您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2012, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (2): 64-69.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

胃癌术后放疗三种放疗技术的剂量学比较研究

张江洲1,卢小开2,冯志宇2,龙志雄1,冉立3,谭诗生2   

  1. 1.武汉市第五医院肿瘤二科, 武汉 430050;  2.贵州省人民医院肿瘤科, 贵阳 550002;
    3.贵州省肿瘤医院肿瘤科, 贵阳 550000
  • 收稿日期:2011-05-31 出版日期:2012-02-10 发布日期:2012-02-10
  • 通讯作者: 谭诗生(1968- ),男,教授,主任医师,主要从事胃肠肿瘤治疗研究。 E-mail:tssh18018@126.com
  • 作者简介:张江洲(1974- ),男,硕士,主治医师,主要从事胃肠肿瘤放疗研究。
  • 基金资助:

    贵州省科学技术厅基金项目(黔科合SY[2010]3137号)

Dosimetric evaluation of three techniques in postoperative
radiotherapy  for  gastric  carcinoma

ZHANG Jiang-zhou1, LU Xiao-kai2, Feng Zhi-yu2, LONG Zhi-xiong1, RAN Li3, TAN Shi-sheng2   

  1. 1. Second Department of Oncology, 5th Hospital of Wuhan City, Wuhan 430050, China;
    2. Department of Oncology, People′s Hospital of Guizhou Province, Guiyang 550002, China;
     3. Department of Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Guizhou Province, Guiyang 550000, China
  • Received:2011-05-31 Online:2012-02-10 Published:2012-02-10

摘要:

目的   比较胃癌术后三维适形放疗(three-dimension  conformal  radiation  therapy,3DCRT)、调强放疗(intensitymodulated radiation therapy,IMRT)及简化调强放疗(simplified intensity modulated radiation therapy,sIMRT)技术的剂量学差异,为胃癌术后放疗照射方法的优选提供依据。方法   选取术后病理证实为Tumor 3、Tumor 4有或无淋巴结转移的10例胃体癌患者:对每一例患者采用3DCRT治疗。 IMRT和sIMRT计划仅用于剂量学比较。患者靶区设定的处方剂量是至少95%计划靶体积(plan target volume,PTV)接受45.00Gy,至少99%PTV接受42.75Gy。利用剂量体积直方图(dose volume histogram,DVH)比较不同照射技术靶区和相关正常组织受量差异和剂量分布。结果   与3DCRT相比,IMRT与sIMRT计划的靶区适形度略高,但三者在PTV受量上剂量相似。就V15(V15表示接受15Gy照射的体积占整个体积的比例)、 V23(V23表示接受23Gy照射的体积占整个体积的比例)整体考虑而言,sIMRT对肾脏的保护最佳、IMRT稍逊、3DCRT最差;从正常肝的平均受量、V23及V30来看,IMRT与sIMRT相似,均较3DCRT稍有优势;在脊髓的受量上三者相似。结论   胃癌术后采用三维适形、简化调强和调强放疗均能使靶区受到足量精确的照射,能较好地保护危及器官。对靶区、危及器官的剂量分布和治疗时间等的全面评价:胃癌术后放疗采用sIMRT与3D-CRT及IMRT相比,sIMRT在胃癌术后放疗中具有最优的时效比。

关键词: 胃肿瘤;放射疗法,适形;放射治疗剂量;对比研究

Abstract:

Objective   To evaluate threedimension  conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and simplified intensity-modulated   radiation therapy (sIMRT) in post-operative radiotherapy for gastric cancer. Methods   A total of 10 patients with gastric body cancer were chosen for this study. All were of the T3 or T4 type, with or without  lymph  node metastasis, and surgery had been performed. All patients were  subjected to 3D-CRT, IMRT and sIMRT   treatment regimes. The dose prescriptions were 45.00Gy to 95% of PTV and 42.75Gy to 99% of PTV. DVHs and 3D dose distributions of the three regimes were compared. Results   IMRT, sIMRT and 3D-CRT had  comparable PTV coverages with the prescribed doses, but IMRT and sIMRT  showed better dose conformity than 3D-CRT. For a normal liver, V23, V30 and mean dose  for IMRT and sIMRT  were similar and  lower than those for 3D-CRT, although these doses were  still within the clinical tolerance range for 3D-CRT. V15 and  V23 for sIMRT showed the lowest doses for kidneys, as contrasted to  3D-CRT being the highest. IMRT, sIMRT and 3D-CRT  had comparable maximum doses to the spinal cord. Conclusions   IMRT, sIMRT and 3D-CRT have adequate and  accurate PTV coverages for the prescribed doses in postoperative radiotherapy for gastric carcinoma,and can protect  neighboring organs.  Overall, sIMRT is the best among the three  techniques.

Key words:  Stomach carcinomas; Radiotherapy, conformal; Dosage ; Control study

中图分类号: 

  • R735.3
[1] 袁志平1,牟华平2,王秋1,王立帅1,陈洁1,张川利1,周光远1,陈家莲1. VEGF、sICAM-1蛋白在结直肠癌患者血清中的表达水平及临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(10): 74-76.
[2] 吕艳锋1,韩冰冰2,禹化龙1,王建新1. 抑制EZH2基因表达的shRNA载体的构建及其作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(9): 31-34.
[3] 冯斐1,燕锦2,袁萍1,胡晓琴1,徐琳2,杨艳芳1. 饮食习惯、生活方式与结直肠癌关系的配对病例对照研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(7): 107-112.
[4] 任鹏1,郝青2,王杰书3,李洪林3,李波3,王峰3. 趋化因子受体3及血管生成拟态在结肠癌肝转移中的作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(8): 96-99.
[5] 王开雷,李乐平,靖昌庆. 两种人大肠癌多药耐药株的建立及耐药性比较[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(4): 75-.
[6] 孔帅,李乐平,靖昌庆,王峰. RNA干扰技术沉默MDR1基因逆转大肠癌耐药细胞株LoVo/5-Fu的耐药性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(6): 80-83.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!