您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2011, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3): 37-.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

连续电除颤与单次电除颤在长时程心室颤动中的疗效对比研究

王伯松,钟敬泉,李景莎,曾绮娴,刘红臻,苏国英,刘东林,张运   

  1. 山东大学齐鲁医院心内科, 济南 250012
  • 收稿日期:2010-12-06 出版日期:2011-03-10 发布日期:2011-03-10
  • 通讯作者: 钟敬泉,主任医师,博士生导师,主要从事心脏电生理和心功能的基础和临床研究。 E-mail: zwky1668@vip.sina.com
  • 作者简介:王伯松(1972- ),博士研究生,主要从事室颤心肺复苏的研究。
  • 基金资助:

    高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助项目(20100131110059)。

Comparison of effects of continuous and one-shock defibrillations on a  canine model of prolonged ventricular fibrillation

WANG Bo-song, ZHONG Jing-quan, LI Jing-sha, ZENG Qi-xian, LIU Hong-zhen, SU Guo-ying, LIU Dong-lin, ZHANG Yun   

  1. Department of Cardiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University,  Jinan 250012, China
  • Received:2010-12-06 Online:2011-03-10 Published:2011-03-10

摘要:

目的     评价连续电除颤与单次电除颤在长时程心室颤动(室颤)中的抢救效果。方法    将24只犬采用体外电击法制备室颤动物模型,室颤维持8min后,将动物随机分为连续电除颤组和单次电除颤组。连续或单次电除颤后立即进行2min心肺复苏,循环以上抢救步骤,直至动物复苏成功或抢救时间超过15min。记录两组动物的复苏延搁时间、复苏成功率、复苏后血流动力学参数以及左室射血分数。结果    与连续电除颤组相比,单次电除颤组在整个心肺复苏过程中的复苏延搁时间明显减少(P<0.05),复苏成功率明显提高(P<0.05),复苏后的冠脉灌注压和射血分数均较高(P均<0.05)。结论    对于长时程室颤的抢救,单次电除颤的效果明显优于连续电除颤。

关键词: 心室颤动;模型,动物;心肺复苏;电除颤

Abstract:

Objective     To investigate effects of continuous and one-shock defibrillations on prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF). Methods    VF was electrically induced in 24 dogs. After 8 min of untreated VF, the animals were randomly divided into the continuous shock group and the one-shock group. After continuous or one-shock defibrillation, the animals were given 2 min of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The process of rescue continued until the animals attained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) or it lasted for 15min. Time of CPR interruptions, rates of ROSC, hemodynamic variables and the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were recorded. Results    Compared with the continuous shock group, animals in the oneshock group had significantly shorter time of CPR interruptions (P<0.05), improved rate of ROSC (P<0.05), and higher coronary perfusion pressure and LVEF(both P<0.05). Conclusion    The effect of one-shock defibrillation on prolonged VF is significantly better than that of continuous shock defibrillation.

Key words: Ventricular fibrillation; Model, animal; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Defibrillation

中图分类号: 

  • R541.78
[1] 王伯松,钟敬泉,李景莎,曾绮娴,刘红臻,苏国英,刘东林,张运. 连续电除颤与单次电除颤在长时程心室颤动中的疗效对比研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(3): 37-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!