您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版)

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

磁共振弥散张量成像对轻度脊髓型颈椎病的诊断价值

孟祥水1,柴相君2,李笃民1,马祥兴1,李传福1,侯金文1   

  1. 山东大学齐鲁医院 1. 放射科; 2. 耳鼻喉科, 济南 250012
  • 收稿日期:2008-04-14 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-09-16 发布日期:2008-09-16
  • 通讯作者: 侯金文

Diagnosis value of DTI in cervical spondylosis in early stages

MENG Xiang-shui1, CHAI Xiang-jun2, LI Du-min1, MA Xiang-xing1, LI Chuan-fu1, HOU Jin-wen1   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology; 2. Department of Otolaryngolgogy, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China
  • Received:2008-04-14 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2008-09-16 Published:2008-09-16
  • Contact: HOU Jin-wen

摘要: 目的探讨3.0T磁共振DTI技术对无信号改变脊髓型颈椎病的诊断价值。方法选择21例健康志愿者作为对照组和42例无T2信号改变的脊髓型颈椎病患者行颈髓DTI成像,根据患者有无颈椎病体征将其分为阴性体征组(A组)和阳性体征组(B组)。分析各组表观弥散系数(ADC)、分数各向异性值(FA)、平行于颈髓长轴、前后径和左右径本征值λ1、λ2、λ3值的变化。结果所有受检者DTI成像显示满意。对照组颈髓平均ADC值为(0.78±0.08)×10-3mm2/s,FA值为0.72±0.03,λ1、λ2、λ3值分别为(1.51±0.15)×10-3、(0.42±0.09)×10-3、(0.41±0.10)×10-3mm2/s。A组FA值大于B组(P<0.01),B组ADC、λ1、λ2、λ3值均大于A组(P<0.05);对照组与A组比较,ADC、FA、λ1值无统计学差异(P>0.05),A组λ2、λ3值大于对照组(P<0.05);对照组FA值大于B组(P<0.01),B组ADC、λ2、λ3值大于对照组(P<0.05),而对照组和患者组间λ1值无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论ADC、FA、λ1、λ2、λ3值是检测脊髓型颈椎病早期颈髓微结构改变的敏感指标。

关键词: 脊髓型颈椎病, 弥散张量成像, 磁共振成像

Abstract: To evaluate the diagnosis value of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in cervical spondylosis without high signal intensity on the compression sites. MethodsTwenty-one healthy volunteers and 42 patients with cervical spondylosis without high signal intensity on the T2WI were subjected to DTI by using a 3.0T MR scanner. Forty-two patients were divided into 2 groups based on having or not having cervical spondylosis symptoms. Patients in group A had symptoms of cervical spondylosis while patients in group B did not. ADC, FA, λ1, λ2 and λ3 values were analyzed with a software package of SPSS 11.0. Fiber tracking was performed on examinees with Functool software of the GE Company. ResultsHigh quality ADC maps, FA maps and fiber tracking of cervical spinal cords were obtained. For healthy subjects, average ADC, FA, λ1, λ2 and λ3 values were (0.78±0.08)×10-3mm2/s, 0.72±0.03, (1.51±0.15)×10-3mm2/s, (0.42±0.09)×10-3mm2/s and (0.41±0.10)×10-3mm2/s respectively. The FA value of group A was higher than that of group B(P<0.01), while values of ADC, FA, λ1, λ2 and λ3 of group B were higher than those of group A(P<0.05). The ADC, FA and λ1 values were not statistically significant between group A and the control group(P>0.05), while values of λ2 and λ3 of group A were higher than those of the control group(P<0.05). The FA value of the control group was higher than that of group B(P<0.01), and the ADC, λ2 and λ3 values of group B were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05), while there were no statistically significant differences between group B and the control group(P>0.05). ConclusionThe ADC, FA, λ1, λ2 and λ3 values are sensitive indices for evaluation of the subtle structure of cervical spinal cords which can be quantitatively analyzed by DTI in the early stage of cervical spondylosis.

Key words: Magnetic resonance imaging, Diffusion tensor imaging, Cervical spondylosis

中图分类号: 

  • R445.2
[1] 金晨曦,沈薇,李娜,孙建锋,杨驰,郭泾. ADDWoR关节镜下盘复位术盘-髁运动的定量分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(7): 54-61.
[2] 刘晶晶,庞婧,赵晓丹,林昕,付敏,陈静静. 基于乳腺X线摄影及DCE-MRI机器学习模型预测乳腺癌新辅助治疗后病理完全缓解:双中心研究[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(1): 60-72.
[3] 刘小文,曹永泉,侯明源,于德新. EOB-MRI多定量参数对肝胆期乏血供低信号结节进展风险的评估价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(4): 31-39.
[4] 吴思雨,沈业隆,王锡明. 影像组学预测原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤的Ki-67标记指数[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(11): 67-72.
[5] 靳新娟,左立平,邓展昊,李安宁,于德新. MRI影像组学对135例肝癌耐药蛋白PFKFB3的预测价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(6): 79-86.
[6] 王磊,张帅,刘钢,由胜男,王植,朱珊,陈超,马信龙,杨强. MRI诊断140例腰椎智能网络自动检测分型MCs方法的比较[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(3): 71-79.
[7] 杨咏青,赵鹏,汪玉,马文静,田迷迷,程亚旎,祖璐,林祥涛. 细胞外容积分数对62例不同病理类型肺癌的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(2): 88-94.
[8] 靳新娟,蔡大幸,范金蕾,邓展昊,李楠,于德新,李安宁. 显微镜高分辨率MRI鉴别皮肤良、恶性局灶隆起性结节[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(12): 51-61.
[9] 赵恩举,赵硕,郭云亮,王锡明. 282例颈动脉钙化与脑小血管病MRI总负荷评分的关联性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(1): 38-44.
[10] 陶国伟,王芳,董向毅,徐亚瑄,赵琳丽,胡蓓蓓. 子宫腺肌病的超声与MRI诊断及进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(7): 56-65.
[11] 冯宝民,王舟,徐晗,李佳存,于乔文,修建军. 抗髓鞘少突胶质细胞糖蛋白IgG抗体相关疾病临床及影像特征[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(3): 45-50.
[12] 左立平,蒋丰洋,周斌彬,范金蕾,梁永锋,邓展昊,于德新. 术前MRI在预测169例肝细胞肝癌微血管侵犯及早期复发的价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(3): 89-95.
[13] 刘学业,李齐明,唐弘毅,徐秋平,陈文倩,郭泾. 年轻成人颞下颌关节髁突体积、表面积与关节盘矢向位置的关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(6): 117-121.
[14] 张高瑞,张玉婷,赵雨萱,王方青,于德新. MnFe2O4@CNS纳米探针在胰腺癌诊疗一体化中的价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(4): 48-55.
[15] 宋珍珍,孙小玲,李海鸥,王芳,张冉,于德新. 120例胶质瘤及瘤周水肿MRI影像组学在评估肿瘤复发中的价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(11): 53-60.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!