您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (7): 78-81.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2014.819

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

瘢痕疙瘩放射治疗的疗效与皮肤张力的关系

李中华1, 王海琴2, 孙玉凯1, 芦昌慧1, 杨波1, 王一民1   

  1. 1. 济南市第四人民医院烧伤整形科, 山东 济南 250031;
    2. 济南市第五人民医院妇产科, 山东 济南 250021
  • 收稿日期:2014-11-12 修回日期:2015-03-05 发布日期:2015-07-10
  • 通讯作者: 孙玉凯。E-mail:jinansky@163.com E-mail:jinansky@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    济南市卫生局科技计划(2008-20)

Dose-effect relationship for keloids between skin tension and radiotherapy

LI Zhonghua1, WANG Haiqin2, SUN Yukai1, LU Changhui1, YANG Bo1, WANG Yimin1   

  1. 1. Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Jinan Fourth People's Hospital, Jinan 250031, Shandong, China;
    2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jinan Fifth People's Hospital, Jinan 250021, Shandong, China
  • Received:2014-11-12 Revised:2015-03-05 Published:2015-07-10

摘要: 目的 比较低张力、高张力部位瘢痕疙瘩、放射剂量与临床疗效的关系, 探讨放射治疗的最优方式。方法 选取48例瘢痕疙瘩患者, 其中25例有2处瘢痕位于高张力区:胸部、肩部、耻骨部;23例有2处瘢痕位于低张力区:耳部、颌颈部, 采用随机、开放、自身对照的前瞻性研究方法, 分为高剂量组(A组)、低剂量组(B组)。患者均首先采用二氧化碳点阵激光治疗, 创面愈合24 h内, 给予采用32P敷贴器治疗,A组和B组分别给予7 Gy、5 Gy, 共3次, 放射总剂量分别为21 Gy、15 Gy。比较2组患者的临床疗效和不良反应的发生率。结果 ①低张力区:A组患者治愈率(95.2%)和温哥华瘢痕量表评分(5.21±0.78), 与B组患者治愈率(80.9%)和温哥华瘢痕量表评分(5.43±0.53)比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.043, t=1.069, P>0.05)。A组不良反应发生率(71.4%)高于B组(38.1%), χ2=4.709, P<0.05;②高张力区:A组患者治愈率(75.0%)和温哥华瘢痕量表评分(5.56±0.51)优于B组患者治愈率(41.7%)和温哥华瘢痕量表评分(6.96±0.71), χ2=5.486, t=7.846, P<0.05。结论 瘢痕疙瘩应根据不同位置采取不同放射剂量。对于低张力区瘢痕疙瘩分3次给予15 Gy, 高张力区瘢痕疙瘩分3次给予21 Gy, 能取得较好的临床疗效。

关键词: 瘢痕疙瘩, 点阵激光, 张力, 放射剂量, 32P敷贴

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the association of radiation dose for high-tension and low-tension keloids and to explore the optimal radiotherapy. Methods Of the 48 patients, 25 had two keloids in high-tension parts such as anterior chest wall, scapulae and pubis, and 23 had two keloids in low-tension parts such as ear and neck. The patients were divided into two groups: high radiation dose group (group A) and low radiation dose group (group B). All patients received fractional CO2 laser to remove the hypertrophic scar. After wound healing, patients in group A were treated with 7 Gy 3 times by 32P applicator; patients in group B were treated with 5 Gy 3 times. The clinical efficacy and side effects were compared between the two groups. Results For low-tension parts: there were no significant differences between the two groups in cure rates and VSS scores (95.2% vs 80.9%, 5.21±0.78 vs 5.43±0.53, χ2=2.043, t=1.069, P>0.05). The ratio of side effects in group A was significantly higher than that in group B (71.4% vs 38.1%, χ2=4.709, P<0.05). For high-tension parts: the cure rate and VSS in group A were markedly higher than those in group B (75.0% vs 41.7%, 5.56±0.51 vs 6.96±0.71, χ2=5.486, t=7.846, P<0.05). Conclusion For better curative effects, keloids in low-tension parts should be treated with 15 Gy in 3 fractions, while keloids in high-tension parts should be treated with 21 Gy in 3 fractions.

