富血供肝脏转移瘤与肝细胞肝癌的能谱CT成像定量分析

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2016.058

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨能谱CT成像定量分析在富血供肝脏转移瘤(HVHM)与肝细胞肝癌(HCC)鉴别诊断中的临床应用价值。方法分析行能谱CT扫描的肝脏恶性肿瘤患者47例,分为HVHM组(n=20)和HCC组(n=27),获取动脉期、门静脉期单能量图像,以及碘基图、水基图,测量病灶边缘明显强化区域、正常肝组织和腹主动脉的能谱参数,并计算标准化碘浓度(NIC)、病灶与正常肝组织碘浓度比值(LNR)、病灶动静脉期碘浓度差(ICD)及能谱曲线斜率,对上述参数行独立样本t检验和ROC曲线分析。结果动脉期HVHM组和HCC组的NIC、LNR、能谱曲线斜率无明显差异(P>0.05)。门静脉期HVHM组和HCC组NIC、LNR及能谱曲线斜率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05):两组门静脉期NIC分别为0.59±0.08、0.45±0.10;LNR分别为1.17±0.22、0.92±0.16;能谱曲线斜率分别为1.85±0.49、1.18±0.34。HVHM组和HCC组ICD参数分别为(0.54±0.39)g/L、(0.45±0.39)g/L,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。水(碘)浓度在动脉期、门静脉期差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。门静脉期能谱曲线斜率对HVHM组和HCC组的鉴别诊断效能最高。结论 HVHM和HCC在门静脉期的能谱CT特征性物质含量及能谱曲线具有明显差异,CT能谱成像为HVHM和HCC鉴别诊断提供了一种多参数定量分析方法。

关键词: 肝脏转移瘤, 富血供, 能谱成像, X线计算机, 肝细胞肝癌, 体层摄影术, 定量分析

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the value of the spectral CT quantitative analysis in the differential diagnosis of hypervascular hepatic metastasis(HVHM)and hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC). Methods A total of 47 patients with hepatic malignant tumors undergoing spectral CT scan were divided into HVHM group(n=20)and HCC group(n=27). The monochromatic image sets, iodine-based material decomposition images and water-based material decomposition images were obtained, and the spectral parameters of lesions, normal hepatic tissues and aorta were measured. Then the normalized iodine concentrations(NIC), lesion-normal parenchyma iodine concentration ratio(LNR), iodine concentration difference(ICD)between the arterial phase and portal venous phase, and the slope of spectral curve were calculated. Independent samples t test and ROC were applied to analyze the quantitative parameters. Results Differences of the NIC, LNR and slope of spectral curve were not statistically significant(P>0.05)during arterial phase. Statistically significant differences of the NIC, LNR and slope of spectral curve were found between the HVHM 山东大学学报 (医学版)54卷7期 -岳倩倩,等.富血供肝脏转移瘤与肝细胞肝癌的能谱CT成像定量分析 \=-group and the HCC group(P<0.05)during portal venous phase: NIC=0.59±0.08, 0.45±0.10; LNR=1.17±0.22, 0.92±0.16; the slopes of spectral curve=1.85±0.49, 1.18±0.34, respectively. Differences of ICD between the HVHM group and the HCC group were not statistically significant(P>0.05), and ICD were(0.54±0.39)g/L,(0.45±0.39)g/L, respectively. Differences of water(iodine)concentration in arterial and portal venous phase between the lesions were not statistically significant(P>0.05). The slope of spectral curve in the portal venous phase had the highest diagnostic efficiency in differentiating HVHM from HCC. Conclusions HVHM and HCC have different spectral characteristic parameters and spectral curves during portal venous phase. Spectral CT imaging provides a new multi-parameter quantitative analysis imaging method for differentiating HVHM and HCC.

Key words: Hepatic metastasis, Hypervascularity, Tomography, X-ray computed, Quantitative analysis, Spectral imaging, Hepatocellular carcinoma

中图分类号:

R445

岳倩倩,王新怡,杨志强,姜舒. 富血供肝脏转移瘤与肝细胞肝癌的能谱CT成像定量分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(7): 50-55.

YUE Qianqian, WANG Xinyi, YANG Zhiqiang, JIANG Shu. Quantitative analysis of spectral CT imaging on hypervascular hepatic metastasis and hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2016, 54(7): 50-55.

