您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（医学版）》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (6): 92-102.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2023.0228

• 公共卫生与和管理学 • 上一篇    

华中地区唇腭裂人群主观报告的生活质量

张鑫宇1,匡文颖2,徐婧怡1,颜佳楠1,丁雨喆1,郭妍宇1,袁文钧2   

  1. 1.武汉大学口腔医学院;2.武汉大学口腔医院正畸一科, 湖北 武汉 430079
  • 发布日期:2023-06-06
  • 通讯作者: 袁文钧. E-mail:yuanwenjun@whu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    中华口腔医学会口腔正畸专委会中青年临床科研项目基金(COS-C2021-04)

A quality of life study based on subjective reports of the cleft lip and palate population in Central China

ZHANG Xinyu1, KUANG Wenying2, XU Jingyi1, YAN Jianan1, DING Yuzhe1, GUO Yanyu1, YUAN Wenjun2   

  1. 1.School of Stomatology Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, China;
    2.Department of Orthodontics I, The Stomatological Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, China
  • Published:2023-06-06

PDF (PC)

309

摘要： 目的 评估8~29岁非综合征型唇腭裂人群生活质量,探讨影响其生活质量的因素。 方法 利用CLEFT-Q量表、生活满意度量表、麦克阿瑟主观家庭社会地位量表对2021年6月至2022年12月就诊于武汉大学口腔医院正畸一科的329例非综合征型唇腭裂患者主观报告的生活质量进行横断面研究,统计描述其生活质量。并根据人口社会学信息(性别、年龄、照顾者人数、兄弟姐妹数量、主观家庭社会地位)及患病信息(单/双侧完全唇腭裂)分为不同组,采用SPSS 26.0对数据进行多元线性回归,分析其生活质量的影响因素。 结果 在相关性分析中,年龄对患者的外貌满意度有显著影响(P<0.001);主观家庭社会地位(SSS)对患者的外貌满意度(P<0.001)、健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)(P=0.011)、面部功能的满意度均有显著影响(P=0.022);不同年龄段患者的生活质量有显著差异(P<0.001)。多元线性回归分析表明,HRQoL、外貌满意度、面部功能满意度、SSS以及年龄均对唇腭裂患者的生活质量有影响。 结论 8~29岁唇腭裂患者其主观视角下的HRQoL、外貌、面部功能以及SSS对生活质量的影响呈正相关性,随着患者年龄增大,其生活质量不断下降。这是针对华中地区唇腭裂人群的,从患者主观角度出发,从单维度转向多维度的生活质量研究。此外,临床医生应当在对客观评价病情和疗效的基础上,积极询问患者主观评价,从而针对性地给出干预方案,全面提升患者生活质量。

关键词: 唇腭裂, 主观报告, 生活质量, 外貌, 面部功能, CLEFT-Q量表, 生活满意度量表, 麦克阿瑟主观家庭社会地位量表

Abstract: Objective To assess the quality of life in the non-syndromic cleft lip and palate population aged 8-29 years and to explore its effects from the patients perspective. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted using the CLEFT-Q scale to statistically describe the subjectively reported quality of life in 329 patients with non-syndromic cleft lip and palate who visited the Department of Orthodontics I of Stomatology Hospital of Wuhan University during Jun. 2021 and Dec. 2022. The patients were divided into subgroups according to gender, age, number of caregivers, number of siblings, subjective family social status(SSS), and unilateral/bilateral complete cleft lip and palate. The data were analyzed with multiple linear regression using SPSS 26.0 to analyze the factors influencing their quality of life. Results Correlation analysis showed that age had a significant effect on patients satisfaction with appearance(P<0.001); SSS had a significant effect on patients satisfaction with appearance(P<0.001), health related quality of life(HRQoL)(P=0.011), and satisfaction with facial function(P<0.022); there were significant differences in the quality of life in patients of different age groups(P<0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that HRQoL, satisfaction with appearance, satisfaction with facial function, SSS and age had an effect on the quality of life. Conclusion The effects of HRQoL, appearance, facial function, and SSS on quality of life from a subjective perspective in patients with cleft lip and palate aged 8 to 29 years were positively correlated, with quality of life decreasing as patients aged. This is a quality of life study from the subjective perspective of patients with cleft lip and palate in Central China, which has shifted from a unidimensional to a multidimensional approach. In addition, clinicians should actively ask patients about their subjective evaluations on the basis of objective assessment of their condition and efficacy, so as to give targeted intervention plans to improve their quality of life comprehensively.

