您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (10): 110-115.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2021.0426

• 医学心理学 • 上一篇    下一篇

大学生主动、被动拖延与正念、自我效能感的关系

路翠艳1,潘芳2,方方3   

  1. 1.山东大学学生心理健康教育与咨询中心, 山东 济南 250012;2.山东大学齐鲁医学院基础医学院心理学与伦理学系, 山东 济南 250012;3.山东大学新闻传播学院, 山东 济南 250100
  • 发布日期:2021-10-15
  • 通讯作者: 路翠艳. E-mail:lucy2004@sdu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    山东大学2019年教育教学改革项目(2019Y314)

Relationship between active or passive procrastination and mindfulness, and self-efficacy of college students

LU Cuiyan1, PAN Fang2, FANG Fang3   

  1. 1. Student Psychological Health Education and Counseling Center, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;
    2. Department of Medical Psychology and Ethics, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;
    3. School of Journalism and Communication, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, Shandong, China
  • Published:2021-10-15

摘要: 目的 探讨大学生主动或被动拖延与正念的相关关系及自我效能感在其中的中介作用。 方法 使用拖延评估量表、主动拖延量表、正念注意觉知量表和一般自我效能感量表对454名大学生进行问卷调查。 结果 被动拖延与一般自我效能感(r=-0.34, P<0.01)、正念水平(r=-0.40, P<0.01)分别呈低度中度负相关,主动拖延与一般自我效能感(r=0.39, P<0.01)、正念水平(r=0.31, P<0.01)分别呈中度低度正相关,正念水平与一般自我效能感呈低度正相关(r=0.23, P<0.01)。一般自我效能感在正念与被动拖延或主动拖延间都起部分中介作用,效应量分别为18.60%、26.82%。 结论 正念水平越高,大学生被动拖延发生的可能性越低,但采取主动拖延策略的可能性更大;正念与自我效能感可负向预测大学生被动拖延,可正向预测大学生主动拖延。这增进了对大学生两种拖延行为的理解,并为未来相应地制定干预策略提供重要的依据。

关键词: 拖延, 主动拖延, 正念, 自我效能感, 中介作用

Abstract: Objective To explore the relationship between college students active or passive procrastination and mindfulness, and to evaluate the mediating role of self-efficacy. Methods A total of 454 college students were assessed with Procrastination Assessment Scale-students, Active Procrastination Scale, Mindful Attention Awareness Scale and General Self-efficacy Inventory. Results Passive procrastination was low or moderately negatively correlated with general self-efficacy(r=-0.34, P<0.01)and mindfulness(r=-0.40, P<0.01), while active procrastination was moderately or low positively correlated with general self-efficacy(r=0.39, P<0.01)and mindfulness(r=0.31, P<0.01). Mindfulness was low positively correlated with general self-efficacy(r=0.23, P<0.01). General self-efficacy played a partial mediating role between active or procrastination and mindfulness, amounting 18.60% and 26.82% effects respectively. Conclusion Higher level of mindfulness is related to lower likeliness of passive procrastination, but higher level of mindfulness is related to higher likeliness of active procrastination. Mindfulness and self-efficacy can negatively predict passive procrastination, while positively predict active procrastination. Our findings improve the understanding of active and passive procrastinations among college students, and provide an important basis for the intervention strategies.

Key words: Procrastination, Active procrastination, Mindfulness, Self-efficacy, Mediating role

中图分类号: 

  • R395.1
[1] Beutel ME, Klein EM, Aufenanger S, et al. Procrastination, distress and life Satisfaction across the age range-a German representative community study[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(2):e0148054.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0148054.
[2] Klein EM, Beutel ME, Kai WM, et al. Assessing procrastination: dimensionality and measurement invariance of the General Procrastination Scale-Screening(GPS-S)in a representative sample[J]. Eur J Psychol Assess, 2017, 35(5): 1-8.
[3] Kim KR, Seo EH. The relationship between procrastination and academic performance: a meta-analysis[J]. Pers Indiv Differ, 2015, 82: 26-33. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.038.
[4] Chu AC, Choi JN. Rethinking procrastination: positive effects of “active” procrastination behavior on attitudes and performance[J]. J Soc Psychol, 2005, 145(3): 245-264.
[5] Moran JNC, Sarah V. Why not procrastinate? Development and validation of a new active procrastination scale[J]. J Soc Psychol, 2009, 149(2): 195-212.
[6] Eerde vW. Procrastination in academic settings and the big five model of personality: a meta-analysis[J]. Counseling the Procrastinator in Academic Settings, 2004: 29-40. doi. 10.1037/10808-003.
[7] Wolters, Christopher A. Understanding procrastination from a self-regulated learning perspective[J]. J Educ Psychol, 2003, 95(1): 179-187.
[8] 陈小莉, 戴晓阳,董琴.Aitken拖延问卷在大学生中的应用研究[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2008, 16(1): 22-23. CHEN Xiaoli, DAI Xiaoyang, DONG Qin. A research of aitken procrastination inventory applied to chinese college students[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2008, 16(1): 22-23.
[9] Haycock LA. The cognitive mediation of procrastination: An investigation of the relationship between procrastination and self-efficacy beliefs[J]. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1993, 54(4-B): 2261.
[10] 何元庆, 王丽峰, 刘杨. 正念团体训练对大学生拖延的影响[J]. 中国卫生事业管理, 2017, 34(7): 546-549. HE Yuanqing, WANG Lifeng, LIU Yang. Studying on the influence of mindfulness group training on college students procrastination[J]. Chinese Health Service Management, 2017, 34(7): 546-549.
[11] Cheung R, Ng M. Being in the moment later? Testing the inverse relation between mindfulness and procrastination[J]. Personality and Individual Differences, 2019, 141: 123-126. doi:10.1007/s12671-018-1069-y.
[12] Sirois FM, Tosti N. Lost in the moment? an investigation of procrastination, mindfulness, and well-being[J]. J Rational-Emotive Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 2012, 30(4): 237-248.
[13] 周敏.正念训练对医学高职生学业拖延的影响[J].现代职业教育,2020,4(48):13-15.
[14] Feng K, Xu W, Zhao J. Dispositional mindfulness and life satisfaction: The role of core self-evaluations[J]. Personality and Individual Differences, 2014, 56(1): 165-169.
[15] Judge TA, Locke EA, Durham CC. The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: a core evaluations approach[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1997, 19: 151-188. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(96)00104-4.
[16] 吴超荣, 甘怡群, 核心自我评价:一个验证性因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 41(4): 622-627. WU Chaorong, GAN Yiqun. Core self-evaluation: a confirmatory factor analysis[J]. Acta Scicentiarum Naturalum Universitis Pekinesis, 2005, 41(4): 622-627.
[17] 陈保华, 大学生学习拖延初探[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2007.
[18] 倪士光, 李虹, 徐继红, 等. 主动拖延量表在中国大学生群体中的修订及信效度检验[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2011, 19(4): 462-465. NI Shiguang, LI Hong, XU Jihong, et al. Revision of a new active procrastination scale for Chinese undergraduates[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2011, 19(4): 462-465.
[19] 王才康, 胡中锋, 刘勇. 一般自我效能感量表的信度和效度研究[J]. 应用心理学, 2001, 7(1): 37-40. WANG Caikang, HU Zhongfeng, LIU Yong. Evidences for reliability and validity of the chinese version of general self efficacy scale[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 7(1): 37-40.
