18] 房怿, 张婷婷, 张文静, 等. 围手术期迷走神经保护[J]. 国际麻醉学与复苏杂志, 2017, 38(12): 1128-1132. FANG Yi, ZHANG Tingting, ZHANG Wenjing, et al. Conservation of vagus nerve during perioperative period[J]. International Journal of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation, 2017, 38(12): 1128-1132.
[19] 王刚, 江志伟. 加速康复外科推广过程中面临的挑战与对策[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2019, 57(9): 24-27, 37. WANG Gang, JIANG Zhiwei. Challenges and countermeasures in the spread of enhanced recovery after surgery[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2019, 57(9): 24-27,37.
[20] Haase O, Langelotz C, Scharfenberg M, et al. Reduction of heart rate variability after colorectal resections[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2012, 397(5): 793-799.
[21] 程康文, 王贵和, 束宽山, 等. 加速康复外科在腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术中的应用及其对患者术后恢复、营养及应激的影响[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2019, 28(10): 1228-1236. CHENG Kangwen, WANG Guihe, SHU Kuanshan, et al.Application of enhanced recovery after surgery in laparoscopic assisted radical resection for gastric cancer and its influence on postoperative recovery, nutrition status and stress of the patients[J]. Chinese Journal of General Surgery, 2019, 28(10): 1228-1236.
[22] 赵健, 韩晓玲, 王刚, 等. 多模式止痛对机器人45例远端胃切除术后肠功能的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2019, 57(9): 43-47. ZHAO Jian, HAN Xiaoling, WANG Gang, et al. Effects of multimodal analgesia on the intestinal function of 45 patients who received robotic distal gastrectomy[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2019, 57(9): 43-47.
[23] 程黎阳, 谢正勇, 戴观荣, 等. 快速康复外科应用于胃肠手术的安全性评估及个体化原则[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2012, 28(1): 14-17. CHENG Liyang, XIE Zhengyong, DAI Guanrong, et al. The safety and individuation principle of fast-track surgery applied in gastrointestinal surgery[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2012, 28(1): 14-17.
[24] Gögenur I. Postoperative circadian disturbances[J]. Dan Med Bull, 2010, 57(12): B4205.
[25] Luo X, Gao H, Yu X, et al. Spectral analysis of heart rate variability for trauma outcome prediction: an analysis of 210 ICU multiple trauma patients[J]. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2019. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01175-5.
[26] Ushiyama T, Mizushige K, Wakabayashi H, et al. Analysis of heart rate variability as an index of noncardiac surgical stress[J]. Heart Vessels, 2008, 23(1): 53-59.
[1] 史爽,李娟,米琦,王允山,杜鲁涛,王传新. 胃癌miRNAs预后风险评分模型的构建与应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 47-52.
[2] 李玉杰,韩伟,黄炜,董玉科,李韬,党燕伟,蔡晓清,申晓,龚文丹,许连方. 加速康复外科在44例悬雍垂腭咽成形术中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(11): 92-97.
[3] 宗帅,肖东杰,刘华,郏雁飞,马晓丽,李焕杰,黎娉,郑燕,汪运山. CSN5在胃癌中的表达及与患者预后的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(7): 12-16.
[4] 郝姝桦,郏雁飞,郑燕,马晓丽,孔毅,黎娉,宗帅,张垚,汪运山. ARNT2在胃癌中的表达及临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(7): 6-10.
[5] 董秀红. 认知催眠疗法减轻胃癌化疗患者癌因性疲乏的疗效观察[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(7): 56-59.
[6] 张守彩,高玉,郑桂喜,杨咏梅,刘延红,高杨,王传新. 两种方法评估胃蛋白酶原在萎缩性胃炎和胃癌中的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(12): 46-52.
[7] 李帅,李迪诺,袁超凡,梁旭,王玉彬. miR-98-5p靶向调控AKT2基因对人胃癌MGC803细胞增殖的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(11): 27-31.
[8] 韦丽兰, 莫书荣. 红景天苷对人胃癌细胞SGC-7901抑瘤作用的体外实验研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(12): 12-15,32.
[9] 朱丽华, 赵琳琳, 李盖. 靶向沉默IL-6R基因对胃癌细胞增殖的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(S1): 22-23.
[10] 徐光辉, 李玉, 刘忠伦, 胡楠. 晚期胃癌患者血清TP表达与含替吉奥方案化疗疗效的相关性研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(S1): 77-79.
[11] 延冰1,刘国勤2,姜永胜2,沈海玉2,孙少川2. 高剂量法诱导胃癌铂类耐药细胞株的建立及其生物学特性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(4): 49-52.
[12] 王丽丽1,于超2,徐成伟2. 胃癌患者血浆凝血酶激活的纤溶抑制物水平及临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(2): 73-77.
[13] 耿超1,潘英芳2,林森1. 肿瘤坏死因子α诱导蛋白8对胃癌细胞转移能力的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(5): 85-88.
[14] 肖锦华1,王亚萍1,朱华燕1,潘宇红1,徐秋岚2. HMGB1与MMP-9在早期胃癌患者血清中的表达及其临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(10): 70-73.
[15] 张琪1,2,李延青1,张翠萍2,赵坤2,孙向红3. 活化诱导胞嘧啶核苷脱氨酶在肠型胃癌组织中的表达及与幽门螺杆菌感染的关系[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(12): 61-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!