Key words: Cleft lip and palate, Subjective reports, Quality of life, Appearance, Facial function, CLEFT-Q, Satisfaction with life scale, MacArthur scale of subjective social status

中图分类号: 

  • R783.5
[1] Mossey PA, Little J, Munger RG, et al. Cleft lip and palate[J]. Lancet, 2009, 374(9703): 1773-1785.
[2] Hunt O, Burden D, Hepper P, et al. The psychosocial effects of cleft lip and palate: a systematic review[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2005, 27(3): 274-285.
[3] Medvedev ON, Landhuis CE. Exploring constructs of well-being, happiness and quality of life[J]. PeerJ, 2018, 6: e4903. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4903.
[4] Palmeiro MRL, Bronstrup MB, Durham J, et al. Quality of life and mastication in denture wearers and cleft lip and palate adults[J]. Braz Oral Res, 2018, 32: e113. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0113.
[5] Raghavan S, Philip K, Batra P, et al. Aesthetic perceptions and psychosocial impact of malocclusion: comparison between cleft and non-cleft patients and their parents[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2019, 41(1): 38-45.
[6] Branson EK, Branson VM, McGrath R, et al. Psychological and peer difficulties of children with cleft lip and/or palate: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 2022: 10556656221125377. doi: 10.1177/10556656221125377
[7] Aleksieva A, Begnoni G, Verdonck A, et al. Self-esteem and oral health-related quality of life within a cleft lip and/or palate population: a prospective cohort study[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021, 18(11): 6078.
[8] Groenewald CB, Murray CB, Palermo TM. Adverse childhood experiences and chronic pain among children and adolescents in the United States[J]. Pain Rep, 2020, 5(5): e839.
[9] Ali MA, Nasir AF, Abass SK. Oral health-related quality of life among sudanese children treated for cleft lip and palate[J]. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 2021, 58(11): 1405-1411.
[10] Marcusson A, Paulin G, Ostrup L. Facial appearance in adults who had cleft lip and palate treated in childhood[J]. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg, 2002, 36(1): 16-23.
[11] Aljohani M, Alshammari F, Alamri H, et al. Evaluation of oral health-related quality of life for adult individuals with cleft lip and/or palate using OHIP-49 and compared with a control group: a cross-sectional study[J]. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent, 2021, 11(5): 516-524.
[12] Mariano NCR, Sano MN, Curvêllo VP, et al. Impact of orofacial dysfunction on the quality of life of adult patients with cleft lip and palate[J]. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 2018, 55(8): 1138-1144.
[13] Wong Riff KWY, Tsangaris E, Goodacre TEE, et al. What matters to patients with cleft lip and/or palate: an international qualitative study informing the development of the CLEFT-Q[J]. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 2018, 55(3): 442-450.
[14] Wong Riff KWY, Tsangaris E, Forrest CR, et al. CLEFT-Q: detecting differences in outcomes among 2434 patients with varying cleft types[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2019, 144(1): 78e-88e.
[15] Wehby GL, Tyler MC, Lindgren S, et al. Oral clefts and behavioral health of young children[J]. Oral Dis, 2012, 18(1): 74-84.
[16] Tsangaris E, Wong Riff KWY, Goodacre T, et al. Establishing content validity of the CLEFT-Q: a new patient-reported outcome instrument for cleft lip/palate[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, 2017, 5(4): e1305.
[17] Sanders AE, Slade GD, Turrell G, et al. The shape of the socioeconomic-oral health gradient: implications for theoretical explanations[J]. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 2006, 34(4): 310-319.
[18] Präg P. Subjective socio-economic status predicts self-rated health irrespective of objective family socio-economic background[J]. Scand J Public Health, 2020, 48(7): 707-714.
