左胸廓内动脉联合桡动脉行冠状动脉旁路移植术早期临床疗效

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2023.0666

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨体外循环与非体外循环下左胸廓内动脉(left internal thoracic artery, LITA)联合桡动脉(radial artery, RA)行全动脉化冠状动脉旁路移植术(total arterialized coronary artery bypass grafting, TA-CABG)的早期临床效果。方法回顾性分析山东省千佛山医院心脏外科2020年1月至2022年6月接受全动脉化冠状动脉搭桥术105例患者临床资料,其中不停跳冠状动脉旁路移植术(off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, OPCAB)患者59例,为OPCAB组,体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术(on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, ONCAB)患者46例,为ONCAB组。分析包括术前资料、术中桥血管获取及吻合方式、术后并发症及处理措施,所有患者术后12个月复查冠状动脉CT血管造影(computed tomography angiography, CTA),并评估桥血管通畅率及不良心血管事件发生率。结果 ONCAB组手术时间高于OPCAB组,术后住院时间小于OPCAB组,差异有统计学意义(P=0.006),两组术中吻合口个数、桥血管流量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后机械通气时间、术后24 h引流量、心律失常、围术期心肌梗死、切口感染及前臂并发症差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),两组患者均无院内死亡及术后脑血管事件发生。结论体外循环与非体外循环下LITA联合RA行冠状动脉旁路移植术近期临床效果满意;ONCAB组术后住院时间少于OPCAB组;RA获取时应注意桡神经分支保护;术中及术后抗痉挛治疗十分重要。

关键词: 冠状动脉旁路移植术, 全动脉化, 桡动脉, 通畅率, 早期

Abstract: Objective To investigate the early clinical efficacy of left internal thoracic artery(LITA)plus radial artery(RA)in total arterialized coronary artery bypass grafting(TA-CABG). Methods The clinical data of 105 patients who underwent total TA-CABG during Jan. 2020 and Jun. 2022 in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery of Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital were retrospectively analyzed, including 59 who underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting(OPCAB)and 46 who underwent on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting(ONCAB). Preoperative data, intraoperative graft acquisition and anastomosis methods, postoperative complications and management measures were included. Computed tomography angiography(CTA)was conducted in all patients 12 months after surgery to evaluate the graft patency rate and incidence of adverse cardiovascular events. Results The operation time of ONCAB group was longer than that of OPCAB group, while the postoperative hospital stay was shorter, with statistically significant difference(P=0.006). However, there were no statistically significant differences in the number of anastomosis, flow in grafts, postoperative mechanical ventilation time, 24 h postoperative drainage, arrhythmia, perioperative myocardial infarction, incision infection and forearm complications(P>0.05). No death or postoperative cerebrovascular events occurred in either groups. Conclusion LITA plus RA yields satisfactory early clinical outcomes in TA-CABG. ONCAB group needs shorter hospital stay than OPCAB group. Protection of radial nerve branch is important when RA is obtained. Intraoperative and postoperative antispasmodic therapy is essential.

Key words: Coronary artery bypass grafting, Total arterialization, Radial artery, Patency rate, Early phase

中图分类号:

R654.2

张熙伟,任琳玮,张辉,张歆杰,刘伟国,王东. 左胸廓内动脉联合桡动脉行冠状动脉旁路移植术早期临床疗效[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(3): 39-46.

ZHANG Xiwei, REN Linwei, ZHANG Hui, ZHANG Xinjie, LIU Weiguo, WANG Dong. Early clinical efficacy of left internal thoracic artery plus radial artery in total arterialized coronary artery bypass grafting[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2024, 62(3): 39-46.

