您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (6): 54-57.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2014.718

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

小野寺指数在老年食管癌放射治疗中的临床应用

杨圣思, 程玉峰   

  1. 山东大学齐鲁医院放疗科, 山东 济南 250012
  • 收稿日期:2014-10-17 修回日期:2015-03-19 发布日期:2015-06-10
  • 通讯作者: 程玉峰。 E-mail:qlcyf@163.com E-mail:qlcyf@163.com

Application of Onodera prognostic nutrition index in elderly patients with esophageal carcinoma treated with radiotherapy

YANG Shengsi, CHENG Yufeng   

  1. Department of Radiotherapy, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China
  • Received:2014-10-17 Revised:2015-03-19 Published:2015-06-10

摘要: 目的 探讨小野寺预后营养指数(以下简称小野寺指数)在老年食管癌放射治疗中的临床应用价值。方法 选取山东大学齐鲁医院放疗科2011年1月~2014年6月单纯放射治疗的老年食管鳞癌患者93例,根据患者入院后首次血常规和生化检查结果,计算小野寺指数[小野寺指数=白蛋白值(g/L)+5×淋巴细胞总数(×109/L)],并根据小野寺指数将患者分为营养良好组(小野寺指数≥45)和营养不良组(小野寺指数<45),比较两组患者的临床病理特征、生活质量、放射性食管炎分级和肿瘤退缩速度。结果 小野寺指数与老年食管癌患者的肿瘤大小(P=0.002)、远处转移(P=0.024)密切相关;生活质量,尤其是治疗态度(P=0.036)、进食量(P=0.043)、日常生活自理能力(P=0.028)方面,营养良好组明显优于营养不良组;营养不良组放射性食管炎的分级显著高于营养良好组(P=0.032);两组肿瘤退缩速度的差异性尚未达到统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 小野寺指数能较好地反映老年食管癌患者放疗前的营养状态、临床病理特征及放疗并发症发生的情况,是一个较有价值的食管癌放疗评估指标。

关键词: 放射治疗, 老年人, 小野寺预后营养指数, 食管肿瘤

Abstract: Objective To explore the applicative value of Onodera prognostic nutrition index (Onodera index) in elderly patients with esophageal carcinoma treated with radiotherapy. Methods Onodera index of 93 elderly patients with esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma treated with only radiotherapy were collected, and the patients were divided into good-nourishment group (Onodera index ≥45) and poor-nourishment group (Onodera index <45). Correlations between Onodera index and clinicopathological features, quality of life, radiation esophagitis and tumor regression were analyzed. Results Onodera index was found to be related to tumor size (P=0.002) and distant metastases (P=0.024). Good-nourishment group had significantly better quality of life especially therapeutic attitude (P=0.036), food intake (P=0.043) and self-care ability (P=0.028) than poor-nourishment group. Patients in poor-nourishment group had significantly more serious radiation esophagitis than those in good-nourishment group (P=0.032), while there was no significant difference in tumor regression between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Onodera index is a valuable clinical indicator to estimate the nutritional status, clinicopathological features and early complications of elderly esophageal carcinoma patients treated with radiotherapy.

Key words: Elderly patients, Onodera prognostic nutrition index, Esophageal carcinoma, Radiotherapy

中图分类号: 

