您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 64 ›› Issue (9): 68-77.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2025.0820

• 公共卫生与预防医学 • 上一篇    

相对脂肪量指数与糖尿病或糖尿病前期患者全因死亡率和心血管疾病死亡率的关系

李爱婧1,韦茂英1,吴婵1,郭景宜1,孙安宁1,顾鑫1,龚燕冰1,2   

  1. 1. 北京中医药大学东直门医院肾病内分泌二区, 北京 100700;2.北京中医药大学, 北京 100029
  • 发布日期:2026-09-09
  • 通讯作者: 龚燕冰. E-mail:gyb_1226@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家中医药管理局青年岐黄学者支持项目[国中医药人教发(2020)7号];2023年度国家资助博士后研究人员计划(GZC20230324)

Association between relative fat mass index and all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality among individuals with diabetes and prediabetes

LI Aijing1, WEI Maoying1, WU Chan1, GUO Jingyi1, SUN Anning1, GU Xin1, GONG Yanbing1,2   

  1. 1. Division Ⅱ of Nephrology and Endocrinology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100700, China;
    2. Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China
  • Published:2026-09-09

摘要: 目的 探究糖尿病或糖尿病前期患者中相对脂肪量(relative fat mass, RFM)指数与全因死亡率及心血管疾病死亡率之间的关联。 方法 纳入来自美国国家健康与营养检查调查(National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, NHANES)数据库(1999—2018年)的11 852例糖尿病或糖尿病前期患者。将研究对象按RFM指数四分位数分为Q1(9.63~29.75)、Q2(29.75~35.54)、Q3(35.54~44.05)、Q4(44.05~58.41)四组。应用多因素Cox比例风险回归模型,将RFM指数分别作为连续变量和分类变量纳入分析,探究其对全因死亡率和心血管疾病死亡率的影响。采用限制性立方样条分析与阈值效应分析探究潜在非线性关系,并进行亚组分析和敏感性分析。 结果 在平均103.94个月的随访期间,11 852例糖尿病及糖尿病前期患者中,发生全因死亡2 039例(17.20%)、心血管死亡661例(5.58%)。在完全调整模型中,当RFM指数作为连续变量分析时,RFM指数每增加一个单位,全因死亡风险增加1.6%(HR=1.016, 95% CI: 1.002~1.030, P=0.029),心血管死亡风险增加3.6%(HR=1.036, 95% CI: 1.007~1.066, P=0.005)。当RFM指数作为分类变量分析时,与Q1组相比,在Q3组和Q4组中,全因死亡风险分别增加58.8%(HR=1.588, 95% CI: 1.286~1.961, P<0.001)及61.3%(HR=1.613, 95% CI: 1.229~2.116, P=0.001);心血管死亡风险分别增加79.8%(HR=1.798, 95% CI: 1.238~2.610, P=0.002)及124.8%(HR=2.248, 95% CI: 1.355~3.729, P=0.002)。绘制限制性立方样条后发现,RFM指数与全因死亡率之间呈现非线性U型曲线,而心血管疾病死亡率则随RFM指数的增加而呈线性上升趋势。亚组分析结果显示受教育程度对RFM指数与全因死亡率及心血管疾病死亡率的关联均具有显著的效应修饰作用。敏感性分析结果与主分析结果一致。 结论 在糖尿病或糖尿病前期患者中,RFM指数与全因死亡率及心血管疾病死亡率的增加有关。