参考文献

[1] Safiri S, Karamzad N, Singh K, et al. Burden of ischemic heart disease and its attributable risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019[J]. Eur J Prev Cardiol, 2022, 29(2): 420-431.
[2] 中国心血管健康与疾病报告编写组.中国心血管健康与疾病报告2021概要[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2022, 37(6): 553-578.
[3] Loof D, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, et al. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events[J]. N Engl J Med, 1986, 314(1): 1-6.
[4] Rayol S, Van den Eynde J, Cavalcanti L,et al. Total arterial coronary bypass graft surgery is associated with better long-term survival in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: a systematic review with meta-analysis[J]. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg, 2021, 36(1): 78-85.
[5] Royse A, Ren J, Royse C, et al. Coronary artery bypass surgery without saphenous vein grafting: JACC review topic of the week[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2022, 80(19): 1833-1843.
[6] 韩家炜, 张恒, 郑哲. 全动脉冠状动脉旁路移植术的临床应用现状与策略[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2024, 31(2): 304-310.
[7] Lawton J, Tamis-Holland J, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for coronary artery revascularization: executive summary: a report of the American college of cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines[J]. Circulation, 2022, 145(3): e4-e17.
[8] Gaudino M, Benedetto U, Fremes S, et al. Radial-artery or saphenous-vein grafts in coronary-artery bypass surgery[J]. N Engl J Med, 2018, 378(22): 2069-2077.
[9] Shapira O. Radial artery as the preferred second conduit for coronary bypass[J]. N Engl J Med, 2018, 378(22): 2134-2135.
[10] Notenboom M, Khamooshian A, Sjatskig J, et al. Conventional open harvesting of the radial artery as a conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting[J]. Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg, 2021. doi: 10.1510/mmcts.2021.042.
[11] Aguirre V, Marchand K, Viana F, et al. The radial artery: open harvesting technique[J]. Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg, 2021, 10:2021. doi: 10.1510/mmcts.2021.048.
[12] Neumann F, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization[J]. Eur Heart J, 2019, 40(2): 87-165.
[13] Ogawa S, Tsunekawa T, Hosoba S, et al. Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting: propensity analysis of the left internal thoracic artery versus the right internal thoracic artery as a bypass graft to the left anterior descending artery[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2020, 57(4): 701-708.
[14] Kando Y, Shiiya N, Tsuda K, et al. Radial artery vs saphenous vein grafts for sequential coronary bypass grafting as a second conduit for the left coronary territory[J]. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2022, 70(10): 862-870.
[15] Nappi F, Bellomo F, Nappi P, et al. The use of radial artery for CABG: an update[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2021, 2021: 5528006. doi: 10.1155/2021/5528006.
[16] Taggart D, Gerry S, Gray A. Radial artery versus saphenous vein versus right internal thoracic artery for coronary artery bypass grafting: different conduits or different trials?[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2022, 63(1): ezac562. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac562.
[17] Khan M, Patel K, Franklin S, et al. Radial artery spasm: reviews and updates[J]. Ir J Med Sci, 2020, 189(4): 1253-1258.
[18] Gaudino M, Kurlansky P, Fremes S. The use of the radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting improves long-term outcomes: And now what?[J]. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2021, 162(5): 1548-1552.
[19] Chen XJ, Zheng BS, Xing WH, et al. Hotspot issue of clinical practice of multiple arterial grafting in coronary artery bypass surgery in China[J]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi, 2019, 99(14): 1048-1052.
[20] 陈新忠, 陈绪军, 李伟栋, 等. 桡动脉桥在中国冠状动脉旁路移植术中地位的重新认识[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2019, 99(42): 3284-3287. CHEN Xinzhong, CHEN Xujun, LI Weidong, et al. Reunderstanding of the role of radial artery bridge in coronary artery bypass grafting in China[J]. Chinese Medical Journal, 2019, 99(42): 3284-3287.
[21] Maestri F, Formica F, Gallingani A, et al. Radial artery versus saphenous vein as third conduit in coronary artery bypass graft surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease: a ten-year literature review[J]. Acta Biomed, 2022, 93(2): e2022049. doi: 10.23750/abm.v93i2.11370.
[22] Tinica G, Chistol RO, Bulgaru ID, et al. Long-term graft patency after coronary artery bypass grafting: effects of surgical technique[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2019, 17(1): 359-367.
[23] 吴立松, 董然, 党海明, 等. 桡动脉序贯吻合的冠状动脉旁路移植术近期临床疗效分析[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2019, 99(42): 3308-3312. WU Lisong, DONG Ran, DANG Haiming, et al. Recent clinical effect analysis of coronary artery bypass grafting with sequential radial artery anastomosis[J]. Chinese Medical Journal, 2019, 99(42): 3308-3312.
[24] Kasahara H, Shin H, Takahashi T, et al. Comparison of patency of single and sequential radial artery grafting in coronary artery bypass[J]. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2022, 34(4): 515-522.
[25] Dimagli A, Soletti GJ, Harik L, et al. Angiographic outcomes for arterial and venous conduits used in CABG[J]. Clin Med, 2023, 12(5): 2022.
[26] Gaudino MF, Leonard JR, Taggart DP. Lessons learned from Radial Artery Database International ALliance(RADIAL)[J]. Ann Cardiothorac Surg, 2018, 7(5): 598-603.
[27] Tranbaugh RF, Schwann TA, Swistel DG, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery using the radial artery, right internal thoracic artery, or saphenous vein as the second conduit[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2017, 104(2): 553-559.
[28] Gaudino M, Benedetto U, Fremes S, et al. Association of radial artery graft vs saphenous vein graft with long-term cardiovascular outcomes among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. JAMA, 2020, 324(2): 179-187.
[29] Garatti A, Parolari A, Canziani A, et al. Is female sex an independent risk factor for early mortality in isolated coronary artery bypass graft? A propensity-matched analysis[J]. J Cardiovasc Med(Hagerstown), 2018, 19(9): 497-502.
[30] Harky A, Sankaranarayanan V, Kong QG. Internal mammary artery: the primary conduit for surgical revascularization[J]. Coron Artery Dis, 2021, 32(1): 64-72.
[31] Miwa S, Desai N, Koyama T, et al. Radial artery patency study investigators. radial artery angiographic string sign: clinical consequences and the role of pharmacologic therapy[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2006, 81(1): 112-118.
[32] Xie Q, Huang J, Zhu K, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with coronary heart disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus: Cumulative meta-analysis[J]. Clin Cardiol, 2021, 44(7): 899-906.
[33] Kasahara H, Shin H, Takahashi T, et al. Comparison of patency of single and sequential radial artery grafting in coronary artery bypass[J]. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2022, 34(4): 515-522.

相关文章 15

[1]	刘惠君,吴兆婷,王玉立,徐明阳,刘霄,康燕,王红梅. 子宫下段收缩不良导致的产后出血的危险因素及早期干预[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(5): 61-66.
[2]	国科,陈绪军,施超,罗俊辉,杨岷,王晓武,王振东,李有金,孟春营,陈文生. 游离右内乳动脉与桡动脉构建Y桥在全动脉冠脉旁路移植术多中心应用效果[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(9): 84-91.
[3]	祝永才,谢艳,齐秋晨,李培龙,王传新,杜鲁涛. 基于外周血单个核细胞ATM基因甲基化的联合模型在胰腺癌早期诊断中的价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(6): 78-88.
[4]	肖飞,王联群,季强. STS多支动脉冠脉旁路移植应用解读[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 6-11.
[5]	陈绪军,申林,陈军,于涛,曹广庆,肖飞. 解剖完全再血管化是冠心病外科治疗的新策略[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 12-17.
[6]	国科,陈绪军,郑宝石,黄克力,王晓武,陈景伟,林宇,罗俊辉,王海晨,王振东,廖成全,李有金,陈文生. 解剖完全再血管化全动脉冠脉旁路移植术多中心应用中期结果[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 18-25.
[7]	国科,陈绪军,郑宝石,施超,黄克力,曹勇,陈军,吴东凯,张晓慎,罗俊辉,申林,莫绪明,杨岷,王晓武,雷印胜,田茂州,王振东,孟自力,孙忠东,李有金,陆辉辉,孟春营,高峰,陈黔苏,郭能瑞,柳德斌,张楠,林宇,陈文生,宋保国,方智,王海晨,廖晓波,徐朝军. 快通道拔管在全动脉冠脉旁路移植术的多中心临床效果[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 26-32.
[8]	卢圣勋,邢亚闯,罗俊辉,刘杰,何厚乐,王志强,张娜. 糖尿病患者冠脉旁路移植手术中动脉桥的研究现状[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 33-39.
[9]	莫绪明,王庆峰. 冠状动脉旁路移植术在儿童心血管疾病中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 40-46.
[10]	王智琪,戚继荣,扈元利,陈绪军,王庆峰,莫绪明. 全动脉冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗儿童川崎病后冠状动脉瘤1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 47-53.
[11]	温学龙,刘安慧,陈经纬,吴梦婷,杨岷. 急性非ST抬高型心肌梗死行冠状动脉旁路移植手术时机Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 60-70.
[12]	赵汉卿,周新睿,李子建,唐兴. 循环肿瘤细胞联合血清学检测在非小细胞肺癌中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 79-85.
[13]	马志虎,于晓凤,孙玉亮,王刚,裴艳涛,陈斌,史安浩,乔丽,朱磊. 加速康复外科综合治疗在三角纤维软骨复合体损伤患者围术期中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(3): 28-35.
[14]	张洁,赵颖慧,董雅琪,李娟,李培龙,杜鲁涛. GPR133基因甲基化在早期胃癌淋巴结转移预测中的作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(3): 76-84.
[15]	齐在文,白霄,秦源. 周期性张应力在冠状动脉旁路移植术后移植静脉内膜增生机制和治疗中的研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(12): 118-124.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed