您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（医学版）》

山东大学学报（医学版） ›› 2017, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (9): 11-16.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2016.1415

• 老年人生活质量与影响因素研究专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同年龄阶段老年人的幸福感、心理压力与心理弹性研究

江虹1,徐晶晶1,王瑞1,伊向仁2,周雅茹3,潘芳1   

  1. 1.山东大学基础医学院医学心理学与伦理学系, 山东 济南 250012;2.山东大学体育学院, 山东 济南 250061;3.山东大学公共卫生学院, 山东 济南 250012
  • 收稿日期:2016-11-01 出版日期:2017-09-10 发布日期:2017-09-10
  • 通讯作者: 潘芳. E-mail:panfang@sdu.edu.cn E-mail:panfang@sdu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    科技部基础性工作专项(2015FY111600)

A study of happiness, stress and mental resilience of elderly of different ages

JIANG Hong1, XU Jingjing1, WANG Rui1, YI Xiangren2, ZHOU Yaru3, PAN Fang1   

  1. 1. Department of Medical Psychology and Ethnics, School of Basic Medical Science, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;
    2. School of Physical Education, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, Shandong, China;
    3. School of Public Health, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China
  • Received:2016-11-01 Online:2017-09-10 Published:2017-09-10

PDF (PC)

1805

摘要： 目的 探讨不同年龄阶段老年人的幸福感、心理压力与心理弹性。 方法 采用整群取样的方法,以人脸量表、知觉压力量表和心理弹性量表对某社区622名60岁以上的老年人进行调查研究。 结果 老年人的幸福感随年龄增加呈现动态变化,表现为60~岁组老年人幸福感最高,65~岁组开始下降,70~岁组老年人幸福感最低,此后一直维持在较低的水平。80~岁组老年人的心理压力最低,与其他年龄组相比有统计学差异。60~岁组和65~岁组老年人的心理弹性得分显著高于80~岁组和85岁及以上组。配偶健在、身体健康状况很好和较好及收入状况好的老年人幸福感水平更高。离异者的心理压力最大,收入状况较好者的心理弹性更高。年龄、婚姻状况、收入、身体健康状况和心理弹性与幸福感显著相关,且心理弹性具有最大效应值。年龄、收入、身体健康状况和心理压力与心理弹性显著相关,心理压力具有较大效应值。婚姻状况、身体健康状况和心理弹性是幸福感的预测因子;性别、身体健康状况和心理压力是心理弹性的预测因子。 结论 老年人的幸福感随年龄增加而降低,高心理弹性者幸福感高,心理压力和身体健康状况通过降低心理弹性影响老年人的幸福感。

关键词: 老年人, 幸福感, 增龄, 心理弹性, 心理压力

Abstract: Objective To explore the happiness, stress and mental resilience of elderly of different ages. Methods A total of 622 elderly aged over 60 years who lived in the same community were investigated with the Face Scale, Perceived Stress Scale(PSS)and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale(CD-RISC). Results The happiness of elderly displayed dynamic changes with aging, the 60- year group had the highest happiness, the 65- year group had declining happiness, and the 70- year group had the lowest happiness, which then remained at a low level with aging. The 80- year group had the lowest stress compared with other groups. The 60- year group and 65- year group had significantly higher scores of CD-RISC than the 80- year group and >85-year group. Elderly with good physical health, living with spouse and good income had high level of happiness. The divorced group had the highest stress score, and the moderate-income group had the best mental resilience. Age, marital status, income, physical health and mental resilience were significantly 山 东 大 学 学 报 (医 学 版)55卷9期 -江虹,等.不同年龄阶段老年人的幸福感、心理压力与心理弹性研究 \=-correlated with happiness, among which mental resilience had the greatest effect. Age, income, physical health and stress were significantly related to mental resilience, among which stress had the greatest effect. Marital status, physical health and mental resilience were the predicators of happiness. Gender, physical health and stress were the predicators of mental resilience. Conclusion Happiness of elderly changes dynamicly with aging. Elderly with higher mental resilience have higher level of happiness. Stress and physical health can reduce resilience, which influences the level of happiness.

