您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (5): 109-113.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2021.1081

• • 上一篇    下一篇

1例6 q三体嵌合胎儿的产前诊断

宋敏1*,周玉侠2*,高璐2,刘娜2,王菊2,古晋2,张艳萍2   

  1. 1.山东第一医科大学附属济南妇幼保健院妇产科, 山东 济南 250001;2.山东省妇幼保健院医学遗传与产前诊断中心, 国家生育调控技术重点实验室, 山东省优生技术重点实验室, 山东 济南 250002
  • 发布日期:2022-06-01
  • 通讯作者: 张艳萍. E-mail:sddx308@163.com*共同第一作者
  • 基金资助:
    中国疾病预防与控制中心妇幼保健中心“母婴营养与健康研究项目”(2021FY021)

Prenatal diagnosis for a fetus of mosaic trisomy 6q

SONG Min1*, ZHOU Yuxia2*, GAO Lu2, LIU Na2, WANG Ju2, GU Jin2, ZHANG Yanping2   

  1. 1. Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Jinan Maternal and Child Care Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250001, Shandong, China;
    2. Medical Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Shandong Province;
    Key Laboratory of Birth Regulation and Control Technology of National Health and Family Planning Commission of China;
    Key Laboratory for Improving Birth Outcome Technique of Shandong Province, Jinan 250002, Shandong, China
  • Published:2022-06-01

摘要: 目的 探讨产前染色体嵌合的适宜诊断策略。 方法 回顾分析1例因超声显示胎儿心脏室间隔缺损伴单脐动脉而就诊的孕妇病例。该孕妇因中孕期血清学筛查提示21三体高危,孕17+2周于外院行无创DNA产前检测。孕25+5周因超声异常于山东省妇幼保健院医学遗传与产前诊断中心接受羊膜腔穿刺及胎儿染色体核型分析与染色体微阵列检测(CMA)、未培养羊水细胞6pter/6qter定制探针荧光原位杂交(FISH)检测以及引产胎儿胎盘和皮肤组织的CMA检测。羊水细胞核型计数82个细胞,核型分析5个。 结果 外院无创检测提示,胎儿21三体综合征、18三体综合征及13三体综合征均为低风险。本院报告羊水细胞核型为47,XN,+del(6)(p21.1)[24]/46,XN[58]。两次直接羊水细胞CMA均未发现异常,但传代培养的羊水细胞CMA检测提示6q三体嵌合。直接羊水细胞FISH检测计数100个细胞,89个为正常二倍体,6个为6q三体,FISH结果判读无异常。引产胎儿胎盘和皮肤组织的CMA检测均未发现异常。 结论 结合胎儿B超、核型分析和不同原理的分子遗传检测结果,判定胎儿可能为6q三体极低比例嵌合胎儿,减少了假阴性风险。

关键词: 染色体嵌合, 产前诊断, 核型分析, 染色体微阵列, 荧光原位杂交

Abstract: Objective To explore the prenatal diagnosis of chromosome moasic. Methods The clinical data of a pregnant woman whose ultrasound scans suggested fetal ventricular septal defect and single umbilical artery were retrospectively analyzed. As peripheral venous blood for serological screening indicated high risk of trisomy 21, the woman received non-invasive prenatal testing(NIPT)in another hospital at 17+2 weeks of gestation. For further prenatal diagnosis, she received amniocentesis, karyotype analysis, chromosome microarray analysis(CMA), 6pter/6qter probe fluorescence in situ hybridization(FISH), and CMA of fetus placenta and skin tissue at 25+5 weeks of gestation. A total of 82 cells were counted and 5 cells were analyzed in karyotype analysis of amniotic fluid cells. Results NIPT suggested a low risk of trisomy 21, 18 and 13 syndromes. The karyotype of amniotic fluid was 47,XN,+del(6)(p21.1)[24]/46,XN[58]. CMA indicated normal in the uncultured amniotic fluid cells, but 6q trisomy moasic in the cultured cells. FISH analyzed 100 uncultured cells, among which 89 were normal, and 6 were 6q trisomy. FISH test was normal. No abnormality was found in CMA of the placenta and skin tissue of the induced fetus. Conclusion Based on the results of fetal ultrasound, karyotype analysis and molecular genetic testing, the fetus was determined to be moasic with a very low proportion of trisomy 6q, and the risk of false negative was reduced.

Key words: Chromosome moasic, Prenatal diagnosis, Karyotype analysis, Chromosome Microarray, Fluorescence in situ hybridization

中图分类号: 