[19] Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, et al. The satisfaction with life scale[J]. J Pers Assess, 1985, 49(1): 71-75.
[20] Karki S, Horváth J, Laitala ML, et al. Validating and assessing the oral health-related quality of life among Hungarian children with cleft lip and palate using Child-OIDP scale[J]. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent, 2021, 22(1): 57-65.
[21] 李凌江, 杨德森, 张亚林, 等. 社区人群生活质量研究——年龄差异及其影响因素[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志. 1995, 3(2): 84-88. LI Lingjiang, YANG Desen, ZHANG Yalin, et al. A study on quality of life in general populatiou[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1995, 3(2): 84-88.
[22] McArdle JJ, Grimm KJ, Hamagami F, et al. Modeling life-span growth curves of cognition using longitudinal data with multiple samples and changing scales of measurement[J]. Psychol Methods, 2009, 14(2): 126-149.
[23] Mani M, Carlsson M, Marcusson A. Quality of life varies with gender and age among adults treated for unilateral cleft lip and palate[J]. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 2010, 47(5): 491-498.
[24] Huang SL, Hou JW, Sun L, et al. The effects of objective and subjective socioeconomic status on subjective well-being among rural-to-urban migrants in China: the moderating role of subjective social mobility[J]. Front Psychol, 2017, 8: 819. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00819
[25] Sakurai K, Kawakami N, Yamaoka K, et al. The impact of subjective and objective social status on psychological distress among men and women in Japan[J]. Soc Sci Med, 2010, 70(11): 1832-1839.
[26] Cohen S, Alper CM, Doyle WJ, et al. Objective and subjective socioeconomic status and susceptibility to the common cold[J]. Health Psychol, 2008, 27(2): 268-274.
[27] Quon EC, McGrath JJ. Community, family, and subjective socioeconomic status: relative status and adolescent health[J]. Health Psychol, 2015, 34(6): 591-601.
[28] Stock NM, Feragen KB. Psychological adjustment to cleft lip and/or palate: a narrative review of the literature[J]. Psychol Health, 2016, 31(7): 777-813.
[29] Hunt O, Burden D, Hepper P, et al. Self-reports of psychosocial functioning among children and young adults with cleft lip and palate[J]. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 2006, 43(5): 598-605.
[30] Fadeyibi IO, Coker OA, Zacchariah MP, et al. Psychosocial effects of cleft lip and palate on Nigerians: the Ikeja-Lagos experience[J]. J Plast Surg Hand Surg, 2012, 46(1): 13-18.
[31] 张仁华,吴正华. 唇腭裂患者家长心理状态及干预效果[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2008, 193(9): 925-926. ZHANG Renhua, WU Zhenghua. Psychological state of parents of cleft lip and palate patients and its intervention effect[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2008, 46(9): 925-926.
[32] Stock NM, Costa B, White P, et al. Risk and protective factors for psychological distress in families following a diagnosis of cleft lip and/or palate[J]. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 2020, 57(1): 88-98.
[33] Miller CK. Feeding issues and interventions in infants and children with clefts and craniofacial syndromes[J]. Semin Speech Lang, 2011, 32(2): 115-126.
[34] Feitosa MCP, Garib D, de Cássia Moura Carvalho Lauris R, et al. The impact of orthognathic surgery on quality of life in individuals with oral clefts[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2022, 44(2): 170-177.
[35] Markey CN. Invited commentary: why body image is important to adolescent development[J]. J Youth Adolescence, 2010, 39(12): 1387-1391.
[36] Saunders JF, Frazier LD. Body dissatisfaction in early adolescence: the coactive roles of cognitive and sociocultural factors[J]. J Youth Adolescence, 2017, 46(6): 1246-1261.
[37] Ata RN, Ludden AB, Lally MM. The effects of gender and family, friend, and media influences on eating behaviors and body image during adolescence[J]. J Youth Adolescence, 2007, 36(8): 1024-1037.