关键词: 相对脂肪量指数, NHANES, 糖尿病, 糖尿病前期, 死亡率

Abstract: Objective To investigate the association between the relative fat mass(RFM)index and all-cause mortality as well as cardiovascular mortality in patients with diabetes or prediabetes. Methods A total of 11,852 patients with diabetes or prediabetes from the American National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey(NHANES)database(1999-2018)were included. The study participants were divided into four groups according to the quartiles of the RFM index: Q1(9.63-29.75), Q2(29.75-35.54), Q3(35.54-44.05), and Q4(44.05-58.41). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were applied to evaluate the associations of RFM index, treated both as a continuous variable and as a categorical variable, with all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. Restricted cubic spline and threshold effect analyses were applied to explore potential nonlinear relationships. Additionally, subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results During a mean follow-up of 103.94 months, a total of 2,039 all-cause deaths(17.20%)and 661 cardiovascular deaths(5.58%)occurred among the 11,852 participants with diabetes or prediabetes. In the fully adjusted model, when RFM index was analyzed as a continuous variable, each unit increase in RFM index was associated with a 1.6% increase in all-cause mortality risk(HR=1.016, 95%CI: 1.002-1.030, P=0.029)and a 3.6% increase in cardiovascular mortality risk(HR=1.036, 95%CI: 1.007-1.066, P=0.005). When the RFM index was analyzed as a categorical variable, compared to the Q1 group, the Q3 and Q4 groups showed a 58.8%(HR=1.588, 95%CI: 1.286-1.961, P<0.001)and 61.3%(HR=1.613, 95%CI: 1.229-2.116, P=0.001)increase in all-cause mortality risk, respectively, and a 79.8%(HR=1.798, 95%CI: 1.238-2.610, P=0.002)and 124.8%(HR=2.248, 95%CI: 1.355-3.729, P=0.002)increase in cardiovascular mortality risk, respectively. Restricted cubic spline analysis revealed a nonlinear U-shaped curve between RFM index and all-cause mortality, while cardiovascular mortality showed a linear increasing trend with higher RFM index. Subgroup analysis indicated that education level significantly modified the associations of RFM index with both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Sensitivity analyses yielded results consistent with the main findings. Conclusion In patients with diabetes or prediabetes, a higher RFM index is associated with increased risks of both cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality.

Key words: Relative fat mass index, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, NHANES, Diabetes, Prediabetes, Mortality

中图分类号: 

  • R587.1
[1] Tabák A G, Herder C, Rathmann W, et al. Prediabetes: a high-risk state for diabetes development[J]. Lancet, 2012, 379(9833): 2279-2290.
[2] GBD 2021 Diabetes Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of diabetes from 1990 to 2021, with projections of prevalence to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021[J]. Lancet, 2023, 402(10397): 203-234.
[3] Sun H, Saeedi P, Karuranga S, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045[J]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2022, 183: 109119. DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109119
[4] American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 2. diagnosis and classification of diabetes: stan-dards of care in diabetes-2024[J]. Diabetes Care, 2024, 47(1): 20-42.
[5] Joslin E P, Boston M D. The prevention of diabetes mellitus[J]. JAMA, 2021, 325(2): 190. DOI:10.1001/jama.2020.17738
[6] 中华医学会内分泌学分会, 中华医学会糖尿病学分会, 中国医师协会内分泌代谢科医师分会. 中国成人糖尿病前期干预的专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志, 2023, 15(6):484-494. Chinese Society of Endocrinology, Chinese Diabetes Society, Chinese Endocrinologist Association. Intervention for adults with pre-diabetes: a Chinese expert consensus(2023 edition)[J]. Chinese Journal of Diabetes Mellitus, 2023, 15(6): 484-494.
[7] Fernández-Sánchez A, Madrigal-Santillán E, Bautista M, et al. Inflammation, oxidative stress, and obesity[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2011, 12(5): 3117-3132.
[8] Dandona P. Endothelium, inflammation, and diabetes[J]. Curr Diab Rep, 2002, 2(4): 311-315.
[9] Karam B S, Chavez-Moreno A, Koh W, et al. Oxidative stress and inflammation as central mediators of atrial fibrillation in obesity and diabetes[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2017, 16(1): 120. DOI:10.1186/s12933-017-0604-9
[10] Antar S A, Ashour N A, Sharaky M, et al. Diabetes mellitus: Classification, mediators, and complications; A gate to identify potential targets for the development of new effective treatments[J]. Biomed Pharmacother, 2023, 168: 115734. DOI:10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115734
[11] Zhao P P, Du T Q, Zhou Q, et al. Association of weight-adjusted-waist index with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in individuals with diabetes or prediabetes: a cohort study from NHANES 2005-2018[J]. Sci Rep, 2024, 14(1): 24061. DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-74339-y
[12] Wang P P, Fan Y Q, Gao H Y, et al. Body roundness index as a predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with diabetes and prediabetes[J]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2025, 219: 111958. DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111958
[13] Yan Z Q, Chang X, Liu Z M, et al. The association of obesity and lipid-related indicators with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality risks in patients with diabetes or prediabetes: a cross-sectional study based on machine learning algorithms[J]. Front Endocrinol, 2025, 16: 1492082. DOI:10.3389/fendo.2025.1492082
[14] Suthahar N, Meems L M G, Withaar C, et al. Relative fat mass, a new index of adiposity, is strongly associated with incident heart failure: data from PREVEND[J]. Sci Rep, 2022, 12(1): 147. DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-02409-6
[15] Woolcott O O, Bergman R N. Relative fat mass(RFM)as a new estimator of whole-body fat percentage-A cross-sectional study in American adult individuals[J]. Sci Rep, 2018, 8(1): 10980. DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-29362-1
[16] Luo P Q, Li D P, Guo Y M, et al. The modified role including mediating and synergistic interactive effects of glucose tolerance status in the associations between relative fat mass and the risks of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality from the 4C cohort study[J]. DiabetolMetabSyndr, 2024, 16(1): 313. DOI:10.1186/s13098-024-01558-8
[17] Zou X T, Zhou X H, Zhu Z X, et al. Novel subgroups of patients with adult-onset diabetes in Chinese and US populations[J]. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2019, 7(1): 9-11.
[18] Zhang Q, Xiao S C, Jiao X J, et al. The triglyceride-glucose index is a predictor for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in CVD patients with diabetes or pre-diabetes: evidence from NHANES 2001-2018[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2023, 22(1): 279. DOI:10.1186/s12933-023-02030-z
[19] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The NHANES 2017-2018 anthropometry procedures manual[EB/OL].(2017-03-01)[2025-07-02]. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/continuousnhanes/manuals.aspx?BeginYear=2017
[20] Zhu X L, Yue Y, Li L, et al. The relationship between depression and relative fat mass(RFM): a population-based study[J]. J Affect Disord, 2024, 356: 323-328. DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2024.04.031
[21] Chobanian A V, Bakris G L, Black H R, et al. The seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure: the JNC 7 report[J]. JAMA, 2003, 289(19): 2560-2572.