  • R715
[1] 中华人民共和国卫生部.中国出生缺陷防治报告(2012)[EB/OL]. [2012-09-04] (2021-09-02). http://www.gov.cn/gzdt/2012-09/12/content-2223371.htm.
[2] Patterson D. Molecular genetic analysis of Down syndrome[J]. Human Genetics, 2009, 126(1): 195-214.
[3] 滕晓坤,肖华胜. 基因芯片与高通量DNA测序技术前景分析[J].中国科学C辑:生命科学, 2008, 38(10): 891-899.
[4] McCoy RC, Demko ZP, Ryan A, et al. Evidence of selection against complex mitotic-origin aneuploidy during preimplantation development[J]. PLoS Genet, 2015, 11(10): e1005601.
[5] 郭颖,常颖,陈叙.嵌合体形成及其对产前筛查及诊断结果的影响[J].国际妇产科杂志, 2018, 45(1): 14-18.
[6] Blakey-Cheung S, Parker P, Schlaff W, et al. Diagnosis and clinical delineation of mosaic tetrasomy 5p[J]. Eur J Med Genet, 2020, 63(1): 103634.
[7] Gu S, Jernegan M, Van den Veyver IB, et al. Chromosomal microarray analysis on uncultured chorionic villus sampling can be complicated by confined placental mosaicism for aneuploidy and microdeletions[J]. Prenat Diagn, 2018, 38(11): 858-865.
[8] 高佳琪,王彦林.染色体非整倍体嵌合在产前诊断中的研究进展[J].中国计划生育和妇产科, 2016, 8(1): 20-24.
[9] Hsu LY, Benn PA. Revised guidelines for the diagnosis of mosaicism in amniocytes[J]. Prenat Diagn, 1999, 19(11): 1081-1082.
[10] Wegner RD, Schröck E, Obladen M, et al. Partial trisomy/monosomy 6q in fetal cells and CVS long-term culture not present in CVS short-term culture[J]. Prenat Diagn, 1996, 16(8): 741-748.
[11] De Grouchy J, Emerit I, Aicardi J. Partial trisomy for the long arm of a C chromosome(6)through t(Gp+;Cqs+)translocation[J]. Ann Genet, 1969, 12(2): 133-137.
[12] Tabet AC, Aboura A, Gérard M, et a1. Molecular characterization of a de novo 6q24.2q25.3 duplication interrupting UTRN in a patient with arthrogryposis [J]. Am J Med Genet A, 2010, 152A(7): 1781-1788.
[13] 秦凤金,路晓燕,冯亚佩,等.一例6q部分三体1q部分单体患儿的分子细胞遗传学分析[J].中华医学遗传学杂志, 2016, 33(2): 231-234. QIN Fengjin, LU Xiaoyan, FENG Yapei, et al. Cytogenetic and molecular characterization of a patient with partial 6q trisomy and 1q monosomy [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics, 2016, 33(2): 231-234.
[14] Marinescu PS, Saller DN, Parks WT, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 6q25.3qter and monosomy 10q26.12qter by array CGH in a fetus with an apparently normal karyotype[J]. Clin Case Rep, 2015, 3(2): 92-95.
[15] Valerio D, Di Domenico A, Felicetti M, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of a partial 6q trisomy: a case report[J]. Prenat Diagn, 2006, 26(10): 917-919.
[16] Kulharya AS, Carlin ME, Stettler RW, et a1. Prenata ldiagnosis of a de novo trisomy6q22.2-6qter and monosomy 1pter-1p36.3. Case report with a 2-year follow-up and a briefr view of other Prenatal cases of partial trisomy 6q[J]. Clin Genet, 1997, 51(2): 115-117.
[1] 邹丹,徐佩文,李敬,黄色新,颜军昊. 46,XX/46,XY已生育男性嵌合体1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(5): 129-132.
[2] 张雪,白改改,陶国伟,吴海芳,罗霞,刘培淑. 脐尿管未闭导致膀胱脱垂同时合并脐膨出的罕见病例1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(2): 115-117.
[3] 赵冰清,高选,李江夏. 基于辅助生殖人群的复发性流产夫妇染色体核型回顾性分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(7): 26-31.
[4] 曾睿,胡欣婷,云晓雅,田筝,李青,刘杰,张娅,王欣. 荧光原位杂交对197例慢性淋巴细胞白血病的诊断[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(11): 35-40.
[5] 王婧男1,郑燕2,肖东杰2,李金星1,丁卜同2,刘相东3,汪运山2,4. SATB1与HER2表达和乳腺癌分化程度的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(9): 91-.
[6] 桑坦1,丁卜同2,常亚丽1,陈昀1,李志红2,汪运山2,韩淑毅2,童书青2,郭农建1. 成人急性淋巴细胞白血病ETV6基因重排分析及其临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(3): 79-82.
[7] . 比较基因组杂交技术的改进及其在产前诊断中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2009, 47(7): 89-92.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 肖伟玲,林亚杰,牟东珍,孙萍,梁淑娟 . 分泌型人IL-1β表达载体的构建及在H7402细胞中的表达[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2008, 46(2): 119 -122 .
[2] 高静,陈雯,张同霞,王小花,戴廷军,姚红,赵秀鹤,迟兆富,单培彦 . 颞叶癫痫大鼠海马线粒体细胞色素氧化酶亚基Ⅲ和Ⅳ表达的变化[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2007, 45(8): 817 -820 .
[3] 刘益民,杜鲁涛,王丽丽,蒋秀梅,李娟,曲爱林,王海燕,郑桂喜,张欣,杨咏梅,王传新. 膀胱癌患者血清microRNA检测中内参基因的筛选及验证[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(5): 86 -91 .
[4] . 干细胞标记物LGR5在结直肠癌发生发展中的表达及意义[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2009, 47(8): 85 -88 .
[5] 于渊1,李岩1,荣风年2,梁婧1,刘晓琳1,王福立1. 自体CIK细胞治疗对卵巢癌调节性T细胞的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(5): 101 -104 .
[6] 蒋慧慧1,胡志敏2,李先哲1,席广民1,蒋汉明1,苑辉卿1. 人PDLIM4基因启动子报告基因载体的构建及其在人类肿瘤细胞中的表达[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(5): 19 .
[7] 林文俐1,张楠2,曲飞3,刘杰2,王婧男4,解田燕3,孙玉萍2. 肝细胞生长因子和血管内皮生长因子C在非小细胞肺癌中的共表达及与淋巴管生成的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(10): 111 -115 .
[8] 王海峰,史本康,张克勤,李永智,朱耀丰,王海新. B超检测的精索静脉直径及返流与术后精液质量的关系[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2007, 45(7): 751 -752 .
[9] 张元凯,刘培来,李德强,李明. 枢椎椎板螺钉联合寰椎侧块螺钉固定技术在复杂寰枢椎脱位中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(11): 98 .
[10] 张秀珍,刘莉,刘倩. 慢性乙型肝炎患者血清瘦素水平与抗病毒治疗应答的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(9): 96 -99 .