您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (1): 38-41.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2015.772

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

CIK细胞联合光动力治疗中晚期食管癌的疗效观察

张明明1,安永辉1,韩彩莉2,张瑛琪2,马明1,李娜1,邹长鹏1   

  1. 河北医科大学第一医院 1.肿瘤科;
    2.急诊科, 河北 石家庄 050031
  • 收稿日期:2015-08-14 出版日期:2016-01-11 发布日期:2016-01-11
  • 通讯作者: 安永辉. E-mail:sjzyhd@vip.sina.com E-mail:sjzyhd@vip.sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    河北省重点科技研究计划(20140483)

Clinical efficacy of combined cellular immunotherapy and photodynamic therapy for advanced esophageal cancer

ZHANG Mingming1, AN Yonghui1, HAN Caili2, ZHANG Yingqi2, MA Ming1, LI Na1, ZOU Changpeng1   

  1. 1. Department of Oncology;
    2. Department of Emergency, First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050031, Hebei, China
  • Received:2015-08-14 Online:2016-01-11 Published:2016-01-11

摘要: 目的 探讨细胞因子诱导的杀伤细胞(CIK)联合光动力(PDT)治疗中晚期食管癌的临床疗效及对生活质量的影响。 方法 将收治的63例中晚期食管癌患者随机分为2组,单纯CIK组33例,行单纯CIK细胞治疗;联合治疗组30例,CIK细胞联合PDT治疗;CIK细胞培养14 d,分3次安全回输患者体内,间隔1~2 d,每次回输细胞数量>1×109个,活力>95%。联合治疗组: CIK细胞培养14 d,期间第12天按照5 mg/kg静脉注射光敏剂喜泊分注射液,第13天在胃镜引导下使用630 nm波长的激光进行照射,功率密度150 mW/cm2,持续30 min,能量密度270 J/cm2,第14 天回输CIK细胞。对所有患者进行临床症状缓解率、内镜下总有效率、免疫功能及生活质量评价。 结果 联合治疗组临床症状缓解率(93.3% vs 60.6%)及内镜下评价总有效率(90.0% vs 63.6% )均高于单纯CIK组(P<0.01,P<0.05);两组CD3+、CD3+ CD56+治疗前后差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05),且治疗后联合治疗组CD3+、CD3+ CD56+较单纯CIK组明显上升(P<0.05);联合治疗组生活质量提高率显著高于单纯CIK组(86.7% vs 33.3%,P<0.01)。 结论 CIK细胞联合光动力治疗中晚期食管癌患者,对提高患者的近期临床疗效,增强免疫功能等具有较好的临床价值。

关键词: 细胞因子诱导的杀伤细胞, 食管癌, 临床疗效, 光动力治疗

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of cytokine-induced killer(CIK)cells and photodynamic therapy(PDT)in combination in the treatment of advanced esophageal cancer. Methods A total of 63 patients with advanced esophageal cancer were collected and randomly divided into two groups: CIK group(treated with CIK cells alone, n=33), and CIK+PDT group(treated with both CIK cells and PDT, n=30). For the CIK group, CIK cells were cultured for 14 days, and transfused for 3 times at an interval of 1~2 days, and the number of CIK cells was >1×109, activity > 95%. For the CIK+PDT group, CIK cells were cultured for 14 days, administered with photofrin 5 mg/kg on day 12, irradiated by 630nm-laser under endoscopic guidance on day 13 for 30 min, power density being 150 mW/cm2, energy density being 270 J/cm2, and transfused on day 14. The remission rate of clinical symptoms, total effective rate, immune function and life quality of all patients were evaluated. Results The remission rate of clinical symptoms(93.3% vs 60.6%)and the total effective rate(90% vs 63.6%)were much higher in the CIK+PDT group than in the CIK group(P<0.01, P<0.05). There were significant differences in the percentages of CD3+, and CD3+ CD56+ T cells before and after treatment in the two groups(all P<0.05); and the increase was higher in the CIK+PDT group than in the CIK group(P<0.05). The increase of life quality was higher in the CIK+PDT 山 东 大 学 学 报 (医 学 版)54卷1期 - 张明明,等.CIK细胞联合光动力治疗中晚期食管癌的疗效观察 \=-group than in the CIK group(86.7% vs 33.3%, P<0.01). Conclusion The CIK cells combined with PDT can improve the clinical efficacy, and enhance the immune function of patients with advanced esophageal cancer, and thereby have a good clinical value.

