产科47例子宫切除的临床分析

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2023.0138

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的分析47例子宫切除患者的高危因素,为降低产科子宫切除率提供理论依据。方法回顾性分析2016年7月至2021年6月于山东第一医科大学附属省立医院产科行子宫切除术的47例患者的临床资料。结果近5年山东第一医科大学附属省立医院产科子宫切除比例为1.22‰。产后出血依然是子宫切除第一位危险因素(41例),其次为妊娠合并妇科恶性肿瘤(3例)、产褥感染致子宫坏死(2例)、中期妊娠引产后胎盘植入(1例)。产后出血的主要原因为凶险性前置胎盘并植入,占比90.24%(37/41);其次是高龄妊娠合并子宫肌瘤,占比4.88%(2/41);再次为产后宫缩乏力延误治疗,占比2.44%(1/41),及妊娠期急性脂肪肝合并DIC,占比2.44%(1/41)。37例凶险性前置胎盘并植入患者中,19例(51.35%)行子宫次全切术,18例(48.65%)行子宫全切术,子宫次全切患者的平均出血量及输血量少于子宫全切患者,P<0.05;37例凶险性前置胎盘并植入患者中,采取血管介入手术(包括腹主动脉球囊阻断以及髂血管阻断术)的患者占54.05%(20/37),未采用血管介入手术的患者占45.95%(17/37),采取血管介入患者的平均出血量少于未采用血管介入患者,P<0.05。结论凶险性前置胎盘并植入引起的产后出血是导致子宫切除的最主要原因。对于严重的凶险性前置胎盘并植入案例,采取适当的介入手术,同时结合患者的意愿及年龄,行计划性子宫次全切术可以减少出血量,从而改善患者预后。

关键词: 产后出血, 子宫切除, 凶险性前置胎盘并植入, 血管介入手术

Abstract: Objective To analyze the risk factors so as to provide a theoretical basis for reducing the rate of obstetric hysterectomy. Methods Clinical data of 47 patients undergoing obstetric hysterectomy during July 2016 and June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Results In the past 5 years, the rate of hysterectomy in the Obstetric Department of Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University was 1.22‰. Postpartum hemorrhage ranked the first risk factor for hysterectomy(41 cases), followed by pregnancy with gynecological malignant tumors(3 cases), uterine necrosis caused by puerperal infection(2 cases), and placental implantation after induced labor in the second trimester(1 case). The main cause of postpartum hemorrhage was pernicious placenta previa and accreta(90.24%, 37/41), followed by advanced pregnancy with giant uterine fibroids(4.88%, 2/41), uterine inertia(2.44%, 1/41)and pregnancy acute fatty liver with DIC(2.44%, 1/41). Among 37 cases of pernicious placenta previa and accreta, 19(51.35%)underwent subtotal hysterectomy, and 18(48.65%)total hysterectomy. The average amount of blood loss and blood transfusion in the total hysterectomy cases were higher than those in the subtotal hysterectomy cases(P<0.05). Of the 37 patients with pernicious placenta previa and accreta, 54.05%(20/37)received vascular interventional procedures, including abdominal aortic balloon occlusion and iliac vascular occlusion. The average blood loss of the vascular intervention cases was lower than that of the non-vascular intervention cases(P<0.05). Conclusion Postpartum hemorrhage caused by pernicious placenta previa and accreta is the main cause of hysterectomy. For serious and pernicious cases of placenta previa and accreta, appropriate interventional surgery and subtotal hysterectomy can reduce blood loss and improve the prognosis.

Key words: Postpartum hemorrhage, Hysterectomy, Pernicious placenta previa and accreta, Vascular interventional procedures

中图分类号:

R714.7

张红媛,顾永忠,侯哲. 产科47例子宫切除的临床分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(7): 96-100.

ZHANG Hongyuan, GU Yongzhong, HOU Zhe. A clinical analysis of 47 cases of hysterectomy[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2023, 61(7): 96-100.

参考文献

[1] 何镭, 刘兴会. 产科紧急子宫切除[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2018, 34(7): 489-491. HE Lei, LIU Xinghui. Obstetric emergency hysterectomy [J]. Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2018, 34(7): 489-491.
[2] de la Cruz CZ, Thompson EL, ORourke K, et al. Cesarean section and the risk of emergency peripartum hysterectomy in high-income countries: a systematic review [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2015, 292(6): 1201-1215.
[3] 漆洪波, 段然, 彭方亮. 剖宫产手术中的子宫切除[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2019, 35(2): 141-144. QI Hongbo, DUAN Ran, PENG Fangliang. Hysterectomy in cesarean section [J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2019, 35(2): 141-144.
[4] 余竹平, 时春艳, 胡君, 等. 难治性产后出血切除子宫病例的临床特点和危险因素[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2018, 21(12): 795-800. YU Zhuping, SHI Chunyan, HU Jun, et al. Clinical characteristics and high risk factors of intractable postpartum hemorrhage requiring hysterectomy: analysis of 152 patients [J]. Chinese Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 2018, 21(12): 795-800.
[5] Huque S, Roberts I, Fawole B, et al. Risk factors for peripartum hysterectomy among women with postpartum haemorrhage: analysis of data from the WOMAN trial [J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2018, 18(1): 186. doi:10.1186/s12884-018-1829-7.
[6] 何镭, 刘兴会. 产科紧急子宫切除术手术指征及时机[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2016, 32(12): 1155-1159. HE Lei, LIU Xinghui. Indications and timing for emergency peripartum hysterectomy [J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2016, 32(12): 1155-1159.
[7] 李诗兰.重症产褥感染的诊断与治疗C//全国围产医学专题学术研讨会论文汇编.中华医学会围产医学分会、青海省医学会, 2007: 2.
[8] Govindappagari S, Wright JD, Ananth CV, et al. Risk of peripartum hysterectomy and center hysterectomy and delivery volume[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 128(6): 1215-1224.
[9] Kallianidis AF, Rijntjes D, Brobbel C, et al. Incidence, indications, risk factors, and outcomes of emergency peripartum hysterectomy worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2023, 141(1): 35-48.
[10] Latif Khan Y, Rahim A, Gardezi J, et al. Conventional and conservative management of placenta accreta is two ends of a single continuum: a report of three cases and literature review [J]. Clin Case Rep, 2018, 6(9): 1739-1746.
[11] Zeng CJ, Yang MY, Ding YL, et al. Placenta accreta spectrum disorder trends in the context of the universal two-child policy in China and the risk of hysterectomy [J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2018, 140(3): 312-318.
[12] Hidalgo-Lopezosa P, Hidalgo-Maestre M. Risk of uterine rupture in vaginal birth after cesarean: systematic review [J]. Enferm Clin, 2017, 27(1): 28-39.
[13] Carusi DA. The placenta accreta spectrum: epidemiology and risk factors [J]. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 61(4): 733-742.
[14] Jauniaux E, Kingdom JC, Silver RM. A comparison of recent guidelines in the diagnosis and management of placenta accreta spectrum disorders [J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2021, 72: 102-116. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.06.007.
[15] Silver RM, Barbour KD. Placenta accreta spectrum: accreta, increta, and percreta [J]. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am, 2015, 42(2): 381-402.
[16] Allen L, Jauniaux E, Hobson S, et al. FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: nonconservative surgical management [J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2018, 140(3): 281-290.
[17] Güngördük K, Yildirim G, Dugan N, et al. Peripartum hysterectomy in Turkey: a case-control study [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2009, 29(8): 722-728.
[18] DAntonio F, Iacovelli A, Liberati M, et al. Role of interventional radiology in pregnancy complicated by placenta accreta spectrum disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 53(6): 743-751.
[19] 鲁景元, 顾建平, 郑明俭, 等. 凶险性前置胎盘子宫切除相关因素分析[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2018, 34(9): 690-694. LU Jingyuan, GU Jianping, ZHENG Mingjian, et al. Related factors for hysterectomy in pernicious placenta previa: a logistic regression analysis [J]. Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2018, 34(9): 690-694.
[20] Durukan H, Durukan ÖB, Yazıcı FG. Placenta accreta spectrum disorder: a comparison between fertility-sparing techniques and hysterectomy[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2021, 41(3): 353-359.
[21] Horgan R, Abuhamad A. Placenta accreta spectrum: prenatal diagnosis and management [J]. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am, 2022, 49(3): 423-438.
[22] Takeda S, Takeda J, Murayama Y. Placenta previa accreta spectrum: cesarean hysterectomy [J]. Surg J(N Y), 2021, 7(Suppl 1): S28-S37.
[23] Jauniaux E, Hussein AM, Fox KA, et al. New evidence-based diagnostic and management strategies for placenta accreta spectrum disorders [J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2019, 61: 75-88. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.04.006.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed