您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (2): 76-82.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2020.1421

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

70例不同垂直骨面型骨性Ⅱ类错牙合磨牙及基骨横向特征

张嘉豪,刘东旭   

  1. 山东大学齐鲁医学院口腔医学院 山东大学口腔医院正畸科 山东省口腔组织再生重点实验室山东省口腔生物材料与组织再生工程实验室, 山东 济南 250012
  • 发布日期:2021-03-05
  • 通讯作者: 刘东旭. E-mail:liudongxu@sdu.edu.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东大学临床研究重点项目(2020SDUCRCA005)

Transverse characteristics of skeletal class Ⅱ malocclusion molars and basal bone in 70 cases with different vertical facial types

ZHANG Jiahao, LIU Dongxu   

  1. Department of Orthodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University &
    Shandong Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration &
    Shandong Engineering Laboratory for Dental Materials and Oral Tissue Regeneration, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China
  • Published:2021-03-05

摘要: 目的 分析成人骨性Ⅱ类患者上下颌第一磨牙及基骨的横向特征,以及其与垂直骨面型的相关性。 方法 成人骨性Ⅱ类错牙合患者(ANB角≥5°)70例,其中男35例,女35例,年龄范围18~37岁,平均年龄25.26岁。按下颌平面角(∠FH-MP)将其分为低角组(∠FH-MP <22°,n=23)、均角组(∠FH-MP=22°~28°,n=24)和高角组(∠FH-MP>28°,n=23)。锥体束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)数据, Mimics21.0软件测量上下颌基骨宽度、上下颌第一磨牙牙间宽度、阻抗中心间宽度、磨牙倾斜度和阻抗中心水平牙槽骨厚度。使用单因素方差分析、LSD法、Pearson相关分析进行统计学分析。 结果 上下颌基骨宽度、上颌第一磨牙阻抗中心间宽度高角组低于均角和低角组(P<0.05);下颌平面角与上颌基骨宽度及上颌第一磨牙阻抗中心间宽度呈负相关(r=-0.279、-0.468);上下颌第一磨牙阻抗中心间宽度差高角组低于低角组(P<0.05)。上颌第一磨牙颊倾度下颌第一磨牙舌倾度高角组高于低角组(P<0.05);下颌平面角与上颌第一磨牙颊舌向倾斜度呈正相关(r=0.422),与下颌第一磨牙颊舌向倾斜度呈负相关(r=-0.272)。上颌第一磨牙阻抗中心水平牙槽骨厚度高角组低于低角组(P<0.05);下颌高角组低于均角及组和低角组(P<0.05)。 结论 在成人骨性Ⅱ类患者中,高角型较均角及低角型上颌基骨宽度更小,上颌第一磨牙更加颊倾,下颌第一磨牙更加舌倾,上下颌第一磨牙阻抗中心水平牙槽骨更薄。

关键词: 骨性Ⅱ类, 垂直骨面型, 宽度, 锥体束计算机断层扫描, 相关性

Abstract: Objective To explore the transverse characteristics of basal bone and maxillary mandibular first molars in adult patients with skeletal class Ⅱ malocclusion, and to analyze the correlation between the characteristics and vertical facial types. Methods A total of 70 adult patients(35 males and 35 females, age 18-47 years, mean 25.26 years)with skeletal class Ⅱ malocclusion(∠ANB ≥ 5 °)were divided into three groups according to the mandibular plane angle(∠FH-MP): hypodivergent group(∠FH-MP<22°, n=23), normodivergent group(∠FH-MP=22°-28°, n=24)and hyperdivergent group(∠FH-MP>28°, n=23). Data were scanned with cone beam computed tomography(CBCT). The maxillomandibular basal bone width, intermolar widths, maxillomandibular intermolar width between centers of resistance, molar inclination, and thickness of alveolar bone were measured with Mimics21.0. Relevant factors were assessed with One-way ANOVA, LSD method and Pearson correlation analysis. Results The maxillomandibular basal bone width and intermolar width between centers of resistance of the upper first molars were shorter in the hyperdivergent group than in the other two groups(P<0.05). The mandibular plane angle was negatively correlated with the maxillary basal bone width and the intermolar width between centers of resistance of the upper first molars(r=0.279, -0.468). The width difference between centers of resistance of the upper and lower first molars in hyperdivergent group was smaller than that in hypodivergent group(P<0.05). The buccal inclination of upper first molar and the lingual inclination of lower first molar in hyperdivergent group were higher than those in hypodivergent group(P<0.05). The mandibular plane angle was positively correlated with the buccal-lingual inclination of the upper first molar(r=0.422), and negatively correlated with the buccal-lingual inclination of the lower first molar(r=-0.272). The buccolingual width at the alveolar crest of upper first molar at centers of resistance level in hyperdivergent group was lower than that in hypodivergent group(P<0.05), and that of the lower first molar in hyperdivergent group was lower than that in the other two groups(P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with the normodivergent and hypodivergent patients, skeletal class Ⅱ hyperdivergent patients have smaller width of the maxillary base, more buccal inclined upper first molar, more lingual inclined lower first molar, and thinner buccolingual width at the alveolar crest of upper and lower first molar at centers of resistance.

Key words: Skeletal class Ⅱ, Vertical facial type, Transverse, Cone beam computed tomography, Correlation

中图分类号: 

  • R783.5
[1] Ortu E, Pietropaoli D, Adib F, et al. Electromyographic evaluation in children orthodontically treated for skeletal Class Ⅱ malocclusion: Comparison of two treatment techniques [J]. Cranio®, 2019, 37(2): 129-135.
[2] Moyers RE, Riolo ML, Guire KE, et al. Differential diagnosis of class Ⅱ malocclusions. Part 1. Facial types associated with class Ⅱ malocclusions [J]. Am J Orthod,1980,78(5): 477-494.
[3] Ortu E, Pietropaoli D, Adib F, et al. Electromyographic evaluation in children orthodontically treated for skeletal Class Ⅱ malocclusion: Comparison of two treatment techniques [J]. Cranio®, 2019, 37(2): 129-135.
[4] Hwang S, Song J, Lee J, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of dentofacial transverse widths in adults with different sagittal facial patterns [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2018, 154(3): 365-374.
[5] McNamara JA. Influence of respiratory pattern on craniofacial growth [J]. Angle Orthod, 1981, 51(4): 269-300.
[6] Lai J, Ghosh J, Nanda RS. Effect of orthodontic therapy on the facial profile in long and short vertical facial patterns [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2000, 118(5): 505-513.
[7] Blanchette ME, Nanda RS, Currier GF, et al. A longitudinal cephalometric study of the soft tissue profile of short- and long face syndromes from 7 to 17 years [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 1996, 109(2): 116-131.
[8] Isaacson JR, Isaacson RJ, Speidel TM, et al. Extreme variation in vertical facial growth and associated variation in skeletal and dental relations [J]. Angle Orthod, 1971, 41(3): 219-229.
[9] 王璇, 谢小瑞, 李琴, 等. 正常牙合垂直骨面型与牙弓宽度的相关性研究[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2017, 33(6): 802-806. WANG Xuan, XIE Xiaorui, LI Qin, et al. The relationship between arch width and vertical facial skeletal types of the adults with individual normal occlusion [J]. Journal of Practical Stomatology, 2017, 33(6): 802-806.
[10] 鲁琦澔, 张卫兵. 成人骨性Ⅱ类患者不同垂直骨面型上颌后牙区牙槽骨复合体形态比较的CBCT分析[J]. 口腔医学, 2020, 40(5): 432-436.
[11] Eraydin F, Cakan DG, Tozlu M, et al. Evaluation of buccolingual molar inclinations among different vertical facial types [J]. Korean J Orthod, 2018, 48(5): 333.
[12] Lai J, Ghosh J, Nanda RS. Effect of orthodontic therapy on the facial profile in long and short vertical facial patterns [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2000, 118(5): 505-513.
[13] Blanchette ME, Nanda RS, Currier GF, et al. A longitudinal cephalometric study of the soft tissue profile of short- and long-face syndromes from 7 to 17 years [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1996, 109(2): 116-131.
[14] Isaacson JR, Isaacson RJ, Speidel TM, et al. Extreme variation in vertical facial growth and associated variation in skeletal and dental relations [J]. Angle Orthod, 1971, 41(3): 219-229.
[15] Southard TE, Marshall SD, Allareddy V, et al. Adult transverse diagnosis and treatment: A case-based review [J]. Semin Orthod, 2019, 25(1): 69-108.
[16] Tamburrino R, Boucher N, Vanarsdall R, et al. The transverse dimension: diagnosis and relevance to functional occlusion [J]. RWISO J, 2010, 2(1): 13-22.
[17] Koo YJ, Choi SH, Keum BT, et al. Maxillomandibular arch width differences at estimated centers of resistance: Comparison between normal occlusion and skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion [J]. Korean J Orthod, 2017, 47(3): 167-175.
[18] 沈悦. 不同垂直骨面型安氏Ⅱ~1类错牙合畸形颌面骨骼及牙弓宽度的研究[D]. 石家庄: 河北医科大学, 2008.
[19] Chen FS, Terada K, Wu LP, et al. Dental arch widths and mandibular-maxillary base width in class Ⅲ malocclusions with low, average and high MP-SN angles [J]. Angle Orthod, 2007, 77(1): 36-41.
[20] Kiliaridis S, Mahboubi PH, Raadsheer MC, et al. Ultrasonographic thickness of the masseter muscle in growing individuals with unilateral crossbite [J]. Angle Orthod, 2007, 77(4): 607-611.
[21] Janson G, Bombonatti R, Cruz KS, et al. Buccolingual inclinations of posterior teeth in subjects with different facial patterns [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2004, 125(3): 316-322.
[22] Tsunori M, Mashita M, Kasai K. Relationship between facial types and tooth and bone characteristics of the mandible obtained by CT scanning [J]. Angle Orthodd, 1998, 68(6): 557-562.
[23] Sayuti E, Thahar B, Soemantri ESS, et al. First maxillary molar position alteration in class Ⅱ Division 1 malocclusion treatment with maxillary premolar extraction [J]. OALib, 2016, 3(9): 1-7.
[24] Solow B. The dentoalveolar compensatory mechanism: background and clinical implications [J]. Br J Orthod, 1980, 7(3): 145-161.
[25] Eraydin F, Cakan DG, Tozlu M, et al. Evaluation of buccolingual molar inclinations among different vertical facial types [J]. Korean J Orthod, 2018, 48(5): 333.
[26] Masumoto T, Hayashi I, Kawamura A, et al. Relationships among facial type, buccolingual molar inclination, and cortical bone thickness of the mandible [J]. Eur J Orthod, 2001, 23(1): 15-23.
[27] Grippaudo C, Oliva B, Greco AL, et al. Relationship between vertical facial patterns and dental arch form in class Ⅱ malocclusion [J]. Prog Orthod, 2013, 14: 43. doi:10.1186/2196-1042-14-43.
[28] Edwards CB, Marshall SD, Qian F, et al. Longitudinal study of facial skeletal growth completion in 3 dimensions [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 2007, 132(6): 762-768.
[29] Melsen B. Palatal growth studied on human autopsy material [J]. Am J Orthod, 1975, 68(1): 42-54.
[30] I?瘙塂eri H, Solow B. Change in the width of the mandibular body from 6 to 23 years of age: an implant study [J]. Eur J Orthod, 2000, 22(3): 229-238.
[31] Tweed C, The Frankfort-mandibular incisor angle(FMIA)in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning and prognosis [J]. The Angle Orthodontist, 1954, 24(3): 121-169.
[1] 刘丽雯,马俊,李沛铮,张秀芳,刘艺鸣. 128例帕金森病照料者负担及影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 45-49.
[2] 王静,刘粉,曾荣,黄思源,许长娟,梁子婷,董亮. 以胸膜病变为特征的IgG4相关性肺疾病1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(3): 114-116.
[3] 高金梅,张向莲,刘铁菊. 血浆D-二聚体与109例膀胱癌中发生31例转移的关联性分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(3): 98-102.
[4] 夏宇,陈任,陈菲,李伯阳,潘新锋,高翔,李程跃,徐凌忠. 2008~2017上海市居民健康素养时序变化与孕产妇及婴幼儿死亡率的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(12): 97-102.
[5] 华星星,孙晓杰,赵德利,刘卫东,倪志松,邹跃威,马仲锋,姚能亮,王家林,王海鹏. 山东省5县癌症患者治疗方式和医疗费用及其相关性分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(6): 69-75.
[6] 李丁洋,曹闪闪,郭泾. 成年女性舌骨位置与牙颌面相关指标的三维分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(5): 85-90.
[7] 韩福燕,成士清,王召宝,鞠瑛. 食管癌患者外周血红细胞分布宽度检测的临床价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(7): 67-72.
[8] 蒋洁,张晓黎,董明,刘金波,蒋玲. 肿瘤相关性骨软化症3例分析并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(5): 108-111.
[9] 孟伟,吴大玮,单悌超,张帆,郭海鹏,刘宇,丁士芳,翟茜. 替加环素治疗重症患者呼吸机相关性肺炎[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(4): 71-75.
[10] 吴倩,倪阳,杨清锐,孙红胜. 双眼睑肿胀及双侧颌下包块1例——IgG4相关性疾病的诊断与思考[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(11): 93-96.
[11] 陈雪凌, 吴子忠, 刘东旭, 谢涌涛, 郭甜甜, 张士杰. 前方牵引联合快速扩弓对安氏Ⅲ类错牙合畸形患者上气道影响的CBCT研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(8): 71-78.
[12] 刘璐, 李荣荣, 刘梦珺, 张琰, 刘东旭. 成人安氏Ⅰ类双颌前突患者的上颌切牙区牙槽骨体积[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(8): 66-70.
[13] 王浩, 张娜, 薛付忠, 王萍, 康殿民, 刘言训. 山东省艾滋病病毒感染者及艾滋病患者空间流行特征[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(2): 81-86.
[14] 丘雨蓓, 吴耀辉, 樊彦妮, 郭伟忠, 彭佳梅, 任会萍. 福州地区大学生牙科焦虑症与艾森克人格的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(12): 103-106.
[15] 徐阳1,曲辉2,孙国瑞2,何庆泗2. 胰腺癌根治术后淋巴结总数及阴性淋巴结数与预后的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(7): 70-74.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王焕亮,孙宝柱,杜洪玫,周长青,张丽. 不同麻醉监测指标调控异丙酚麻醉的比较[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2006, 44(5): 471 -474 .
[2] 于慧1,2 ,陈少华1 ,赵家军2 ,高聆3
. 乙醇对人肝L02细胞糖原和GSK3β、PAMPK的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2009, 47(04): 75 -78 .
[3] 黄庆,田辉,李林,梁飞,刘贤锡 . 老年人肺癌组织中鸟氨酸脱羧酶基因表达及其临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2006, 44(6): 556 -559 .
[4] 朱梅佳,韩巨,王新怡,鹿伟,王爱华,关心华,曹霞,曹秉振. 伴有皮层下梗死和白质脑病的常染色体显性遗传性脑动脉病临床病理研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2006, 44(8): 834 -839 .
[5] 宋海岩,武玉玲,张艳萍. 牡蛎提取物对高温致神经管畸形中凋亡细胞的保护作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2007, 45(2): 113 -116 .
[6] 赵正斌1,薛双林2,张立婷1,李俊峰1,赵荣荣1,周海莲3,陈红1. 原花青素对瘦素诱导肝星状细胞增殖和TIMP-1产生的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(7): 46 .
[7] 王志刚,丁 璇,孙 鹏/sup>,王成伟,郝晓光,潘 顺 . 术前脑血管造影在血管内支架成形术治疗缺血性脑血管病中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2007, 45(2): 146 -148 .
[8] 孟静1,刘晓立2,郭春3,马春红3 . 小鼠Tim-3真核表达载体pTARGET-Tim-3的构建[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(11): 37 -40 .
[9] 宋永红,马春红,吕红娟,朱传福,聂向民,王玫,刘艳,张萍 . 中国北方汉族人群HLA基因多态性研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2007, 45(6): 546 -553 .
[10] 张向丽,刘凤英 . 血清TPA、 sVCAM-1与子痫前期发病关系的初步探讨[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2007, 45(7): 705 -707 .