  • R735.1
[1] Liu JF, Wang QZ, Hou J. Surgical treatment for cancer of the oesophagus and gastric cardia in Hebei, China[J]. Br J Surg, 2004, 91(1): 90-98.
[2] Kamangar F, Dores GM, Anderson WF. Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24(14): 2137-2150.
[3] Onodera T, Goseki N, Kosaki G. Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery of malnourished cancer patients[J]. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi, 1984, 85(9): 1001-1005.
[4] Nozoe T, Kimura Y, Ishida M, et al. Correlation of pre-operative nutritional condition with post-operative complications in surgical treatment for esophageal carcinoma[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2002, 28(4): 396-400.
[5] Nozoe T, Ninomiya M, Maeda T, et al. Prognostic nutritional index: a tool to predict the biological aggressiveness of gastric carcinoma[J]. Surg Today, 2010, 40(5): 440-443.
[6] Kanda M, Fujii T, Kodera Y, et al. Nutritional predictors of postoperative outcome in pancreatic cancer[J]. Br J Surg, 2011, 98(2): 268-274.
[7] 常颖智, 曹杰, 谭卫民, 等. 小野寺预后营养指数在老年结直肠癌患者预后评估中的应用[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2013, 16(6): 561-564. CHANG Yingzhi, CAO Jie, TAN Weimin, et al. Application of Onodera prognostic nutrition index in prognostic evaluation of elderly patients with colorectal cancer[J]. Chin J Gastrointest Surg, 2013, 16(6): 561-564.
[8] 常颖智, 曹杰, 谭卫民, 等. 小野寺预后营养指数在老年结肠癌中的应用[J]. 广东医学, 2012, 33(4): 503-505.
[9] 中国非手术治疗食管癌临床分期专家小组. 非手术治疗食管癌的临床分期标准(草案)[J]. 中华放射肿瘤学杂志, 2010, 19(3): 179-180.
[10] 王澜, 孔洁, 韩春, 等. 非手术治疗食管癌临床分期标准的临床应用与探讨[J]. 中华放射肿瘤学杂志, 2012, 21(4): 330-333. WANG Lan, KONG Jie, HAN Chun, et al. The evaluation of prognosis and investigation of clinical staging for esophageal carcinoma treated with non-surgical methods[J]. Chin J Radiat Oncol, 2012, 21(4): 330-333.
[11] 许茜, 祝淑钗, 刘志坤, 等. 食管癌大体肿瘤靶区的体积分级与病理T分期的关系[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2010, 32(6): 432-435. XU Qian, ZHU Shuchai, LIU Zhikun, et al. Exploration of the classification of gross tumor volume and pathological staging of esophageal carcinoma[J]. Chin J Oncol, 2010, 32(6): 432-435.
[12] Pan H, Cai S, Ji J, et al. The impact of nutritional status, nutritional risk, and nutritional treatment on clinical outcome of 2248 hospitalized cancer patients: a multi-center, prospective cohort study in Chinese teaching hospitals[J]. Nutr Cancer, 2013, 65(1): 62-70.
[13] Hebuterne X, Lemarie E, Michallet M, et al. Prevalence of malnutrition and current use of nutrition support in patients with cancer[J]. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, 2014, 38(2): 196-204.
[14] Di FF, Lecleire S, Pop D, et al. Baseline nutritional status is predictive of response to treatment and survival in patients treated by definitive chemoradiotherapy for a locally advanced esophageal cancer[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2007, 102(11): 2557-2563.
[15] 杨留勤.总疗程时间对食管癌放射治疗疗效的影响[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2003, 11(3): 200-201.
[16] Ohara K, Shimizu W, Itai Y. Pitfalls in the assessment of radioresponse as determined by tumor regression: consideration based on the location and histologic constitution of tumors[J]. Nihon Lgaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi, 2000, 60(6): 324-329.
[17] Kawashima M, Fujii H, Hayashi R, et al. Influence of delayed tumor clearance on reliability of complete response rate in chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer[J]. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2007, 37(8): 559-567.
[1] 李波波 李道堂 刘曙光 王兴武. 食管癌患者血清中DKK-1的表达[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2209, 47(6): 58-61.
[2] 潘芳. 基于不同理论模式的老年人心理健康评估的研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(9): 1-5.
[3] 李长瑾,洪炜,赵佳,甘伟. 老年人生活质量与心理弹性的关系及领悟社会支持的中介作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(9): 6-10.
[4] 江虹,徐晶晶,王瑞,周雅茹,伊向仁, 潘芳. 城市老年人的孤独感与社会支持的增龄性变化及影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(9): 17-22.
[5] 底学敏,牛书雷,赵静,杜随,于慧敏,张宏涛,王娟. CT引导下125I粒子植入治疗晚期胃癌淋巴结转移[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(9): 79-84.
[6] 江虹,徐晶晶,王瑞,伊向仁,周雅茹,潘芳. 不同年龄阶段老年人的幸福感、心理压力与心理弹性研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(9): 11-16.
[7] 王美建,侯新国,梁凯,陈丽. 山东省城市中老年人群血脂现状调查[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(5): 70-75.
[8] 张欢欢,王翠平,赵敏,郭冬梅,陈立勇,蔺新英. 利用微型营养评价法和微型营养评价精法评价社区老年人的营养状况[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(11): 65-70.
[9] 李燕,刘坤,孙晓杰. 山东省3县农村老年人与收入相关的健康不平等状况及影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(6): 91-96.
[10] 张扬, 李万湖, 宋惟阳, 刘春蕾, 张权. 健康中老年人脑血管反应能力分布特征的屏气功能磁共振成像研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(5): 85-88.
[11] 余慧慧, 雷震, 路翠艳, 江虹, 王淑康, 潘芳. 团体心理干预对糖尿病患者心理和生理状况的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(5): 89-94.
[12] 刘坤, 张楠, 李燕, 孙晓杰. 农村老年人资源生成器量表的修订与评价[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(2): 87-91.
[13] 闫文明, 王宏伟. 鼻咽癌同步放化疗的远期疗效分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(S2): 91-91.
[14] 李高峰. 介入治疗联合三维适形放疗治疗原发性巨块型肝癌的疗效观察[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(S1): 47-47.
[15] 雷震,江虹,尹世平,丁娟,潘芳. 积极心理干预对社区老年人心理健康与幸福感水平的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(2): 93-96.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!