常温自身动脉转流内脏优先策略在胸腹主动脉置换手术中的脊髓保护作用

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2024.0313

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的总结常温自身动脉转流内脏优先的胸腹主动脉置换手术策略及其脊髓保护作用,为该策略在胸腹主动脉置换手术中的应用积累临床经验。方法回顾性分析中国医学科学院阜外医院于2019年6月至2022年6月期间接受常温自身动脉转流内脏优先策略的胸腹主动脉置换手术的患者资料。收集相关临床资料(基线资料、围术期指标、随访结局指标),分析整体治疗效果,以及常温自身动脉转流内脏优先策略的安全性和疗效。结果共27例胸腹主动脉瘤患者采用常温自身动脉转流内脏优先的方法进行TAAA修复手术治疗。其中Crawford分型Ⅰ型2例(7.4%),Ⅱ型14例(51.9%),Ⅲ型9例(33.3%),Ⅳ型2例(7.4%)。平均手术时间(562.5±99.5)min,术后平均机械通气时间(30.8±25.3)h,术后ICU中位时间112.00(69.00, 162.00)min,术后住院时间(19.8±8.4)d。手术后30 d内死亡1例(3.7%),其他患者均存活。急性肾衰竭3例(11.1%),因出血导致二次开胸手术1例(3.7%)。除死亡患者外,对26例患者进行6~56个月随访,平均随访时间(34.0±11.5)个月。在随访期间未出现截瘫、死亡或其他手术并发症。结论常温自身动脉转流内脏优先策略可以安全、有效地治疗胸腹主动脉瘤,可以降低脊髓损伤并发症。

关键词: 胸腹主动脉瘤, 胸腹主动脉置换术, 脊髓损伤, 截瘫, 内脏保护

Abstract: Objective To summarize the application of the normothermic artery bypass and visceral-anastomosis-first strategy in thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm(TAAA)repair and to evaluate its spinal cord protective effect, so as to accumulate clinical experience for the implementation of this procedure in thoracoabdominal aortic replacement surgery. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data of patients who underwent thoracoabdominal aortic replacements with normothermic artery bypass and visceral-anastomosis-first strategy at Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, between June 2019 and June 2022. Relevant clinical data(baseline data, perioperative indices, and follow-up outcome indices)were collected to assess the overall treatment outcome, as well as the safety and efficacy of the strategy. Results A total of 27 patients with TAAA were treated surgically for TAAA repair using the normothermic autoarterial diversion with a visceral priority strategy. Among them, 2 cases(7.4%)were Crawford classification typeⅠ, 14 cases(51.9%)were type Ⅱ, 9 cases(33.3%)were type Ⅲ, and 2 cases(7.4%)were type Ⅳ. The mean/median time for surgery, postoperative mechanical ventilation, postoperative ICU time, and postoperative hospital stay were(562.5±99.5)min,(30.8±25.3)h, 112.00(69.00, 162.00)min, and(19.8±8.4)d, respectively. One case(3.7%)died within 30 days of surgery, and the remaining patients survived. Acute renal failure was observed in 3 cases(11.1%)and re-thoracotomy due to hemorrhage was performed in 1 case(3.7%). Except for the deceased patient, the remaining 26 patients were followed up for a period from 6 to 56 months with a mean follow-up of(34.0±11.5)months. There were no paraplegia, deaths or other surgical complications during the follow-up period. Conclusion The normothermic artery bypass and visceral-anastomosis-first strategy can be safely and effectively used to treat TAAA and may reduce the incidence of spinal cord injury complications.

Key words: Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, Thoracoabdominal aortic replacement, Spinal cord injury, Paraplegia, Visceral protection

中图分类号:

R543.1

孙境,张帅,齐红霞,李远,周永康,胡可鉴,钱向阳. 常温自身动脉转流内脏优先策略在胸腹主动脉置换手术中的脊髓保护作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 80-85.

SUN Jing, ZHANG Shuai, QI Hongxia, LI Yuan, ZHOU Yongkang, HU Kejian, QIAN Xiangyang. Spinal cord protection by normothermic auto-arterial bypass and distal-anastomosis-first strategy in thoracoabdominal aortic replacement surgery[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2024, 62(9): 80-85.

