您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (11): 36-39.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2015.412

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

联合检测血清PCT和NSE对小细胞肺癌的诊断价值

张志强1,吴艳华1,王茂水1,王新锋1,汪运山2   

  1. 1.山东省胸科医院检验科, 山东 济南 250013;2.山东大学附属济南市中心医院中心实验室, 山东 济南 250013
  • 收稿日期:2015-04-23 出版日期:2016-11-10 发布日期:2016-11-10
  • 通讯作者: 汪运山. E-mail:sdjnwys@163.com王新锋. E-mail:13789821006@163.com E-mail:sdjnwys@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东省医药卫生科技发展计划(2015WS0207)

Diagnostic value of combination of PCT and NSE in serum for detecting small cell lung cancer

ZHANG Zhiqiang1, WU Yanhua1, WANG Maoshui1, WANG Xinfeng1, WANG Yunshan2   

  1. 1. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shandong Provincial Chest Hospital, Jinan 250013, Shandong, China;
    2. Cental Laboratory, Jinan Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan 250013, Shandong, China
  • Received:2015-04-23 Online:2016-11-10 Published:2016-11-10

摘要: 目的 探讨联合检测血清降钙素原(PCT)和神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)对小细胞肺癌的诊断价值。 方法 将123例排除肺部感染及其他感染史和肝脏等转移的新诊断的住院肺癌患者,分为鳞癌组(n=48)、腺癌组(n=52)与小细胞癌组(n=23),另选择门诊健康体检者作为对照组(n=40),比较各组之间PCT和NSE的水平。 结果 各组之间PCT和NSE水平相比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。PCT在腺癌组、鳞癌组与小细胞癌组之间的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),NSE在腺癌组、鳞癌组与小细胞癌组之间的差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。PCT和NSE区分小细胞肺癌和鳞癌、腺癌的鉴别诊断最佳截断点分别为0.10和23.91 ng/mL,ROC曲线下面积分别为0.671和0.806,敏感性为56.5%和69.6%,特异性为77.0%和90.0%,联合检测(PCT+NSE)可将特异性提高为98.0%,联合检测(PCT或NSE)可将敏感性提高为82.6%。 结论 检测血清PCT对小细胞肺癌具有一定的鉴别意义,在小细胞肺癌患者中判断细菌感染时,应谨慎判读PCT结果。联合检测PCT和NSE将有助于肺癌的鉴别诊断和组织分型。

关键词: 神经元特异性烯醇化酶, ROC曲线, 降钙素原, 小细胞肺癌

Abstract: Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of combination of procalcitonin(PCT)and neuron-specific enolase(NSE)in serum for differentiating small cell lung cancer from other lung cancers. Methods A total of 123 lung cancer patients without lung infections, other sites infection history and liver metastasis were divided into three groups: squamous carcinoma group(n=48), adenocarcinoma group(n=52)and small cell carcinoma group(n=23). And 40 healthy volunteers were taken as control group. Serum PCT and NSE levels were tested and compared among each group. Results Serum PCT and NSE levels were statistical different among the four groups(P<0.01). Mann-Whitney analysis showed that, there were statistical differences between small cell carcinoma and squamous carcinoma or adenocarcinoma groups(P<0.05, P<0.01). For PCT and NSE, the area under the ROC curve was 0.671 and 0.806, the best cut-off point was 0.10 and 23.91 ng/mL, sensitivity was 56.5% and 69.6%, and specificity was 77.0% and 90.0%. Combination(PCT+NSE)would increase the specificity to 98.0%, while combination(PCT or 山 东 大 学 学 报 (医 学 版)54卷11期 -张志强,等.联合检测血清PCT和NSE对小细胞肺癌的诊断价值 \=-NSE)would increase the sensitivity to 82.6%. Conclusion PCT can be used as a marker in differentiating small cell lung cancer from other lung cancers. However, for the small cell lung cancer patients, serum PCT cannot be simply used to detect the infection. Meanwhile, combined biomarkers(PCT and NSE)will improve the diagnostic performance in discrimination of small cell lung cancer.

Key words: Small cell lung cancer, Neuron specific enolase, ROC curve, Procalcitonin

中图分类号: 