Key words: Photodynamic therapy, Esophageal cancer, Clinical curative effect, Cytokine-induced killer cells

中图分类号: 

  • R735.1
[1] 秦莉, 王志华. CIK细胞的体外培养与细胞毒作用[J]. 医学分子生物学杂志, 2007, 4(1):82-85. QIN Li, WANG Zhihua. In vitro culture and cytotoxicity of cytokine-induced killer cells[J]. Journal of Medical Molecular Biology, 2007, 4(1):82-85.
[2] Yoon HY, Cheon YK, Choi HJ, et al. Role of photodynamic therapy in the palliation of obstructing esophageal cancer[J]. Korean J Intern Med, 2012, 27(3):278-284.
[3] 罗光华, 马鸣, 郭莉莉, 等. CIK 细胞治疗对肿瘤患者外周血免疫细胞亚型的影响[J]. 中国肿瘤生物治疗杂志, 2013, 20(4):475-477. LUO Guanghua, MA Ming, GUO Lili, et al. Effect of cytokine-induced killer cell therapy on immune cell subsets of peripheral blood in tumor patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Cancer Biotherapy, 2013, 20(4):475-477.
[4] 沙卫红, 李瑜元, 聂玉强, 等. 光动力疗法治疗进展期消化道肿瘤的疗效观察[J]. 中国综合临床, 2005, 21(2):125.
[5] 毛永平, 邱海霞, 顾瑛, 等. 进展期食管癌的光动力治疗[J]. 中国激光医学杂志, 2010, 19:10-12. MAO Yongping, QIU Haixia, GU Ying, et al. Photodynamic therapy for advanced esophageal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Laser Medicine & Surgery, 2010, 19:10-12.
[6] 周际昌. 实用肿瘤内科学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2003: 28-48.
[7] 李昌立. 氟尿嘧啶植入剂用于消化道恶性肿瘤手术患者效果观察[J]. 山东医药, 2012, 52: 59-60.
[8] Sangiolo D. Cytokine induced killer cells as promising immunotherapy for solid tumors[J]. J Cancer, 2011, 2(6):363-368.
[9] Milla Sanabria L, Rodriguez ME, Cogno IS, et al. Direct and indirect photodynamic therapy effects on the cellular and molecular components of the tumor micro environment [J]. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2013, 1835(1):36-45.
[10] 吴念, 冯虎翼. 细胞因子诱导的杀伤细胞免疫治疗的研究进展[J]. 中国生物制品学杂志, 2014, 6(27):861-864. WU Nian, FEN Huyi. Progress in research on immunotherapy with cytokine-induced killer cells[J]. Chin J Biologicals, 2014, 6(27):861-864.
[11] 李黎波, 罗荣城, 廖旺军, 等. 内镜下卟吩姆钠-光动力学疗法治疗恶性肿瘤的临床研究[J]. 中国激光医学杂志, 2007, 16(1): 27-30. LI Libo, LUO Rongcheng, LIAO Wangjun, et al. Endoscopic perfimer sodium-photodynamic therapy for malignant tumor: a clinical study[J]. Chinese Journal of Laser Medicine & Surgery, 2007, 16(1):27-30.
[12] 潘林娜, 张志燕, 李曼, 等. 光动力治疗食管癌近期疗效观察[J]. 世界华人消化杂志, 2006, 14(5):530-532. PAN Linna, ZHANG Zhiyan, LI Man, et al. Effect of photodynamic therapy for esophageal carcinoma in near future [J]. World Chinese Journal of Digestology, 2006, 14(5): 530-532.
