您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (3): 109-113.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2020.1130

• 医学教学 • 上一篇    下一篇

预防医学专业学生《卫生统计学》学习满意度评价

韩璇1,2,孙秀彬1,刘铱1,王淑康1,刘静1,袁中尚1,张涛1,李秀君1,薛付忠1,刘云霞1   

  • 发布日期:2022-03-09
  • 通讯作者: 刘云霞. E-mail:yunxialiu@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东大学齐鲁医学院2020年度本科教学改革与研究重点项目(qlyxjy-202008)

Evaluation of learning satisfaction of preventive medicine students with Health Statistics

HAN Xuan1,2, SUN Xiubin1, LIU Yi1, WANG Shukang1, LIU Jing1, YUAN Zhongshang1, ZHANG Tao1, LI Xiujun1, XUE Fuzhong1, LIU Yunxia1   

  1. 1. Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;
    2. Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital &
    Institute, Bejing 100142, China
  • Published:2022-03-09

摘要: 目的 了解预防医学专业学生对《卫生统计学》课程的学习满意度,并探讨影响因素,为优化《卫生统计学》教学、提高教学效果提供参考依据。 方法 利用问卷星平台发放自行设计的问卷,对预防医学专业两个年级的本科生进行调查,收集其对《卫生统计学》课程的满意度及可能的影响因素等信息,采用秩和检验、 χ2检验和多元线性回归进行统计分析。 结果 共回收有效问卷190份(97.44%),《卫生统计学》的学习满意度评分为83,学习动机、学习环境、师生互动和教学设计维度评分分别为16、20、20、24。多元线性回归分析表明,学生学习成绩排名、学习动机、师生互动和教学设计对学习满意度存在影响。 结论 预防医学专业学生对《卫生统计学》有较高的满意度,今后教学中应注重学生学习动机的培养和激发,增加师生间的有效互动沟通,强化优化教学设计,以提高满意度,提升整体教学质量。

关键词: 卫生统计学, 预防医学专业, 教学评价, 满意度, 影响因素

Abstract: Objective To investigate the learning satisfaction of preventive medicine students with the course of Health Statistics, and to explore the influencing factors, so as to provide reference for optimizing teaching design and teaching effects. Methods A self-designed questionnaire was distributed on the Wenjuanxing platform among undergraduates of two grades to collect their satisfaction with Health Statistics and the possible influencing factors. Data collected were analyzed with rank sum test, Chi-square test and multiple linear regression. Results A total of 190 effective questionnaires(97.44%)were collected. The score of learning satisfaction was 83, and the scores of learning motivation, learning environment, teacher-student interaction and teaching design were 16, 20, 20 and 24 respectively. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that student learning score rank, learning motivation, teacher-student interaction and teaching design had an impact on learning satisfaction. Conclusion Preventive medicine students have high satisfaction with Health Statistics. Future teaching should stimulate students learning motivation, increase the effective interaction between teachers and students, and optimize the teaching design, so as to improve students satisfaction and improve the overall teaching quality.

Key words: Health Statistics, Preventive medicine, Teaching evaluation, Satisfaction, Influencing factors

中图分类号: 

