您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (8): 88-91.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2016.210

• • 上一篇    下一篇

Stoppa入路手术治疗骨盆前环骨折合并后尿道断裂

刘华水,段升军,刘士懂,贾堂宏,贾逢爽   

  1. 济南市第三人民医院创伤外科, 山东 济南 250113
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-02 出版日期:2016-08-10 发布日期:2016-08-10
  • 通讯作者: 贾堂宏. E-mail:jnsylhs2008@163.com E-mail:jnsylhs2008@163.com

Stoppa approach in the treatment of anterior pelvic ring fractures complicated with posterior urethral disruption

LIU Huashui, DUAN Shengjun, LIU Shidong, JIA Tanghong, JIA Fengshuang   

  1. Department of Traumatology, Third Peoples Hospital of Jinan, Jinan 250113, Shandong, China
  • Received:2016-03-02 Online:2016-08-10 Published:2016-08-10

摘要: 目的 探讨Stoppa入路手术Ⅰ期治疗骨盆前环骨折合并后尿道断裂的可行性和疗效。 方法 选取2012年1月至2015年7月采用Stoppa入路手术治疗骨盆前环骨折合并后尿道断裂患者16例。均急诊Ⅰ期行尿道会师牵引、尿道会师吻合或部分吻合,骨盆骨折重建钢板内固定术。术后随访6~36个月,应用Tometta评估和Majeed评分评价骨折复位和术后功能情况。根据临床检查及患者的主观感受评价尿道修复效果。 结果 手术部位平均切口长度12 cm,手术平均时间136 min。骨折复位Tometta评估:优11例,良3例,可2例。术后功能Majeed评分:优12例,良3例,可1例。尿管拔除后,12例排尿通畅,最大尿流率平均18.5 mL/s;4例出现不同程度的尿道狭窄,6例阴茎勃起困难,2例尿失禁发生。 结论 Stoppa入路手术视野清晰,操作安全,可Ⅰ期直视下实现对尿道断裂修复并骨盆前环骨折的复位和固定,是治疗骨盆前环骨折合并后尿道断裂理想入路。

关键词: 尿道断裂, 骨盆骨折, Stoppa入路, 骨折固定术

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of Stoppa approach in the treatment of anterior pelvic ring fractures complicated with posterior urethral disruption. Methods Clinical data of 16 cases of anterior pelvic ring fractures complicated with posterior disruption during January 2012 and July 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were treated with emergency operation with the Stoppa approach of open reduction and internal fixation of the pelvis combined with urethral realignment by traction and primary urethra suturing or partial suturing. All patients were followed up for 6 to 36 months. The reduction of fracture and recovery of function were evaluated with Tometta and Majeed score. The urethral repair effect was evaluated with postoperative clinical examination and patients subjective feelings. Results The mean length of incision was 12 cm. The average operation time was 136 min. According to the Tometta score classification, the results were excellent in 11 cases, good in 3 cases, and fair in 2 cases. According to the Majeed score classification, the results were excellent in 12 cases, good in 3 cases, and fair in 1 case. After the urinary catheter was removed, 12 patients achieved good urination, with the mean maximal urine flow being 18.5 mL/s; 4 patients developed dysuria; 6 patients had penile erectile difficulties; and 2 patients had urinary incontinence. Conclusion The Stoppa approach is a safe approach, which can provide clear surgical field to repair the urethral disruption and fix the anterior pelvic ring fractures. It can be an ideal approach in the treatment of anterior pelvic ring fractures complicated with posterior urethral disruption.

Key words: Fracture fixation, Pelvic fractures, Posterior urethral disruption, Stoppa approach

中图分类号: 

  • R615
[1] Andrich DE, OMalley KJ, Summerton DJ, et al. The type of urethroplasty for a pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect cannot be predicted preoperatively[J]. J Urol, 2003, 170(2 Pt 1):464-457.
[2] Hirvensalo E, Lindahl J, Böstman O. A new approach to the internal fixation of unstable pelvic fractures[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1993, 297:28-32.
[3] Cole JD, Bolhofner BR. Acetabular fracture fixation via a modified Stoppa limited intrapelvic approach. Description of operative technique and preliminary treatment results [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1994, 305:112-123.
[4] Elmadag M, Acar MA. A modified stoppa(technique)approach for treatment of pediatric acetabular fractures[J]. Case Rep Orthop, 2013, 2013:478131. doi:10.1155/2013/478131. Epub 2013 May 27.
[5] ONeill F, Leonard M, Morris S. A bilateral crescent and anterior ring pelvic fracture sustained by inadvertently performing the ‘splits’ [J]. J Surg Case Rep, 2012, 2012(9):11. doi:10.1093/jscr/2012.9.11.
[6] Kim HY, Yang DS, Park CK, et al. Modified Stoppa approach for surgical treatment of acetabular fracture [J]. Clin Orthop Surg, 2015, 7(1):29-38.
[7] Liu Y, Yang H, Li X, et al. Newly modified Stoppa approach for acetabular fractures [J]. Int Orthop, 2013, 37(7):1347-1353.
[8] 贾健,郭录增,武长林, 等.骨盆骨折合并尿道断裂的早期手术治疗[J].中华外科杂志,2007,45(4): 249-253. JIA Jian, GUO Luzeng, WU Changlin, et al. Early operative treatment of pelvic fractures associated with urethral disruption[J]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2007, 45(4):249-253.
[9] Ter-Grigorian AA, Kasyan GR, Pushkar DY. Urogenital disorders after pelvic ring injuries[J]. Cent European J Urol, 2013, 66(3):352-356.
[10] Koraitim MM. Pelvic fracture urethral injuries:evaluation of various methods of management[J]. J Urol, 1996, 156(4):1288-1291.
[11] Mouraviev VB, Coburn M, Santucci RA. The treatment of posterior urethral disruption associated with pelvic fractures:comparative experience of early realignment versus delayed urethroplasty[J]. J Urol, 2005, 173(3):873-876.
[12] Koraitim MM. Pelvic fracture urethral injuries: the unresolved controversy [J]. J Urol, 1999, 161(5):1433-1441.
[1] 刘华水,段升军,贾逢爽,刘士懂,陈华,王业本,贾堂宏,赵国辉,朱礼明,刘珉岑. TiRobot机器人辅助经皮空心螺钉内固定治疗不稳定型骨盆骨折[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(7): 103-109.
[2] 王志勇,桑锡光,柳豪. 交锁髓内钉治疗尺桡骨骨折的回顾性疗效分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(1): 78-81.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!