Key words: Happiness, Aging, Elderly, Stress, Mental resilience

中图分类号: 

  • R395
[1] 梅锦荣. 老年人主观幸福感的社会性因素[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 1999, 13(2): 85-87.
[2] 张伟, 胡仲明, 李红娟. 城市老年人主观幸福感的影响因素分析[J]. 人口与发展, 2014, 20(6): 71-75. ZHANG Wei, HU Zhongming, LI Hongjuan. Analysis on the influencing factors of subjective well being of the elderly in urban[J]. Population and Development, 2014, 20(6): 71-75.
[3] 吴芳, 张磊. 城市空巢老人主观幸福感的影响因素[J]. 管理观察, 2014, 28: 15-17. WU Fang, ZHANG Lei. The factors effecting on the subjective well-being of the city Empty Nester[J]. Observation of Management, 2014, 28: 15-17.
[4] 高健, 贾梦, 康铁君, 等. 接受性社会支持对退休老人心理健康和主观幸福感的影响[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2010, 3(18): 2655-2659. GAO Jian, JIA Meng, KANG Tiejun, et al. The receiving social supports effect on mental health and subjective well-being of the retired elderly[J]. Chinese Journal of Gerontology, 2010, 3(18): 2655-2659.
[5] 刘仁刚. 老年人主观幸福感的城乡差异[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2000, 8(2): 73-78. LIU Rengang. The differences between the subjective well-being of the elderly in urban and rural areas[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2000, 8(2): 73-78.
[6] 王希华, 周华发. 老年人生活质量、孤独感与主观幸福感现状及相互关系[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2010, 30(5): 676-677. WANG Xihua, ZHOU Huafa. The situation and relationship between the quality of life, loneliness and subjective well being of the elderly[J]. Chinese Journal of Gerontology, 2010, 30(5): 676-677.
[7] Tiemeier H, Breteler M, Hofman A, et al. A multivariate score objectively assessed health of depressed elderly[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2005, 58: 1134-1141.
[8] Vink D, Aartsen M, Schoevers R. Risk factors for anxiety and depression in the elderly: a review[J]. J Affect Disord, 2008, 106: 29-44.
[9] Southwick SM, Charney DS. The science of resilience: implications for the prevention and treatment of depression[J]. Science, 2012, 338(6103): 79-82.
[10] Perron JL, Cleverley K, Kidd S. Resilience, loneliness, and psychological distress among homeless youth[J]. Arch Psychiatr Nurs, 2014, 28(4): 226-229.
[11] Masten AS, Best KM, Garmezy N. Resilience and development: Contributions from the study of children who overcome adversity[J]. Dev Psychopathol, 1990, 2(4): 425-444.
[12] Cicchetti D, Rogosch FA. The role of self-organization in the promotion of resilience in maltreated children[J]. Dev Psychopathol, 1997, 9(4): 797-815.
[13] 刘春琴, 李华芳, 田晓红, 等. 精神科护士人格特征与心理困扰的关系: 心理弹性的中介作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(9): 90-94. LIU Chunqin, LI Huafang, TIAN Xiaohong, et al. Relationship between personality and psychological distress in nurses of psychiatric department: mediating effect of resilience[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Science), 2015, 53(9): 90-94.
[14] 郝元涛, 方积乾. 世界卫生组织生存质量测定量表中文版介绍及其使用说明[J]. 现代康复, 2000, 4(8): 1127-1129. HAO Yuantao, FANG Jiqian. The introduction and usage of WHOQOL instrument in Chinese[J]. Modern Rehabilitation, 2000, 4(8): 1127-1129.
[15] Andrew FM, Withey SB. Social indicators of well-being Americans life of Quality[M]. New York, Plenum, 1976.
[16] Cohens S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress[J]. J Health Soc Behavior, 1983, 24: 385-396.