Key words: Radiation dose, Keloid, Fractional laser, 32P applicator, Tension

中图分类号: 

  • R622+.9
[1] Ogawa R, Okai K, Tokumura F, et al. The relationship between skin stretching/contraction and pathologic scarring: the important role of mechanical forces in keloid generation[J]. Wound Repair Regen, 2012, 20 (2): 149-157.
[2] Gurtner GC, Dauskardt RH, Wong VW, et al. Improving cutaneous scar formation by controlling the mechanical environment: large animal and phase I studies[J]. Ann Surg, 2011, 254(2): 217-225.
[3] Akaishi S, Akimoto M, Ogawa R, et al. The relationship between keloid growth pattern and stretching tension: visual analysis using the finite element method[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2008, 60(4): 445-451.
[4] Ogawa R, Mitsuhashi K, Hyakusoku H, et al. Postoperative electron-beam irradiation therapy for keloids and hypertrophic scars: retrospective study of 147 cases followed for more than 18 months[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2003, 111(2): 547-555.
[5] Wagner W, Alfrink M, Micke O, et al. Results of prophylactic irradiation in patients with resected keloids-a retrospective analysis[J]. Acta Oncol, 2000, 39(2): 217-220.
[6] Ka HB, Veen RE. Biologically effective doses of postoperative radiotherapy in the prevention of keloids: dose-effect relationship[J]. Strahlenther Onkol, 2005, 181(11): 717-723.
[7] Ogawa R, Miyashita T, Hyakusoku H, et al. Postoperative radiation protocol for keloids and hypertrophic scars: statistical analysis of 370 sites followed for over 18 months[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2007, 59(6): 688-691.
[8] 张奇亮. 敷贴治疗核医学[M]. 济南: 济南出版社, 2004: 23.
[9] Ahuja RB, Chatterjee P. Comparative efficacy of intralesional verapamil hydrochloride and triamcinolone acetonide in hypertrophic scars and keloids[J]. Burns, 2014, 40(4): 583-588.
[10] 蔡景龙, 张宗学. 现代瘢痕治疗学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 1998: 161.
[11] Gauglitz GG. Management of keloids and hypertrophic scars: current and emerging options[J]. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol, 2013, 6: 103-114. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S35252. Print 2013.
[12] Song C, Wu HG, Chang H, et al. Adjuvant single-fraction radiotherapy is safe and effective for intractable keloids[J]. J Radiat Res, 2014, 55(5): 912-916.
[13] Ka HB, Veen RE, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM. Dose-effect relationships for recurrence of keloid and pterygium after surgery and radiotherapy[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2009, 74(1): 245-251.
[1] 刘相永,孙颖,黎莉. PARP-1抑制剂对BRCA1基因沉默的乳腺癌细胞株MCF-7及PTEN基因沉默的前列腺癌细胞株22RV1增殖的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(5): 6-11.
[2] 周静, 张丽娟, 董有静. 七氟烷对卵白蛋白致敏的高反应气道平滑肌张力的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(5): 52-54.
[3] 郑琳, 罗秋, 孟繁媛, 付睿. 肌电引导下A型肉毒毒素治疗 痉挛性斜颈21例临床观察[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(S2): 115-116.
[4] 孙玉凯, 李中华, 王海琴, 芦昌慧, 杨波, 王一民. 两种方法治疗瘢痕疙瘩的前瞻性研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(8): 85-89.
[5] 李中华1,王海琴2,王一民1,杨波1,孙玉生1. 32P敷贴结合无针缝合器治疗前胸瘢痕疙瘩的疗效[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(1): 88-92.
[6] 韩春燕,盛巍,韩俊庆. 卡培他滨增敏联合后程加速超分割放射治疗食管癌的疗效观察[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2008, 46(4): 427-429.
[7] 付雷,胡立宽,闵瑞,竺鑫丽,宋轶鹏,张帅,许曼. 肺癌大剂量常规分次三维适形放疗对心脏的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2008, 46(12): 1173-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!