您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2010, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (12): 75-77.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

660nm激光口腔治疗仪对阿弗他溃疡的疗效评价

马缨卫1,董莉莉1,刘同军1,万军1,侯学元2   

  1. 1.山东大学附属济南市中心医院口腔科, 济南250013; 2. 山东大学信息科学工程学院, 济南 250100
  • 收稿日期:2010-08-29 发布日期:2010-12-16
  • 作者简介:马缨卫(1962- ),女,副主任医师,主要从事口腔内科、儿童青少年错合畸形的早期干预、矫治的临床研究。
  • 基金资助:

    山东省科技计划资助项目(031050112)。

Efficacy evaluation of 660nm laser for recurrent oral ulcer

MA Ying-wei1, DONG Li-li1, LIU Tong-jun1, WAN-jun1, HOU Xue-yuan2   

  1. 1. Department of Stomatology, Jinan Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan 250013, China;
    2. School of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China
  • Received:2010-08-29 Published:2010-12-16

摘要:

目的    评价660nm激光口腔治疗仪治疗复发性口腔溃疡的疗效。方法    2006年5月~2007年9月本院口腔科门诊复发性口腔溃疡(排除重型溃疡)患者121例,随机分为实验组61 例,对照组60 例。实验组采用660nm激光口腔治疗仪局部照射,对照组局部外涂金达甘油。疗效评价标准采用DP分级法,记录平均溃疡期D、疼痛指数P,按照P-VAS标尺分段法记录治疗前、治疗后3、5、10min和治疗后24h的自发痛、激惹痛,组间对照比较。结果    两组疼痛缓解率在治疗后3min、10min、24h比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组治疗后5min比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组治疗总有效率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论    660nm激光治疗比药物治疗缓解疼痛起效快、有效持续时间长,能显著缩短口腔溃疡的愈合时间。

关键词: 激光治疗;药物治疗;复发性口腔溃疡

Abstract:

Objective    To evaluate the effect of 660nm laser on treating recurrent oral ulcer (ROU).  Methods    A total of 121 ROU patients (gravistype excluded) were divided into two groups: the experimental group with 61patients and the control group with 60 patients. The experimental group received laser therapy and the control group received drug treatment with Jinda glycerol. The evaluation criteria were DP classification and P-VAS grading. Pain indexes(P) and mean ulcer duration(D) were recorded before treatment, and 3minutes, 5 minutes, 10 minutes and 24 hours after treatment. The results were analyzed by using ttest and χ2 analysis. Results    There were significant differences in the pain relief rate between the two groups 3 minutes, 10 minutes and 24 hours after treatment(P<0.05),  while there was no difference at baseline and 5 minutes after treatment(P>0.05). There were significant differences in the total effective rate between the two groups (P<0.05). Conclusions    660nm laser is more effective in the treatment of ROU compared with the drug, with earlier onset of action and longer duration. It can obviously accelerate healing time and relieve pain.

Key words: Laser therapy; Drug treatment; Recurrent oral ulcer

中图分类号: 

  • R816.98
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!