[17] Ng SM. Validation of the 10-item Chinese perceived stress scale in elderly service workers: one-factor versus two-factor structure[J]. BMC Psychology, 2013, 1: 9.
[18] Leung DY, Lam TH, Chan SS. Three version of perceived stress scale: validation in a sample of Chinese cardiac patients who smoke[J]. BMC Public Health, 2010, 10: 513.
[19] 徐云, 周蓉, 付春梅. 心理弹性量表(CD-RISC)在大学生中的信效度验证及结构探讨[J].中国健康心理学杂志, 2016, 24(6): 100-103. XU Yun, ZHOU Rong, FU Chunmei. Reliability, validity and explorations of the structure of psychological resilience scale(CD-RISC)in college students[J]. Journal of Chinese Mental Health, 2016, 24(6): 100-103.
[20] 李燕, 刘坤, 孙晓杰. 山东省3县农村老年人与收入相关的健康不平等状况及影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(6): 91-96. LI Yan, LIU Kun, SUN Xiaojie. Health inequality related to income and influencing factors of the rural elderly in three counties of Shandong Province[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Science), 2016, 54(6): 91-96.
[21] García-Huidobro D, Puschel K, Soto G. Family functioning style and health: opportunities for health prevention in primary care[J]. Br J Gen Pract, 2012, 62: e198-203.
[22] Ozbay F, Fitterling H, Charney D, et al. Social support and resilience to stress across the life span: A neurobiologic frame work[J]. Curr Psychiatry Rep, 2008, 10(4): 304-310.
[1] 王健 孟庆跃 Winnie Yip 曲江斌 王丽娜. 农村居民日常活动的主观幸福感分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2209, 47(6): 118-.
[2] 逄锦宏,苏萍,乔俊鹏,陈巧巧,陈学禹,赵颖颖,施婕,孙晓茹,李秋春,何蕊言,范轶欧,迟蔚蔚. 老年人群可改变心血管危险因素聚集模式与脑卒中的关联[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(9): 11-19.
[3] 付雨,姜伟,朱高培,薛付忠. 基于多水平模型的山东省老年人健康相关生命质量及其影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(9): 57-64.
[4] 刘国伟,翟艳,王薇,吕军城. 潍坊市某城区65岁及以上老年人社会适应能力现状及其影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(2): 104-110.
[5] 王利红,窦少坤,栾惠,李宝瑞,宗爱珍,徐同成. 多糖在吞咽障碍食品中应用的研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(8): 1-8.
[6] 郭艳童,于媛媛,陈莹莹,付雨,张伯韬,袁莹,孙爽爽,赵英淇,朱高培,薛付忠. 山东省主动健康示范区域老年人慢病管理知信行现状及影响机制[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(7): 98-105.
[7] 宋东玉,吕靖然,李玉丽,刘宇舟. 基于安德森模型的城市中老年人隔代抚养培训需求影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(6): 108-115.
[8] 姜淑伟,马良,康保絮,王志浩. FRAIL量表在老年关节置换术后压力性损伤风险预测中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(11): 54-66.
[9] 王琼,李欣宇,徐磊,周成超,江帆. 社区听力康复对老年听力障碍患者沟通能力的干预效果评估:一项随机对照试验[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(11): 96-104.
[10] 王少虎,牟鑫,许程飞,赵颖馨,张华. 老年人颈动脉狭窄与脑白质结构网络拓扑属性的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(2): 72-77.
[11] 赵洋,孔凡磊,李士雪. 同住子女性别对济南市656例随迁老人幸福感的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(6): 122-128.
[12] 赵思博,彭立,凌鸿翔. 农村老年人医疗保险参与和自杀风险的关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 113-118.
[13] 苏永刚,王睿,杨同卫. 健康中国视域下老年人群自杀的影响因素及预防对策[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(2): 8-13.
[14] 于书卷,王美娟,陈丽,曹英娟,吕晓燕,刘雪燕,林鹏,颜景政. 老年2型糖尿病患者轻度认知功能障碍的影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(11): 108-112.
[15] 王辛,郭丹,梁佳瑞,郭丽,王健. 社会资本对老年人健康促进行为的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(7): 97-103.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(医学版)》编辑部　
地址:山东大学科技期刊社（济南市历城区山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B座721室） 电话: 0531-88366918 E-mail: xbyxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发