[22] World Health Organization. Guideline on haemoglobin cutoffs to define anaemia in individuals and populations[EB/OL].(2024-01-01)[2025-07-03]. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/376196/9789240088542?eng.pdf.
[23] Levey A S, Coresh J. Chronic kidney disease[J]. Lancet, 2012, 379(9811): 165-180.
[24] Li C Y, Zhang Z X, Luo X Q, et al. The triglyceride-glucose index and its obesity-related derivatives as predictors of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive patients: insights from NHANES data with machine learning analysis[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2025, 24(1): 47. DOI:10.1186/s12933-025-02591-1
[25] Ghulam A, Gianfagna F, Bonaccio M, et al. Association between BMI, RFM and mortality and potential mediators: Prospective findings from the Moli-sani study[J]. Int J Obes, 2023, 47(8): 697-708.
[26] Wang J, Guan J Y, Huang L Y, et al. Sex differences in the associations between relative fat mass and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: a population-based prospective cohort study[J]. NutrMetab Cardiovasc Dis, 2024, 34(3): 738-754.
[27] Woolcott O O, Bergman R N. Defining cutoffs to diagnose obesity using the relative fat mass(RFM): Association with mortality in NHANES 1999-2014[J]. Int J Obes, 2020, 44(6): 1301-1310.
[28] Linge J, Petersson M, Forsgren M F, et al. Adverse muscle composition predicts all-cause mortality in the UK Biobank imaging study[J]. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle, 2021, 12(6): 1513-1526.
[29] Rier H N, Jager A, Sleijfer S, et al. Low muscle attenuation is a prognostic factor for survival in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with first line palliative chemotherapy[J]. Breast, 2017, 31: 9-15.
[30] Howitt C, Brage S, Hambleton I R, et al. A cross-sectional study of physical activity and sedentary beha-viours in a Caribbean population: combining objective and questionnaire data to guide future interventions[J]. BMC Public Health, 2016, 16(1): 1036. DOI:10.1186/s12889-016-3689-2
[31] Chagas C L, da Silva N F, Rodrigues I G, et al. Diffe-rent factors modulate visceral and subcutaneous fat accumulation in adults: a single-center study in Brazil[J]. Front Nutr, 2025, 12: 1524389. DOI:10.3389/fnut.2025.1524389
[32] Suthahar N, Zwartkruis V, Geelhoed B, et al. Associations of relative fat mass and BMI with all-cause mortality: Confounding effect of muscle mass[J]. Obesity, 2024, 32(3): 603-611.
[33] Klein S, Gastaldelli A, Yki-Järvinen H, et al. Why does obesity cause diabetes?[J]. Cell Metab, 2022, 34(1): 11-20.
[34] Shlipak M G, Wassel Fyr C L, Chertow G M, et al. Cystatin C and mortality risk in the elderly: the health, aging, and body composition study[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2006, 17(1): 254-261.
[35] Muntner P, Winston J, Uribarri J, et al. Overweight, obesity, and elevated serum cystatin C levels in adults in the United States[J]. Am J Med, 2008, 121(4): 341-348.
[36] Costanzo S, Magnacca S, Bonaccio M, et al. Reduced pulmonary function, low-grade inflammation and increased risk of total and cardiovascular mortality in a general adult population: Prospective results from the Moli-sani study[J]. Respir Med, 2021, 184: 106441. DOI:10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106441
[1] 马小莉,林华,孟丽莹,左丹,刘诗群,张有涛,刘元涛,孙靖,张玉超. 配对盒基因4变异与妊娠期糖尿病发生风险、β细胞功能及围产结局的关联性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(8): 79-88.
[2] 尹丹丹,彦名南,韩净净,张伟,崔学雷,刘亚平,石书龙,季宗文. 大黄素治疗糖尿病肾病的网络药理学[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(7): 11-27.
[3] 林华,黄庆先,孙燕佩,李雪梅,孙靖,刘元涛. 化脓性肝脓肿患者肺炎克雷伯菌感染的影响因素及预测模型[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(6): 30-42.
[4] 吉寒冰,吴雨桐,吴思佳,黄鑫,李洪凯,陈昊. 二甲双胍靶点对胎儿神经系统畸形影响的遗传学证据[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(6): 86-93.
[5] 孟晓梅,郝亚平,王亮,于晓,唐与晓. 血清Isthmin1、Gremlin2水平与2型糖尿病患者视网膜病变的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(9): 102-107.
[6] 王梦星,薛付忠,杨帆. 基于多模态交叉注意力机制融合的1型糖尿病血糖浓度预测方法[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(8): 41-50.
[7] 申路佳,逯天威,巩伟明,赵岩松,王淑康,袁中尚. 代谢风险评分在2型糖尿病人群心血管结局预测中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(8): 69-78.
[8] 李晓琪,刘佩丽,成红,赵艳艳. 基于自注意力机制预测ICU脓毒症患者的死亡率[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(8): 86-93.
[9] 陈莹莹,王鲁,胡锡峰,朱高培,薛付忠. 基于贝叶斯网络的2型糖尿病患者并发脑卒中风险预测[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(8): 94-102.
[10] 葛雪,赵红艳. 疱疹病毒感染对重症肺炎患者临床预后及呼吸道微生态的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(6): 27-37.
[11] 陈绪军, 何国伟. 着力进一步推进动脉桥在我国冠心病冠脉旁路移植术中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 1-5.
[12] 卢圣勋,邢亚闯,罗俊辉,刘杰,何厚乐,王志强,张娜. 糖尿病患者冠脉旁路移植手术中动脉桥的研究现状[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 33-39.
[13] 李敬,郝盼盼. 急性心力衰竭患者出入院心率变化与预后相关性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(4): 75-82.
[14] 杜学识,倪向敏,梁馨予,白倩,朱文艺,王建. 雌马酚对DN的保护作用及潜在靶点[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(8): 49-58.
[15] 孙丽娜,白红艳,牛宗格,张福帅,曲仪庆. 基于SII构建及评价预测ARDS住院死亡率的在线临床风险模型[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(7): 10-20.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!