您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (6): 104-107.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2017.401

• • 上一篇    下一篇

健康管理队列白内障发病风险预测模型

于媛媛1,2,王春霞3,苏萍1,2,孙苑潆1,2,薛付忠1,2,刘言训1,2   

  1. 1.山东大学公共卫生学院生物统计学系, 山东 济南 250012;2.山东大学齐鲁生物医学大数据研究中心, 山东 济南 250012;3.济宁医学院附属医院健康管理中心, 山东 济宁 272000
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-06 出版日期:2017-06-10 发布日期:2017-06-10
  • 通讯作者: 薛付忠. E-mail:xuefzh@sdu.edu.cn刘言训. E-mail:liu-yx@sdu.edu.cn E-mail:xuefzh@sdu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家国际科技合作专项项目(2014DFA32830)

A prediction model to estimate risks of cataract based on health management cohort

YU Yuanyuan1,2, WANG Chunxia3, SU Ping1,2, SUN Yuanying1,2, XUE Fuzhong1,2, LIU Yanxun1,2   

  1. 1. Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;
    2. Cheeloo Research Center for Biomedical Big Data, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;
    3. Health Management Center, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining 272000, Shandong, China
  • Received:2017-05-06 Online:2017-06-10 Published:2017-06-10

摘要: 目的 构建50岁以上健康管理队列的白内障发病风险预测模型。 方法 依托山东多中心健康管理纵向观察数据库,采用Cox比例风险回归构建白内障发病风险预测模型,通过ROC曲线下面积(AUC)评价模型的预测效果,并利用十折交叉验证来检验模型的稳定性。 结果 随访期间共新发白内障病例1 010例,发病密度为24.76‰。预测模型最终纳入年龄、性别、吸烟、高黏稠血症、鼓膜疾患、屈光不正、糖尿病、总胆固醇和收缩压9个变量。白内障发病风险预测模型的AUC为0.712(95%CI:0.693~0.732)。十折交叉验证的平均AUC为0.714。 结论 研究构建的白内障发病风险预测模型有较好的预测效果,为白内障高危人群的早期筛查提供了依据。

关键词: 风险预测模型, 队列研究, 白内障, Cox比例风险回归

Abstract: Objective To establish a prediction model to estimate risks of cataract among health management population aged above 50 years. Methods Based on the Shandong Multi-center Longitudinal Cohort for Health Management, a prediction model for cataract was constructed using Coxs proportional hazards regression model. The predictability was evaluated with the area under the receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve(AUC). The stability was tested with ten-fold cross-validation. Results During the follow-up period, there were 1010 new cataract cases, and the incidence density was 24.76‰. The risk factors included in prediction model were age, sex, smoking habit, hyperviscosemia, tympanic diseases, ametropia, diabetes, total cholesterol and systolic blood pressure(SBP). The AUC of the prediction model was 0.712(95% CI: 0.693-0.732). The ten-fold cross-validation showed that the AUC was 0.714. Conclusion The prediction model of cataract has high predictability and reliability. It can provide scientific basis for identifying high-risk groups of cataract.

Key words: Cohort study, Cataract, Coxs proportional hazards regression, Risk prediction model

中图分类号: 