[13] Yoon HY, Cheon YK, Choi HJ, et al. Role of photodynamic therapy in the palliation of obstructing esophageal cancer[J]. Korean J Intern Med, 2012, 27(3):278-284.
[14] Yoo J, Ha K. New insights into the mechanisms for photodynamic therapy-induced cancer cell death[J]. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol, 2012, 295:139-174.
[15] Peters FP, Kara MA, Rosmolen WD, et al. Endoscopic treatment of high-grade dysplasia and early stage cancer in Barretts esophagus[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2005, 61(4):506-514.
[16] Allison RR, Moghissi K. Oncologic photodynamic therapy: clinical strategies that modulate mechanisms of action[J]. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 2013, 10(4): 331-341.
[1] 吕龙飞,李林,李树海,亓磊,鲁铭,程传乐,田辉. 腔镜下细针导管空肠造瘘在微创McKeown食管癌切除术中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 77-81.
[2] 韩福燕,成士清,王召宝,鞠瑛. 食管癌患者外周血红细胞分布宽度检测的临床价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(7): 67-72.
[3] 刘连科, 邵明雯, 马兰, 孙婧, 管丹, 束永前. 食管癌伴神经内分泌分化的临床病理特点及诊断标志物[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(7): 87-91.
[4] 王颉, 张友忠, 冯进波, 刘洪丽, 宗丽菊. 慢病毒介导的hTERT-shRNA联合光动力治疗对宫颈癌细胞SiHa的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(1): 27-33.
[5] 樊庆凯, 龚维明, 宁斌, 宋宏亮, 蔚建鲁, 贾堂宏. PKP治疗骨质疏松性多节段椎体压缩性骨折的临床疗效[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(11): 73-76.
[6] 王秉翔1,聂林1, 蒲华清2,张志勉2. Dynesys动态稳定系统与腰椎后路椎体间融合术术后疗效的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(9): 72-78.
[7] 李波翰,吴东进,宋杨,张程,赵杰,李德全,张颖哲,马胜忠,高春正. 周围神经吻合后神经生长因子-纤维蛋白胶包埋的临床观察[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(7): 58-61.
[8] 丁佰娟,张友忠,吕昌帅,姜侃,刘洪丽. TMPyP4-PDT对人宫颈癌细胞的杀伤效应[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(11): 53-57.
[9] 王美建,侯新国,宋君,周克华,杨俊朋,肖芳,刘继东,邓楠,周晓莹,陈丽. 2型糖尿病患者胰岛素治疗结构化管理模式研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(10): 1-5.
[10] 陈艳1,李秀梅2,王洪江3,庞作良3,李卉4,姜孝芳4,马莉莉1,谌宏鸣5,李惠武4. 新疆哈萨克族食管癌c-myc的表达及其调控机制[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(11): 135-.
[11] 吴玉生1,刘雪莹1,姜文杰2,张道杰3. 麝香注射液对急性脑梗死患者血单核细胞趋化蛋白-1水平及中性粒细胞CD11b/CD18表达的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(6): 111-114.
[12] 崔莹莹1,2,周婷2,张蓓1,2,荣风年2. SKOV3冻融抗原负载的DC-CIK细胞对SKOV3的杀伤作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(2): 131-135.
[13] 张蓓1, 2,闫莉2,周婷2,荣风年2. 细胞因子诱导的杀伤细胞治疗妇科恶性肿瘤的近期疗效观察[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(11): 121-.
[14] 张好1,周英智2,刁玉涛3,李会庆3,周瑞雪4,赵德利4,雷复华4. 食管癌高发区食管炎影响因素的病例对照研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(10): 120-124.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!