您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2012, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (9): 100-.

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

MSCTA在肝癌介入治疗术前的应用价值

鲁东,吕维富,张正峰,王伟昱,侯昌龙,张行明,肖景坤,周春泽   

  1. 安徽省立医院影像科, 合肥 230001
  • 收稿日期:2012-04-09 出版日期:2012-09-10 发布日期:2012-09-10
  • 通讯作者: 吕维富(1964- ),男,主任医师,主要从事肿瘤及血管疾病介入治疗的研究。 E-mail: lwf99@126.com
  • 作者简介:鲁东(1975- ),男,主治医师,主要从事肿瘤及其相关疾病介入治疗的研究。
  • 基金资助:

    安徽省卫生厅医学科研课题计划(09C222)

Clinical value of MSCTA in interventional treatment of
hepatocellular carcinoma

LU Dong, L Wei-fu, ZHANG Zheng-feng, WANG Wei-yu, HOU Chang-long,
ZHANG Xing-ming, XIAO Jing-kun, ZHOU Chun-ze   

  1. Department of Medical Imaging, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei 230001, China
  • Received:2012-04-09 Online:2012-09-10 Published:2012-09-10

摘要:

目的   评价多层螺旋CT血管成像(multislice spiral CT angiography,MSCTA)在肝癌介入治疗术前的应用价值。方法   对62例肝癌患者肝动脉化疗栓塞前分别行MSCTA和数字减影血管造影(digital subtraction angiography,DSA),分析肝动脉解剖、肝癌供养动脉及门静脉系统的显示情况。结果   MSCTA在显示腹腔动脉及肝动脉解剖方面与DSA高度一致。最大密度投影(maximum intensity projection,MIP)与DSA对肿瘤供养动脉的显示均优于容积重建(volume rendering,VR)(P<0.05);MIP对3级肝动脉显示优于VR(P<0.05),与DSA比较无差异;4级及以上肝动脉分支的显示MIP优于VR,DSA优于MIP,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。MSCTA与DSA对门脉癌栓及侧支血管的显示无统计学差异(P>0.05),对肝动脉-门静脉瘘的显示DSA优于MSCTA(P<0.05)。结论   MSCTA能准确显示肝癌供血动脉及门静脉系统,有效指导介入治疗。

关键词: 肝肿瘤;体层摄影术,X线计算机;血管造影术,数字减影;放射学,介入性;栓塞,治疗性

Abstract:

Objective   To evaluate the clinical value of multislice spiral CT angiography (MSCTA) in the interventional treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods   MSCTA and digital subtraction angiography(DSA) were performed in 62 hepatocellular carcinoma patients before the transcatheter hepatic artery chemoembolization. The images of hepatic artery anatomy, hepatic tumorous vascular system and portal vein system were analyzed. Results   MSCTA was highly consistent with DSA in displaying the celiac artery and hepatic artery anatomy. Both the maximum intensity projection(MIP)and DSA were superior to volume rendering (VR) in demonstrating the tumor supplying arteries(P<0.05). MIP was better than VR(P<0.05) in demonstrating hepatic artery branches of grade 3, and there was no significant difference between DSA and MIP. For displaying the grade 4 or above hepatic arterial branches, DSA was better than MIP, and MIP was better than VR, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). There was no significant difference between MSCTA and DSA in showing tumor thrombus of portal veins and portal venous collateral vessels(P>0.05). However, DSA was superior to MSCTA in demonstrating the hepatic artery-portal vein shunt(P<0.05). Conclusion   MSCTA can accurately display supplying arteries of liver cancer and the portal vein system, and provide effective guidance for the interventional treatment.

Key words: Liver neoplasms; Tomography, Xray computed; Angiography, digital subtraction; Radiology, interventional;Embolization, therapeutic

中图分类号: 

  • R816.5
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!