[20] 陈思佚, 崔红, 周仁来, 等. 正念注意觉知量表(MAAS)的修订及信效度检验[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2012, 20(2): 148-151. CHEN Siyi, CUI Hong, ZHOU Renlai, et al. Revision of mindful attention awareness scale(MAAS)[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2012, 20(2): 148-151.
[21] 温忠麟, 张雷, 侯杰泰, 等. 中介效应检验程序及其应用[J]. 心理学报, 2004, 36(5): 614-620. WEN Zhonglin, ZHANG Lei, HOU Jietai, et al. Testing and application of the mediating effects[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2004, 36(5): 614-620.
[22] 张颖, 宋正东,侯小宝. 大学生主动拖延与自我效能感的相关性研究[J]. 科教导刊, 2019, 361(1): 189-190. ZHANG Ying, SONG Zhengdong, HOU Xiaobao. Research on the correlation between college students procrastination and self-efficacy[J]. The Guide of Science & Education, 2019, 361(1): 189-190.
[23] Glick DM, Millstein DJ,Orsillo SM. A preliminary investigation of the role of psychological inflexibility in academic procrastination[J]. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 2014, 3(2): 81-88.
[24] Alexander ES, Onwuegbuzie AJ. Academic procrastination and the role of hope as a coping strategy[J]. Personality & Individual Differences, 2007, 42(7): 1301-1310.
[25] 答会明. 父母教养方式与孩子的自信、自尊、自我效能及心理健康水平的相关研究[J]. 中国健康教育, 2002, 18(8): 483-486. DA Huiming. Relationship of upbringing given by parents to self-confidence, self-esteem, self-efficacy and mental health of their children[J]. Chinese Journal of Health Education, 2002, 18(8): 483-486.
[26] 王才康, 刘勇. 一般自我效能感与特质焦虑,状态焦虑和考试焦虑的相关研究[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2000, 8(4): 229-230. WANG Caikang, LIU Yong. Correlation among general self-efficacy, trait anxiety, state anxiety, and test anxiety[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2000, 8(4): 229-230.
[27] Wheeler MS, Arnkoff DB, Glass CR. The neuroscience of mindfulness: how mindfulness alters the brain and facilitates emotion regulation[J]. Mindfulness, 2017, 8: 1471-1487. doi:10.1007/s12671-017-0742-x.
[28] 王晶. 学业拖延类型与时间管理倾向、压力应对策略的关系——控制源的中介效应分析[D]. 西安:陕西师范大学, 2014.
[29] Vago DR, Silbersweig DA. Self-awareness, self-regulation, and self-transcendence(S-ART): a framework for understanding the neurobiological mechanisms of mindfulness[J]. Front Hum Neurosci, 2012, 6: 296. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00296.
[1] 郑金爱,王艳梅,曲艳,李力维,刘勇,张媛. 知觉压力在维持性血液透析患者正念水平与失志综合征间的中介效应[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(4): 109-116.
[2] 曹丹凤,李慧. 儿童期不良经历对妊娠期抑郁症状的影响:母胎依恋的中介作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(3): 87-91.
[3] 赵迪,吕高荣,李国鹏,张云雪,王伟民,董晓玲,厉萍. 14条目和6条目弗莱堡正念调查量表在胃肠癌患者中的心理测量学评价[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(6): 87-91.
[4] 王清,周淼,赵迪,厉萍. 医学生心理控制源在正念水平与平静心境间的中介作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(5): 104-109.
[5] 白璐,张雨青,房玉英. 正念在不孕症患者生育压力与创伤后应激障碍间的中介及调节作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(2): 83-87.
[6] 李佳欢,王娟,陈擎仪,李艳艳,赵静,曹枫林. 正念和反刍在护士工作压力与睡眠质量关系中的链式中介作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(2): 103-108.
[7] 景翔,王亚丽,卢露,夏宇,焦安安,李耀祖,徐凌忠. 农村老年人日常活动能力、社会支持与孤独感的关系:一般自我效能的中介作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(1): 94-99.
[8] 黄凤艳,许俐,刘平,王志萍. 会阴裂伤在孕前BMI与产后盆底肌功能障碍关联性中的中介作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(2): 99-104.
[9] 徐晓芳,薛明玥,吕高荣,侯芳艳,厉萍. 心理资本在不孕不育夫妇中男性正念与心理困扰间的中介作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(2): 105-109.
[10] 赵迪,冯秀娟,侯芳艳,吕高荣,徐晓芳,厉萍. 山东农村中年女性绝经综合征与生殖衰老分期、人格和正念的关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(12): 92-96.
[11] 张烜,李佳欢,王颖,柴榕,杨蓓,曹枫林. 情绪调节在实习护生正念水平与临床沟通能力之间的中介作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(12): 86-91.
[12] 李长瑾,洪炜,赵佳,甘伟. 老年人生活质量与心理弹性的关系及领悟社会支持的中介作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(9): 6-10.
[13] 康晓菲,方跃艳,赵迪,冯秀娟,厉萍. 不孕女性患者知觉压力在正念水平与心理困扰间的中介作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(9): 105-109.
[14] 刘春琴, 李华芳, 田晓红, 邹桂元, 厉萍. 精神科护士人格特征与心理困扰的关系:心理弹性的中介作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(9): 90-94.
[15] 江虹, 谢经汤, 丁娟, 雷震, 潘芳. 亲职压力对心理健康的影响:应对方式和家庭功能的中介和调节作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(11): 81-85.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!