您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2011, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (1): 111-.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

特质焦虑量表在农村自杀死亡及其对照组中的信度和效度评价

王东芳1,贾存显1,徐爱强2,张吉玉2,路长飞1,王欣欣1   

  1. 1.山东大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学研究所, 济南 250012;
    2.山东省疾病预防控制中心, 济南 250014
  • 收稿日期:2010-09-08 出版日期:2011-01-10 发布日期:2011-01-10
  • 通讯作者: 贾存显(1970- ), 男,副教授,主要从事社会流行病学研究。 E-mail: jiacunxian@sdu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:王东芳(1985- ),女,硕士研究生,主要从事肿瘤及伤害流行病学研究。

Evaluation of reliability and validity of Trait Anxiety Inventory in rural suicides and controls

WANG Dong-fang1, JIA Cun-xian1, XU Ai-qiang2, ZHANG Ji-yu2, LU Chang-fei1, WANG Xin-xin1   

  1. 1. Institute of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China;
    2. Shandong Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jinan 250014, China
  • Received:2010-09-08 Online:2011-01-10 Published:2011-01-10

摘要:

目的     检验特质焦虑量表在农村自杀研究中的信度和效度。方法    应用配对病例对照研究,在山东省疾病监测点上选取3个县(市)自2008年9月1日至2009年8月31日农村自杀死亡病例200例作为病例组,并按照同性别、年龄(±3岁)、当地居住者1∶1配比选取正常对照组,用问卷调查和特质焦虑量表进行测评。 结果    自杀死亡组和正常对照组量表的Cronbach′s α系数分别为0.906和0.877;当条目删除时,两组条目得分与删掉条目后合计得分的Pearson相关系数分别为0.183~0.697、0.122~0.659。自杀死亡组特质焦虑评分(45.35±10.29)显著高于正常对照组得分(32.85±7.67)(t=-15.137, P<0.001),并且分别和Beck绝望量表的得分呈现正相关(r=0.52,0.64;均P<0.001);对自杀死亡组、正常对照组进行探索性因子分析,分别提取3个和4个公因子;条目5和8在两组数据间的归属不统一,显示两组数据提取的公因子与原量表设计者的假设不一致。结论    特质焦虑量表在自杀研究中具有较好的信度、区分效度和效标效度,但有些条目需要进一步完善。

关键词: 特质焦虑;量表;自杀;农村;信度;效度

Abstract:

Objective    To study the reliability and validity of Trait Anxiety Inventory (TAI) in rural suicides and their paired controls. Methods    200 suicide deaths that occurred from September 1st, 2008 to August 31st, 2009 were collected from three counties selected from disease surveillance points of Shandong Province. Informants of each suicide or the paired control with the same age (±3 years), gender and district as the suicide were interviewed by trained interviewers using questionnaires and TAI. Results    The Cronbach′s α of suicides and controls were 0.906 and 0.877, respectively. The corrected item-total correlations in suicides and controls were 0.1830.697 and 0.1220.659, respectively. The total scores of trait anxiety had significant differences between the suicides(45.35±10.29) and controls(32.85±7.67)(t=-15.137, P<0.001), and had a positive correlation with the scores of Beck Hopelessness Scale(r=0.52,0.64;both P<0.001). Exploratory factor analysis was carried out in the suicidal group and the control group and yielded 3 factors and 4 factors, respectively. The adscription of items 5 and 8 in the two groups was different, which indicated that all factors extracted from the two groups were different from the hypothesis of the scale′s original designer. Conclusion    The reliability, discrimininative validity and criterion validity of TAI in suicide research are acceptable, but further research is needed to modify and improve its structural validity.

Key words: Trait anxiety; Scale; Suicide; Rural; Reliability; Validity

中图分类号: 

  • R749.7
[1] 贾存显1,庄茂强1,王健2. 山东省西部农村居民主观幸福感与自杀态度的关系[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(8): 128-.
[2] 韩梅1,贾存显1,2,邱惠敏3,马吉祥4,路长飞1,刘慧1. 简易应对方式量表评价及其与农村自杀死亡关系研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(10): 160-164.
[3] 王欣欣1, 贾存显1,2,庄茂强1 ,高琦1,刘丽媛1,刘慧1,韩梅1. 在农村自尊量表评价以及自尊与自杀死亡的病例对照研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(7): 159-162.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!