您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (8): 44-48.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2015.153

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

应用Enterprise支架治疗动脉粥样硬化性椎-基底动脉狭窄的探讨

王小飞, 王成伟, 王志刚, 丁璇, 王敏卿   

  1. 山东大学第二医院神经外科, 山东 济南 250033
  • 收稿日期:2015-02-05 发布日期:2015-08-10
  • 通讯作者: 王成伟.E-mail:15106983331@163.com E-mail:15106983331@163.com

Application of enterprise stent in atherosclerotic vertebral-basilar arterial stenosis

WANG Xiaofei, WANG Chengwei, WANG Zhigang, DING Xuan, WANG Minqing   

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250033, Shandong, China
  • Received:2015-02-05 Published:2015-08-10

摘要: 目的 探讨应用Enterprise支架治疗动脉粥样硬化性椎-基底动脉狭窄的安全性和有效性.方法 回顾性分析2012年1月至2014年6月山东大学第二医院神经外科应用Enterprise支架治疗动脉粥样硬化性椎-基底动脉狭窄患者46例,患者术前至少提前3 d服用氯吡格雷(75 mg/d)和阿司匹林(300 mg/d)联合抗血小板治疗.记录患者各项临床指标,并于术后1、3、6、12个月进行临床及脑血管造影随访.结果 46例患者共计48处狭窄病变.其中男33例(71.7%),女13例(28.3%).病变位于基底动脉28处(58.3%),左侧椎动脉15处(31.3%),右侧椎动脉5处(10.4%).病变血管狭窄程度50%~70%共6处(33.3%),70%~99%共32处(66.7%).手术成功率100%.围手术期并发症4例(8.7%).术后6个月,35处病变获得造影随访,其中术后支架内再狭窄5例(14.3%).随访期发生与病变血管供血区一致的缺血事件5例(10.9%).结论 应用Enterprise支架治疗动脉粥样硬化性椎-基底动脉狭窄安全有效,技术成功率高,并发症发生率较低.

关键词: 颅内支架, 介入治疗, 动脉粥样硬化, 狭窄, 椎-基底动脉

Abstract: Objective To assess the safety and efficacy of enterprise stent in the treatment of atherosclerotic vertebral-basilar arterial stenosis. Methods A retrospective study was performed in patients who received enterprise stent in the Department of Neurosurgery, Second Hospital of Shandong University during Jan. 2012 and June 2014. Patients were prescribed with medication of clopidogrel 75 mg/d and aspirin 300 mg/d at least 3 days preoperatively. The observation indexes, clinical follow-ups and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) performed in month 1, 3, 6 and 12 postoperatively were collected and reviewed. Results Of the 46 patients with 48 lesions, 33 (71.7%) were men and 13 (28.3%) were women, 28 lesions (58.3%) were at the basilar artery, 15 (31.3%) were at the left vertebral artery, and 5 (10.4%) were at the right vertebral artery. The technical success rate was 100%. Altogether 4 patients (8.7%) developed perioperative complications. DSA examination of 35 lesions 6 months postoperatively showed 5 cases (14.3%) had postoperative restenoses. And 5 (10.9%) ischemic events occurred during the follow-up. Conclusion Application of enterprise stent is safe and efficacious, with high technical success rate and low perioperative complication rate.

Key words: Enterprise stent, Vertebral-basilar artery, Stenosis, Atherosclerosis, Interventional therapy

中图分类号: 