参考文献

[1] Namasivayam S, Salman K, Mittal P, et al. Hypervascular hepatic focal lesions: spectrum of imaging features[J]. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol, 2007, 36(3): 107-123.
[2] 周康荣. 中华影像医学: 肝胆胰脾卷[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2002: 67.
[3] Christine S, Stephen T, Ivancevic MK, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI of metastatic liver lesions: is there a difference between hypervascular and hypovascular metastases?[J]. Acta Radiol, 2014, 55(5): 515-523.
[4] Matos AP, Altun E, Ramalho M, et al. An overview of imaging techniques for liver metastases management[J]. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2015, 9(12): 1561-1576.
[5] Bhayana D, Kim TK, Jang HJ, et al. Hypervascular liver masses on contrast-enhanced ultrasound: the importance of washout[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2010, 194(4): 977-983.
[6] Chae EJ, Song JW, Krauss B, et al. Clinical utility of dual-energy CT in the evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules: initial experience[J]. Radiology, 2008, 249(2): 671-681.
[7] 刘金刚, 刘亚, 李丽新, 等. CT能谱成像在诊断肿瘤淋巴结转移和肿瘤性质中的作用[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2011, 45(8): 731-735. LIU Jingang, LIU Ya, LI Lixin, et al. Preliminary study of spectral CT imaging in the differential diagnosis of metastatic lymphadenopathy due to various tumors[J]. Chin J Radiol, 2011, 45(8): 731-735.
[8] Paul J, Vogl TJ, Mbalisike EC. Oncological applications of dual-energy computed tomography imaging[J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2014, 38(6): 834-842.
[9] 陈赜, 张志勇, 赵霄, 等. 269例肝转移瘤血管造影影像分析[J]. 吉林医学, 2010, 31(25): 4360-4361.
[10] Lv P, Lin XZ, Li J, et al. Differentiation of small hepatic hemangioma from small hepatocellular carcinoma: recently introduced spectral CT method[J]. Radiology, 2011, 259(3): 720-729.
[11] Yu Y, He N, Sun K, et al. Differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma from angiomyolipoma of the liver with CT spectral imaging: a preliminary study[J]. Clin Radiol, 2013, 68(9): 491-497.
[12] Voboril R. Blood supply of metastatic liver tumors: an experimental study[J]. Int Surg, 2005, 90(2): 71-77.
[13] Semelka RC, Hussain SM, Marcos HB, et al. Perilesional enhancement of hepatic metastases: correlation between MR imaging and histopathologic findings-initial observations[J]. Radiology, 2000, 215(1): 89-94.
[14] Hayano K, Desai GS, Kambadakone AR, et al. Quantitative characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic liver tumor by CT perfusion[J]. Cancer Imaging, 2013, 13(4): 512-519.
[15] 薛敏娜, 白人驹, 李丰坦, 等. CT灌注成像对原发性肝癌、肝转移瘤和肝血管瘤的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 国际放射学杂志, 2008, 31(3): 152-155. XUE Minna, BAI Renju, LI Fengtan, et al. Differential value of CT perfusion imaging in hepatocellular carcinomas, hepatic metastastes and hemoangiomas[J]. Int J Med Radiol, 2008, 31(3): 152-155.
[16] Wei W, Yu Y, Lv W, et al. Predictive value of dual-energy spectral computed tomographic imaging on the histological origin of carcinomas in the ampullary region[J]. Abdom Imaging, 2014, 39(4): 702-710.
[17] Wang Q, Shi G, Qi X, et al. Quantitative analysis of the dual-energy CT virtual spectral curve for focal liver lesions characterization[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2014, 83(10): 1759-1764.

相关文章 15

[1]	杨晓喆,赵妍,青卉,王向东,张罗. 大气细颗粒物通过TLR4/NF-κB通路诱导鼻黏膜上皮细胞炎症反应[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(9): 47-55.
[2]	靳新娟,左立平,邓展昊,李安宁,于德新. MRI影像组学对135例肝癌耐药蛋白PFKFB3的预测价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(6): 79-86.
[3]	赵恩举,赵硕,郭云亮,王锡明. 282例颈动脉钙化与脑小血管病MRI总负荷评分的关联性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(1): 38-44.
[4]	左立平,蒋丰洋,周斌彬,范金蕾,梁永锋,邓展昊,于德新. 术前MRI在预测169例肝细胞肝癌微血管侵犯及早期复发的价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(3): 89-95.
[5]	夏晓娜,黄召弟,任庆国,刘枫,邓贺,任国荣,段建东,王韶玉. CT双期增强扫描对182枚甲状腺良恶性结节的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(7): 57-62.
[6]	柴佳威,朱坤兵,张华伟,崔凤云,王甜甜,田兴松. 1例肝细胞肝癌甲状腺转移罕见病例报道与文献回顾[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(3): 120-124.
[7]	蔡凡凡,纪淙山,杨世锋,顾慧,袁宪顺,刘洪武,秦松楠,高琳,王箬芃,王锡明. 第三代双源CT在房颤患者冠状动脉CT血管成像中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(2): 14-18.
[8]	高琳,顾慧,康冰,于鑫鑫,张帅,王箬芃,王锡明. CT平扫和增强图像对480例患者肺磨玻璃结节的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(10): 70-76.
[9]	陈晓丽,桂振朝,高杨,邢梦瑶,修建军. 13例涎腺导管癌的影像学表现分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(1): 78-82.
[10]	程召平,段艳华,姚金坤,李岩,顾慧,袁宪顺,刘斌,毕万利,宋照亮,聂佩,陈月芹,孙占国,刘善平,王鲁光,唐忠仁,魏相磊,董亮,王春亭,王锡明. 105例新型冠状病毒肺炎胸部CT影像学特征——山东省多中心回顾性分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(5): 38-45.
[11]	张丽红,王林省,陈东风,陈月芹,李娴,刘艳杰,李磊. 肾脏混合性上皮间质瘤的CT和MRI表现[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(7): 70-75.
[12]	邵倩倩,王景溥,王庆杰. 抗凋亡转录因子在肝细胞肝癌中的表达及预后作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(12): 7-12.
[13]	张丽红,李娴,王林省,李宏磊,李磊. 含脂肪节细胞神经瘤的影像学表现与病理对照[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(12): 73-78.
[14]	王玉红,张丽红,王林省,陈月芹,王彦辉,王皆欢,李传福. 消化道颗粒细胞瘤的影像学表现[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(8): 66-70.
[15]	李扬,何闯,陈玉潇,杨丽,李良山,李廷源,黄学全. 放射性¹²⁵I粒子植入近距离治疗长骨转移瘤的临床疗效[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(2): 50-54.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed