您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (1): 38-47.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2023.0435

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于机器学习的胃肠道疾病舌诊模型构建

张景慧1,王娟2,赵玉洁3,段淼1,刘毅然4,林敏娟1,谯旭4,李真1,左秀丽1   

  • 发布日期:2024-02-02
  • 通讯作者: 左秀丽. E-mail:zuoxiuli@sdu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(82070551)

Construction of a machine learning-based tongue diagnosis model for gastrointestinal diseases

ZHANG Jinghui1, WANG Juan2, ZHAO Yujie3, DUAN Miao1, LIU Yiran4, LIN Minjuan1, QIAO Xu4, LI Zhen1, ZUO Xiuli1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;
    2. Hospital Development Center of Qingdao Municipal Health Commission, Qingdao 266001, Shandong, China;
    3. Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250011, Shandong, China;
    4. School of Control Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, Shandong, China
  • Published:2024-02-02

摘要: 目的 构建基于机器学习的胃肠道疾病舌诊模型,以寻求更加方便、经济的方式实现对常见胃肠道疾病的非侵入性诊断。 方法 前瞻性收集接受电子内镜检查的948名受试者的舌象图片,经过质量筛选,最终获得符合应用标准的3 140张图片构成本研究使用的舌象数据集。对原始舌象数据进行预处理、特征提取与模式识别,在传统机器学习方法的基础之上,提出一种从特征融合和决策融合两个方面实现信息融合的方法,以此构建以舌象特征为输入的胃肠道疾病舌诊模型。 结果 本研究构建的基于舌象的信息融合诊断模型的曲线下面积(area under the curve, AUC)为0.808,高于单一手工特征(AUC=0.769)和深度特征(AUC=0.779)模型;使用BSFCM混合采样方法进行样本增强提高了该模型对幽门螺杆菌(Helicobacter pylori, H.pylori)感染(AUC=0.816)、胆汁反流(AUC=0.829)、反流性食管炎(AUC=0.800)、胃糜烂(AUC=0.833)和十二指肠糜烂(AUC=0.818)的分类性能。 结论 本研究构建的基于机器学习的智能舌诊模型对多种胃肠道疾病具有较高的区分度,或为胃肠道疾病的诊断与筛查提供一种新的、有价值的思路与方法。

关键词: 人工智能, 舌象, 胃肠道疾病, 机器学习, 舌诊模型

Abstract: Objective To construct a machine learning(ML)-based tongue diagnostic model for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal diseases so as to realize the non-invasive auxiliary diagnosis of common gastrointestinal diseases in a more convenient and faster way. Methods Tongue images of 948 subjects who underwent electronic endoscopy were prospectively collected. After quality screening, 3,140 images that met the application criteria were finally obtained to constitute the tongue image data set, which underwent preprocessing, feature extraction and pattern recognition. On the basis of traditional machine learning methods, a method to realize information fusion in terms of feature fusion and decision fusion was proposed, and a tongue diagnosis model of gastrointestinal diseases was constructed. Results The area under the curve(AUC)of the model was 0.808, which was higher than that of the single handcrafted feature(AUC=0.769)and deep feature(AUC=0.779)models. Sample enhancement using the BSFCM hybrid sampling method improved the models performance for Helicobacter pylori(H. pylori) infection(AUC=0.816), bile reflux(AUC=0.829), reflux esophagitis(AUC=0.800), gastric erosion(AUC=0.833)and duodenal erosion(AUC=0.818). Conclusion The intelligent tongue diagnostic model based on ML constructed in this study shows a high degree of differentiation for a variety of gastrointestinal diseases, and may provide a new and valuable idea and method for the diagnosis and screening of gastrointestinal diseases.

Key words: Artificial intelligence, Tongue image, Gastrointestinal diseases, Machine learning, Tongue diagnosis model

中图分类号: 