[38] Downey DB. Number of siblings and intellectual development. The resource dilution explanation[J]. Am Psychol, 2001, 56(6/7): 497-504.
[39] 刘霞, 张跃兵, 张国华. 家庭因素对非独生子女心理健康的影响[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2019, 27(10): 1536-1539. LIU Xia, ZHANG Yuebing, ZHANG Guohua. Effect of family factors on mental health of non-only children[J]. China Journal of Health Psychology, 2019, 27(10): 1536-1539.
[40] Chi XL, Huang LY, Wang J, et al. The prevalence and socio-demographic correlates of depressive symptoms in early adolescents in China: differences in only child and non-only child groups[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020, 17(2): 438.
[41] 李源源. 独生与非独生个体的幸福感差异分析——基于CGSS(2015和2017)数据的实证分析[J]. 调研世界, 2021(6): 12-19. doi: 10.13778/j.cnki.11-3705/c.2021.06.002 LI Yuanyuan. Analysis on the difference of happiness between only-child and non-only-child Individuals-an empirical analysis based on CGSS(2015 and 2017)data[J]. The World of Survey and Research, 2021(6): 12-19.
[42] Kelly SN, Shearer J. Appearance and speech satisfaction and their associations with psychosocial difficulties among young people with cleft lip and/or palate[J]. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 2020, 57(8): 1008-1017.
[43] Paganini A, Moss T, Persson M, et al. A gender perspective on appearance-related concerns and its manifestations among persons born with unilateral cleft lip and palate[J]. Psychol Health Med, 2021, 26(6): 771-778.
[44] Crepaldi TA, Vitor LLR, Carrara CFC, et al. Do cleft lip and palate types affect health-related quality of life of adolescents?[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2019, 30(3): 829-833.
[45] Klassen AF, Riff KWW, Longmire NM, et al. Psychometric findings and normative values for the CLEFT-Q based on 2434 children and young adult patients with cleft lip and/or palate from 12 countries[J]. CMAJ, 2018, 190(15): E455-E462.
[1] 郝文婷,李洁,景正月,赵丹,袁叶敏,于才婷,周成超. 衰弱在农村慢性病老年人睡眠质量与生活质量间的中介作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(2): 102-107.
[2] 路梦新,杨瑶瑶,封丹珺. 公务员职业倦怠亚型与神经质、生活质量的关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(10): 116-121.
[3] 冀永娟,项紫霓,匡桂芳. 青岛市两所三甲医院医务人员职业倦怠对生活质量影响的路径分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 102-107.
[4] 田迷迷,肖连祥,渐楠,赵慧,魏新红,石岩,李冠,张帅,林祥涛. 超声和MRI对胎儿唇腭裂的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(12): 62-67.
[5] 李长瑾,洪炜,赵佳,甘伟. 老年人生活质量与心理弹性的关系及领悟社会支持的中介作用[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(9): 6-10.
[6] 朱建雷,刘金同,王旸,王端卫,朱晓萌,张珊静,朱建伟. 枣庄市农村留守儿童主观生活质量与自我意识现状[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(9): 128-132.
[7] 龚晴, 张昊, 乔颖. 精神分裂症患者家属生活质量调查分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 52(Z2): 177-178.
[8] 谭耀坤, 邓惠英, 罗梅银. 延续性护理肺血栓栓塞症患者 出院后生活质量的影响[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 52(Z2): 158-159.
[9] 李广顺. 社区糖尿病患者血糖控制以及生活质量情况调查[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 52(S2): 53-54.
[10] 付晓荣. 循证护理干预对上消化道出血患者 情绪障碍和生活质量的影响[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 52(S2): 142-143.
[11] 李凤波, 高晓芳, 王小双. 基层医院维持性血液透析患者生存质量相关影响因素调查分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 52(S1): 46-46.
[12] 申勇, 范存晖, 杨茜, 夏青, 薛青, 肖文林. 单侧完全性唇腭裂男性患者的牙齿发育状况[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 52(7): 99-101.
[13] 周忠伟1，杨雄1，万应彪2，信燕华1，翟堃1，马坚2，黄永清2，姜敏3，王怡瑞4. 宁夏回汉族人群中染色体17q22、10q25.3和ABCA4基因多态性与非综合征型唇腭裂的关联[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(1): 103-108.
[14] 成媛媛1，唐茂芹2. 简明幸福与生活质量满意度问卷在焦虑障碍患者中的信效度[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(7): 147-150.
[15] 李霞，刘培淑，毛洪鸾，张小磊，郑靖芳. 山东部分社区盆底功能障碍性疾病的流行病学研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(5): 66-70.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(医学版)》编辑部　
地址:山东大学科技期刊社（济南市历城区山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B座721室） 电话: 0531-88366918 E-mail: xbyxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发