磁共振弥散加权成像评估肝细胞癌组织学分级的价值

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2014.594

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨弥散加权成像(DWI)评价肝细胞癌(HCC)组织学分级的价值。方法经手术切除且病理证实HCC患者27例,术前均行上腹部常规磁共振成像(MRI)及DWI检查,分析病灶的DWI信号强度、表观弥散系数(ADC)值与HCC组织学分级之间的关系。结果本组27例27个HCC病灶中,组织病理学诊断高分化HCC病灶6个、中分化HCC病灶10个、低分化HCC病灶11个。在DWI中,1例(3.7%)为等信号,9例(33.3%)为略高信号,17例(63%)为高信号。不同分化HCC信号强度之间差异无统计学意义(P=0.758)。低分化HCC的ADC值[(1.16±0.16)×10^-3mm²/s]明显小于高分化[(1.43±0.09)×10^-3mm²/s](P=0.004)和中分化 [(1.34±0.19)×10^-3mm²/s](P=0.023)。HCC的ADC值与组织学分级呈中等负相关(r=-0.566,P=0.002)。结论应用ADC值能区分低、中、高分化HCC,因而ADC值有助于术前预测HCC的组织学分级。另外,DWI信号强度对HCC的组织学分级价值不大。

关键词: 表观弥散系数, 组织学分级, 弥散加权成像, 肝细胞癌, 磁共振成像

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the significance of magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in predicting the histological grading of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods Data of 27 patients with 27 surgically removed HCC who underwent preoperative conventional MRI and DWI examinations were retrospectively reviewed. The relationship between visual signal intensity and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with histological differentiation of HCC was analyzed. Results Histopathologically, the tumors were classified into well-differentiated (n=6), moderately-differentiated (n=10) and poorly-differentiated (n=11). On DWI, 1 of the 27 HCCs appeared isointense, 9 slightly hyperintense, and the remaining 17 tumors hyperintense to the surrounding liver. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between visual signal intensity and histopathologic grade (P=0.758). The mean ADC value of the poorly-differentiated HCCs[(1.16±0.16)×10^-3mm²/s] was significantly lower than that of the well-differentiated HCCs[(1.43±0.09)×10^-3mm²/s] (P=0.004) and moderately-differentiated HCCs [(1.34±0.19)×10^-3mm²/s] (P=0.023). There was a significant correlation between the differentiation and the ADC value of the HCCs (r=-0.566, P=0.002). Conclusion DWI with ADC measurement of HCC may be a valuable imaging tool to noninvasively predict the differentiation of HCC. However, the histopathological grades of HCC are not correlated with the visualsignal intensity.

Key words: Magnetic resonance imaging, Diffusion-weighted imaging, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Histological grading, Apparent diffusion coefficient

中图分类号:

R445.2

郭卫华, 赵素红, 庞国栋, 邵广瑞. 磁共振弥散加权成像评估肝细胞癌组织学分级的价值[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 52(12): 89-93.

GUO Weihua, ZHAO Suhong, PANG Guodong, SHAO Guangrui. Application value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in estimating the histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2014, 52(12): 89-93.

