您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (4): 87-91.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2018.157

• • 上一篇    

上颌第一磨牙根管解剖结构的锥形束CT研究

郝新宇1,2,李建华3,张静3,聂晓琨3,熊世江2,3   

  1. 1.山东大学口腔医院儿童口腔科, 山东 济南 250012;2.山东省口腔生物医学重点实验室, 山东 济南 250012;3.山东大学口腔医院特诊科, 山东 济南 250012
  • 发布日期:2022-09-27
  • 通讯作者: 熊世江. E-mail:xiongsj@sdu.edu.cn

Cone beam computed tomography on the anatomical structure of maxillary first molars root canal

HAO Xinyu1,2, LI Jianhua3, ZHANG Jing3, NIE Xiaokun3, XIONG Shijiang2,3   

  1. 1. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Stomatology, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;
    2. Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;
    3. VIP Department, School of Stomatology, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China
  • Published:2022-09-27

摘要: 目的 应用锥形束CT(CBCT)扫描法研究753颗上颌第一磨牙的根管解剖结构。 方法 选取山东大学口腔医院放射科拍摄CBCT的753颗上颌第一磨牙的影像资料,观察根管系统的解剖结构。 结果 753颗上颌第一磨牙中:四根管616颗(81.81%),其中MB2 612 颗(81.27%)、DB2 4颗(0.53%);三根管135颗(17.93%); 双根管2颗(0.27%);单根管发生率为0。753颗上颌第一磨牙根管类型:近中颊根管Ⅲ型共383颗(51.00%),其次Ⅴ型共143颗(19.04%)、Ⅰ型共136颗(18.11%),其余根管类型较少;远中颊根管Ⅰ型共747颗(99.47%),其余根管类型共4颗;腭根根管全部为Ⅰ型(100%)。753颗上颌第一磨牙的根管长度(根管口到解剖性根尖孔的距离):7.1~12.0 mm共1 976个(87.55%),12.1~18.0 mm共178个(7.89%),4.1~7.0 mm共103个(4.56%)。 结论 上颌第一磨牙根管系统复杂多变,CBCT扫描法可有效发现各型根管解剖结构,为临床治疗提供依据。

关键词: 上颌第一磨牙, 锥形束CT, 根管解剖结构

Abstract: Objective To explore the anatomical structure of the root canal of maxillary first molars with cone beam computed tomography(CBCT). Methods The CBCT data of 753 maxillary first molars were reviewed to observe the anatomical structure of the root canal system. Results Of all 753 maxillary first molars, 616(81.81%)had 4 canal roots, including 612(81.27%)MB2 and 4(0.53%)DB2; 135(17.93%)had 3 canal roots, 2(0.27%)had 2 canal roots; no single canal root was observed. Of all mesiobuccal canal roots, 383(51.00%)molars were type Ⅲ, 143(19.04%)were type Ⅴ, 136(18.11%)were type Ⅰ, and only a few molars were other types. Of all distobuccal canal roots, 747(99.47%)molars were type Ⅰ, and 4 belonged to the other types. All(100%)palatal canal roots were type Ⅰ. As to the length of the canal root, 1976(87.55%)were 7.1-12.0 mm, 178(7.89%)were 12.1-18.0 mm, and 103(4.56%)were 4.1-7.0 mm. Conclusion The root canal system of the maxillary first molar is complex and changeable. The anatomical structure of various root canals can be effectively observed with CBCT to provide the basic information for clinical treatment.

Key words: Maxillary first molars, Cone beam computed tomography, Anatomical structure of root canal

中图分类号: 

  • R781.03
[1] Zehnder M, Belibasakis GN. On the dynamics of root canal infections-what we understand and what we dont[J]. Virulence, 2015, 6(3): 216-222.
[2] 陈媛媛, 张文汇, 郭斌, 等. 比较注射冲洗与辅助超声荡洗对根管清洁效果的系统评价[J].华西口腔医学杂志, 2015, 33(2): 145-152. CHEN Yuanyuan, ZHANG Wenhui, GUO Bin, et al. Cleaning effect of ultrasonic activation as an adjunct to syringe irrigation of root canals: a systematic review[J]. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi, 2015, 33(2): 145-152.
[3] Rodrigues E, Braitt AH, Galvão BF, et al. Maxillary first molar with 7 root canals diagnosed using cone-beam computed tomography[J]. Restor Dent Endod, 2017, 42(1): 60-64.
[4] Shetty H, Sontakke S, Karjodkar F, et al. A cone beam computed tomography(CBCT)evaluation of MB2 canals in endodontically treated permanent maxillary molars[J]. A retrospective study in Indian population[J]. J Clin Exp Dent, 2017, 9(1): e51-e55. doi: 10.4317/jced.52716.
[5] Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Ahuja R, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography study of root and canal morphology of maxillary first and second molars in an Indian population[J]. J Endod, 2010, 36(10): 1622-1627.
[6] Chan HL, Misch K, Wang HL. Dental imaging in implant treatment planning[J]. Implant Dent, 2010, 19(4): 288-298.
[7] 田成. 前磨牙根管系统的CBCT研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2013.
[8] Han T, Ma Y, Yang L, et al. A study of the root canal morphology of mandibular anterior teeth using cone-beam computed tomography in a Chinese subpopulation[J]. J Endod, 2014, 40(9): 1309-1314.
[9] Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1984, 58(5): 589-599.
[10] Pekiner FN, Borahan MO, Dumlu A. Evaluation of distolingual canal/roots in mandibular molars and mesiobuccal canals in maxillary molars by CBCT[J]. Open Dent J, 2017, 11: 360-366.
[11] 马海峰, 耿海霞, 钱君荣, 等. 锥形束CT图像经Planmeca Romexis软件三维影像重建鲁西南地区汉族人下颌第一恒磨牙牙根及根管的变异[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2017, 21(16): 2521-2526. MA Haifeng, GENG Haixia, QIAN Junrong, et al. Variations in the root and root canal of permanent mandibular first molars in the Han population of southwest Shandong Province: a three-dimensional reconstruction based on cone-beam CT data using Planmeca Romexis software[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2017, 21(16): 2521-2526.
[12] Betancourt P, Navarro P, Muñoz G, et al. Prevalence and location of the secondary mesiobuccal canal in 1100 maxillary molars using cone beam computed tomography[J]. BMC Med Imaging, 2016, 16(1): 66.
[13] Vasundhara V, Lashkari KP. An in vitro study to find the incidence of mesiobuccal 2 canal in permanent maxillary first molars using three different methods[J]. J Conserv Dent, 2017, 20(3): 190-193.
[14] 刘文菲, 崔广, 宫琳. 上颌第一磨牙近中颊根根管系统锥形束CT影像学观察[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2014, 7(8): 479-481. LIU Wenfei, CUI Guang, GONG Lin. Observation 0f the maxillary first molar mesiobuccal root canal system by using cone beam computer tomography[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Stomatology, 2014, 7(8): 479-481.
[15] 王岩, 裴涛, 曾红燕, 等. 锥体束CT对上颌第一磨牙近中颊根管形态的研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2012, 28(9): 956-958. WANG Yan, PEI Tao, ZENG Hongyan, et al. The morphological study of maxillary first molar meiobuccal canal with cone beam computer tomography[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2012, 28(9): 956-958.
[16] Blattner TC, George N, Lee CC, et al. Efficacy of cone-beam computed tomography as a modality to accurately identify the presence of second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first and second molars: a pilot study[J]. J Endod, 2010, 36(5): 867-870.
[17] 高燕, 安少锋, 凌均綮. 离体上颌磨牙近中颊根第二根管出现率的研究[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2006, 4l(9): 52l-524. GAO Yan, AN Shaofeng, LING Junqi. An in vitro study on the incidence of the second mesiobuccal canal in the mesiobuccal root of the first and second maxillary molars[J]. Chinese Journal of Etomatology, 2006, 4l(9): 52l-524.
[18] 詹福良, 李莉. 浅谈根管解剖形态[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2012, 5(9): 521-526. ZHAN Fuliang, LI Li. Analysis of root canal morphology[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Stomatology, 2012, 5(9): 521-526.
[19] Zhang R, Yang H, Yu X, et al. Use of CBCT to identify the morphology of maxillary permanent molar teeth in a Chinese subpopulation[J]. Int Endod J, 2011, 44(2): 162-169.
[20] da Silveira PF, Vizzotto MB, Liedke GS, et al. Detection of vertical root fractures by conventional radiographic examination and cone beam computed tomography-an in vitro analysis[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2013, 29(1): 41-46.
[21] Kim Y, Lee SJ, Woo J. Morphology of maxillary first and second molars analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography in a Korean population: variations in the number of roots and canals and the incidence of fusion[J]. J Endod, 2012, 38(8): 1063-1068.
[22] Ghoncheh Z, Zade BM, Kharazifard MJ. Root morphology of the maxillary first and second molars in an iranian population using cone beam computed tomography[J]. J Dent(Tehran), 2017, 14(3): 115-122.
[23] Lee JH, Kim KD, Lee JK, et a1. Mesiobuccal root canal anatomy of Korean maxillary first and second molars by cone-beam computed tomography[J]. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol, Oral Radiol, Endod, 2011, 111(6): 785-791.
[24] 方溢云, 林正梅, Ashroy Jhugroo. 毛里求斯人和中国珠三角地区人上颌第一磨牙近中颊根根管形态比较研究[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2010, 26(6): 759-763. FANG Yiyun, LIN Zhengmei, Ashroy Jhugroo. Canal morphology of the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar in people from Mauritius and Pearl River Delta Region in China[J]. J Pract Stomatol, 2010, 26(6): 759-763.
[25] 梁景平. 我国根管治疗的现状分析[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2010, 45(7): 385-388.
[1] 王煜,尹增正,聂晓琨,马志德,熊世江. 1 125颗下颌第一恒磨牙近中中央根管的CBCT检出率及相关因素分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(3): 100-109.
[2] 尹增正,聂晓琨,王煜,马志德,熊世江. 800颗上颌第一前磨牙颊根腭侧面沟和根管的CBCT影像形态学观察[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(8): 74-79.
[3] 刘学业,李齐明,唐弘毅,徐秋平,陈文倩,郭泾. 年轻成人颞下颌关节髁突体积、表面积与关节盘矢向位置的关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(6): 117-121.
[4] 魏成石,申丽丽,王效英. 上颌第一磨牙双腭根双根管2例[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(8): 110-112.
[5] 张冰,贾凌璐,贾婷婷,张云鹏,文勇,徐欣. 上颌窦外侧壁牙槽管解剖的锥形束CT研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(5): 92-96.
[6] 李德水, 刘盼盼, 史晓昕, 郭泾. 正畸美学区的CBCT测量分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(2): 75-80.
[7] 张云鹏, 文勇, 唐翠竹, 张冰, 占发龙, 徐欣. 上颌后牙牙根与毗邻解剖结构关系的锥形束CT分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(10): 66-71.
[8] MICHAEL M. P. NG'WANAMASELE, 韩延钊, 张风河, 佟冬冬, 李亮, 程慧娟, 王春玲, 刘东旭. 三维配准方法评价下颌后退手术后上呼吸道的形态学变化[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(10): 61-65,71.
[9] 刘盼盼1,2,谢志伟1,2,李国菊2,3,郭泾1,2. 汉族均角成年人群下颌体形态的测量分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(12): 95-99.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!