  • R651.1
[1] Derdeyn CP, Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, et al. Aggressive medical treatment with or without stenting in high-risk patients with intracranial artery stenosis (SAMMPRIS): the final results of a randomised trial[J]. Lancet, 2014, 383(9914): 333-341.
[2] Peng T, Qian Z, Liu A, et al. Progressive occlusion of enterprise stent-assisted coiling of ruptured wide-necked intracranial aneurysms and related factors on angiographic follow-up: a single-center experience with 468 patients[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(3): 92407.
[3] Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Howlett-Smith H, et al. Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis[J]. N Engl J Med, 2005, 352(13): 1305-1316.
[4] Failure of extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke. Results of an international randomized trial. The EC/IC Bypass Study Group[J]. N Engl J Med, 1985, 313(19): 1191-1200.
[5] Bose A, Hartmann M, Henkes H, et al. A novel, self-expanding, nitinol stent in medically refractory intracranial atherosclerotic stenoses: the Wingspan study[J]. Stroke, 2007, 38(5): 1531-1537.
[6] Vajda Z, Schmid E, Guthe T, et al. The modified Bose method for the endovascular treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic arterial stenoses using the Enterprise stent[J]. Neurosurgery, 2012, 70(1): 91-101.
[7] Mori T, Fukuoka M, Kazita K, et al. Follow-up study after intracranial percutaneous transluminal cerebral balloon angioplasty[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol,1998,19(8): 1525-1533.
[8] Jiang WJ, Wang YJ, Du B, et al. Stenting of symptomatic M1 stenosis of middle cerebral artery: an initial experience of 40 patients[J]. Stroke, 2004, 35(6): 1375-1380.
[9] Park S, Kim JH, Kwak JK, et al. Intracranial stenting for severe symptomatic stenosis: self-expandable versus balloon-expandable stents[J]. Interv Neuroradiol, 2013, 19(3): 276-282.
[10] Kurre W, Berkefeld J, Brassel F, et al. In-hospital complication rates after stent treatment of 388 symptomatic intracranial stenoses: results from the INTRASTENT multicentric registry[J]. Stroke, 2010, 41(3): 494-498.
[11] Krischek O, Miloslavski E, Fischer S, et al. A comparison of functional and physical properties of self-expanding intracranial stents[Neuroform3, Wingspan, Solitaire, Leo+, Enterprise][J]. Minim Invasive Neurosurg, 2011, 54(1): 21-28.
[12] Turk AS, Levy EI, Albuquerque FC, et al. Influence of patient age and stenosis location on wingspan in-stent restenosis[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2008, 29(1): 23-27.
[13] Zaidat OO, Klucznik R, Alexander MJ, et al. The NIH registry on use of the Wingspan stent for symptomatic 70-99% intracranial arterial stenosis[J]. Neurology, 2008, 70(17): 1518-1524.
[14] Yue X, Xi G, Lu T, et al. Influence of residual stenosis on clinical outcome and restenosis after middle cerebral artery stenting[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2011, 34(4): 744-750.
[15] Shin YS, Kim BM, Suh SH, et al. Wingspan stenting for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: clinical outcomes and risk factors for in-stent restenosis[J]. Neurosurgery, 2013, 72(4): 596-604.
[1] 付洁琦,张曼,张晓璐,李卉,陈红. Toll样受体4抑制过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ加重血脂蓄积的分子机制[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 24-31.
[2] 郭志华,赵大庆,邢园,王薇,梁乐平,杨静,赵倩倩. Ⅰ期端端吻合术治疗重度颈段气管狭窄临床分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 72-76.
[3] 尹妮,杨关林,姜钧文,王春田,王凤耀,贾连群,高晓宇,潘嘉祥,李芹,李佳,冯元洁,高玉竹,周鹤,张哲. 巴马小型猪冠状动脉粥样硬化模型的评价方法[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(7): 1-5.
[4] 金发光. 良性中心气道狭窄诊治规范的理解与认识[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(4): 7-13.
[5] 黄海东,郑贵亮,王琴,杨宇光,李强,白冲. 治疗性介入呼吸病技术的新领域——气管T管的临床应用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(4): 23-29.
[6] 张云华,李杰. 颈动脉斑块内新生血管显影程度及血浆Lp-PLA2水平对急性脑梗死的临床诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(3): 112-116.
[7] 姜士伟,闫磊,唐悦清,任巨超,臧元伟,张永振,顾刚利,徐忠华. 自体管状肉芽组织重建兔全周尿道的功能组织学评估[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(11): 15-21.
[8] 李媛媛,王锡明,王龙,纪淙山,段艳华,程召平,刘燕萍,陈静. 双源CT Flash扫描在心血管源性气道狭窄患儿诊断中的临床应用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(11): 59-64.
[9] 魏丹丹,张澄. 血管紧张素Ⅳ型受体过表达对早期动脉粥样硬化斑块形成的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(8): 1-5.
[10] 刘敏,许小伟,杜文军. 肝硬化门脉高压合并脾动静脉瘘1例[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(7): 91-92.
[11] 吴世秀,李杰,贾汇刚,李金娥,崔琳玲,路红. 彩色多普勒超声对下肢动脉硬化闭塞症胫前动脉窃血的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(6): 78-81.
[12] 王丹,亓恒涛,孙书珍. 原发性肾病综合征儿童颈动脉结构和功能改变[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(5): 88-91.
[13] 孙鹏飞,孟晓,张凯,黎莉. 抵抗素样分子 β在动脉粥样硬化斑块稳定性中的作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(3): 1-4.
[14] 段红永,管强,梁宁,杨笑非,韩锋,马明,刘增庆. 下肢动脉闭塞介入中发生远端栓塞的治疗经验[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(3): 55-58.
[15] 胡浩然,袁梦,梁丽宁,季宪飞,李涛,陈永,刘福利,边红军,周轶,胡波,钟霞,商德亚. 心肌缺血后适应循环时间对急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(2): 57-62.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!