  • R734.2
[1] Assicot M, Gendrel D, Carsin H, et al. High serum procalcitonin concentrations in patients with sepsis and infection[J]. Lancet, 1993, 341(8844): 515-518.
[2] 王信杰,杜向阳.降钙素原与腺苷脱氨酶联合检测诊断结核性胸腔积液[J].山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(9): 79-82. WANG Xinjie, DU Xiangyang. Combined detection of procalcitonin and adenosine deaminase for tuberculous pleural effusion[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2012, 50(9): 79-82.
[3] Sandri MT, Passerini R, Leon ME, et al. Procalcitonin as a useful marker of infection in hemato-oncological patients with fever[J]. Anticancer Res, 2008, 28(5B): 3061-3065.
[4] 刘平平,郑力,张浩,等. PCT和C-反应蛋白在恶性肿瘤合并感染的早期诊断价值[J].浙江临床医学, 2014, 16(9): 1383-1384. LIU Pingping, ZHENG Li, ZHANG Hao, et al. PCT and C-reactive protein in early diagnosis of infection in the patients with malignant tumor[J]. Zhejiang Clinical Medical Journal, 2014, 16(9): 1383-1384.
[5] Kallio R, Surcel HM, Bloigu A, et al. C-reactive protein, procalcitonin and interleukin-8 in the primary diagnosis of infections in cancer patients [J]. Eur J Cancer,2000, 36(7): 889-894.
[6] Russwurm S, Stonans I, Stonane E, et al.Procalcitonin and CGRP-1 mrna expression in various human tissues[J]. Shock, 2001, 16(2): 109-112.
[7] 上官红,肖伟,董亮,等.血清CYFRA21-1、NSE和CEA在肺癌诊断和评估预后中的临床价值[J].山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(12): 134-137. SHANGGUAN Hong, XIAO Wei, DONG Liang, et al. Clinical value of serum CYFRA21-1, NSE and CEA in the diagnosis and prognosis of lung cancer [J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2010, 48(12): 134-137.
[8] 陈孝谦,汪铮,李秀.血清降钙素原对渗出性胸腔积液病因的鉴别价值[J].临床肺科杂志, 2013, 18(8): 1446-1448. CHEN Xiaoqian, WANG Zheng, LI Xiu. Value of serum procalcitonin in the differentiation of causes of pleural exudates [J]. Journal of Clinical Pulmonary Medicine, 2013, 18(8): 1446-1448.
[9] Cate CC, Pettengill OS, Sorenson GD. Biosynthesis of procalcitonin in small cell carcinoma of the lung[J]. Cancer Res, 1986, 46(2): 812-818.
[10] Mehanic S, Baljic R. The importance of serum procalcitonin in diagnosis and treatment of serious bacterial infections and sepsis[J]. Mater Sociomed, 2013, 25(4): 277-281.
[11] 佟威威,佟广辉,王婧,等. Cyfra21-1、NSE、SCCA和CRP在肺癌诊断中的应用[J].中国免疫学杂志, 2015, 31(3): 396-400. TONG Weiwei, TONG Guanghui, WANG Jing, et al. Value of Cyfra21-1, NSE, SCCA and CRP in diagnosis of lung cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Immunology, 2015, 31(3): 396-400.
[12] Lortet-Tieulent J, Soerjomataram I, Ferlay J, et al. International trends in lung cancer incidence by histological subtype: adenocarcinoma stabilizing in men but still increasing in women[J]. Lung Cancer, 2014, 84(1): 13-22.
[13] Falsey AR, Becker KL, Swinbume AJ, et al. Utility of serum procalcitonin values in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstrutive pulmonary disease: a cautionary note[J]. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 2012, 7: 127-135.
[14] Schuetz P, Maurer P, Punjabi V, et al. Procalcitonin decrease over 72 hours in US critical care units predicts fatal outcome in sepsis patients[J]. Crit Care, 2013, 17(3): R115-R122.
[15] 叶倩,陈燕,罗玲青,等.血清降钙素原及C反应蛋白在鉴别肿瘤患者发热原因中的价值[J].国际检验医学杂志, 2014, 35(19): 2064-2066. YE Qian, CHEN Yan, LUO Lingqing, et al.The value of serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in the differentiation of the causes of fever in cancer patients[J]. International Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 2014, 35(19): 2064-2066.
[16] Ukay I, Garzoni C, Ferry T, et al. Postoperative serum pro-calcitonin and C-reactive protein levels in patients with orthopedic infections[J]. Swiss Med Wkly, 2010, 140: w13124.
[1] 曾海燕,李睿,孙新东,谢鹏,孟雪,范秉杰,李万龙,袁双虎. 局限期小细胞肺癌患者预防性脑照射后脑转移的关联分析:双中心研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(7): 61-66.
[2] 孙启晶,陈方方,李春晓,张才擎. PNI及HGB评估中晚期非小细胞肺癌患者预后的临床价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(4): 55-59.
[3] 戴建建,袁冰,张颖,林琦,袁苑,韩明勇. CT引导下125I粒子植入治疗Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌疗效与并发症的临床观察[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(2): 32-37.
[4] 彭岳,冯振,谢厚耐,王晖,李猛,任万刚,刘通,彭忠民. 61例肺部多发病灶患者的外科治疗[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(11): 42-46.
[5] 王丽丽,霍彬,王磊,汪浩,侯定坤,霍小东,王金焕,臧立,曹强,柴树德,王海涛. 亚肺叶切除联合125I粒子植入治疗早期肺癌有效性的Meta分析与系统评价[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(10): 76-83.
[6] 于玉娟,高成杰,王晓鹏,李波. 帕瑞昔布钠对脑肿瘤切除术患者炎症反应的影响及脑保护作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(6): 65-68.
[7] 臧丽娇,仇杰,庄根苗,安丽. 血清S100B蛋白、神经元特异性烯醇化酶与新生儿低血糖脑损伤的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(4): 51-54.
[8] 王立敏,王旭东. 吸氧浓度对心肺复苏大鼠S100β蛋白和神经元特异性烯醇化酶表达的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(3): 5-8.
[9] 高昂, 王世江, 付正, 孙新东, 于金明, 孟雪. 18F-FDG PET/CT确定局部晚期非小细胞肺癌加量放疗靶区的可行性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(7): 73-77.
[10] 高南南, 陈栋, 于永慧, 张丽丽. 血清生物学标志物在新生儿坏死性小肠结肠炎手术评估中的价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(6): 73-76.
[11] 杨璐, 刘延国, 李际盛, 王秀问. 蟾毒灵对非小细胞肺癌顺铂化疗的增敏作用及机制[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(3): 6-11.
[12] 付海燕, 胡占升, 杜红阳, 李潮, 包翠芬. 地黄多糖对过表达Notch1(NICD)大鼠骨髓间充质干细胞诱导分化及增殖的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(1): 34-40.
[13] 高鹏, 沈方臻, 肖文静, 修元德, 周玲玲. IB期非小细胞肺癌Runx2、Ezrin表达与术后转移的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(1): 63-66.
[14] 刘淑真, 于国华. 重组人血管内皮抑制素治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(S1): 125-126.
[15] 刘新农,展翰翔,胡三元,张光永, 王磊. 血清miR-146a在脓毒症早期诊断中的价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(9): 92-94.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!