  • R776.1
[1] Brian G, Taylor H. Cataract blindness: challenges for the 21st century[J]. Bull World Health Organ, 2001, 79(3): 249-256.
[2] 张小梅, 杨剑锋. 长沙市老年性白内障患病率及其影响因素分析[J]. 湖南师范大学学报(医学版), 2015, 12(2): 40-43. ZHANG Xiaomei, YANG Jianfeng. Analysis on the prevalence and influence factors of senile cataract of Changsha City[J]. J Hunan Normal Univ(Med Sci), 2015, 12(2): 40-43.
[3] Abbas S, Raza ST, Chandra A, et al. Polymorphism of FABP2 and PPARG2 genes in risk prediction of cataract among North Indian population[J]. Meta Gene, 2014, 2(4): 307-313.
[4] Foster PJ, Wong TY, Machin D, et al. Risk factors for nuclear, cortical and posterior subcapsular cataracts in the Chinese population of Singapore: the Tanjong Pagar Survey[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2003, 87(9): 1112-1120.
[5] Abraham AG, Condon NG, Gower EW. The new epidemiology of cataract[J]. Ophthalmol Clin North Am, 2006, 19(4): 415-425.
[6] McCarty CA, Taylor HR. The genetics of cataract[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2001, 42(8): 1677-1678.
[7] Neale RE, Purdie JL, Hirst LW, et al. Sun exposure as a risk factor for nuclear cataract[J]. Epidemiology, 2003, 14(6): 707-712.
[8] 李德馨, 王思玲, 苏德森. 白内障的发病机制与药物治疗[J]. 沈阳药科大学学报, 2002, 19(4): 300-307.
[9] 陈章玲. 屈光性白内障手术研究进展[J]. 医学综述, 2015, 21(1): 69-71.
[10] 杨萍, 周文君. 白内障超声乳化术后影响角膜内皮细胞损伤因素的Logistic分析及预测模型[J]. 重庆医学, 2014, 43(25): 3343-3345.
[11] Mangione CM, Orav EJ, Lawrence MG, et al. Prediction of visual function after cataract surgery: a prospectively validated model[J]. Arch Ophthalmol, 1995, 113(10): 1305-1311.
[12] 杨梅, 朱蓉嵘, 梁从凯, 等. 基于江苏省阜宁县社区人群的白内障相关因素调查[J]. 中华眼科杂志, 2014, 50(3): 179-183. YANG Mei, ZHU Rongzheng, LIANG Congkai, et al. Cataract risk factor survey in Funing county of Jiangsu province[J]. Chin J Ophthalmol, 2014, 50(3): 179-183.
[13] Zhao J, Ellwein LB, Cui H, et al. Prevalence and outcomes of cataract surgery in rural China the China nine-province survey[J]. Ophthalmology, 2010, 117(11): 2120-2128.
[14] 中国高血压防治指南修订委员会. 中国高血压防治指南(2010年修订版)[J]. 中国实用乡村医生杂志, 2012, 19(10): 1-15.
[15] 中华医学会糖尿病学分会. 中国2型糖尿病防治指南(2013年版)[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志, 2014, 6(7): 447-498.
[16] Ye J, He J, Wang C, et al. Smoking and risk of age-related cataract: a meta-analysis[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2012, 53(7): 3885-3895.
[17] Chatterjee A, Milton RC, Thyle S. Prevalence and aetiology of cataract in Punjab[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 1982, 66(1): 35-42.
[18] Asbell PA, Dualan I, Mindel J, et al. Age-related cataract[J]. Lancet, 2005, 365(9459): 599-609.
[19] Harding JJ, Van Heyningen R. Drugs, including alcohol, that act as risk factors for cataract, and possible protection against cataract by aspirin-like analgesics and cyclopenthiazide[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 1988, 72(11): 809-814.
[20] Saleemurrehman SR, Kaunsar R, Kadri S, et al. Prevalence of bilateral cataract blindness in persons ≥50 years of age in Pulwama district, Jammu & Kashmir, India[J]. Int J Res Med Sci, 2014, 2(1):145-150.
[21] Krishnaiah S, Vilas K, Shamanna BR, et al. Smoking and its association with cataract: results of the Andhra Pradesh eye disease study from India[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2005, 46(1): 58-65.
[22] Maralani HG, Tai BC, Wong TY, et al. Metabolic syndrome and risk of age-related cataract over time: an analysis of interval-censored data using a random-effects model metabolic syndrome and cataract[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2013, 54(1): 641-646.
[23] Nirmalan PK, Robin AL, Katz J, et al. Risk factors for age related cataract in a rural population of southern India: the Aravind Comprehensive Eye Study[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2004, 88(8): 989-994.
[24] Chen KJ, Pan WH, Huang CJ, et al. Association between folate status, diabetes, antihypertensive medication and age-related cataracts in elderly Taiwanese[J]. J Nutr Health Aging, 2011, 15(4): 304-310.
[25] Lindblad BE, Håkansson N, Wolk A. Smoking cessation and the risk of cataract: a prospective cohort study of cataract extraction among men[J]. JAMA Ophthalmol, 2014, 132(3): 253-257.
[26] 马德环, 叶冬青, 陈逖. 老年性白内障危险因素病例对照研究[J]. 临床眼科杂志, 2001, 9(4): 276-279. MA Dehuan, YE Dongqing, CHEN Di. A case-control study on dangerous factors of senile cataract[J]. Journal of clinical ophthalmology, 2001, 9(4): 276-279.
[1] 王建民,李晓峰,由志涛,董圣杰,赵宇驰,李占菊,邹德鑫,张剑锋,孙涛,杜伟. 基于可解释机器学习的后路腰椎椎体间融合术后慢性疼痛风险预测模型构建[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(2): 78-88.
[2] 逄锦宏,苏萍,乔俊鹏,陈巧巧,陈学禹,赵颖颖,施婕,孙晓茹,李秋春,何蕊言,范轶欧,迟蔚蔚. 老年人群可改变心血管危险因素聚集模式与脑卒中的关联[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(9): 11-19.
[3] 王乐,罗清馨,吴思佳,吴雨桐,葛祎蕾,俞一凡,韦云,吉寒冰,刘铁梅,张紫妍,修佳伟,薛付忠,李洪凯. 虚弱和癫痫关联研究:前瞻性队列和孟德尔随机化分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(9): 20-30.
[4] 杜祥阁,徐文文,刘妍,王琛,常海燕. IOL Master700与Pentacam测量白内障患者角膜曲率及散光的对比研究[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(12): 102-108.
[5] 于晴晴,常开锋,李吉庆,张凯,付苹,刘晓雯,赵英淇,薛付忠. 中老年人群高血压在非甾体抗炎药暴露与心脑血管疾病风险关联中的中介分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(8): 79-85.
[6] 卢伟,刘欢,贾贤杰,苏萍,施婕,王雅倩,迟蔚蔚. 植被覆盖与呼吸系统恶性肿瘤死亡风险关联分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(8): 94-100.
[7] 钟璐,薛付忠. 基于贝叶斯网络不确定性推理的肺癌风险预测模型[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(4): 86-94.
[8] 郭艳,张哲莹,王云溪,魏小娟. 人源性长寿保障基因2在结直肠癌组织中的表达及其临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(7): 67-71.
[9] 徐源佑,杨亚超,王春霞,马晓天,薛付忠,刘言训,王萍. 基于体检队列的胃炎风险预测模型[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(6): 112-116.
[10] 宋媛媛,李桂梅. 婴儿Lowe综合征1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(4): 119-121.
[11] 曹瑾,季晓康,孙秀彬,蒋正,薛付忠. γ-谷氨酰转肽酶与高尿酸血症关系的队列分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(6): 124-128.
[12] 李吉庆,赵焕宗,宋炳红,张理纯,李向一,陈亚飞,王萍,薛付忠. 基于健康管理队列的心血管事件风险预测模型[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(6): 56-60.
[13] 王春霞,许艺博,杨宁,夏冰,王萍,薛付忠. 基于健康管理队列的冠心病风险预测模型[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(6): 66-71.
[14] 张光,王广银,吴红彦, 张红玉,王停停,李吉庆,李敏,康凤玲,刘言训,薛付忠. 健康管理人群高脂血症风险预测模型[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(6): 72-76.
[15] 李江冰,宋心红,林海燕,张冬芝,李向一,许艺博,王丽,薛付忠. 健康管理人群缺血性异常心电图的影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(6): 77-81.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!