  • R241.25
[1] Wang YC, Huang YT, Chase RC, et al. Global burden of digestive diseases: a systematic analysis of the global burden of diseases study, 1990 to 2019[J]. Gastroenterology, 2023, 165(3): 773-783.
[2] Wang WY, Zhou H, Wang YF, et al. Current policies and measures on the development of traditional Chinese medicine in China[J].Pharmacol Res,2021,163:105187. doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105187.
[3] 王庆盛, 高慧, 许朝霞, 等. 冠心病及其不同合并病患者的舌诊参数特征分析[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2022, 37(3): 1316-1320. WANG Qingsheng, GAO Hui, XU Zhaoxia, et al. Analysis of tongue diagnostic parameters in patients with coronary heart disease and its different complications[J]. China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy, 2022, 37(3): 1316-1320.
[4] 于然, 娄彦妮, 梁婉娴, 等. 基于食管癌高发区人群筛查探索反流性食管炎及Barrett食管的舌象转化规律[J]. 中医杂志, 2021, 62(9): 782-788. YU Ran, LOU Yanni, LIANG Wanxian, et al. The change characteristics of tongue manifestation of reflux esophagitis and barretts esophagus based on an esophageal carcinoma screening study in high-risk areas of China[J]. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2021, 62(9): 782-788.
[5] Wu TC, Lu CN, Hu WL, et al. Tongue diagnosis indices for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a cross-sectional, case-controlled observational study[J]. Medicine, 2020, 99(29): e20471. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000020471.
[6] Hou B, Zeng Y, Ling H, et al. Correlation between helicobacter pylori infection and tongue manifestations: a meta-analysis[J]. Digital Chinese Medicine, 2018, 1(2): 155-163.
[7] Haug CJ, Drazen JM. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in clinical medicine, 2023[J]. N Engl J Med, 2023, 388(13): 1201-1208.
[8] Litjens G, Kooi T, Bejnordi BE, et al. A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis[J]. Med Image Anal, 2017, 42: 60-88. doi:10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005.
[9] Fan SY, Chen B, Zhang XR, et al. Machine learning algorithms in classifying TCM tongue features in diabetes mellitus and symptoms of gastric disease[J]. Eur J Integr Med, 2021, 43: 101288. doi:10.1016/j.eujim.2021.101288.
[10] Bi WL, Hosny A, Schabath MB, et al. Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging: clinical challenges and applications[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2019, 69(2): 127-157.
[11] Sun TG, Mao L, Chai ZK, et al. Predicting the proliferation of tongue cancer with artificial intelligence in contrast-enhanced CT[J]. Front Oncol, 2022,12: 841262. doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.841262.
[12] Yuan L, Yang L, Zhang SC, et al. Development of a tongue image-based machine learning tool for the diagnosis of gastric cancer: a prospective multicentre clinical cohort study[J]. E Clinical Medicine, 2023, 57: 101834. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101834.
[13] Li MY, Zhu DJ, Xu W, et al. Application of U-net with global convolution network module in computer-aided tongue diagnosis[J]. J Healthc Eng, 2021: 5853128. doi:10.1155/2021/5853128.
[14] Ma CZ, Zhang P, Du SY, et al. Construction of tongue image-based machine learning model for screening patients with gastric precancerous lesions[J]. J Pers Med, 2023, 13(2): 271. doi:10.3390/jpm13020271.
[15] Wang XZ, Luo SY, Tian GH, et al. Deep learning based tongue prickles detection in traditional Chinese medicine[J]. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med, 2022: 5899975. doi:10.1155/2022/5899975.
[16] 姜楠, 袁莉, 汪莉, 等. 初诊胃癌患者舌象特征的客观化研究[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2023, 38(1): 427-433. JIANG Nan, YUAN Li, WANG Li, et al. Objective study on tongue features of newly diagnosed gastric cancer patients[J]. China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy, 2023, 38(1): 427-433.
[17] Jiang T, Guo XJ, Tu LP, et al. Application of computer tongue image analysis technology in the diagnosis of NAFLD[J]. Comput Biol Med, 2021,135:104622. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104622.
[18] Li J, Chen QG, Hu XJ, et al. Establishment of noninvasive diabetes risk prediction model based on tongue features and machine learning techniques[J]. Int J Med Inform, 2021, 149: 104429. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104429.
[19] Olaf R, Philipp F, Thomas B. U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation[C]. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention-MICCAI 2015: 18th International Conference, Munich, Germany, October 5-9, 2015, Proceedings, Part III 18, 2015: 234-241.
[20] Mohanaiah P, Sathyanarayana P, GuruKumar L, et al. Image texture feature extraction using GLCM approach[J]. In J Sci Res Publ, 2013, 3(5): 1-5.
[21] Kaplan K, Kaya Y, Kuncan M, et al. Brain tumor classification using modified local binary patterns(LBP)feature extraction methods[J]. Med Hypotheses, 2020, 139: 109696. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109696.
[22] Arivazhagan S, Ganesan L, Priyal SP. Texture classification using Gabor wavelets based rotation invariant features[J]. Pattern Recognit Lett, 2006, 27(16): 1976-1982.
[23] Hu MK. Visual pattern recognition by moment invariants[J]. IRE Trans Inf Theory, 1962, 8(2): 179-187.
[24] Liu YR, Qiao X, Gao R. Plankton classification on imbalanced dataset via hybrid resample method with LightBGM[C]. 2021 6th International Conference on Image, Vision and Computing(ICIVC). July 23-25, 2021, Qingdao, China. IEEE,2021:191-195. doi:10.1109/ICIVC52351.2021.9526988.
[25] Džeroski S, Ženko B. Is combining classifiers with stacking better than selecting the best one?[J]. Mach Learn, 2004, 54(3): 255-273.
[26] Malfertheiner P, Camargo MC, El-Omar E, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection[J]. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2023, 9: 19. doi:10.1038/s41572-023-00431-8.
[27] Zhang LY, Zhang J, Li D, et al. Bile reflux is an independent risk factor for precancerous gastric lesions and gastric cancer: an observational cross-sectional study[J]. J Dig Dis, 2021, 22(5): 282-290.
[28] Gore JC. Artificial intelligence in medical imaging[J]. Magn Reson Imaging, 2020, 68:1-4. doi:10.1016/j.mri.2019.12.006.
[29] You YJ, Lai X, Pan Y, et al. Artificial intelligence in cancer target identification and drug discovery[J]. Signal Transduct Target Ther, 2022, 7(1): 156. doi:10.1038/s41392-022-00994-0.
[30] Lin S, Li ZG, Fu BW, et al. Feasibility of using deep learning to detect coronary artery disease based on facial photo[J]. Eur Heart J, 2020, 41(46): 4400-4411.
[31] Liang B, Li R, Lu J, et al. Tongue diagnostic parameters-based diagnostic signature in coronary artery disease patients with clopidogrel resistance after percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Explore, 2023, 19(4): 528-535.
[32] Zhang NN, Jiang ZX, Li JX, et al. Multiple color representation and fusion for diabetes mellitus diagnosis based on back tongue images[J]. Comput Biol Med, 2023, 155: 106652. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106652.
[33] Zhang Q, Wen J, Zhou JH, et al. Missing-view completion for fatty liver disease detection[J]. Comput Biol Med, 2022, 150: 106097. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106097.
[34] Shi YL, Guo DD, Chun Y, et al. A lung cancer risk warning model based on tongue images[J]. Front Physiol, 2023, 14: 1154294. doi:10.3389/fphys.2023.1154294.
[35] Ma JJ, Wen GH, Wang CJ, et al. Complexity perception classification method for tongue constitution recognition[J]. Artif Intell Med, 2019, 96: 123-133. doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2019.03.008.
[36] He KM, Zhang XY, Ren SQ, et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition[C]. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition(CVPR). June 27-30, 2016, Las Vegas, NV, USA. IEEE, 2016: 770-778. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2016.90.
[37] Hosny A, Parmar C, Quackenbush J, et al. Artificial intelligence in radiology[J]. Nat Rev Cancer, 2018, 18(8): 500-510.
[1] 梁晨,姚丽娟,吕龙飞,唐泽,秦达,崔有斌,余孝淇. 三维重建联合CT引导下穿刺定位在微创治疗肺磨玻璃结节中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(5): 74-82.
[2] 廖原,门丹,李一帆,李怀臣,龙飞,刘铱. PM2.5短期暴露对结核病发病风险的个体精准评估[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(3): 116-123.
[3] 中国医师协会骨科医师分会智能骨科学组,中华预防医学会脊柱疾病预防与控制专业委员会脊柱脊髓损伤疾病预防与控制学组. 人工智能脊柱退变影像学测量位点与标注专家共识(2025)[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(2): 1-10.
[4] 刘禹,霍娅娅,龚丞,梁婷,李斌. 基于机器学习的骨科生物材料设计与优化[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(2): 22-33.
[5] 季心宇,余思沂,孙圆圆,姬冰. 基于人工智能和步态分析的骨科疾病辅助诊疗方法[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(2): 34-43.
[6] 王建民,李晓峰,由志涛,董圣杰,赵宇驰,李占菊,邹德鑫,张剑锋,孙涛,杜伟. 基于可解释机器学习的后路腰椎椎体间融合术后慢性疼痛风险预测模型构建[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(2): 78-88.
[7] 王丽云,高天勤,刘雨佳,陈青,陈柳,沙凯辉. 基于机器学习产后压力性尿失禁风险预测模型的构建及验证[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(6): 55-66.
[8] 王宝炫,焦杰,张厚君,刘奇,于冠英. 衰弱与肌少症评估在胃肠道肿瘤术后结局预测中的应用与展望[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(4): 51-58.
[9] 张鑫茹,李扬,孙萌,聂玮,马喆. Vision-LSTM模型在甲状腺影像报告与数据系统4b类甲状腺结节超声影像诊断中的应用与评估[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(11): 68-74.
[10] 武琪琪,成淼淼,肖晓燕. 多模态模型在肾脏病领域的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(10): 117-124.
[11] 梁博文,陆清声. 机器人辅助主动脉腔内修复术的进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 61-65.
[12] 王静,刘晓菲,曾荣,许长娟,张锦涛,董亮. 基于机器学习算法鉴定哮喘的坏死性凋亡相关生物标志物[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(7): 21-32.
[13] 郭振江,王宁,赵光远,杜立强,崔朝勃,刘防震. 基于机器学习建立术前预测近端胃癌食管切缘阳性模型[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(7): 78-83.
[14] 梁永媛,蔡培飞,郑桂喜. 基于多检验变量和机器学习算法的结肠癌诊断模型建立及价值评估[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(2): 51-59.
[15] 王玉涛,孙岩. 单细胞转录组学与机器学习综合分析揭示腹主动脉瘤潜在生物标志物[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(11): 40-53.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!