您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2011, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2): 1-.

• 论文 •    下一篇

血清维生素D水平与中老年人生活质量的相关性研究

王燕,康东红,曹维,王萍,刘智文   

  1. 山东大学附属千佛山医院内分泌科, 济南 250014
  • 收稿日期:2010-10-12 出版日期:2011-02-10 发布日期:2011-02-10
  • 通讯作者: 康东红(1965- ),女, 副主任医师,硕士生导师,主要从事代谢性骨病的研究。 E-mail: kangdonghong2003@yahoo.com.cn
  • 作者简介:王燕(1983- ),女,硕士研究生,主要从事代谢性骨病的研究。
  • 基金资助:

    民政部老年学和老年医学“十一五研究计划”(民人教科字[2008]47-1)。

Relationship between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and the quality of life in middle-aged and older people

WANG Yan, KANG Dong-hong, CAO Wei, WANG Ping, LIU Zhi-wen   

  1. Department of Endocrinology, Qianfoshan Hospital  Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan  250014, China
  • Received:2010-10-12 Online:2011-02-10 Published:2011-02-10

摘要:

目的    探讨血清维生素D水平与中老年人生活质量的关系。方法     2009年9~11月在本院查体中心随机抽取济南市区机关事业单位167例中老年人, 45~85岁,平均(61.02±10.06)岁。据25羟维生素D(25OHD)水平分为3组:维生素D不足组(25OHD<49.9nmol/L),维生素D临界值组(25OHD=50~74.9nmol/L),维生素D正常组(25OHD ≥75nmol/L)。用酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)测定血25OHD水平。采用SF36量表对生活质量进行评价。 结果    血清25OHD水平为(54.21±19.88)nmol/L,维生素D正常者仅占18.0%。男、女25OHD水平分别为(58.13±19.07)nmol/L、(51.24±20.07)nmol/L,两者差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。<60岁和≥60岁的人群25OHD水平分别为(58.82±19.34)和(49.54±19.43)nmol/L,两者差异有统计学意义(P<0.01) 。在生理功能、生理职能、躯体疼痛、总体健康、社会功能、活力、精神健康7个维度中,维生素D不足组得分低于维生素D临界值组及维生素D正常组得分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Pearson相关分析示25OHD水平与生活质量各维度评分均呈正相关(P均<0.05)。多元逐步回归分析显示维生素D对生活质量各维度评分影响较大。结论    中老年人群普遍存在维生素D不足,女性较男性重,老年人较中年人重。血清25OHD水平与中老年人的生活质量呈正相关。应合理补充维生素D,并使其维持在适当水平。

关键词: 血清25羟维生素D; SF36量表; 生活质量; 中老年人

Abstract:

Objective    To assess the correlation of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) and the quality of life in middle-aged and older people. Methods    A total of 167 middle-aged and older people, from 45 to 85 years old with a mean age of 61.02±10.06 in Jinan institutions, were recruited from September to November 2009. Serum 25OHD was categorized into 3 groups: <49.9nmol/L as the insufficient group, 50-74.9nmol/L as the borderline group, and ≥75nmol/L as the normal group. Serum 25OHD levels were measured by ELISA and the SF36 form was adopted to investigate the quality of life. Results    The mean 25OHD concentration was (54.21±19.88)nmol/L, while Vitamin D was detected as normal in 18.0% of the population. The 25OHD  concentration of females and males were (58.13±19.07)nmol/L and (51.24±20.07) nmol/L, respectively. The difference was significant (P<0.05). The 25OHD concentration of people below and above 60 yrs old were (58.82±19.34) and (49.54±19.43) nmol/L, respectively. The difference was also significant(P<0.01). People with insufficient vitamin D received lower scores than the other two groups in seven dimensions: physical functioning (PF), role-physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), and mental health (MH) (P<0.05). Positive correlation between Vitamin D and the scores ofthe quality of life was found by Pearson analysis(P<0.05). Stepwise multiple linear regression showed that vitamin D was the main factor affecting the quality of life. Conclusion    25OHD insufficiency is prevalent in middleaged and older people, especially in the elderly and females. Lower serum 25OHD concentration in middle-aged and older people are associated with poorer quality of life. More attention should be paid to vitamin D supplementation in these populations.

Key words: Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D; SF36; Quality of life; Middleaged and older people

中图分类号: 

  • R151.4
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!