声触诊组织量化技术在乳腺肿块定性诊断中的价值

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2016.067

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨声触诊组织量化(VTQ)技术在乳腺肿块良恶性鉴别诊断中的应用价值。方法应用VTQ技术对102例共107个乳腺肿块内部、肿块边缘及周围乳腺组织行剪切波速度(SWV)测量,分别记为SWVi、SWVb、SWVg。以病理结果为标准,比较乳腺良性组与恶性组SWV差异,绘制ROC曲线确定判断乳腺病灶良恶性的最佳界值。结果所有肿块的SWVi值明显高于SWVb和SWVg,SWVb值明显高于SWVg,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。乳腺恶性组SWVi、SWVb分别为(6.70±1.75)、(4.58±1.38)m/s,良性组分别为(3.52±1.52)、(2.80±0.97)m/s,两组参数恶性组均高于良性组(P<0.01)。以SWVi值5.06m/s为界值诊断乳腺肿块良恶性的敏感性为83.7%、特异性为85.9%;以SWVb值3.51m/s为界值诊断肿块良恶性的敏感性为79.1%、特异性为81.2%。结论乳腺肿块内部与肿块边缘的SWV均有助于乳腺肿块良恶性的鉴别诊断。

关键词: 超声检查, 声触诊组织量化, 乳腺疾病, 鉴别, 诊断

Abstract: Objective To explore the diagnostic value of virtual touch tissue quantification(VTQ)in the differential diagnosis of breast masses. Methods A total of 102 patients with 107 breast masses were examined by means of VTQ technique. The shear wave velocity(SWV)was measured within the lesion(SWVi), in the boundary zone(SWVb)and in the normal glandular tissues(SWVg). With results of pathological diagnosis as the gold standard, receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of VTQ and to find the optimal cut-off point in differentiating malignant from benign lesions. Results The SWVi was higher than SWVb and SWVg, and SWVb was higher than SWVg in both malignant and benign groups(P<0.05). The SWVi and SWVb were(6.70±1.75)and(4.58±1.38)m/s, respectively in malignant lesions, and were(3.52±1.52)and(2.80±0.97)m/s respectively in benign lesions, with significant differences between benign and malignant lesions(P<0.01). When the cut-off point of SWVi was determined as 5.06 m/s, the sensitivity was 83.7% and the specificity was 85.9%. When the cut-off point of SWVb was determined as 3.51 m/s, the sensitivity was 79.1% and the specificity was 81.2%. Conclusion The SWVi and SWVb can help the differential diagnosis of breast tumors.

Key words: Virtual touch tissue quantification, Breast diseases, Ultrasonography, differentiation, Diagnosis

中图分类号:

R655.8

范凤景,张广英,曹淑娟,丁红宇,刘德泉. 声触诊组织量化技术在乳腺肿块定性诊断中的价值[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(9): 48-52.

FAN Fengjing, ZHANG Guangying, CAO Shujuan, DING Hongyu, LIU Dequan. Diagnostic value of virtual touch tissue quantification in the differential diagnosis of breast tumors[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2016, 54(9): 48-52.