  • R195.1
[1] 李晓松. 卫生统计学[M]. 8版.北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2017.
[2] 曹文君, 王丹丹, 原浩, 等. 翻转课堂应用于医学统计学教学后学生满意度研究[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2019, 36(3): 459-461.
[3] 熊华军, 马大力. 本科教学质量满意度影响因素的实证分析[J]. 高教探索, 2013(1): 83-89. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9760.2013.01.019. XIONG Huajun, MA Dali. An empirical study on the factors influencing satisfaction of undergraduate education quality [J]. Higher Education Exploration, 2013(1): 83-89. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9760.2013.01.019.
[4] 杨洁. 大学生学习满意度的现状及影响因素分析——以南方某师范学院为例[J]. 重庆高教研究, 2016, 4(6): 57-65. YANG Jie. Analysis of the college students learning satisfaction and influencing factors-taking a normal college in south of china as an example [J]. Chongqing Higher Education Research, 2016, 4(6): 57-65.
[5] Jebb AT, Ng V, Tay L. A review of key likert scale development advances: 1995-2019 [J]. Front Psychol, 2021, 12: 637547. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.637547.
[6] 高秀梅. 当代大学生学习动机的特征及其对学业成绩的影响[J]. 高教探索, 2020(1): 43-47. GAO Xiumei. On characteristics of college students learning motivation and the influence on their academic performance [J]. Higher Education Exploration, 2020(1): 43-47.
[7] 曾嘉灵, 陆星儿, 杨阳, 等. 基于结构方程的远程学习者满意度影响因素研究[J]. 中国远程教育, 2016(8): 59-65.
[8] 徐驰,贾鑫华,王琪, 等. 预防医学专业学生卫生统计学学习现状及其影响因素分析[J]. 赣南医学院学报, 2018, 38(9): 935-937. XU Chi, JIA Xinhua, WANG Qi, et al. Investigation and analysis of learning status on health statistics in preventive medicine students [J]. Journal of Gannan Medical University, 2018, 38(9): 935-937, 955.
[9] 闫小龙, 芮东升, 李珂, 等. 预防医学专业卫生统计学教学效果影响因素分析及思考[J]. 卫生职业教育, 2021, 39(8): 78-80.
[10] 樊安彤, 肖宇飞, 石福艳, 等. 医学院校统计学专业课程设置及满意度调查分析[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2019, 36(6): 883-885.
[11] 朱玉, 刘浩瀚, 丁蕾, 等. 预防医学专业本科生卫生统计学学习态度和学习需求调查分析[J]. 卫生职业教育, 2020, 38(3): 134-136.
[12] Park JY. Student interactivity and teacher participation: an application of legitimate peripheral participation in higher education online learning environments [J]. Technol, Pedagogy Educ, 2015, 24(3): 389- 406.
[13] Offir B, Lev Y, Bezalel R. Surface and deep learning processes in distance education: synchronous versus asynchronous systems [J]. Computers & Education, 2008, 51(3): 1172- 1183.
[14] Kang M, Im T. Factors of learner-instructor interaction which predict perceived learning outcomes in online learning environment [J]. J Comput Assist Learn, 2013, 29(3): 292-301.
[15] 杨柳. 直接效应与中介效应: 师生互动与学业成绩的关系——基于CEPS调查数据的实证研究[J]. 教育导刊(上半月), 2021(2): 51-57.
[16] 吴薇, 姚蕊. 本科生在线课堂师生互动的满意度及其影响因素[J]. 大学教育科学, 2020, 182(4): 95-104. WU Wei, YAO Rui. Satisfaction and influencing factors of interaction between teachers and students in undergraduate online classroom [J]. University Education Science, 2020, 182(4): 95-104.
[17] 彭欣, 李哲, 李宏革, 等. 混合式教学法在卫生统计学实践教学中的应用[J]. 中国继续医学教育, 2020, 12(7): 31-33. PENG Xin, LI Zhe, LI Hongge, et al. Application of mixed teaching method in practice teaching of health statistics [J]. China Continuing Medical Education, 2020, 12(7): 31-33.
[18] 张彦琦, 易东, 刘岭, 等. 基于SPOC的混合式教学模式的构建与实践[J]. 重庆医学, 2019, 48(21): 3766-3769.
[19] 张小凡, 阳乐, 李佳圆. PBL教学在流行病学教学中应用于不同学习风格学生的效果[J]. 现代预防医学, 2020, 47(14): 2685-2688. ZHANG Xiaofan, YANG Le, LI Jiayuan. Effect of PBL on epidemiology teaching for different students learning styles [J]. Modern Preventive Medicine, 2020, 47(14): 2685-2688.
[20] 林征, 刘双, 胡志坚. 对分课堂的教学模式在统计学教学中应用[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2019, 36(1): 154-155.
[21] 陈玲慰, 刁莎, 马越, 等. 基于学生视角探究翻转课堂模式在《卫生统计学》教学中的应用效果[J]. 现代预防医学, 2019, 46(6): 1148-1152. CHEN Lingwei, DIAO Sha, MA Yue, et al. Application and evaluation of flipped class mode of the medical statistics course based on students perspective [J]. Modern Preventive Medicine, 2019, 46(6): 1148-1152.
[22] Li S, Liao X, Burdick W, et al. The effectiveness of flipped classroom in health professions education in China: a systematic review [J]. J Med Educ Curric Dev, 2020, 7: 2382120520962838. doi: 10.1177/2382120520962838.
[23] 王晓敏, 陈星, 黄美梦, 等. 后疫情时代卫生统计学线上线下教学模式的探索[J]. 西部素质教育, 2021, 7(7): 144-145.
[24] 梁裕芬. 面向学习者进行教学设计保障选修课的教学质量[J]. 广西中医学院学报, 2010, 13(2): 93-94.
[25] 于歆杰. 以高质量在线教学应对高校疫情防控大考[J]. 人民论坛, 2020(10): 108-109. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3381.2020.10.031.
[1] 孙佳丽,王亮,王长凤,张杰,郭磊. Klippel-Trenaunay综合征儿童情绪与行为特征及其影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(3): 78-82.
[2] 宋一鸣,王佳丰,韩晓娟,杜怡峰. 脑维持与认知功能:测量、影响因素和机制[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(1): 1-7.
[3] 徐欣颖,颜伟,石兴龙,岳芳,吕婧,乔颖异,张宇琦,程传龙,左慧,李秀君. 山东省滨州市手足口病的流行特征及影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(1): 118-125.
[4] 孙爽爽,仉率杰,张伯韬,袁莹,于媛媛,薛付忠. 基于真实世界研究的18~50岁人群急性缺血性卒中影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(9): 40-46.
[5] 王宁,郝秀梅,牛翔,黄金明,徐静雅. 中国中老年高血糖、血脂异常、高血压人群健康体检服务利用现状及影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(7): 82-91.
[6] 张永媛,王清亮,连雪洪. 山东省某三级综合医院罕见病患者住院费用结构变动情况及影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 111-119.
[7] 陈瑛翼,游倩,王意,张帆,李凤,季舒铭,徐浩源,饶志勇. 办公室职员肌肉质量减少预测模型的开发与验证[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(4): 26-35.
[8] 刘国伟,翟艳,王薇,吕军城. 潍坊市某城区65岁及以上老年人社会适应能力现状及其影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(2): 104-110.
[9] 穆弘杰,卢伟,吕军城. 居民抑郁、焦虑症状和心理健康素养现况及影响因素分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(12): 105-111.
[10] 刘峰,马彩霞,李春燕,程海英,靳乐雨,刘仲,李学文. 2023年11月流感高峰期济南市大学生流感样病例发生情况及影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(7): 91-97.
[11] 景睿,张文茜,董卉,董怡然,于胜男,段勇,闫芹,赵传禄,李秀君,汪卫兵. 济南市大一新生结核病防治知信行现状及行为影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(2): 101-107.
[12] 冯绪强,高萍,孙超,陶琳,闫根全,冷冰. 替加环素治疗感染性疾病临床疗效及影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(12): 11-20.
[13] 于菲萍,李鑫,司明舒,张丹,苏永刚. 医学生医养结合认知程度与养老就业意愿[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(11): 105-114.
[14] 刘凤祺,高峰,薛彩彩,乔秀梅,王金红. 高糖诱导PC12细胞损伤的影响因素及梓醇的保护作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(7): 34-39.
[15] 张鑫宇,匡文颖,徐婧怡,颜佳楠,丁雨喆,郭妍宇,袁文钧. 华中地区唇腭裂人群主观报告的生活质量[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(6): 92-102.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!