参考文献

[1] Moulakakis KG, Karaolanis G, Antonopoulos CN, et al. Open repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in experienced centers[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2018, 68(2): 634-645.
[2] Svensson LG. Our experience with 1000 recent thoracoabdominal aneurysm repairs, including endovascular stenting[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2023,165(5):1754-1758.
[3] Amabile A, Lewis E, Costa V, et al. Spinal cord protection in open and endovascular approaches to thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms[J]. Vascular, 2023, 31(5): 874-883.
[4] Hsu CCT, Kwan GNC, van Driel ML, et al. Distal aortic perfusion during thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair for prevention of paraplegia[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2012(3): CD008197. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008197.
[5] Etz CD, Weigang E, Hartert M, et al. Contemporary spinal cord protection during thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic surgery and endovascular aortic repair: a position paper of the vascular domain of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2015, 47(6): 943-957.
[6] Arora L, Hosn MA. Spinal cord perfusion protection for thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery[J]. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2019, 32(1): 72-79.
[7] Coselli JS, Green SY, Price MD, et al. Spinal cord deficit after 1114 extent II open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2020, 159(1): 1-13.
[8] Coselli JS. Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm: a journey through the distal aorta[J]. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2023, 39(Suppl 2): 212-217.
[9] Gaudino M, Khan FM, Rahouma M, et al. Spinal cord injury after open and endovascular repair of descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms: a meta-analysis[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2022, 163(2): 552-564.
[10] Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Black JH 3rd, et al. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines[J]. Circulation, 2022, 146(24): e334-e482.
[11] Etz CD, Kari FA, Mueller CS, et al. The collateral network concept: a reassessment of the anatomy of spinal cord perfusion[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2011, 141(4): 1020-1028.
[12] Fujiyoshi T, Nishibe T, Koizumi N, et al. Impact of preservation of the latissimus dorsi muscle through a left anteroaxillary thoracotomy on spinal cord protection in descending thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aortic operations[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2019: ezz087. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezz087.
[13] Ohira S, Lansman SL, Spielvogel D. Collateral network concept in 2023[J]. Ann Cardiothorac Surg, 2023, 12(5): 450-462.
[14] Miller LK, Patel VI, Wagener G. Spinal cord protection for thoracoabdominal aortic surgery[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2022, 36(2): 577-586.
[15] Coselli JS, de la Cruz KI, Preventza O, et al. Extent II thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: how I do it[J]. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2016, 28(2): 221-237.
[16] Minatoya K, Ogino H, Matsuda H, et al. Replacement of the descending aorta: recent outcomes of open surgery performed with partial cardiopulmonary bypass[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2008, 136(2): 431-435.
[17] Coady MA, Mitchell RS. Femoro-femoral partial bypass in the treatment of thoracoabdominal aneurysms[J]. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2003, 15(4): 340-344.
[18] Zhang L, Yu CT, Yang XB, et al. Normothermic iliac perfusion improves early outcomes after thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm repair[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2019, 55(6): 1054-1060.
[19] Dong XH, Ge YP, Wang R, et al. Spinal cord protection of aorto-iliac bypass in open repair of extent II and III thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm[J]. Heart Lung Circ, 2022, 31(2): 255-262.
[20] Papanikolaou D, Savio C, Zafar MA, et al. Left atrial to femoral artery full cardiopulmonary bypass: a novel technique for descending and thoracoabdominal aortic surgery[J]. Int J Angiol, 2020, 29(1): 19-26.
[21] Coselli JS, LeMaire SA, Preventza O, et al. Outcomes of 3309 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2016, 151(5): 1323-1337.
[22] Kouchoukos NT, Kulik A, Haynes M, et al. Early outcomes after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair with hypothermic circulatory arrest[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2019, 108(5): 1338-1343.
[23] Dregelid E, Daryapeyma A. Novel visceral-anastomosis-first approach in open repair of a ruptured type 2 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm: causes behind a mortal outcome[J]. Case Rep Vasc Med, 2013, 2013: 978625. doi:10.1155/2013/978625.
[24] Matalanis G, Chng SL. Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm- the branch first technique[J]. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2019, 31(4): 708-712.
[25] Monnot A, Dusseaux MM, Godier S, et al. Passive temporary visceral shunt from the axillar artery as an adjunct method during the open treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2016, 36: 127-131. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2016.03.031.

相关文章 15

[1]	周永康,孙境,张帅,钱向阳. 胸腹主动脉瘤开放修复脊髓保护策略的研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 49-54.
[2]	甘琦晴,刘现虎,苟园,杨彬. 主动脉夹层合并截瘫诊断与治疗2例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(8): 101-106.
[3]	黎少莹,江子晴,王林,刘永瑞,左俊岭. 中间链球菌引起多发性脓肿、急性脊髓炎1例报道[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(8): 101-105.
[4]	刘东,朱冬昀,彭长亮,张程,赵杰,高春正. 脊髓损伤修复的复合透明质酸水凝胶支架的构建及其评价[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(9): 53-59.
[5]	陈磊,刘东晓,李开鸣,宋新强,曾宪思,蒋丽杰. 有序胶原材料联合CBD-BDNF对大鼠脊髓损伤的修复作用[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(5): 43-48.
[6]	李红志,刘静,宋岩,迟令懿,刘玉光. 利拉鲁肽对脊髓损伤修复作用的探讨[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(4): 1-5.
[7]	牟乐明1，孙占胜1，王伯珉1，高平2，初向全3. 骨髓间充质干细胞移植对脊髓损伤大鼠Toll样受体4表达的影响[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 52(1): 37-41.
[8]	李旭，秦东京，曹新山，姜兴岳，张迪，王静. 无骨折脱位型颈脊髓损伤DTI征象与JOA评分的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(1): 83-87.
[9]	张慧，郭雨霁，郝爱军，马保华. 粒细胞集落刺激因子对急性脊髓损伤中小胶质细胞的作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(5): 10-.
[10]	刘杨，苗宇船. 滋补脾阴方药对大鼠脊髓损伤后脑源性神经营养因子表达的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(10): 33-36.
[11]	刘晓阳，孙建民，崔新刚，蒋振松. 鞘内注射VEGF对大鼠脊髓损伤后神经纤维和神经元的保护作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(4): 38-42.
[12]	赵伟. 电针对脊髓损伤后硫酸软骨素蛋白多糖表达的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(3): 73-.
[13]	赵伟. 电针对脊髓损伤后硫酸软骨素蛋白多糖表达的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(3): 73-.
[14]	朱俊德1，余资江1，刘鲜林2，常傲霜2. 大鼠脊髓全横断损伤后不同时间的组织改变[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(1): 43-47.
[15]	刘洋，贾堂宏，龚维明，宁斌，郭舒亚，宋宏亮，徐鹏，张涛，张来波 . 脊髓损伤后大鼠水钠代谢紊乱动物模型的建立[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2009, 47(03): 53-55.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed