您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2010, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (5): 147-.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

宽恕干预对大学生愤怒水平及愤怒控制的影响

陈翠1,2,张红静2,江景华1,吴希庆1,张李娜1   

  1. 1. 聊城心理医院, 山东  聊城 252000;2. 山东大学医学院医学心理学研究所, 济南 250012
  • 收稿日期:2009-12-18 出版日期:2010-05-16 发布日期:2010-05-16
  • 通讯作者: 张红静,女,副教授,主要从事儿童和大学生心理健康问题研究。 E-mail: zhjing@sdu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:陈翠(1982- ),女,硕士研究生,主要从事医学心理学研究。

Impact of forgiveness intervention on expression of anger and anger control ability of college students

CHEN Cui1, 2, ZHANG Hongjing2, JIANG Jinghua1, WU Xiqing1, ZHANG Lina1   

  1. 1. Psychological Hospital of Liaocheng, Liaocheng 252000, Shandong, China;
    2. Medical Psychology Institute, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China
  • Received:2009-12-18 Online:2010-05-16 Published:2010-05-16

摘要:

目的  考查宽恕干预对低宽恕个体的愤怒水平及愤怒控制的影响。方法  根据人际侵犯动机问卷得出225名被试的宽恕水平,从宽恕水平低于其平均数一个标准差以下的被试中随机抽取26人,将他们随机分为两组,即实验组和对照组各13人。通过让被试回忆最近发生的愤怒事件以激活其愤怒情绪,以心率和Speilberger的状态怒分别记录被试愤怒时的生理唤醒和主观体验水平,以Speilberger的愤怒控制问卷测量被试的愤怒控制能力。本研究以利益查找和共情技术为宽恕干预措施,考查宽恕干预对愤怒体验水平及愤怒控制的影响。结果  对照组与实验组第一次回忆愤怒事件时记录的心率均显著高于身体放松时的;干预后实验组的心率显著低于对照组(P=0.026);干预后实验组的状态怒显著低于对照组(P=0.048);干预后实验组与对照组的愤怒控制没有显著差异(P=0.075)。结论  这种利益查找及共情的宽恕干预措施可以缓解大学生的愤怒水平,但其对愤怒控制能力的影响还需进一步研究。

关键词: 宽恕;利益查找;共情;愤怒;愤怒控制

Abstract:

Objective  To check the impact of the forgiveness intervention on the experience of anger and anger control of college students. Method  sAccording to the forgiveness level of 225 subjects checked by the Transgression-Related Interpersonal Motivations Inventory-18, we extracted 26 subjects from them whose forgiveness levels were one standard deviation lower than the mean. Then they were randomly allocated into two groups as the experimental group and the control group and recalled their anger experiences.  HR and the state anger were used to reflect the level of the anger experience. The anger control invention was used to check the anger control ability of the subjects. The benefit-finding and empathy technique was used as the forgiveness intervention to see its impact on the expression of anger and anger control of the subjects. Results  The HR of the individuals in both the experimental group and the control group were higher when they recall their anger experience than that when recalling their relax condition, and the HR of the experimental group were lower than that of the control group when they caught the forgiveness intervention(P=0.026), as well as the state anger(P=0.048). There was no difference in the anger control ability between the experimental group and the control group(P=0.075). Conclusion  The benefit-finding and empathy technique is well as a forgive intervention which could reduce the expression of anger. Some more studies are needed to check its impact on the anger control ability of the college students.

Key words: Forgiveness; Benefit-finding; Empathy; Anger; Anger control

中图分类号: 

  • R395.6
[1] 石海英1,刘倩倩2,吴少怡2. 某高校医学生人格特征与学业拖延的关系[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(12): 103-106.
[2] 苑光宗,唐柳,傅文青,孔明,郭玲玲,徐丽华. 大学生人格特质与父母教养方式的关系[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(7): 151-.
[3] 张伯华,胡霜,张德秀,宋婧杰,刘羽曦. 汶川地震后一年半绵阳、北川受灾群众心理卫生状况及其与五态人格的关系[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(5): 132-.
[4] 姚方敏1 ,宋东峰2,傅文青1. 医学研究生认知情绪调节策略对抑郁和焦虑情绪的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(5): 150-153.
[5] . 济南市青少年心理健康素质状况调查[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2009, 47(7): 117-121.
[6] 王瑞1,吴少怡2,刘言训1. 中国大学生人格量表与心理适应量表对6913例新生的测试分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2009, 47(11): 132-134.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!