参考文献

[1] Fitzmaurice C, Dicker D, Pain A, et al. The global burden of cancer 2013[J]. JAMA oncology, 2015, 1(4):505-527.
[2] 黄哲宙, 陈万青, 吴春晓, 等. 中国女性乳腺癌的发病和死亡现况—全国32个肿瘤登记点2003-2007年资料分析报告[J]. 肿瘤, 2012, 32(6):435-439. HUANG Zhezhou, CHEN Waning, WU Chunxiao, et al. Incidence and mortality of female breast cancer in China—a report from 32 Chinese cancer registries, 2003-2007[J]. TUMOR, 2012, 32(6):435-439.
[3] Kim EK, Ko KH, Oh KK, et al. Clinical application of the BI-RADS final assessment to breast sonography in conjunction with mammography[J]. Am J Roentgenol, 2008, 190(5):1209-1215.
[4] Hooley RJ, Scoutt LM, Philpotts LE. Breast ultrasonography: state of the art [J]. Radiology, 2013, 268(3):642-659.
[5] Balleyguier C, Ciolovan L, Ammari S, et al. Breast elastography: the technical process and its applications[J]. Diagn Interv Imaging, 2013, 94(5):503-513.
[6] 肖静, 李杰, 时丹丹, 等. 超声弹性成像面积比与 Itoh 评分法在乳腺病变诊断中的比较[J].山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(6):149-151. XIAO Jing, LI Jie, SHI Dandan, et al. Comparison of values of the area ratio and the Itoh scoring system with sonoelastography in the diagnosis of breast lesions [J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2011, 49(6):149-151.
[7] Zhi H, Ou B, Lou BM, et al. Comparison of ultrasound elastography, mammography, and sonography in the diagnosis of solid breast lesions[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2007, 26(6):807-815.
[8] Athanasiou A, Tardivon A, Tanter M, et al. Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging—preliminary results [J]. Radiology, 2010, 256(1):297-303.
[9] Meng W, Zhang G, Wu C, et al. Preliminary results of acoustic radiation force impulse(ARFI)ultrasound imaging of breast lesions[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2011, 37(9): 1436-1443.
[10] Golatta M, Schweitzer-Martin M, Harcos A, et al. Evaluation of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification, a new shear wave velocity imaging method, for breast lesion assessment by ultrasound [J]. Biomed Res Int, 2014, 960262. doi: 10.1155/2014/960262. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
[11] Wang ZL, Sun L, Li Y, et al. Relationship between elasticity and collagen fiber content in breast disease: a preliminary report [J]. Ultrasonics, 2015, 57: 44-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2014.10.016. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
[12] Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K, et al. Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses [J]. Breast Cancer Res, 2010, 12(6): R104. doi: 10.1186/bcr2787. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
[13] Zhou J, Zhan W, Chang C, et al. Role of acoustic shear wave velocity measurement in characterization of breast lesions [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2013, 32(2):285-294.
[14] 王荣, 王兴田, 胡春梅,等. 声脉冲辐射力成像对乳腺肿块鉴别诊断价值的初步研究[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2012, 21(2):142-145. WANG Rong, WANG Xingtian, HU Chunmei, et al. Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography in differential diagnosis of breast masses[J]. Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography, 2012, 21(2):142-145.
[15] 吴长君, 张光晨, 孟巍, 等. 声触诊组织量化技术鉴别乳腺良性肿块的价值[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2011, 20(11):965-967. WU Changjun, ZHANG Guangchen, MENG Wei, et al. Diagnostic value touch tissues quantification in discriminating breast benign and malignant solid tumors [J]. Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography, 2011, 20(11):965-967.

相关文章 15

[1]	李波波李道堂刘曙光王兴武. 食管癌患者血清中DKK-1的表达[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2209, 47(6): 58-61.
[2]	徐平于国放李霞. 不同类型甲状腺上动脉PSV对Graves病与桥本氏甲状腺炎鉴别诊断的价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2209, 47(6): 62-64.
[3]	王欣，邢春燕，杨艳平. 血清磷酸丙酮酸水合酶检测对诊断侵袭性白念珠菌感染的临床价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2209, 47(6): 92-94.
[4]	山东省医学会心电学分会山东省医学伦理学学会心电学分会. 心电图报告规范化书写专家共识(2026)[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(4): 1-7.
[5]	中国医师协会骨科医师分会智能骨科学组,中华预防医学会脊柱疾病预防与控制专业委员会脊柱脊髓损伤疾病预防与控制学组. 人工智能脊柱退变影像学测量位点与标注专家共识(2025)[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(2): 1-10.
[6]	罗淇,王霞,姜孟. 脑功能网络分析在失语症诊疗中的应用:病理机制分析、临床诊断与疗效评价[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(8): 111-126.
[7]	河南省生物医学工程学会立体心电图专业委员会,中国医药教育协会心电学专业委员会,山东中医药学会心电学专业委员会,青岛市医学会心电生理与起搏专科分会,全国医药技术市场协会远程心脏专业委员会. 心电向量图诊断标准规范化专家共识(2025)[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(7): 1-10.
[8]	刘保国,宋翔,赵晓文,毛亚丽. 血清STAT5B、NKAIN1 mRNA检测在乳腺癌中的应用价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(7): 68-74.
[9]	祝永才,谢艳,齐秋晨,李培龙,王传新,杜鲁涛. 基于外周血单个核细胞ATM基因甲基化的联合模型在胰腺癌早期诊断中的价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(6): 78-88.
[10]	赵汉卿,周新睿,李子建,唐兴. 循环肿瘤细胞联合血清学检测在非小细胞肺癌中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 79-85.
[11]	魏旭鹏,常成,赵秀鹤. 模拟多系统萎缩的抗Homer3抗体相关自身免疫性小脑共济失调1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 95-100.
[12]	赵芸慕兰,高海燕. 中、高危分化型甲状腺癌患者术后 ¹³¹I治疗反应及预后的影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(2): 21-28.
[13]	崔倩倩,李金鹏,吴豫丹,侯志平,孙玮螺,崔盼盼,何培元. 粪便miRNA对结直肠进展期腺瘤无创筛查的临床价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(2): 43-50.
[14]	刘振昆,吕纪玲,徐伟伟,马力天,张才擎. BALF tNGS检测及培养对NSCLC合并IPFD的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(11): 36-45.
[15]	张鑫茹,李扬,孙萌,聂玮,马喆. Vision-LSTM模型在甲状腺影像报告与数据系统4b类甲状腺结节超声影像诊断中的应用与评估[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(11): 68-74.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed