您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2010, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (9): 97-.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

蒙特利尔认知评估量表在血管性认知功能障碍初步应用的研究

王德巍,谢兆宏,来超,朱正禹,王允,金苏芹,毕建忠   

  1. 山东大学第二医院神经内科, 济南 250033
  • 收稿日期:2010-02-04 出版日期:2010-09-16 发布日期:2010-09-16
  • 通讯作者: 毕建忠(1961- ),男,主任医师,博士,主要从事痴呆的基础和临床研究。 E-mail:bjz@sdu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:王德巍(1983- ),女,住院医师,硕士,主要从事血管性认知障碍的研究。 E-mail:wangdewei45@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点基础研究发展计划资助项目(2009CB526507)

Preliminary application of Montreal cognitive assessment in vascular cognitive impairment

WANG De-wei, XIE Zhao-hong, LAI Chao, ZHU Zheng-yu, WANG Yun, JIN Su-qin, BI Jian-zhong   

  1. Department of Neurology,  Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250033, China
  • Received:2010-02-04 Online:2010-09-16 Published:2010-09-16

摘要:

目的    研究蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)在血管性认知功能障碍(VCI)中的初步应用,探讨适合我国国情的VCI筛查分界值。方法     选择VCI病例组50例,对照组60例,分别用MoCA和简易精神状态量表(MMSE)评定2组认知功能,比较MoCA和MMSE检测VCI的效度,并分别将病例组和对照组进行年龄、性别、教育程度、工作性质的分层分析。结果    受教育程度、工作性质均对MoCA得分有显著影响。受教育程度为初中以上者MoCA的筛查分界值≥25分,此时筛查VCI灵敏度为83.3%,高于MMSE 46.7%;初中以下者MoCA的分界值≥22分,筛查VCI灵敏度为85%,高于MMSE 50%。结论    MoCA用于筛查VCI优于MMSE。应用MoCA有助于早期发现VCI患者,减少漏诊。MoCA得分是判断认知功能是否正常的非特异性指标,不能取代临床诊断。

关键词: 认知障碍;痴呆,血管性;蒙特利尔认知评估量表

Abstract:

 Objective     To study the application of Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) in vascular cognitive impairment (VCI), and make a benchmark for a cutoff score. Methods   60 healthy elderly controls and 50 patients meeting the clinical criteria for VCI were tested by MoCA and mini-mental state examination(MMSE). The validities of MoCA and MMSE were compared. The age, sex, education and nature of the work in the two groups were stratified and analyzed. Results    Education and nature of the work had statistical differences between MoCA and MMSE. In persons whose education level was below junior high school, the cutoff score for MoCA was ≥22, and the sensitivity was 83.3%, which was higher than that for MMSE sensitivity (46.7%); in those whose education level was above junior high school, the cutoff score for MoCA was ≥25, the sensitivity was 85%, which was higher than that for MMSE (50%). Conclusion     MoCA has a higher screening sensitivity for VCI than MMSE do. Adjustment in the cutoff scores would improve the detection of VCI by reducing false negativity. MoCA scores should be used to identify current cognitive difficulties but not be used to make formal diagnosis.

Key words: Cognition disorders; Dementia, vascular; Montreal cognitive assessment

中图分类号: 

  • R742
[1] 宋希俊1,郑延红2,刘新民1,王立为1,赵晓民3,夏作理3. 淋巴性脑水肿大鼠孤束背内侧亚核Glu、GABA及GAD67的时程变化[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(3): 64-.
[2] 宋希俊1,郑延红2,刘新民1,王立为1,赵晓民3,夏作理3. 淋巴性脑水肿大鼠孤束背内侧亚核Glu、GABA及GAD67的时程变化[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(3): 64-.
[3] . 帕金森病猫额、顶叶皮质功能改变的18FFDG PET/CT研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2009, 47(8): 62-66.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!