参考文献

[1] Oishi K, Itamoto T, Amano H, et al. Clinicopathologic features of poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2007, 95(4):311-316.
[2] Lim K S, Tan C H. Diffusion-weighted MRI of adult male pelvic cancers[J]. Clin Radiol, 2012, 67(9):899-908.
[3] Taouli B, Koh D M. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the liver[J]. Radiology, 2010, 254(1):47-66.
[4] Lim K S. Diffusion-weighted MRI of HCC in cirrhosis[J]. Clin Radiol, 2014, 69(1):1-10.
[5] 刘静静, 王劲, 颜荣华, 等. 常规磁共振成像及磁共振弥散加权成像在不同分化小HCC中的临床应用[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志, 2012, 18(18):573-577.
[6] Colagrande S, Carbone S F, Carusi L M, et al.Magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging: extraneurological applications[J]. Radiol Med, 2006, 111(3):392-419.
[7] Chen Y C, Li C W, Kuo Y T, et al. Early response of hepatocellular carcinoma to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization: choline levels and MR diffusion constants-initial experience[J]. Radiology, 2006, 239(2):448-456.
[8] Nasu K, Kuroki Y, Tsukamoto T, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of surgically resected hepatocellular carcinoma: imaging characteristics and relationship among signal intensity, apparent diffusion coefficient, and histopathological grade [J]. Am J Roentgenol, 2009, 193(2):438-444.
[9] Piana G, Trinquart L, Meskine N, et al. New MR imaging criteria with a diffusion-weighted sequence for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic liver diseases[J]. J Hepatol, 2011, 55(1):126-132.
[10] Nakanishi M, Chuma M, Hige S, et al. Relationship between diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and histological tumor grading of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2012, 19(4):1302-1309.
[11] Nishie A, Tajima T, Asayama Y, et al. Diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient for predicting histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2011, 80(2):29-33.
[12] Guo A C, Cummings T J, Dash R C, et al. Lymphomas and high-grade astrocytomas:comparison of water diffusibility and histologic characteristics[J]. Radiology, 2002, 224(1):177-183.
[13] Higano S, Yun X, Kumabe T, et al. Malignant astrocytic tumors: clinical importance of apparent diffusion coefficient in prediction of grade and prognosis [J]. Radiology, 2006,241(3):839-846.
[14] Taouli B, Vilgrain V, Dumont E, et al. Evaluation of liver diffusion isotropy and characterization of focal hepatic lesions with two single-shot echo-planar MR imaging sequences[J]. Radiology, 2003, 226(1):71-78.
[15] 汪俊萍, 白人驹, 孙浩然, 等. 兔VX2肝癌模型的MR扩散加权成像与肿瘤恶性程度的相关性[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2009, 89(31):2210-2213.
[16] Kamel I R, Bluemke D A, Ramsey D, et al. Role of diffusion-weighted imaging in estimating tumor necrosis after chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma [J].Am J Roentgenol, 2003, 181(3):708-710.
[17] Asayama Y, Yoshimitsu K, Nishihara Y, et al. Arterial blood supply of hepatocellular carcinoma and histologic grading: radiologic-pathologic correlation [J]. AJR, 2008, 190(1):28-34.

相关文章 15

[1]	王玉红,张丽红,王林省,陈月芹,王彦辉,王皆欢,李传福. 消化道颗粒细胞瘤的影像学表现[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(8): 66-70.
[2]	许玉军,柳明,何祥萌,李成利. 1.0T开放型磁共振引导经皮穿刺¹²⁵I放射性粒子植入治疗晚期胰腺癌[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(2): 21-25.
[3]	王光彬. MRI在凶险性前置胎盘诊断中的价值[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(9): 7-9.
[4]	王伟,曹煜姗,孙达权,黄小琼,徐国强. 人TIMP-2蛋白在肝癌细胞迁移与侵袭中的作用[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(7): 11-17.
[5]	董金叶,林祥涛,曹金凤,吴勇,赵慧,谢辉辉,肖连祥. 16~42周胎儿脊髓颈膨大发育的MRI分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(5): 74-78.
[6]	张湛,许相丰,刘海东,王玮. MRI在宫颈癌T分期中的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(5): 70-73.
[7]	俞璐,刘强. 体素内不相干运动磁共振成像对糖尿病患者肾脏功能的评价作用[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(11): 68-71.
[8]	孟祥水,柴相君,马祥兴,任庆国,杨志成. CT、MRI对喉癌治疗方案选择的价值[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(10): 76-79.
[9]	董芳,杜怡峰. 腔隙性脑梗死患者认知障碍与高同型半胱氨酸血症、梗死灶数目及体积的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(10): 46-49.
[10]	张扬, 李万湖, 宋惟阳, 刘春蕾, 张权. 健康中老年人脑血管反应能力分布特征的屏气功能磁共振成像研究[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 53(5): 85-88.
[11]	戴庭敏, 沈遥遥, 涂江龙, 丁剑午. 氟尿嘧啶诱导急性可逆性脑白质病1例[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 53(4): 95-96.
[12]	王小林, 王虎, 何发清, 郭兵文. 肝细胞癌经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗后 CT检查与评价[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 52(S2): 74-75.
[13]	翟栋材, 张申杰, 张博, 张涛. 超声造影与增强MRI评价聚焦超声消融治疗子宫腺肌症的对照研究[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 52(S1): 112-113.
[14]	仝佳1，张正军2，孙新海3，耿厚法2,孙琳2. 糖尿病视网膜病变对2型糖尿病患者脑损伤的预测价值[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 52(6): 46-50.
[15]	Hasan Akhtar, 王茜，李传福. 中枢神经系统表面含铁血黄素沉积症的影像表现(附1例报道)[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 52(5): 111-112.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed