您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (11): 77-79.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2015.262

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

双腔支气管导管与支气管封堵器进行单肺通气对PetCO2和PaCO2的影响

杨晓玫, 方宁宁, 易文波   

  1. 山东大学齐鲁医院麻醉科, 山东 济南 250012
  • 收稿日期:2015-03-12 出版日期:2015-11-10 发布日期:2015-11-10
  • 通讯作者: 易文波.E-mail:yiwenbo616@126.com E-mail:yiwenbo616@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东省自然科学基金(ZR2009CM098)

Effect of double-lumen-tube or bronchial blocker used for one-lung ventilation on PetCO2 and PaCO2

YANG Xiaomei, FANG Ningning, YI Wenbo   

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China
  • Received:2015-03-12 Online:2015-11-10 Published:2015-11-10

摘要: 目的 对比分析双腔支气管导管(DLT)和支气管封堵器(BB)在单肺通气时对呼气末二氧化碳分压(PetCO2)和动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)的影响.方法 30例择期进行胸科手术的患者随机分为DLT组和BB组,每组15例.两组患者在麻醉诱导后进行BB或DLT置入,记录两组进行单肺通气后的PetCO2和PaCO2值.结果 进行单肺通气时,DLT组的PetCO2值高于BB组,PaCO2值低于BB组, PetCO2与PaCO2相关性优于BB组.结论 与使用BB相比,使用DLT进行单肺通气更有利于CO2的排出.

关键词: 单肺通气, 双腔支气管导管, 支气管封堵器, 呼气末二氧化碳分压, 动脉血二氧化碳分压

Abstract: Objective To assess the effect of double-lumen-tube (DLT) and bronchial blocker for one-lung ventilation on partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (PetCO2) and arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2). Methods Thirty patients were randomly assigned to DLT group (n=15) and BB group (n=15). After anesthesia induction, DLT or BB was intubated into the trachea. After one-lung ventilation, the values of PetCO2 and PaCO2 were recorded and analyzed. Results Compared with BB group, the PetCO2 value was higher, the PaCO2 value was lower, and the correlation between PetCO2 and PaCO2 was better in DLT group. Conclusion Compared with BB, DLT was better at exhalation of CO2.

Key words: Bronchial blocker, One-lung ventilation, Partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide, Double-lumen-tube, Arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide

中图分类号: 

  • R655.3
[1] Mirzabeigi E, Johnson C, Ternian A. One-lung anesthesia update[J]. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2005, 9(3):213-226.
[2] Camilo LM, Ávila MB, Cruz LF, et al. Positive end-expiratory pressure and variable ventilation in lung-healthy rats under generalanesthesia[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(11): e110817. doi:10.1371/journal. Pone.0110817.
[3] 秦丹丹,黄中华,叶凤青,等.低流量单肺通气时PaCO2与PETCO2的相关性[J].山东医药, 2008, 48(5):56-57.
[4] Grichnik KP, Clark JA. Pathophysiology and management of one-lung ventilation[J]. Thorac Surg Clin, 2005, 15(1):85-103.
[5] Majekodunmi AA, Falase BA, Udom BO, et al. One lung ventilation using double-lumen tubes: initial experience from Lagos, Nigeria[J]. Niger J Clin Pract, 2015, 18(2):227-230.
[6] Brodsky JB. Con: a bronchial blocker is not a substitute for a double-lumen endobronchial tube[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2015, 29(1):237-239.
[7] Neustein SM. Pro: bronchial blockers should be used routinely for providing one-lung ventilation[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2015, 29(1):234-236.
[8] Hohberger LA, DePew ZS, Utz JP, et al. Utilizing an endobronchial blocker and a flexible bronchoscope for transbronchial cryobiopsies in diffuse parenchymal lung disease[J]. Respiration, 2014, 88(6): 521-522.
[9] Knoll H, Ziegeler S, Schreiber JU, et al. Airway injuries after one-lung ventilation: a comparison between double-lumen tube and endobronchial blocker: a randomized, prospective, controlled trial[J]. Anesthesiology, 2006, 105(3):471-477.
[10] 陈洁,王平,钟泰迪. Coopdech封堵支气管导管与双腔支气管导管单肺通气效果的比较[J].中华麻醉学杂志, 2008, 28(10):945-946.
[11] Belpomme V, Ricard-Hibon A, Devoir C, et al. Correlation of arterial PCO2 and PETCO2 in prehospital controlled ventilation[J]. Am J Emerg Med, 2005, 3(7):852-859.
[12] Cinnella G, Grasso S, Natale C, et al. Physiological effects of a lung-recruiting strategy applied during one-lung ventilation[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2008, 52(6):766-775.
[13] Tobias JD. Noninvasive carbon dioxide monitoring during one-lung ventilation:end-tidal versus transcutaneous techniques[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2003, 17(3):306-308. [14] 肖亮灿,叶升,许静红,等. 对比分析支气管封堵器和双腔支气管导管对儿童单肺通气的影响[J]. 中山大学学报:医学科学版, 2012, 33(4):544-548. XIAO Liangcan, YE Sheng, XU Jinghong, et al. Comparative analysis of effect of bronchial Blocker and double-lumen tube on one lung ventilalion in chiIdren[J]. Journal of Sun Yat-sen University: Medical Sciences, 2012, 33(4):544-548. [15] Narayanaswamy M, McRae K, Slinger P, et al. Choosing a lung isolation device for thoracic surgery: a randomized trial of three bronchial blockers versus double-lumen tubes[J]. Anesth Analg, 2009, 108(4):1097-1101.
[1] 司立博,田辉,岳韦名,李林,李树海,高存. 肺碰撞瘤1例[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(3): 111-112.
[2] 张林1,张振江2,孟龙1,马伟1,杜贾军1. 恶性局灶性磨玻璃样肺结节的外科治疗[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(9): 84-87.
[3] 房建伟1,刘凡英1,李军1,2. 肺硬化性血管瘤的临床特点及外科治疗[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(2): 83-87.
[4] 万小蔹,朱建荣,王红梅,黄丽蓉,庄少侠. 缺血预处理对大鼠肺缺血再灌注肺损伤的保护作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(1): 28-.
[5] 魏煜程,王滋宗,杨荣华,沈毅
.

大鼠肺移植受体OB与细胞凋亡
关系的初步研究

[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2009, 47(04): 21-25.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!